RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa >> RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply - 12/31/2015 1:32:38 PM

James Ward

Posts: 1183
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: I�aki Harrizabalagatar

There is to note that in 1941 the Germans employed the only cavalry units they had, the 1st Cav Div and the SS Cav brigade, in the Pripyat marshes, because their mobility was superior to infantry in that terrain. The combed the marshes fighting Soviet stragglers. Interestingly the Soviet army also used cavalry units in the terrain.However in the game if you detach 1st Cav Div from 2nd PzGroup it will get out of command radius and become inoperative.

There are 2 separated problems related to the Prypiat marshes in the game.

1) Supply is unhistorically high, no problem supplying armies in the swamp.

2) The Soviets have lots of HQs. In a PBEM I am playing as Soviet I have been able to send an army sneaking through the marshes with his HQ, so the units remain in command, without much weakening the Central Front, and I have cut the railway Brest-Minsk. For the german player to send one of their armies to protect communications is very serious, he has only 3 infantry armies in AGC

Your point 2 is the biggest reason why the russians can pull off an unrealistic advance through the marshes. They have so many HQ's that they can totally out maneuver the germans through them. This is certainly at odds with their historical capabilities.

Perhaps if the front HQ's had a command range for the army HQ's this could limit any russian offensive. Then the russian could still defend in the marshes but not advance and with a defense to far forward you would almost certainly lose your army HQ.

(in reply to I�aki Harrizabalagatar)

Post #: 31

RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply - 12/31/2015 1:48:09 PM

ChuckBerger

Posts: 278
Joined: 8/10/2006
Status: offline

If folks are so worried about the marshes... just take them. Rush PzG2 from Brest-Litovsk straight through the marshes. I did it in my game against MichaelT and took Gomel (undefended) on turn 3. Even if a Russian army is placed in Gomel, odds are you can take it turn 3 or 4.

And there's a nice little path headed north to Mogilev, so if you want you can split the PzG into 2 bits - one to hit Gomel, another to flank Minsk/Mogilev from the south - and it's possible to keep both groups in command radius.

This approach has drawbacks, of course - but so does everything.

(in reply to James Ward)

Post #: 32

RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply - 12/31/2015 1:50:47 PM

I�aki Harrizabalagatar

Posts: 825
Joined: 12/11/2001
Status: offline

I am playing a PBEM with Germans v1.02 and my opponent didn�t have the chance to do it, as Flaviusx predicted, because I took Gomel early in August, and Gomel is the key for the Soviet strategy in the Prypiat, with the city in German hands any army in the marshes can easily be cut off and left to starve.

However RickInVA has a valid point. Historically the Soviets didn�t have the chance to implement that strategy because, as in my game, Gomel fell in August 20. In my other PBEM as Soviet v1.01 I had no problem holding Gomel (and we are already in September) so I tried that strategy succesfully.

Now, in RL, could a Soviet army move, and more importantly, be supplied in a march through the Prypiat marshes? In 1944 the 1st Byelorussian Front could, but in 1941 German 1st Cavlary Div had to live off the country, because logistics completely broke down. Perhaps anyona can point to any study on the subject?

(in reply to etsadler)

Post #: 33

RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply - 12/31/2015 1:53:41 PM

I�aki Harrizabalagatar

Posts: 825
Joined: 12/11/2001
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChuckBerger

If folks are so worried about the marshes... just take them. Rush PzG2 from Brest-Litovsk straight through the marshes.

Well,that for sure was impossible in RL, and shows what I wrote in my first post starting this thread, that marshes allow for too much supply to go through.

(in reply to ChuckBerger)

Post #: 34

RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply - 12/31/2015 2:07:25 PM

willgamer

Posts: 902
Joined: 6/2/2002
From: Huntsville, Alabama
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RickInVA

The "way it worked historically" is not generally the "only way it could have happened". Unless you just want to watch history repeat itself there needs to be the capacity for different events than purely historical.

At that point I think you then look to see if it is a "can't" or a "didn't". If it is indeed a "can't" then game mechanics to prevent it are appropriate. If it is a "didn't" then ask "why"? If the "why" is not something that is important in the game then a mechanic to prevent it is appropriate. But if the same reason "why" the thing didn't happen historically is a factor in the game, and preventing choice on the part of a player (or AI) solely to force a "historical" result is, IMHO, not a proper design choice.

"Didn't Happen" is not the same as "Couldn't Happen" or even "Shouldn't Happen". While there has been some discussion about causes and reasons most of the discussion has just been (IMHO) that the result is not historical as so must be changed. What prevented the SU from doing this is real life? Is that same limiter present in the game? If not, then a rule is probably OK, if it is, then what is the consequence of the SU doing so, both in RL and in game, etc.

Given the excellence of the German staff, one thing that most certainly wouldn't be allowed to stand is an army boundary that zig-zags across the main line of communication, the road, in a way that prevents any one army from dealing with an actual threat!

If the current boundary is historically correct, there was no realized historical threat; if the game allows such threat, the boundary becomes incorrect and must be allowed to be moved for proper operations.

_____________________________

Rex Lex or Lex Rex?

(in reply to etsadler)

Post #: 35

RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply - 12/31/2015 10:59:39 PM

James Ward

Posts: 1183
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: I�aki Harrizabalagatar

I am playing a PBEM with Germans v1.02 and my opponent didn�t have the chance to do it, as Flaviusx predicted, because I took Gomel early in August, and Gomel is the key for the Soviet strategy in the Prypiat, with the city in German hands any army in the marshes can easily be cut off and left to starve.

However RickInVA has a valid point. Historically the Soviets didn�t have the chance to implement that strategy because, as in my game, Gomel fell in August 20. In my other PBEM as Soviet v1.01 I had no problem holding Gomel (and we are already in September) so I tried that strategy succesfully.

Now, in RL, could a Soviet army move, and more importantly, be supplied in a march through the Prypiat marshes? In 1944 the 1st Byelorussian Front could, but in 1941 German 1st Cavlary Div had to live off the country, because logistics completely broke down. Perhaps anyona can point to any study on the subject?

Even in 1944 there wasn't so much of an offensive in the marshes as there was a rush through them. Most of fighting in Bagration took place east of the marshes. To deploy an army or even a corp off the roads in the marshes for any length of time was just not feasible.

(in reply to I�aki Harrizabalagatar)

Post #: 36

RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply - 1/1/2016 1:38:15 AM

battlevonwar

Posts: 1041
Joined: 12/22/2011
Status: offline

I noticed it's a very vulnerable location from Brest to AGC FBS supply if the Russians deploy 20 divisions in the Marshes. Which I have finally learned how to cope with my last few games. If the Germans go directly North with 6 Army early they more or less link up with an AGC Operation and cut the Russians off. I like to with the AI (who will let me) remove my troops from view and it naturally fills the void there and lets this happen think it will cut me at Brest. Then I pocket 20-50 Red Divisions. Can be achieved with less units using Panzers/Motorized. You just need 1 or 2 silly Sacrificial Divisions on the Southern Pripyet Rail line and then an Army along the borders of the Marsh which can be move to mop up afterwards or rested and drive along the Rail North to join AGC again.

In my PBEM games, not such an easy trap. A human opponent will not try the same mistake. I haven't witnessed it at least. They will devote piecemeal a couple of units and go directly for the Brest~Minsk Rail. Maybe... If they bother at all. Usually they would those armies East of Minsk blocking German movement and filling mores and gaps and buying more time till bad weather hits. The Mud is more dangerous than the Marshes. AGC Center from Minsk to Smolensk could be a little larger for operations..The Narrows and the Marshes squeezing them tighter along with rivers and tons of Forts make this the most formidable region aside getting close to Leningrad...

(in reply to James Ward)

Post #: 37

RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply - 1/2/2016 1:29:26 AM

governato

Posts: 1079
Joined: 5/6/2011
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline

Nothing like to look at some Russian maps of the prypet marshes to get an idea of what happened there.
They are attached below, but here is the executive summary.

1) yes there were several infantry division in the marshes in July 41. Two German and two Russian in AGC sector, and 2-4 for each side in AGS sector. Some Mechanized divisions got stuck there as well.

2) the Red Army did not conduct any offensives, but rather a step by step withdrawal. Similarly the Wehrmacht just kept contact with the enemy.

3) The AGS sector involved more units on both sides, possibly as a railroad passed through the area (see third map below)

4) the German 1st Cav division was in the marshes for only a few weeks in early July.

Some info about the Geman 45th ID is HERE and then HERE for the the 293rd, there is an interesting mention of the 293rd getting support from armored trains (if google translated right from German :))

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by governato -- 1/2/2016 3:48:09 AM >

(in reply to battlevonwar)

Post #: 38

RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply - 1/2/2016 1:30:27 AM

governato

Posts: 1079
Joined: 5/6/2011
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline

Here is AGS (not the time frame is slightly different).

Attachment (1)

(in reply to governato)

Post #: 39

RE: Pripyat Marshes and supply - 1/2/2016 1:32:14 AM

governato

Posts: 1079
Joined: 5/6/2011
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline

I am not sure how feasible this is, but a good option 'd be to shift the existing Brest to Gomel railway a couple hexes South and having it reach Kiev instead This way it's be harder to sneak in a lot of supplied Red Army (or German) forces in the AGC sector, where historically there were only a couple, and likely depleted as they were never rotated to rest.