Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Cruiser Replacement Dates

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Cruiser Replacement Dates Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Cruiser Replacement Dates - 3/24/2016 1:19:05 PM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wdolson


quote:

ORIGINAL: Revthought

The turn around on repairing many of the ships was less than 2 months. Maryland and Tennessee were returned to active duty in February, the Pennsylvania returned to active service in April, and the Nevada in October. Most of the repair times on damaged ships seem to take much longer than this. Even relatively minor damage you're looking at, what seems anecdotally, around 120 days of repair time. I think the absolute best I've seen is 55 days for a Battleship with 13 flt damage after Pearl Harbor.

The ships that, historically speaking, were not back in service until 1944 were ships that were total losses, had to be re-floated and then completely rebuilt.

The Arizona was left in place only after serious consideration was given to re-floating and rebuilding her; but as I said earlier, ultimately, it was decided that the warping of the steel from the fire after the magazine explosion made it not worth the effort.

Instead she was scavenged for usable parts, and her turrets were lifted off. Her guns being used for shore batteries in Hawaii and the guns from Arizona's number 2 turret being used on Nevada during Nevada's 1944 refit. Those guns were later fired in anger at Okinawa and Iwo Jima. Again, I'd call that cosmic karma if I believed in such things. :D


The battleships that were inboard of other BBs are Pearl Harbor were not severely damaged. One was so badly trapped they had to dynamite the dock to get her free, but the ship was only slightly damaged. Because the Navy needed as many ships as possible in action, those ships went back into service in a damaged state. Much of the damage from the attack was repaired when those ships were later upgraded in late 1942 or 1943. During Midway TF-1 was at sea halfway between San Francisco and Midway waiting in case they were needed. Several of the ships were survivors of the PH attack including damaged BBs that were operational.

The repair algorithms were written by someone who knew quite a bit about what it took to repair ships. The bigger the ship, the more difficult it is to repair damage, especially major damage. In many cases repair crews have to cut away damaged armor plate an other difficult work. If a ship is very badly damaged, the entire shape of the ship might be twisted and the ship needs to be straightened out before repair can begin.

Bill


If one is ever at the Naval Museum at Puget Sound (Bremerton WA), you can see a massive collection of photos that document from beginning to end the restoration process of ships damaged at Pearl Harbor. (Most of the damaged ships were repaired there). It's pretty awe inspiring what they were able to do. When I worked there , one of the docents (an avid model warship builder) said to me once "it doesn't seem so much like they repaired the ships, but took them completely apart , fixed or replaced the broken parts , and rebuilt them". It reminded him of the restoration process of repairing and rebuilding a broken model ship.

(in reply to wdolson)
Post #: 31
RE: Cruiser Replacement Dates - 3/24/2016 4:38:48 PM   
Ian R

 

Posts: 3420
Joined: 8/1/2000
From: Cammeraygal Country
Status: offline
Well, Greger says for example, they didn't so much "repair" the Tennessee's, as re-use the hull/machinery & main armament, rebuild them from the deck up, modernise their torpedo protection, and recommission them with superstructures, secondaries, and modern 'software'(radars, FCS) to the standard of the South Dakota class.
Tennessee was repaired (two bomb hits) 12/41 - 3/42, and then laid up at Bremerton for reconstruction 9/42 - 13/5/43; California (sunk) was raised by 3/42, and modernised at Bremerton 7/6/42 - 31/1/44.



< Message edited by Ian R -- 3/30/2016 10:31:33 PM >


_____________________________

"I am Alfred"

(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 32
RE: Cruiser Replacement Dates - 3/24/2016 4:52:21 PM   
Revthought


Posts: 523
Joined: 1/14/2009
From: San Diego (Lives in Indianapolis)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wdolson


quote:

ORIGINAL: Revthought

The turn around on repairing many of the ships was less than 2 months. Maryland and Tennessee were returned to active duty in February, the Pennsylvania returned to active service in April, and the Nevada in October. Most of the repair times on damaged ships seem to take much longer than this. Even relatively minor damage you're looking at, what seems anecdotally, around 120 days of repair time. I think the absolute best I've seen is 55 days for a Battleship with 13 flt damage after Pearl Harbor.

The ships that, historically speaking, were not back in service until 1944 were ships that were total losses, had to be re-floated and then completely rebuilt.

The Arizona was left in place only after serious consideration was given to re-floating and rebuilding her; but as I said earlier, ultimately, it was decided that the warping of the steel from the fire after the magazine explosion made it not worth the effort.

Instead she was scavenged for usable parts, and her turrets were lifted off. Her guns being used for shore batteries in Hawaii and the guns from Arizona's number 2 turret being used on Nevada during Nevada's 1944 refit. Those guns were later fired in anger at Okinawa and Iwo Jima. Again, I'd call that cosmic karma if I believed in such things. :D


The battleships that were inboard of other BBs are Pearl Harbor were not severely damaged. One was so badly trapped they had to dynamite the dock to get her free, but the ship was only slightly damaged. Because the Navy needed as many ships as possible in action, those ships went back into service in a damaged state. Much of the damage from the attack was repaired when those ships were later upgraded in late 1942 or 1943. During Midway TF-1 was at sea halfway between San Francisco and Midway waiting in case they were needed. Several of the ships were survivors of the PH attack including damaged BBs that were operational.

The repair algorithms were written by someone who knew quite a bit about what it took to repair ships. The bigger the ship, the more difficult it is to repair damage, especially major damage. In many cases repair crews have to cut away damaged armor plate an other difficult work. If a ship is very badly damaged, the entire shape of the ship might be twisted and the ship needs to be straightened out before repair can begin.

Bill

quote:

programmer


Bill,

I think that's what I said! :D Let me also stress, I am completely comfortable with the game as it is. It's a game! It requires abstractions; however, I will note Nevade was very badly damaged and returned to service in October. Pennsylvania was also pretty seriously damaged, but less so floatation wise.

And given what you said, if the goal of the game was more geared toward simulation I'd argue that it should be considerably more difficult to damage those inboard ships in-game. Similarly it should be nearly impossible to sink Pennsylvannia, since she was in drydock on Dec 7th.

_____________________________

Playing at war is a far better vocation than making people fight in them.

(in reply to wdolson)
Post #: 33
RE: Cruiser Replacement Dates - 3/24/2016 5:45:02 PM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Revthought


quote:

ORIGINAL: wdolson


quote:

ORIGINAL: Revthought

The turn around on repairing many of the ships was less than 2 months. Maryland and Tennessee were returned to active duty in February, the Pennsylvania returned to active service in April, and the Nevada in October. Most of the repair times on damaged ships seem to take much longer than this. Even relatively minor damage you're looking at, what seems anecdotally, around 120 days of repair time. I think the absolute best I've seen is 55 days for a Battleship with 13 flt damage after Pearl Harbor.

The ships that, historically speaking, were not back in service until 1944 were ships that were total losses, had to be re-floated and then completely rebuilt.

The Arizona was left in place only after serious consideration was given to re-floating and rebuilding her; but as I said earlier, ultimately, it was decided that the warping of the steel from the fire after the magazine explosion made it not worth the effort.

Instead she was scavenged for usable parts, and her turrets were lifted off. Her guns being used for shore batteries in Hawaii and the guns from Arizona's number 2 turret being used on Nevada during Nevada's 1944 refit. Those guns were later fired in anger at Okinawa and Iwo Jima. Again, I'd call that cosmic karma if I believed in such things. :D


The battleships that were inboard of other BBs are Pearl Harbor were not severely damaged. One was so badly trapped they had to dynamite the dock to get her free, but the ship was only slightly damaged. Because the Navy needed as many ships as possible in action, those ships went back into service in a damaged state. Much of the damage from the attack was repaired when those ships were later upgraded in late 1942 or 1943. During Midway TF-1 was at sea halfway between San Francisco and Midway waiting in case they were needed. Several of the ships were survivors of the PH attack including damaged BBs that were operational.

The repair algorithms were written by someone who knew quite a bit about what it took to repair ships. The bigger the ship, the more difficult it is to repair damage, especially major damage. In many cases repair crews have to cut away damaged armor plate an other difficult work. If a ship is very badly damaged, the entire shape of the ship might be twisted and the ship needs to be straightened out before repair can begin.

Bill

quote:

programmer


Bill,

I think that's what I said! :D Let me also stress, I am completely comfortable with the game as it is. It's a game! It requires abstractions; however, I will note Nevade was very badly damaged and returned to service in October. Pennsylvania was also pretty seriously damaged, but less so floatation wise.

And given what you said, if the goal of the game was more geared toward simulation I'd argue that it should be considerably more difficult to damage those inboard ships in-game. Similarly it should be nearly impossible to sink Pennsylvannia, since she was in drydock on Dec 7th.



Obviously you never read the After action report done by one of our members who let out the secret on the "leaping dolphin" secret weapon that sank Pennsylvania in dry dock!

(in reply to Revthought)
Post #: 34
RE: Cruiser Replacement Dates - 3/24/2016 7:13:12 PM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline
I was wrong. In his world famous "Bring me the head of Diego Garcia" AAR Capt. Mandrake spill the on the Top Secret "Jumping Porpoise" torpedo , to the detriment of the USS Tennessee.


http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2341315&mpage=2&key=

(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 35
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Cruiser Replacement Dates Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.109