RangerJoe
Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015 From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part. Status: offline
|
I respectfully disagree on monetizing carbon reduction and such things to reduce global warming. The Earth would be an ice ball if it weren't for global warming. Think of the CO2 as a resource and use it as such. There is a method to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere using the MgO to MgCO3 conversion. Then the carbon could be removed and it could be used for things such as growing algae. The algae could be grown in a growing medium such as the wastewater from a waste treatment plant with any other nutrients added. Some algae are very high oil producers. But the algae could be consumed directly by humans, used as an animal feed, and/or broken down with the resulting carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and other chemicals separated. Those items could be used a resources for other things such as the carbohydrates used to produce ethanol, the proteins to be fed to vegans/vegetarians, and so on. There is a process to turn organic waste into the equivalent of DF2, with further refining it can be turned into gasoline, kerosene, diesel fuel, carbon black, and methane. The methane is used onsite. The process used 15 BTUs to generate 100 BTUs of energy. The ethanol made from corn (an edible food source for many creatures) uses 100 BTUs to generate 80 BTUs of energy. Besides the damage to the environment from other farming practices, the excessive use of herbicides and pesticides is harmful to the environment. The same process can be used to clean coal and oil. Here is an article about the process: http://discovermagazine.com/2003/may/featoil As far as the have-nots attacking the haves, I could get into that but I don't know how far I could get without getting banned.
_____________________________
Seek peace but keep your gun handy. I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! “Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).” ― Julia Child
|