Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 1:20:38 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Here is the situation in China at the end of impulse 3 (only movement and debarkation)




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 91
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 1:26:21 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		And the situation across Germany. Rundstedt did reorganize a number of corp on the Western front in response to the extreme allied bombing.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 92
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 2:41:30 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #5. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 93
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 2:44:15 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #5. China.

In the south, Pat was threatening to outflank three or four of my Nationalist Chinese units. I decided to retreat them into to the mountains to prevent them from being flanked even though the moves disorganized them.

Also, Pat disembarked the four Japanese units at sea in the China Sea last impulse in the south (Canton and adjacent). Looks like Pat is going after the Nationalist at least early on.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/7/2016 2:50:27 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 94
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 2:51:18 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #5. CW. Disembark.

I learned my lesson the hard way once, fortunately in a solo game, not to leave Bombay ungarrisoned. A partisan that pops up there takes a MAJOR campaign to dislodge. So, this impulse I disembarked an infantry division loaded on an SCS and transported from England on my first impulse.

Also, the CW adds a second corps to the defense Gibraltar.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 95
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 2:56:29 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #5. CW & France. Disembark.

I disembark's Gort into Calais and a French 3-3 corps in Marseilles.

I let the CW VII Mech and IV Mot corps remain at sea in order to keep my options open on where to disembark them. Pat looks like he's ready to roll into Belgium and/or the Netherlands and Denmark if the weather is right next impulse.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/7/2016 2:59:20 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 96
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 2:57:30 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #5. French HQ Reorg.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 97
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 2:58:03 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #5. Europe.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 98
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 4:51:06 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Well there is a break in the weather (rolled a 3, modified to a 5). Three DOW, Italy on France, Germany on Belgium and Denmark. The US cared about two of them.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 99
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 5:29:45 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Both Belgium and Denmark were aligned to the CW. Setup complete.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 100
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 5:34:37 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		By the way, for any land combat against the Belgiums or Poles, I choose the assault table.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 101
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 1:41:17 PM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline 		What are the policies about outside comments on this game?

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 102
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 2:18:02 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline 		Map question - which Major Power is ( Ang) ?

(in reply to Courtenay)
Post #: 103
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 3:20:36 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline 		Ang is the abbreviation for Angola, to which country the hex belongs.

I'm only going to commend on things which can't be changed anymore.

The two Belgian INF should have been put into the hex west of Brussels, because Brussels can't be taken by Germany in the surprise impulse if it is empty. The CAV in Liège chooses the Assault and the Axis advance stops just before the gates of the capital..



_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 104
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/7/2016 11:55:56 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

Ang is the abbreviation for Angola, to which country the hex belongs.

I'm only going to commend on things which can't be changed anymore.

The two Belgian INF should have been put into the hex west of Brussels, because Brussels can't be taken by Germany in the surprise impulse if it is empty. The CAV in Liège chooses the Assault and the Axis advance stops just before the gates of the capital..


Now you tell me!


quote:

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

What are the policies about outside comments on this game?
Pat needs to weigh in on this too. But my view, right now, is that comments that don't "influence" the game are fine. Also, my view is that critiques on things that can't be change (e.g., Centuur's comments above) are fine but not on things still developing. Again, this is just my view. We need to hear from Pat on his view on this.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 105
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 1:40:26 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		No issue with comments per Ronnie's stated constraint. I am hoping to learn. It has been remarkable how many "small" rules I've been learning about since playing MWIF, even though I have played WIF off-and-on for nearly 20 years. I also understand where my main weaknesses are in the game (large land powers - Germany and Russia), so comments after the fact should help a lot.

Pat

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 106
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 1:47:11 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		All the axis powers take land actions.
Forgot to save the ground strike in BE, both Heinkels flew and the first rolled 4,1,1 disorganizing both Be corp.
Below are the other two GS.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 107
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 1:48:03 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		And the strat bombing that occurred before.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 108
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 1:48:59 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Awaiting word on the destinations for the overrun Danish navy.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 109
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 2:02:54 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Awaiting word on the destinations for the overrun Danish navy.

Edinburgh.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 110
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 4:40:04 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Germany moved through all of Denmark, the CP made it to Edinburgh, but the two CAs (Peder Skram and Niels Jiel) were destroyed in port.
First attack is in China.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 111
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 4:43:12 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Well has can be seen that was the Warsaw attack. The campaign did not end has I would have liked. Rolls of 4 will do that. Note, I did decide to destroy the Poznan Corp for you - not much difference between the two.
Here is the attack in China




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 7/8/2016 5:02:31 AM >

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 112
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 4:46:20 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Final attack in Belgium.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 113
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 4:49:24 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Well my attack rolls have certainly been underwhelming this impulse (poor in general: 12, 10, 17 (on a +17), 9, 9, 9, 4, 8).

During the air reorganization phase the FR can intercept the air transport mission. Two Me109's can intercept if you fly. Do you fly?






Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 114
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 4:54:06 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Well my attack rolls have certainly been underwhelming this impulse (poor in general: 12, 10, 17 (on a +17), 9, 9, 9, 4, 8).

During the air reorganization phase the FR can intercept the air transport mission. Two Me109's can intercept if you fly. Do you fly?






No thanks.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 115
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 5:09:13 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Canton Front





Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 116
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 5:09:45 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		European Fronts




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 117
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 5:11:27 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		The Polish and S. China fronts lost a lot of steam with the poor attacks resulting in significant disorganization. I'll have to adjust and see how it goes.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 118
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 5:26:53 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Phew ... I know it was only a 1 out of 10 chance (10%) that the turn would end but I sure was sweating it. It would have been bad (for me) if this turn had ended and you got the initiate to move first on the next turn.

The turn continues much to my relief!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 119
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 5:31:13 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		The USSR makes a claim to Bessarabia. Do you allow the claim?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.734