RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 34 35 [36] 37 38 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/13/2016 2:12:42 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

. The CW will move a transport from Plymouth and loaded with a 3-5 cavalry corps into the Bay of Biscay. Do the axis wish to attempt to intercept?

2. The CW will move a transport from Bristol loaded with Alexander into the Bay of Biscay. Do the axis wish to intercept?

3. The CW will move three CVLs from Liverpool into the Bay of Biscay. Do the axis wish to intercept?

4. The CW will NOT try to initiate a naval combat in the Bay of Biscay. Do the axis wish to try? If so, do the axis wish to add any air units to the battle and where?

As much as I'd like to, I will not engage at this time. No to all of the questions.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1051

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/13/2016 2:40:18 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa
As much as I'd like to, I will not engage at this time. No to all of the questions.

Believe me, I know the feeling.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1052

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/13/2016 3:01:14 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #2. West Med.

The German intercept attempt of the CA Sheffield fails.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1053

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/13/2016 3:01:46 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

once the Rams game starts I will not be available.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1054

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/13/2016 3:01:53 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #2. RN. Bay of Biscay.

No combat attempted by either side.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1055

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/13/2016 3:02:31 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #2. RN. Italian Coast. Attempt to Initiate Combat.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1056

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/13/2016 3:03:11 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #2. West Med.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1057

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/13/2016 3:05:35 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

once the Rams game starts I will not be available.

Enjoy the game.

I have a few questions for tomorrow. By the way, question 5 is the most important one.

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #2. West Med. Axis, Contact.

1. I assume you wish to fight a naval air combat?

2. Do you wish to fly the Bf 100E as a bomber?

3. How do you wish to use your surprise points?

4. What are your targets?

5. Is it possible for you to lose a naval battle?

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/13/2016 3:58:22 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1058

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/13/2016 3:59:16 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

1. I assume you wish to fight a naval air combat?

2. Do you wish to fly the Bf 100E as a bomber?

3. How do you wish to use your surprise points?

4. What are your targets?

5. Is it possible for you to lose a naval battle?

1. Yes.
2. No (impact on AA is not good).
3. Reduce AA to no impact. If more, use it to increase damage to allies.
4. my D on Canariaa, my A on the Almirante if still there (hit units with most AA first).
5. Apparently not in the W. Med

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1059

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/14/2016 12:25:46 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Lost internet due to severed cable. Should be fixed tomorrow. For now using cellular service. Will try to complete what I can, but limited to text. By the way, I'm a horrible and very slow texter.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1060

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/14/2016 12:44:42 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

No problem. It can wait till tomorrow if need be. Don't ruin the thumb

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1061

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/14/2016 12:52:15 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Rd1 results. Cananiss damaged. Liberated damaged. Alicante aborted. Both sides stay. Rd2. Search axis 1, allies 4. Same rolls as before. Flew German plane as fighter again. Should have flown as bomber (sorry). 3 surprise points used to select target. CA Cananiss aborted added to damage. CA Liberated sunk. CA Miguel 1/2 aborted. Both sides stay. Rd3. Search axis 1 allies 10. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. That's 3 axis searh rolls in a row rolling a 1. Too many options to complete battle via text. Will post pictures tomorrow for instructions. Right now I'm in a desperate need of a beer. 😞

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1062

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/14/2016 12:54:21 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

No problem. It can wait till tomorrow if need be. Don't ruin the thumb

I use my middle (bird) figures on both hands. Sometimes my index finger instead.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1063

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/14/2016 1:34:47 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Believe I figured things out from yesterday's post.
If I'm right, I'll engage the 3-box only with 10 surprise points (you have the CV, bomber with NAV factors and two fighters).
It will be an Air to Sea.
I'll spend 4 surprise points to increase my A-A by 2
I'll spend 4 surprise points to decrease your A-A by 2
The last two will be spend to increase my NAV attack by 1 column.
My first damage will be against the CV.
Any other X or D will go against the 5-5 Transport, any A will go against the CA (high AA) and then the BB with high AA.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1064

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/14/2016 11:44:42 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Internet still out, but I did fight next round. AA. +2 axis, -2 allies, 8 surprise points used. RN swordfish & pilot destroyed. German NAV cleared. RAF Hampton aborted. Italian NAV cleared. (Bf 110c flown as fighter). No more bombers left, both sides abort AA. RN anti-aircraft: lowest 1 of 4. Lowest =4. Both NAVs have bombs reduced to 0. Both sides stay. Axis search 6, allies 8. Battle over. Will post pictures when internet is back.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1065

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/15/2016 1:10:40 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #2. West Med. Naval Combat Round 1.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/15/2016 1:16:22 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1066

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/15/2016 1:11:03 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. West Med. Allied #2. Naval Combat Round 2.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/15/2016 1:16:07 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1067

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/15/2016 1:11:37 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #2. West Med. Naval Combat Round 3 (a).

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/15/2016 1:15:55 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1068

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/15/2016 1:12:36 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #2. West Med. Naval Combat Round 3 (b).

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/15/2016 1:15:43 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1069

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/15/2016 1:13:33 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #2. West Med. Naval Combat Round 4.

Axis search = 6, allied search = 8. The naval combat ends in the West Med.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/15/2016 1:15:20 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1070

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/15/2016 1:14:26 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Axis #3. Weather.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1071

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/15/2016 3:48:42 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA41 i3:
Actions shown below. The Germans and Italians flew fighters out to the 2-box of the W. Med.
Some miscellaneous JP naval moves. First naval move in the European theater is the two GE BC out to the Bay of Biscay.
Will you intercept?

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1072

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/15/2016 5:03:12 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

The RN will attempt to intercept. They will use the CA London in the 0-box for the attempt.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/15/2016 5:09:29 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1073

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/15/2016 5:25:06 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

The two BC continued to the N. Atlantic, where they initiated combat. Die rolls of 7/4 resulted in no contact.
Italian sub moved to the Bay of Biscay and the GE sub initiated combat. Die rolls of 6/7 resulted in no contact.
Axis declined to initiate combat in the Italian Coast and the W. Med.

The CW has the option of initiated in the W. Med (Italians moved a CP to 0-box, and a loaded transport (4-3 INF from Marseilles) is now in the 1-box). Will you initiate combat?

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 9/15/2016 5:27:14 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1074

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/15/2016 5:43:50 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Starting my road trip tomorrow morning early. I may get back to this on Thursday evening, but it will be tight for the next several weeks.

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1075

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/15/2016 6:01:26 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Starting my road trip tomorrow morning early. I may get back to this on Thursday evening, but it will be tight for the next several weeks.

Have a nice trip.

The allies will NOT try to initiate combat in the West Med.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1076

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 1:27:28 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #6.

We both upgrade to MWiF 2.2.8.