Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: TOAW IV

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> The Operational Art of War IV >> RE: TOAW IV Page: <<   < prev  10 11 12 [13] 14   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: TOAW IV - 4/20/2017 1:38:54 AM   
Meyer1

 

Posts: 899
Joined: 2/9/2010
Status: offline
Thanks for the screenshots. Couple of questions:

-Those interfaces boxes, can they be hidden or move? or just move?
-The minimap appears to stay the same, could be hidden as well?

(in reply to TDefender)
Post #: 361
RE: TOAW IV - 4/20/2017 3:06:07 AM   
Curtis Lemay


Posts: 12969
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Meyer1

Thanks for the screenshots. Couple of questions:

-Those interfaces boxes, can they be hidden or move? or just move?
-The minimap appears to stay the same, could be hidden as well?


All the Control Panel features (including the micromap and the info panel) can be hidden as well as moved.

_____________________________

My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site

(in reply to Meyer1)
Post #: 362
RE: TOAW IV - 4/20/2017 3:12:29 AM   
Meyer1

 

Posts: 899
Joined: 2/9/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: Meyer1

Thanks for the screenshots. Couple of questions:

-Those interfaces boxes, can they be hidden or move? or just move?
-The minimap appears to stay the same, could be hidden as well?


All the Control Panel features (including the micromap and the info panel) can be hidden as well as moved.

Nice, thanks.

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)
Post #: 363
RE: TOAW IV - 4/20/2017 3:19:37 AM   
Meyer1

 

Posts: 899
Joined: 2/9/2010
Status: offline
If you are planning to release any new screenshots soon, I would like to see how this BTS thingie looks on map, the new jump map (thanks Bob) or any newer features.

(in reply to Meyer1)
Post #: 364
RE: TOAW IV - 4/20/2017 3:58:33 AM   
Meyer1

 

Posts: 899
Joined: 2/9/2010
Status: offline
About the screenshots: since the 3D unit image is gone (kinda miss it), I think the unit icon could be a little bigger. Just sayin'




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Meyer1)
Post #: 365
RE: TOAW IV - 4/20/2017 2:23:36 PM   
Karri

 

Posts: 1137
Joined: 5/24/2006
Status: offline
My one major complain about war and stategy games today are the interfaces. Take any random Matrix game and the interface is about 10 - 15 years behind the curve. I like what I see in TOAW, much better.

(in reply to Meyer1)
Post #: 366
RE: TOAW IV - 4/20/2017 7:51:25 PM   
Curtis Lemay


Posts: 12969
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Meyer1

If you are planning to release any new screenshots soon, I would like to see how this BTS thingie looks on map, the new jump map (thanks Bob) or any newer features.


The attached shot shows the Jump Map. It also shows the Unit Panel in Group Composition mode. (And like when it is in Stack mode, mousing around the stacks on the map changes what is in the Group view - so this is an easy way to examine the stacks on the map).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site

(in reply to Meyer1)
Post #: 367
RE: TOAW IV - 4/20/2017 8:19:27 PM   
Curtis Lemay


Posts: 12969
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline
Here's an example of the BTS marker: There are three possible sets of crossed swords: Silver = Combat Report available; Gold: = Combat Planned; Bronze = BTS.

So, a combat has taken place in the hex. It included a late unit, causing a BTS. And there has been another combat setup for the hex.

Note in the Unit Panel the current round is 2. But note in the Info Panel the BTS hex is at round 5.




Also note that this illustrates the benefit of the BTS system: In the old system, the current round would be 5 -> 3 rounds would have been lost due to the late unit. Instead, only one round was consumed and the only consequence is some delay contained in this one hex.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Curtis Lemay -- 4/20/2017 9:41:05 PM >


_____________________________

My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)
Post #: 368
RE: TOAW IV - 4/20/2017 9:22:46 PM   
ncc1701e


Posts: 7380
Joined: 10/29/2013
From: Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards
Status: offline
Great for the Jump Map and the Stack mode of the Unit Panel, cool stuff.

If you may accept a little criticism in term of graphics, the BTS symbol is hidding too much the unit counter. Is it possible to make it a little smaller or move it a little bit outside the unit counter?

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)
Post #: 369
RE: TOAW IV - 4/20/2017 9:28:45 PM   
Curtis Lemay


Posts: 12969
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ncc1701e

Great for the Jump Map and the Stack mode of the Unit Panel, cool stuff.

If you may accept a little criticism in term of graphics, the BTS symbol is hidding too much the unit counter. Is it possible to make it a little smaller or move it a little bit outside the unit counter?


You can toggle it off/on.

_____________________________

My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site

(in reply to ncc1701e)
Post #: 370
RE: TOAW IV - 4/20/2017 10:13:00 PM   
Meyer1

 

Posts: 899
Joined: 2/9/2010
Status: offline
Thanks a lot for the screenshots.

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)
Post #: 371
RE: Worth the wait - 4/22/2017 5:00:06 AM   
Meyer1

 

Posts: 899
Joined: 2/9/2010
Status: offline
How about a screenshot of the map with the weather on, please?
Post #: 372
RE: TOAW IV - 4/22/2017 6:16:39 AM   
ncc1701e


Posts: 7380
Joined: 10/29/2013
From: Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: ncc1701e

Great for the Jump Map and the Stack mode of the Unit Panel, cool stuff.

If you may accept a little criticism in term of graphics, the BTS symbol is hidding too much the unit counter. Is it possible to make it a little smaller or move it a little bit outside the unit counter?


You can toggle it off/on.


Okay thanks but still. If it is there I intend to use it. But I realize it is hard to guess on a screenshot the usability of it.
The functionality by itself is great. More combat turns per units despite a bad luck even if you are carefully planning your attacks...

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)
Post #: 373
RE: TOAW IV - 4/22/2017 7:04:05 AM   
rhinobones

 

Posts: 1540
Joined: 2/17/2002
Status: offline
Truly appreciate the effort you and the team have given toward making TOAW IV the successor to TOAW III. There have been many (myself certainly included) who doubted this day would come.

Thank you.

Regards, RhinoBones

Also, Now we know why Larry was so spun-up! TOspinInTucson.


_____________________________

Colin Wright:
Comprehensive Wishlist Forum #467 . . . The Norm (blessed be His name, genuflect three times and accept all values in the program as revealed truth)

Pre Combat Air Strikes # 64 . . . I need have no concern about keeping it civil

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)
Post #: 374
RE: TOAW IV - 4/22/2017 11:17:16 AM   
josant

 

Posts: 538
Joined: 3/14/2007
From: Spain
Status: offline
BTS? what is this?

(in reply to rhinobones)
Post #: 375
RE: TOAW IV - 4/22/2017 12:43:09 PM   
Lobster


Posts: 5104
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: offline
I think it is Battle Time Stamp? Don't you just love acronyms?

_____________________________

http://www.operationbarbarossa.net/

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein

Q: What do you call a boomerang that doesn’t come back?
A: A stick.

(in reply to josant)
Post #: 376
RE: TOAW IV - 4/22/2017 1:17:37 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline
Battlefield Time Stamp. See Part III here:
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3899655

(in reply to josant)
Post #: 377
RE: TOAW IV - 4/22/2017 1:43:33 PM   
josant

 

Posts: 538
Joined: 3/14/2007
From: Spain
Status: offline
OK, thanks for the answers

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 378
RE: TOAW IV - 5/29/2017 11:00:50 PM   
erazerhead99

 

Posts: 27
Joined: 5/17/2017
Status: offline
I really think the presentation is near perfect. Wargames Graphics are divided between extremely silly and uninformative models of Soldiers & Tanks and ugly, amateurish NATO-Symbols with terrible colour palettes. Not to mention the awful UIs straight out of Excel 95.
TOAW IV looks like an actual game with good graphics design, all with a fitting ui. Its easily the best-looking Hex-Wargame i ever saw. Thank you for your efforts!

(in reply to josant)
Post #: 379
RE: TOAW IV - 7/15/2017 9:02:10 PM   
bru888


Posts: 132
Joined: 1/10/2016
Status: offline
I figured I would bump this thread to allow you windbags (you know who you are) to go for a 14th page of nonsense while we wait for TOAW IV. And wait. And wait. Two years now, if you count from the official announcement, although I see that this is considered by many to be merely version 3.5 of TOAW III which was in the works well before then.

I looked at the preview (which is a great sign of progress, finally!) and I really don't see much to IV over III other than improved interface (darn it, I may buy IV just for that) and bigger map, they say?

Two years. Ho-hum. Send me an e-mail someday, will you? (I'm sure they will. )

(in reply to erazerhead99)
Post #: 380
RE: TOAW IV - 7/15/2017 9:42:03 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline
You made me check in to see who was the latest to ask for an eta, as if the developers were sitting around waiting for someone to ask, lol.

quote:

I really don't see much to IV over III

There is quite a lot that IV has over III. You can see some details here:

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3899655

(in reply to bru888)
Post #: 381
RE: TOAW IV - 7/15/2017 10:08:36 PM   
bru888


Posts: 132
Joined: 1/10/2016
Status: offline
Thanks for that post! Much of it is over my head (at this point) but at least I can wrap my arms around some of it and sing softly while I wait.

Caution: That post is quite old.

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 382
RE: TOAW IV - 7/15/2017 10:31:17 PM   
bru888


Posts: 132
Joined: 1/10/2016
Status: offline
Let's see.

I like this:
The modeling of ships has been improved.

And this:
Embarked units no longer employ their own strengths in defense.

And this:
Sea Interdiction can now be employed by aircraft, ships, and coastal guns.

And this:
There is now an intermediate supply state that falls between “Supplied” and “Unsupplied”. It’s called “Overextended”.

And this:
Now, the player-turn advances to the median length combat round (instead of the longest).

And this:
The Combat Report now makes it clear how each combat consumed rounds.

And especially these!
Dialogs now scale relative to font size.
Dialogs now have scroll bars when appropriate.
Some dialogs have sorting ability.
There will be additional map zoom levels between the current ones.
Control panel features will be hide-able – showing more of the map
Fonts settable within the game rather than the .ini file.
More info on the Situation Report.
New Map and Interface artwork.

(in reply to bru888)
Post #: 383
RE: TOAW IV - 7/16/2017 5:41:38 AM   
Zap


Posts: 3639
Joined: 12/6/2004
From: LAS VEGAS TAKE A CHANCE
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bru888

I figured I would bump this thread to allow you windbags (you know who you are) to go for a 14th page of nonsense while we wait for TOAW IV. And wait. And wait. Two years now, if you count from the official announcement, although I see that this is considered by many to be merely version 3.5 of TOAW III which was in the works well before then.

I looked at the preview (which is a great sign of progress, finally!) and I really don't see much to IV over III other than improved interface (darn it, I may buy IV just for that) and bigger map, they say?

Two years. Ho-hum. Send me an e-mail someday, will you? (I'm sure they will. )


Two years, not bad. I can see the completion on the Horizon. Be glad your not a follower on the progress of Combined Arms!

_____________________________


(in reply to bru888)
Post #: 384
RE: TOAW IV - 7/24/2017 9:59:18 AM   
JamesM

 

Posts: 1017
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: QLD, Australia
Status: offline
Any chance of this game coming out in the next 2 weeks?

(in reply to Zap)
Post #: 385
RE: TOAW IV - 7/24/2017 11:41:19 AM   
jnpoint


Posts: 549
Joined: 8/9/2007
From: Holstebro, Denmark
Status: offline
I'm holding back buying TOAW 3, because I hope the new game will be released this year. But within the next two weeks, I don't think so.

(in reply to JamesM)
Post #: 386
RE: TOAW IV - 7/24/2017 2:47:31 PM   
Zap


Posts: 3639
Joined: 12/6/2004
From: LAS VEGAS TAKE A CHANCE
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jnpoint

I'm holding back buying TOAW 3, because I hope the new game will be released this year. But within the next two weeks, I don't think so.



+1

_____________________________


(in reply to jnpoint)
Post #: 387
RE: TOAW IV - 7/24/2017 6:15:00 PM   
r6kunz


Posts: 1103
Joined: 7/4/2002
From: near Philadelphia
Status: offline
Look at it like this, the longer the delay until roll-out, the more opportunity for scenario designers to add and refine new scenarios, and vet and update TOAW III scenarios...

Be patient, you Dogs of War.

RAK

(in reply to Zap)
Post #: 388
RE: TOAW IV - 7/26/2017 1:26:35 AM   
Meyer1

 

Posts: 899
Joined: 2/9/2010
Status: offline
Two weeks? No way.

(in reply to r6kunz)
Post #: 389
Page:   <<   < prev  10 11 12 [13] 14   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> The Operational Art of War IV >> RE: TOAW IV Page: <<   < prev  10 11 12 [13] 14   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.234