Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  63 64 [65] 66 67   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/15/2017 3:47:58 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

So much for Soviet fighter pilots
actually the pilots survived, but the planes are gone. Perhaps they'll get more training now
Or maybe get a new career working in the Soviet salt mines.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1921
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/15/2017 4:33:11 PM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

So much for Soviet fighter pilots
actually the pilots survived, but the planes are gone. Perhaps they'll get more training now
Or maybe get a new career working in the Soviet salt mines.


No, pilots are too valuable for that.

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1922
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/15/2017 7:51:27 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MJ42 i1 Axis Attacks 1/3
6 attacks, no great rolls but the poorest roll came on the lowest odds (best for the defenders). Three postings will show the results.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1923
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/15/2017 7:52:34 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MJ42 i1 Axis Attacks 2/3




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1924
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/15/2017 7:53:06 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MJ42 i1 Axis Attacks 3/3
Used Rundstedt, Rommel and von Boch to reorganize after these attacks.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 1/15/2017 7:54:32 PM >

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1925
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/16/2017 9:24:01 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1926
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/16/2017 9:24:50 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. RN. Contested Sea Areas. No Combat.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 1/16/2017 9:26:52 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1927
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/16/2017 9:27:43 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. USN. Contested Sea Areas. No Combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1928
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/16/2017 9:29:35 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. USN. China Sea. South China Sea.

The USN will attempt to initiate a sub combat in both of these sea areas.

1. Which planes and where would the Japanese like to include?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1929
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/16/2017 9:33:08 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. USN and RN. Contested Sea Area. North Sea.

The USN and RN will not try to initiate a naval combat in the North Sea.

2. Do the Germans with to try? (If so, they have only one unit they can use).


If the Germans do attempt to fight a battle shown are the air units both sides can add to the area.

3. If battle attempted, do the axis wish to add any additional air units? If so, where?

4. If battle attempted and successful, instructions?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1930
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/16/2017 9:34:53 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. RN. Contested Sea Area. The Marianas.

5. Does the IJN wish to attempt to initiate a naval combat in the Marianas?

6. If so, do they wish to include additional air. If so, where?

7. If battle is attempted and successfully initiated, instructions?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1931
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/16/2017 10:39:40 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. USN. China Sea. South China Sea.

The USN will attempt to initiate a sub combat in both of these sea areas.

1. Which planes and where would the Japanese like to include?


Into the Sea of Japan goes
- B5N2 to the 2-box
- Ki30 to the 0-box

Into the China Sea goes
- D3A1 to the 0-box

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1932
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/16/2017 10:54:58 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. USN and RN. Contested Sea Area. North Sea.

The USN and RN will not try to initiate a naval combat in the North Sea.

2. Do the Germans with to try? (If so, they have only one unit they can use).


If the Germans do attempt to fight a battle shown are the air units both sides can add to the area.

3. If battle attempted, do the axis wish to add any additional air units? If so, where?

4. If battle attempted and successful, instructions?

After much consternation, the axis decide to let the Allied fleet ride the waves unmolested.
So,
2) No
3 and 4) not applicable.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1933
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/16/2017 10:55:36 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. RN. Contested Sea Area. The Marianas.

5. Does the IJN wish to attempt to initiate a naval combat in the Marianas?

6. If so, do they wish to include additional air. If so, where?

7. If battle is attempted and successfully initiated, instructions?
No, I will not initiate here.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1934
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/17/2017 11:26:48 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. USN, Sea of Japan.

No contact.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1935
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/17/2017 11:27:29 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. USN, China Sea.

No contact.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1936
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/17/2017 11:36:41 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. USSR, Ground Strike.

The USSR assigned this unescorted ground strike under the mistaken assumption that it couldn't be intercepted by axis fighters. That assumption was wrong. The Italian fighter was in range to intercept and I make the call that the axis would intercept.

The Soviet bomber gets through and manages to disorganize the SS mech corps.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1937
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 12:06:03 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. USSR, Ground Strike.

The USSR assigned this unescorted ground strike under the mistaken assumption that it couldn't be intercepted by axis fighters. That assumption was wrong. The Italian fighter was in range to intercept and I make the call that the axis would intercept.

The Soviet bomber gets through and manages to disorganize the SS mech corps.
Carry on.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1938
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 12:43:25 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Western Allies Amphibious Invasions. Axis Ground Support Questions.

The US and CW are attempting amphibious invasions against two targets, Brest and St-Malo in France.

1. Brest land combat. Current odds which include offense shore bombardment are +7.6 (19:5). In ground support the allies are flying four bombers with TAC factors of 3,2, 1 and 1. These bombers are escorted by two fighters with air to air values of 6 and 5. Do the axis wish to attempt to provide defensive ground support to this attack? If so, which bombers and fighters do they wish to fly to the hex? Also, what are your air-to-air instructions?


2. St-Malo land combat. Current odds which include offense shore bombardment are +18 (18:2). In ground support the allies are flying one bomber with TAC 2 and one fighter with air-to-air 6. Do the axis wish to attempt to provide defensive ground support to this attack? If so, which bombers and fighters do they wish to fly to the hex? Also, what are your air-to-air instructions?




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 1/18/2017 12:44:27 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1939
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 3:25:00 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Western Allies Amphibious Invasions. Axis Ground Support Questions.

The US and CW are attempting amphibious invasions against two targets, Brest and St-Malo in France.

1. Brest land combat. Current odds which include offense shore bombardment are +7.6 (19:5). In ground support the allies are flying four bombers with TAC factors of 3,2, 1 and 1. These bombers are escorted by two fighters with air to air values of 6 and 5. Do the axis wish to attempt to provide defensive ground support to this attack? If so, which bombers and fighters do they wish to fly to the hex? Also, what are your air-to-air instructions?

Fighters, in order, Bf109 {from Brest}, Macchi {Brest}, Falco 1 {St-Malo}, Bf110c {Lorrient}
Bomber, use programs order, Ju87R {55,25}, Alclone {54,26}, He115c {St-Malo}

I believe if I get at least 4 GS through it is best to decline the notional, but please verify when the option comes up. If it is my option on my losses and all axis bombers are still in queue, then take the lead bomber out. If the Ju87R has cleared also use the bombers for losses. Otherwise use the fighters as losses. Clear the Ju87R first if I have an option.

If I get a choice against your stacks, take your lead fighter out first. Once he is gone, I will take out bombers as long as I have not taken a fighter loss. After my first fighter loss, all losses are against your fighters till they are all gone.


quote:

2. St-Malo land combat. Current odds which include offense shore bombardment are +18 (18:2). In ground support the allies are flying one bomber with TAC 2 and one fighter with air-to-air 6. Do the axis wish to attempt to provide defensive ground support to this attack? If so, which bombers and fighters do they wish to fly to the hex? Also, what are your air-to-air instructions?

Fighters, in order, Ariete {Rouen}, Ju88C {St-Malo}
Bombers, use computer order, Bf110c {55,24}, Bf110d {54,24}

If it is my option on my losses and all axis bombers are still in queue, then take the lead bomber out. If a bomber has cleared use the last bomber as the loss. Otherwise use the fighters as losses.

If I get a choice against your stacks, take your fighter out first.

It has taken me awhile to figure this out and a mistake is likely. If something looks silly, please stop and let me review.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1940
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 4:38:40 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Western Allies. Brest. Air-to-Air Combat, part 1.

I believe (hope) I've faithfully executed your instructions in the Brest air to air combat, which hasn't gone well for the axis, to this point.

At this point I need direction from you on whether or not you wish to continue this air to air? If so, what are you instructions?


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa
I believe if I get at least 4 GS through it is best to decline the notional, but please verify when the option comes up.
By the way, the choice on whether or not to include the notional had to be made even before adding shore bombardment. Attack odds were in your favor with the notionals so I included them. Hope that was ok.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 1/18/2017 4:42:08 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1941
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 4:54:36 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		staying at least one more round to try and get the bomber through. Please roll well for the axis now.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1942
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 4:59:05 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1941. Allied #2. Western Allies. Brest. Air to Air Combat, part 2.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

staying at least one more round to try and get the bomber through. Please roll well for the axis now.


Sorry ...

Stay or leave?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1943
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 5:34:17 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		So frustrating. Stay.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1944
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 5:45:52 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Western Allies. Brest. Air-to-Air, Part 3.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

So frustrating. Stay.

Sorry again ...

Thus, ends to air to air combat over Breast and ground support.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1945
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 5:51:17 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. St-Malo. Air-to-Air Combat.

Well, if it's any consolation the air to air combat over St-Malo completely goes the axis way.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1946
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 5:54:46 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Now it is all up to the luck of the attack rolls. Plus, you should be in bed now. Don't you work in the morning?

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1947
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 5:55:30 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Western Allies. Land Combat. Ground Support.

The Western Allies manage to add 6 factors of ground support to their attack on Brest. The axis managed to add 2 factors to their defense of St-Malo.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1948
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 6:09:00 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Amphibious Landings Brest and St-Malo.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Now it is all up to the luck of the attack rolls. Plus, you should be in bed now. Don't you work in the morning?
Yes it is and yes I do, but if I didn't finish my impulse it would drive me crazy all day at work thinking about the outcome.

The allies get ashore at both locations but the Brest landings were costly.





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1949
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 1/18/2017 6:22:30 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Western Allies. Northwest France.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1950
Page:   <<   < prev  63 64 [65] 66 67   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  63 64 [65] 66 67   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.982