RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 41 42 [43] 44 45 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/22/2016 4:53:39 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

JA41
N. Atlantic round 2, searches of 7/9 resulted in no combat. CP aborted to Plymouth (sub should be disorganized)
BoB. Italian bomber intiated. Searches of 6/8 resulted in no combat.
W. Med. Italian fighter in the 2-box initiated. rolls of 7/8 resulted in no combat.

I will be out for the next 6-7 hours.

OK, have a nice outing. I'll be occupied this afternoon watching college football, especially, Texas A.M. vs Alabama starting at 2:30 CST. Roll Tide!

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1261

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/23/2016 12:27:31 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA41 i2:
Two Ground attacks. The CW can support with air support if desired. I can intercept the northern one for sure, I do not believe I can the southern attack.

Any support?

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1262

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/23/2016 3:27:55 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa
Any support?

No thank you.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1263

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/23/2016 4:40:46 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA41 i2: Ground Attack Results

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1264

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/23/2016 4:49:06 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA41 i3: Weather

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1265

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 1:24:54 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #3. Actions.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1266

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 1:31:15 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #3. Naval Moves. Bay of Biscay.

The Bay of Biscay will be the only contested sea area in which the axis will have an opportunity to try to initiate a naval combat. The allies will not attempt. But before all that the RN moves a loaded transport into the sea area.

Do you wish to attempt an intercept? If so, which unit would you like to use?

Do you wish to try to initiate a naval combat in the allies choose not to, which they want? If so and assuming you didn't attempt to intercept the transport, which unit would you like to use for the attempt?

I'm not sure if any additional air units are available, but if they are would you like to add them?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1267

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 2:45:01 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Do you wish to attempt an intercept? If so, which unit would you like to use?

Do you wish to try to initiate a naval combat in the allies choose not to, which they want? If so and assuming you didn't attempt to intercept the transport, which unit would you like to use for the attempt?

I'm not sure if any additional air units are available, but if they are would you like to add them?

1) I will attempt to intercept the transport. Initiate with the Hungarian fighter (use for any combat during this impulse).
2) I will also attempt naval combat assuming things look similar to now.
3) I will not fly any other plans out at this time.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1268

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 4:20:51 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #3. Bay of Biscay. Axis Intercept Attempt.

Intercept attempt fails. The RN transport and its cargo continue on the Cape St. Vincent.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 10/25/2016 4:22:18 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1269

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 4:21:40 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #3. Contested Sea Areas.

The allies choose not to try to initiate naval combat in any of the contested sea areas.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1270

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 4:24:02 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #3. Bay of Biscay. Axis Initiated Combat.

Axis successfully initiate combat in the Bay of Biscay. How do you wish to proceed?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1271

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 4:35:18 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Axis successfully initiate combat in the Bay of Biscay. How do you wish to proceed?

Engage the 2-box only, with 6 SP. Make it a naval air. No air combat I believe and your AA is ineffective, so I'll save all SP for moving my result up 3 columns to X 2D 2A
First X on Transport.
My D on transport if damaged, else the Royal Sovereign.
My last A on what is left in the following order (Royal Sovereign, Java, Transport).

Added in edit: I will stay for round 2.

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 10/25/2016 4:36:07 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1272

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 5:02:58 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #3. Bay of Biscay. Round 1.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1273

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 5:05:11 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #3. Bay of Biscay. Round 2a.

1. Do you wish to lose the fighter or the Italian bomber?

2. Do you wish to stay for additional air rounds?

3. Instructions for adding additional air (if any) after this round?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1274

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 5:21:39 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

1. Do you wish to lose the fighter or the Italian bomber?

2. Do you wish to stay for additional air rounds?

3. Instructions for adding additional air (if any) after this round?

1. Lose the fighter.
2. Anybody who does not clear on the next roll, will abort the next air round.
3. No new planes after this round (the ones I want cannot make it to the 2-box).

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 10/25/2016 5:44:32 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1275

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 5:48:08 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #3. Bay of Biscay. Round 2 (b).

Do you wish to stay for a potential third round?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1276

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 6:06:22 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Do you wish to stay for a potential third round?

In the second naval round, I do not wish to fight any more than the one air to air round. The two bombers abort back to their sea zones. I will stay for a third set of search rolls (I am not leaving the sea zone yet). Sorry it was not completely clear earlier.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1277

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 10:47:50 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

Do you wish to stay for a potential third round?

In the second naval round, I do not wish to fight any more than the one air to air round. The two bombers abort back to their sea zones. I will stay for a third set of search rolls (I am not leaving the sea zone yet). Sorry it was not completely clear earlier.

No problem. I just wanted to make sure I understood your instructions. Now I do.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1278

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/25/2016 10:52:55 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #3. Bay of Biscay. Round 3.

Round 3 was anti-climatic, to say the least, but the failed search results certainly suit the allies.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 10/26/2016 1:04:22 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1279

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/26/2016 4:08:15 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA41 i4: Naval Combat Options
Germany took a land while Japan and Italy take combined actions.
No naval moves for any power.
The Germans moved three fighters into the BoB and the Italians one NAV (all into the 2-box).
In the W. Med, the Germans move a fighter into the 2-box and the Italians drop the Fighter in the 1-box to the 0-box.
I will be initiating searches in both zones. You only have NAV's that could react and I suspect they will stay in place. Let me know if I am wrong.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1280

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/26/2016 4:14:26 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

No additional air units in any sea areas. Roll high ... for axis search that is.

The allies will avoid combat if they can.

Sorry to leave at this critical time but it's my bedtime.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 10/26/2016 4:16:09 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1281

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/26/2016 4:15:49 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA41 i4: Naval Combats
The CW is happy.
BoB, the IT Gabianno (NAV in the two box) initiates the searches. The Italian fighter on the N coast of Spain reacts to the 1-box. Search rolls of 7/7 result in no contact.
W. Med, The Italian fighter in the 0-box initiates the searches. A German fighter on the E coast of Spain reacts to the 0-box. Search rolls of 8/8 result in no contact.

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1282

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/26/2016 4:16:39 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

JA41 i4: Naval Combats
The CW is happy.
BoB, the IT Gabianno (NAV in the two box) initiates the searches. The Italian fighter on the N coast of Spain reacts to the 1-box. Search rolls of 7/7 result in no contact.
W. Med, The Italian fighter in the 0-box initiates the searches. A German fighter on the E coast of Spain reacts to the 0-box. Search rolls of 8/8 result in no contact.

Now, I can go to bed in peace.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1283

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/26/2016 6:23:11 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA41 i4: Land Attacks
Two attacks. No support available for the partisan defenders in France. In Spain, the odds were so overwhelming against the division, that I made the decision for you not to support the defended.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1284

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/27/2016 12:26:59 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #5. Weather.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1285

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/27/2016 12:27:22 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #5. Actions.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1286

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/27/2016 12:29:41 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #5. Contested Sea Areas (Post Naval Moves).

The allies chose not to try to initiate naval combat in any of the contested sea areas. The axis, as the non-phasing player, had no opportunity to try due to the fact that the allies added neither ships or planes to any of the three areas.