warspite1
Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008 From: England Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Orm quote:
ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote:
ORIGINAL: brian brian Ahh,'forgot the conquest detail on that rule. Things are good for the Good Guys in Poland. warspite1 Well its a shame we lost a unit in the last attack, but I think overall its a reasonable position. As said previously there has to be a downside for a France First strategy or it would all get a little samey (and WIF isn't that). On the negative side for the Allies, of course the Germans have enough power there already so that, with the right throws, Lodz and Warsaw are dead meat - but if we could only get some lousy stinkin' weather, then the ability of the Poles to last into 1940 becomes very real and we can maybe threaten the resources in the south..... I would claim that holding out the Lodz factory is costing Germany. Germany, also, risk suffering more losses. The Polish units, by being there, binds German units that could be sent to the West front. So the increase in losses might not even be in Poland. It is nice to do offensive actions in Poland but, as with everything, it comes with the downside of additional actions that CW has a hard time finding. warspite1 Yes, it will be interesting to see where he puts his reinforcements next turn (particularly the HG Panzer Division). He has no armour in Poland which is fine if Lodz and Warsaw are the only targets - but if the Poles are able to break south with a unit or two, then he may want that unit in the east. The extra HQ will be potentially be missed in the west too. Okay, he's not very powerful, but von Leeb can still usefully re-organise units. Lets hope we can get the 6-3 into play before Poland gets crushed.
< Message edited by warspite1 -- 4/28/2016 7:29:34 AM >
_____________________________
England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805
|