Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 4:12:58 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Ok, combat ends in N. Atlantic

Any reaction flights to the CSV and W. Med combats? (see post above for what is in both zones).

Below is an image of the two CW planes that can react to the W. Med. The Hampden could also react to CSV. The FR also have a NAV that can react to the W. Med.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 7/31/2016 4:17:12 PM >

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 481
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 4:39:59 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
(1) Hampden to CSV, 0-box.

(2) The Blenheim will stay grounded for now.

(3) Keep French NAV ground too.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 482
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 7:52:41 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Ok,
West Med went the axis way with a 3,10 split.
Below are the results through the first X, you choose the first D, and I'll end with the last D.
Staying for round 2?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 483
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 8:16:46 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Put next damage on the Strasbourg. Allies stay.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 484
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 9:55:53 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Rnd final results shown below. Rnd 2, both search rolls were 6's. No further contact.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 485
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 10:03:07 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
CSV, axis roll 2, allies roll 1. CW ends with 2 surprise points.
You can reduce the result against your CA (in the 3-box) from A to ne OR increase the result against the IT from ne to 2A.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 486
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 10:10:04 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Increase result to 2A against the Italian subs. Regardless of result, the allies will stay.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 487
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 10:21:08 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Kent was aborted as well as both subs.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 488
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 10:22:41 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
I aborted the Kent to Gibraltar, if that does not work, let me know.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 489
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 10:28:52 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

I aborted the Kent to Gibraltar, if that does not work, let me know.
Perfect!


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 490
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 10:38:18 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
The GS results below.
No image for the Paris GS (by the Italians), the disorganized the X INF corp (missed the primary targets).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 491
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 11:01:10 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
You may support against the one land attack I am making this turn.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 7/31/2016 11:02:51 PM >

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 492
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2016 11:34:54 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
The 105 provides support.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 493
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 12:12:37 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Assumed Assault, Net result an 18, you need to lose one unit, which?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 494
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 12:30:41 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
changed mind. 5-4 inf.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/1/2016 12:35:04 AM >


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 495
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 12:42:22 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Guderian, Von Bock, and Von Leeb used to reorganize most of the front line troops disorganized in that ill thought out attack.
Onto the Allies.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 496
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 12:47:28 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
I'll need which units initiated combat in the North Atlantic and West Med.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 497
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 12:53:38 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
The GE sub 4830 and the GE NAV. Note, I also used the air transport for reorg as well as the 3 HQ's. Note a new game file with the 5-4 as the loss was just sent.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 498
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 1:13:48 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

The GE sub 4830 and the GE NAV. Note, I also used the air transport for reorg as well as the 3 HQ's. Note a new game file with the 5-4 as the loss was just sent.
Thanks!


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 499
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 1:39:12 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
MJ40. Allied #3. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 500
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 2:09:22 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
MJ40. Allied #3. West Med. North Atlantic.

The allies elect NOT to try to initiate combat in these two sea areas.

Does the axis wish to try to initiate combat in either or both area? If so, which area(s) and which unit(s). Also, do yo wish to commit any additional axis air units?

Background: The French NAV was flown to the Italian Coast, 2-box. No other allied air units are in position to support combat in the West Med with the exception of the French air unit in Paris. I'm not sure if it can react to the 0-box or not in the West Med.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 501
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 2:40:14 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
I will pass in the N Atl. In the W. Med I will initiate. React the IT fighter to the 1-box.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 502
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 3:21:31 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
MJ40. Allied #3. (Non-Phasing Initiated) West Med.

The attempted naval combat in the West Med is anti-climatic. The search rolls (axis-allies) is 8 - 6. No contact by either side.

I'm also showing the RN disposition off the Italian Coast.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 503
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 3:25:28 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
MJ40. Allied #3. West Med. Egypt.

Note the Libyan territorial "racing" across central Egypt. That's definitely an irritant!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 504
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 3:47:09 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
MJ40. Allied #3. France.

Post movement. No air or land combat.

This ends the allied impulse 3. Back to Pat for our next weather roll and axis impulse 5.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 505
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 4:19:25 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Fine weather around the world.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 506
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 4:26:52 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Axis actions below. Germany plays an offensive chit on Rundstedt.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 507
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 5:35:23 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Movements, there are 4 attacks in Europe and none in Asia. Image below shows the 4, the partisan is automatic,
The attack in Belgium is 60:18 at the moment
The attack on Metz is 18.33:4
The attck in the Italian Alps is 20:8

The French may fly the bomber. Do you wish to and to where?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 508
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 1:20:10 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
1. Boston flies support to the French attacked in Belgium (60:18).

2. For all attacks that the French can select a table, select assault.

3. For losses, take the "least" valuable units (ok to use your best judgement).

4. Vive La France.



_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 509
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2016 9:32:10 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Here are the results of the attacks. With the Reorganizations, I should be good for follow up.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 510
Page:   <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.797