Dixie
Posts: 10303
Joined: 3/10/2006 From: UK Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: warspite1 Well quelle surprise...... another tournament, another opponent we should be beating and....... it never gets any better does it? Why do England footballers not understand that playing the ball forward, quickly, with precision, behind the defence is what causes defences to crumble? We did that a few times in the first half, maybe once in the second... and that's it. Why? Speaking of why, Why was Vardy taken off at half time and not replaced? Why was the knackered Kane brought on and not Rashford? Why Henderson indeed? Mind you, Wilshire and Rooney were pretty awful too. On the positives, we can't score but we dominated the game, Eric Dier looks a better player with every game, Clynne was industrious down the right and Sturridge looked good before he tired. I'm now struggling.... Bad Things... First up, because they lack the composure that is needed. I never feel confident when Ebgland go into half time at 0-0. If they haven't already scored by that point then panic seems to set in and we're treated to lots of sideways passing as no-one takes the lead followed by 30 yard shots into a mass of defenders as someone eventually tries to be a hero. Why was Vardy taken off? Because he fluffed his one chance at getting a goal. He shouldn't have started IMO, he's better from the bench against a side who aren't looking to defend. Why was Kane brought on? I suspect because he's more experienced than Rashford. Why Henderson? I do not know. I can understand Wilshere as he's been ever present for the qualifying campaign. But Henderson has never had a good game for England. He's a 6/10 player, at his absolute best he's competent. But I wouldn't trust him to pass the salt at the dinner table. Wilshere was pants. Get ball. Run at defenders. Lose ball. Repeat to fade. Rooney. Is. Not. A. Midfielder. Passing the ball sideways to Danny Rose to do something with does not a midfielder make. It's not his fault I guess, people are desperate for him to be shoehorned into the side somewhere. But if he has a bad game it's Roy's fault for not dropping him. If he doesn't play and we lose then it's Roy's fault that we're missing his leadership. Jordan Henderson. Again. So bad. It's actually reached the point that I'm feeling sorry for Mark Noble. Like Henderson he's also an average midfielder for a decentish Premier League team. But he's never had the chance to be pish for England. More Questions... Why do people keep talking about the quality forwards we've got in the team when they've managed three goals? Why does the England team still cause me feelings of frustration? Good Things... Clyne was good, but it wasn't that long ago that he was first choice RB was it? But he's good competition for Rose so that's positive. Eric Dier has been good. A few too many long range shots into the sea of bodies at times, but he's played some actual good long range passes. Maybe a side effect of spending time at a foreign academy? Joe Hart didn't drop a bollock this time. So that's an improvement. The red kit looked alright. John Stones hasn't got onto the pitch.
_____________________________
Bigger boys stole my sig
|