Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adjustments

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa >> RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adjustments Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 2/24/2016 7:11:37 AM   
Vic


Posts: 8262
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline 		Remember it is BETA so please don't use customer service when it concerns beta's.

Anyway I fixed the issue with the PBEM++ login. Was a silly coding mistake by me. Sry there.

And updated 103h to 103h3. See first post.

Thanks for the testing and reporting!

Best wishes,
Vic

_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to nukkxx5058)
Post #: 91
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 2/24/2016 10:06:14 AM   
lancer

 

Posts: 2963
Joined: 10/18/2005
Status: offline 		Hi nukkx,

There are a series of new Commanders Reports in the Report tab (they are grouped together). The one recently added highlights any units, within each theatre, that have low supply consumption (it's the stat in the unit info box, along with readiness & AP, etc.).

They are a quick way to identify problems but are entirely optional in their use.

Cheers,
Cameron

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 92
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 2/28/2016 7:26:17 PM   
Tweedledumb

 

Posts: 55
Joined: 12/29/2015
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Status: offline 		Couple of things about 1.03h3

I did a concentric attack and when attacking from one hex it said +0%, from two hexes +20% and from 3 hexes +39%

I know the last should be 40.

Also, the graphics appear a bit fuzzier but it might be my old eyes.

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 93
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 2/29/2016 11:44:01 AM   
Vic


Posts: 8262
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tweedledumb

Couple of things about 1.03h3

I did a concentric attack and when attacking from one hex it said +0%, from two hexes +20% and from 3 hexes +39%

I know the last should be 40.

Also, the graphics appear a bit fuzzier but it might be my old eyes.


Hi Tweedle,

First of all: thanks for reporting back.

If I may ask some follow up questions...
What is your OS (xp? win10? win8?)
If possible could you post a screenshot of those 'fuzzier' graphics?

Best wishes,
Vic

_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to Tweedledumb)
Post #: 94
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 2/29/2016 7:34:15 PM   
Philippeatbay


Posts: 855
Joined: 12/3/2014
Status: offline 		The only way to be sure your memory isn't playing tricks on you is through parallel installations.

So set up two games in exactly the same way, one in the 'fuzzy' version, and one in an older version. Take screenshots of each (and it's very easy to run two games at the same time -- I do it all the time when I'm testing my mods).

For the record, I don't see anything that looks any fuzzier on this as opposed to other versions, but must admit to not really knowing what 'fuzzy' means (hence the need for compare and contrast screenshots).

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 95
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/1/2016 1:46:39 AM   
Tweedledumb

 

Posts: 55
Joined: 12/29/2015
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Status: offline 		Forget my comment about fuzziness - was just tired eyes!

The font in the Unit Troops boxes (in the blue and red boxes) does appear to be smaller, though. Is that intentional?

Running Windows 7 with Nvidia GeForce GTX 650.

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 96
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/1/2016 5:54:03 PM   
sandman2575


Posts: 310
Joined: 9/5/2009
Status: offline 		Couple of things -- perhaps common knowledge but just to point out if not --

-The picture for Gen. Hoth in the "PG" tab is incorrect -- it shows Hoepner for both 3rd and 4th Panzergruppen

-Also, what's with the reduced red & blue modifiers on the unit cards? They are really difficult to read now -- was much better in v.1.02G -- I hope this will get 'rolled back' since this is not an improvement but just the opposite --






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Tweedledumb)
Post #: 97
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/2/2016 10:50:40 PM   
lancer

 

Posts: 2963
Joined: 10/18/2005
Status: offline 		Hi Sandman,

Yep, Hoth has had an historical makeover.

Well spotted, I missed that one.

What version of windows are you using and which screen resolution?

Cheers,
Cameron

(in reply to sandman2575)
Post #: 98
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/3/2016 12:36:51 AM   
sandman2575


Posts: 310
Joined: 9/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lancer

Hi Sandman,

Yep, Hoth has had an historical makeover.

Well spotted, I missed that one.

What version of windows are you using and which screen resolution?

Cheers,
Cameron



First, huge thanks to you and Vic for your dedication and support of this terrific game.

I'm on Windows 7 x64, 1920x1080. The red/blue modifiers looked just fine under v.1.02G. Not sure why it's showing up so compressed and small under the latest beta patch, as shown in the screenshot above -- ??

(in reply to lancer)
Post #: 99
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/3/2016 7:00:35 AM   
KenchiSulla


Posts: 2948
Joined: 10/22/2008
From: the Netherlands
Status: offline 		I can confirm what sandman reported for the fonts. I run windows 10.

_____________________________

AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor

(in reply to sandman2575)
Post #: 100
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/3/2016 10:39:53 AM   
Vic


Posts: 8262
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline 		Hi,

In fact its me that changed the size of those OFF + DEF modifier boxes in the last BETA version.

I'll see if I can get the fonts clearer. I like the smaller box since it obficates the troopType artwork less.

Best wishes,
Vic


_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to KenchiSulla)
Post #: 101
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/3/2016 2:27:28 PM   
sandman2575


Posts: 310
Joined: 9/5/2009
Status: offline 		As someone whose eyesight isn't great, have to say that I much prefer information clearly presented even at the expense of some graphical niceties. Not my call of course, but I'd be very much in favor of the old red/blue modifiers that were clearly readable. This seems like a case of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 102
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/3/2016 2:52:40 PM   
KenchiSulla


Posts: 2948
Joined: 10/22/2008
From: the Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vic

Hi,

In fact its me that changed the size of those OFF + DEF modifier boxes in the last BETA version.

I'll see if I can get the fonts clearer. I like the smaller box since it obficates the troopType artwork less.

Best wishes,
Vic



AHA, Busted!

_____________________________

AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 103
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/3/2016 2:55:31 PM   
Franciscus


Posts: 809
Joined: 12/22/2010
From: Portugal
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sandman2575

As someone whose eyesight isn't great, have to say that I much prefer information clearly presented even at the expense of some graphical niceties. Not my call of course, but I'd be very much in favor of the old red/blue modifiers that were clearly readable. This seems like a case of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"


Yep,+1

_____________________________

Former AJE team member

(in reply to sandman2575)
Post #: 104
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/21/2016 10:35:30 AM   
Vic


Posts: 8262
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline 		v1.03 M has been uploaded!

See the first post of this thread for changelist and download link.

Major changes are the addition of The War Diary and an improvement of the Map Graphics.

Best wishes,
Vic

_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to barkhorn45)
Post #: 105
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/21/2016 3:53:40 PM   
Templer_12


Posts: 1700
Joined: 1/5/2009
From: Germany
Status: offline 		Puplic Bata 1. 03 M

Just a reminder, or for information, the Wehrmacht used for numbering their units often also Roman numerals I, II, III, IV, V, VI ...
For example: III. Panzergruppe = 3th Panzer Group.

Otherwise, I find in the Puplic Bata 1. 03 M extensive corrections of the German texts.
I will intensively deal next weekend with the game and look forward.

Thank you.

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 106
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/21/2016 5:43:06 PM   
Tac2i


Posts: 2001
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: WV USA
Status: offline 		1.03M installed and working. Hugo is alive and well.

_____________________________

Tac2i (formerly webizen)

(in reply to Templer_12)
Post #: 107
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/21/2016 7:24:53 PM   
wadortch

 

Posts: 259
Joined: 3/19/2011
From: Darrington, WA, USA
Status: offline 		103.m installed and running without problems on a Windows 10 machine.

_____________________________

Walt

(in reply to Tac2i)
Post #: 108
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/22/2016 11:02:02 PM   
Gunnulf


Posts: 686
Joined: 10/31/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Templer

Puplic Bata 1. 03 M

Just a reminder, or for information, the Wehrmacht used for numbering their units often also Roman numerals I, II, III, IV, V, VI ...
For example: III. Panzergruppe = 3th Panzer Group.

Otherwise, I find in the Puplic Bata 1. 03 M extensive corrections of the German texts.
I will intensively deal next weekend with the game and look forward.

Thank you.


Actually thats correct to use roman numerals for Armeekorps, but for Armies the numbering was 4 Armee for example. While at this stage the panzergroups were not technically full armies they followed the numbering format. It helped clarify on map markings at a glance which were armies and which were corps.

(in reply to Templer_12)
Post #: 109
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/23/2016 12:44:47 AM   
baloo7777


Posts: 1190
Joined: 5/18/2009
From: eastern CT
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wadortch

103.m installed and running without problems on a Windows 10 machine.


+1

_____________________________

JRR

(in reply to wadortch)
Post #: 110
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/23/2016 12:59:41 AM   
ChuckBerger

 

Posts: 278
Joined: 8/10/2006
Status: offline 		Hmmm. I like the "War Diary" concept, but so far the diary entries seem to have nothing at all to do with what the division is actually experiencing in the game. For instance, 30 June entry is something about "panic" and his platoon having to abandon its positions and run helter-skelter to the rear. But in game, the relevant division had just finished leading the encirclement of Bialystok and spearheading the successful final attack on the city. Certainly no panic, the division didn't even take any casualties in the final assault.

Also, I can't find where to access the diary, aside from the pop-up at the beginning of the turn. And it would be nice to be able to designate the division you want to track, rather than having it randomly assigned.

---

Also, I like your new swamps better than your old swamps!


(in reply to baloo7777)
Post #: 111
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/23/2016 2:06:51 AM   
ChuckBerger

 

Posts: 278
Joined: 8/10/2006
Status: offline 		Yeah, diary definitely not working. Poor deluded Hans is reporting to his parents that Stalin has surrendered and he'll be coming home next week. It's the 4th of June and I'm only just over the Dniepr, far far from any of the main objectives, much less Stalin's capitulation!

(in reply to ChuckBerger)
Post #: 112
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/23/2016 3:49:03 AM   
lancer

 

Posts: 2963
Joined: 10/18/2005
Status: offline 		Hi Chuck,

Clean start or a save game?

The Stalin has surrendered is a rumour (one of a number) that is circulating around the platoon. We are talking a private's perspective of the war here, not that of a Field Marshal. WAD.

In the attack on Bialystok is it possible that one of the other units involved panicked?

Cheers,
Cameron

< Message edited by lancer -- 3/23/2016 4:08:29 AM >

(in reply to ChuckBerger)
Post #: 113
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/23/2016 4:52:38 AM   
ChuckBerger

 

Posts: 278
Joined: 8/10/2006
Status: offline 		Clean start. Definitely no panics in the stack, or anywhere along the entire front. This was turn 2...


(in reply to lancer)
Post #: 114
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/24/2016 1:15:16 AM   
sandman2575


Posts: 310
Joined: 9/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vic

v1.03 M has been uploaded!

See the first post of this thread for changelist and download link.

Major changes are the addition of The War Diary and an improvement of the Map Graphics.

Best wishes,
Vic



My aging eyes thank you for reverting to the bigger Red/Blue offensive/defensive modifiers. Much easier to read.


(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 115
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/24/2016 7:40:24 AM   
lancer

 

Posts: 2963
Joined: 10/18/2005
Status: offline 		Hi Chuck,

Found a small bug that was causing unnecessary panic in the ranks.

Thanks for highlighting it.

Cheers,
Cameron

(in reply to sandman2575)
Post #: 116
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/24/2016 6:07:18 PM   
Vic


Posts: 8262
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline 		Updated version 103M to version 103M2 which has an updated scenario file fixing the issue with the panic story.

Best wishes,
Vic

_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to barkhorn45)
Post #: 117
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/24/2016 7:37:17 PM   
studwick

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 2/25/2016
Status: offline 		1.03M played until around September (made it to around Smolensk). No issues what so ever. Windows 10

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 118
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/26/2016 9:25:28 AM   
Vic


Posts: 8262
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline 		Thanks for reporting back!

@all: do please keep us posted even if all is working well with v1.03m. This is going to be an important patch for 'mainstream' users who are still at the official version of 1.02g.

Best wishes,
Vic

_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to studwick)
Post #: 119
RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adju... - 3/26/2016 5:20:25 PM   
willgamer


Posts: 902
Joined: 6/2/2002
From: Huntsville, Alabama
Status: offline 		Has anyone found a use for Siege Arty in a normal game, or better, with the restriction of converted track only?

Free setup is clunky to use. How about just drag and drop?

Just asking...

_____________________________

Rex Lex or Lex Rex?

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa >> RE: Testing thread for Public Beta 1.03b : Balance Adjustments Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.156