Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/15/2016 4:19:03 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Attack Results




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 661
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/15/2016 4:26:49 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Turn continues and weather stays the same.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 662
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/15/2016 4:29:30 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
China Situation




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 8/15/2016 4:31:06 AM >

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 663
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/15/2016 4:32:47 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Europe situation:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 664
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/15/2016 7:52:36 PM   
CanInf

 

Posts: 275
Joined: 4/8/2014
Status: offline
no need to conquer or Vichy just take Paris and isolate last remaining factory.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 665
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 1:25:35 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. Allied #9. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to CanInf)
Post #: 666
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 1:26:11 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. Allied #9. China.

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 667
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 1:26:38 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. Allied #9. France.

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 668
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 1:27:57 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

no need to conquer or Vichy just take Paris and isolate last remaining factory.

What would be the advantage of leaving France unconquered or Vichied?

(in reply to CanInf)
Post #: 669
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 1:29:12 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. Allied #9. End of Turn Check.

1. This turn comes to an end, mercifully for the allies.

2. No partisans.

3. The USSR adds a chit to the defensive pool.

4. Where does Germany wish to put their two chits?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 670
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 1:36:09 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Put both in the offensive pool and move a 1 pt chit from the defensive pool to the offensive. The JP transports return to base (I would like two transports to Tokyo and the Amph to Fukuoka) and any unneeded CPs in the Japanese Coast currently transporting US resources back to Fukuoka.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 671
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 2:28:41 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Put both in the offensive pool and move a 1 pt chit from the defensive pool to the offensive. The JP transports return to base (I would like two transports to Tokyo and the Amph to Fukuoka) and any unneeded CPs in the Japanese Coast currently transporting US resources back to Fukuoka.

The Japanese only have a TRS and AMPH at sea (no counting CPs). The other two IJN TRSs are docked in Tientsin, China. I moved the AMPH to Fukuoka and the one TRS at sea to Tokyo. I hope that's ok.

P.S., Actually the next phase is Use Oil - Japan so I'm going to revert to Japan's RTB at let you decide on where you wish to return the AMPH and TRS. After that the file would be coming to you anyway.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/16/2016 2:30:37 AM >


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 672
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 2:34:39 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. End of Turn. US Entry.

The US adds a chit to the Germany/Italy entry pool, selects option 16 (Gift of Destroyers to CW) and has to move a chit from the Japanese entry to tension pool.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 673
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 3:04:45 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Axis oil usage:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 674
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 3:06:43 AM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

no need to conquer or Vichy just take Paris and isolate last remaining factory.

What would be the advantage of leaving France unconquered or Vichied?


Well, since the Axis player asked the question, I hope you don't mind if I explore some advantages to leaving France basically paralyzed, and the basic Allied remedy. If the Axis take everything except one isolated factory, France is still a major power but it would effectively have no Primary supply sources. This immobilizes the French Fleet and any units in any colonies. Thought without Option 47 in play they can at least re-organize and possibly trace to French saved oil somewhere too. Without being able to designate a new Home Country, there are other points in the game system that France could no longer utilize.

Doing that is a smart play for the Axis; there would also be no US Entry Effect for conquering France.

But there is a simple decision the Allies can make to get out of such a rules paralysis, and MWiF offers a chance to do so to each Major Power that could do so - Surrender. If the Axis hold more than half the original factory stacks in France, they can surrender and go through the Incomplete Conquest procedure that allows them to designate a new Home Country - which then gives them a new Primary Supply Source and the Fleet can go back into action. As well as all the other rules procedures that happen on Incomplete Conquest.

Though there could be game situations where France would be eligible to surrender but may not wish to. Perhaps the Allies have built a strong Fortress Brittany, or are offering a determined defense of the Pyrenees along with some other coastal French city the Fleet could trace supply to.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 675
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 3:24:03 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

no need to conquer or Vichy just take Paris and isolate last remaining factory.

What would be the advantage of leaving France unconquered or Vichied?


Well, since the Axis player asked the question, I hope you don't mind if I explore some advantages to leaving France basically paralyzed, and the basic Allied remedy. If the Axis take everything except one isolated factory, France is still a major power but it would effectively have no Primary supply sources. This immobilizes the French Fleet and any units in any colonies. Thought without Option 47 in play they can at least re-organize and possibly trace to French saved oil somewhere too. Without being able to designate a new Home Country, there are other points in the game system that France could no longer utilize.

Doing that is a smart play for the Axis; there would also be no US Entry Effect for conquering France.

But there is a simple decision the Allies can make to get out of such a rules paralysis, and MWiF offers a chance to do so to each Major Power that could do so - Surrender. If the Axis hold more than half the original factory stacks in France, they can surrender and go through the Incomplete Conquest procedure that allows them to designate a new Home Country - which then gives them a new Primary Supply Source and the Fleet can go back into action. As well as all the other rules procedures that happen on Incomplete Conquest.

Though there could be game situations where France would be eligible to surrender but may not wish to. Perhaps the Allies have built a strong Fortress Brittany, or are offering a determined defense of the Pyrenees along with some other coastal French city the Fleet could trace supply to.

Thanks, so the supply situation seems to be the most important. And as you say, it can easily be alleviated.

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 676
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 6:52:03 AM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline
Actually, the most important reason to not Vichy France is that if one wants to invade Spain, Vichy is a major obstacle.

The Axis has several alternatives:

1) Don't invade Spain;

2) Create Vichy, collapse Vichy, and invade Spain;

3) Delay creation of Vichy until after the invasion of Spain.

4) Never creating Vichy, and invading Spain.

I will not discuss alternative 1 in this post. The problem with alternative two is the massive US entry hit. Number three is having one's cake and eating it; if you set up to pull it off, the Allies will probably surrender France first, so number three rarely happens. If one wants to invade Spain, then not creating Vichy is much superior to creating it. The Allied response is a strong defense of the Pyrenees, particularly Bayonne and Toulouse. A strong defense here can force the Axis to declare Vichy. Then, if the Axis has decided on a close the Med strategy, then they can collapse Vichy at the cost of a lot of US entry chits. This is a viable Axis strategy. However, attacking Spain without creating Vichy is a much better one, if the Allies let you do it. A major goal of the Allied defense of France is to force the Axis to declare Vichy to get rid of French hold out units in the south. If the whole French army is quickly killed defending Paris, then don't declare Vichy, charge for the Spanish border and take Gibraltar without getting the US in the war too early.

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 677
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2016 7:08:11 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Actually, the most important reason to not Vichy France is that if one wants to invade Spain, Vichy is a major obstacle.

The Axis has several alternatives:

1) Don't invade Spain;

2) Create Vichy, collapse Vichy, and invade Spain;

3) Delay creation of Vichy until after the invasion of Spain.

4) Never creating Vichy, and invading Spain.

I will not discuss alternative 1 in this post. The problem with alternative two is the massive US entry hit. Number three is having one's cake and eating it; if you set up to pull it off, the Allies will probably surrender France first, so number three rarely happens. If one wants to invade Spain, then not creating Vichy is much superior to creating it. The Allied response is a strong defense of the Pyrenees, particularly Bayonne and Toulouse. A strong defense here can force the Axis to declare Vichy. Then, if the Axis has decided on a close the Med strategy, then they can collapse Vichy at the cost of a lot of US entry chits. This is a viable Axis strategy. However, attacking Spain without creating Vichy is a much better one, if the Allies let you do it. A major goal of the Allied defense of France is to force the Axis to declare Vichy to get rid of French hold out units in the south. If the whole French army is quickly killed defending Paris, then don't declare Vichy, charge for the Spanish border and take Gibraltar without getting the US in the war too early.

Thanks, that is a nice summary for why not to declare Vichy. What I had never heard, at least relative to France, was a reason for not conquering France (isolating a factory and leaving it), so that was the main question.

(in reply to Courtenay)
Post #: 678
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/17/2016 12:31:51 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul/Aug 1940. End of Turn. Use Oil, Allies.

China and the USA required no oil.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 679
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/17/2016 3:38:45 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Axis final production plans




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 680
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/17/2016 11:22:34 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. End of Turn. Final Production. Active Allies.

France! China!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 681
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/17/2016 11:23:08 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. End of Turn. Final Production. Neutral Allies.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 682
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/17/2016 11:23:42 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. End of Turn. Destroyed Pool.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 683
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/17/2016 11:49:19 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Axis builds (note Germany will be saving 8 BPs not shown below - save them in Berlin if it comes up while you have the file).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 684
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/17/2016 11:50:24 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Also, I got the following screen after finishing the Japanese production. It is a force reforming, so I agreed and then saved the game at the Chinese builds.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 685
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 12:16:13 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. Allied Builds.

China (4 BPs): MIL(2), GAR(2)

CW (17 BPs): TRS 2nd (4), BB Repair(1), CVP(0), FTR(2), Pilot(2) x 2, MIL(2), GAR(2), TERR(2)

FRA (1 BP): BP Save x 1

USA (10 BPs): BB Repair(2), BB 2nd (4), CP(1), Pilot(2), CVP(1)

USSR (14 BPs): MOT(4) x 3, INF Div(2)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 686
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 12:18:35 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 40. Saving Build Points.

1. Wow, Germany has 8 BPs to save! I'm sending the file back to Pat for that!

2. France (should) have 1 BP save. If it can be saved in Syria, or elsewhere in North Africa, save it there. If not, then Brest.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/18/2016 12:25:03 AM >


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 687
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 12:26:19 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Axis builds (note Germany will be saving 8 BPs not shown below - save them in Berlin if it comes up while you have the file).

Just saw this. Will do and ignore my previous post.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 688
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 12:29:26 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. End of Turn. Save BPs.

As requested, Germany saves 8 BPs to Berlin.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 689
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 12:33:29 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. End of Turn. Save Build Points. France.

France saves her 1 BP in Nantes.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 690
Page:   <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.969