Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  84 85 [86] 87 88   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2017 2:30:21 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Yes, the RN will remain with the objective of sinking/aborting the Italian CP and breaking supply to the Italians in Libya.

Bedtime now ...

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/31/2017 2:31:05 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2551
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2017 3:01:05 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		E Med Round 2, rolls of 3/5 result in allied finding and engaging the CW 3-box only.
Naval Air. 2 SP used to decrease AA to ne. And 2 SP used to increase damage to D 3A.
Applied first damage to BB. Damage roll of 7, aborted the BB (missed saving the correct image, sorry)
First A against the CA was failed, so both units are aborted.

3rd round searches were 9/10 and combat ended.
I aborted your ships to Suez. Feel free to move them elsewhere if desired.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2552
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2017 3:03:09 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Last naval combat decision is in the Bismark Sea, where the USA can initiate searches if they wish.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2553
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2017 10:58:36 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		The US declines.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2554
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/31/2017 11:48:33 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Three ground strikes. 2 with artillery and 1 with a plane. You can intercept. I have a Me109 that can counter-intercept.
Do you wish to fly?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2555
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2017 2:06:01 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Intercept. Fighter will target plane attempting the ground strike.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2556
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2017 2:26:51 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND42 i13 GS
Air to Air over GS cleared the bomber and then the Germans left the area.
Only one GS hit.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2557
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2017 3:23:01 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND42 i13: Land Attacks
Three land attacks, all at high odds. I assumed you would choose assault on the two where you had the choice.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2558
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2017 3:24:51 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		turn ended with a roll of 1.
The Allies get to place a partisan in China.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2559
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2017 3:44:52 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Here is the partisan screen.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2560
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2017 3:45:54 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Here is the destroyed pool for ND42. Russia lost more than they are building.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2561
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2017 3:47:28 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Next several post show the situation at then end of 1942.
Here is the East Front (sorry about the low magnification).





Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2562
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2017 3:48:23 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		And the Iberian Peninsula: Stalemate?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2563
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2017 3:49:55 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		East Med and Eygpt. Note, CW has no transport or CP in the East Med, impacting the supply situation.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2564
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2017 3:50:51 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		And lastly the Siberian Front




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2565
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2017 3:55:42 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		No image for the Pacific. Not much changed. The US took Saipan and the Japanese retook it. There was a large naval engagement in the Marianas. Air power was about equal, but with surprise I (axis) made it a surface. Great damage control by the allies limited the impact to the Enterprise and the Portland being damaged. The JP put the Yamato in front to absorb their X and promptly rolled a 1 making it a great move (any other JP ship would have sunk). The USA then aborted the zone.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2566
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/1/2017 11:18:28 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 20. Nov/Dec 1942. End of Turn. ChiComm Partisan.

A ChiComm partisan spawns and denies the Japanese 1 non-RP that they've been using for production.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2567
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/3/2017 4:28:25 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND42 Axis Oil Usage.
Heavy oil usage by the Japanese, 6 expended.
Germans expended 4 and the Italians 1. All units reorganized. Numbers were right on at 6.4, 4.4 and 1.3.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2568
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/5/2017 3:16:41 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 20. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Use Oil. Allies.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2569
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/6/2017 11:19:57 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 20. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Final Production. Allies.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2570
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/7/2017 1:14:04 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND42 Axis Builds:
Germany (44 BP, 3 saved oil)
save 6 BP (6)
4x pilots (8)
GAR (2)
FIG3 (3)
NAV3 (3)
LND3 (3)
2x sub-fd (2)
mech-div (3)
MOT (4)
arm-div (4)
MIL (2)
AA (4)

Italy (11 BP, 1 saved oil)
1x pilot (2)
1x CP (1)
sub-rp (1)
LND4 (4)
LND3 (3)

Japan (25 BP, 3 saved oil)
4x pilots (8)
FIG2 (2)
CVP1 (1)
CVP0 (0)
2x CP (2)
BB-rp (2) Yamato
CA-rp (1) fast CA in pool
INF (3)
MTN (4)
TERR (2)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2571
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/8/2017 11:28:59 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 20. Nov/Dec 1942. End of Turn. Allied Builds.

CW(29): Arm HQ(8), CP(1) x 3, Terr(2), Par Div(3), Mot(4), Pilot(2) x 2, Lnd(3), CA Repair(1), CVP(1)

France(0):

USA(62): O-Chit(15), Sub 2nd(2), Sub 2nd(1), CV Repair(2), CA Repair(1) x 2, CV 2nd(3), Amph 2nd(4), CP(1) x 2, Pilot(2) x 3, CVP(1), FTR(2), Lnd(4), Mil(2) x 3, Mar Div(3), Arm(6), Mech Div(3)

USSR(26): Cav(2), MTN(4), Inf(3) x 5, FTR(3), Pilot(2)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2572
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/14/2017 12:57:50 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		JF43 Image of the Axis reinforcements and scrap decisions. Germany increased lending to Italy to 4 resources, 1 of them being oil.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2573
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/15/2017 11:21:39 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943.

Allied Resource Lending.

No Changes.

Initiative.

Axis 7 + 1 = 8, Allied 2. With the allies unable to request a re-roll the axis win the initiative.

Do the axis wish to move first or second this turn?

If so, it's probably easiest if you just set the die rolls with the turn you sent me and go from there. If you wish me to move first then I'll do the same and go with the turn I received.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/15/2017 11:25:42 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2574
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/15/2017 11:58:15 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Axis did decide to move first. The East front situation was just to tempting.
Weather JF43 i 1.
Results pretty good, though with rain and storm there will not be any big sweeping moves.
I will try to get to this tonight.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2575
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2017 4:27:45 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND43 i1 Naval Combat
Actions: Japan combined, Germany and Italy lands
Germany flies a NAV to the 4-box of the E. Med.
Japan flies a NAV to the 4-box of the Arabian Sea and a NAV to the 3-box of the China Sea.
Japan moves 2 sub from NEI to the Read Sea and 1 to the SE Indian Ocean (all one naval move). A CA with a Mar-div moves from Saipan to the 4-box of the Bismarck Sea.

3 Possible combats shown below.
In the first search rolls the CW CA in the Red Sea gets the drop on the Japanese subs (rolls of 8/1). You have 5 surprise points and I see three options.
1) avoid combat
2) make it a sub combat, take no damage and inflict 2A
3) let it be a surface combat, take an A and inflict D 3A. (There is a small chance that I could have a sub remain for round two, but you are also likely to damage a submarine)

I could not decide which you would want - option 1 or 3 (2 did not seem likely).




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 8/16/2017 4:29:04 AM >

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2576
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2017 12:37:59 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Red Sea. I'll take option 3.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/16/2017 12:38:12 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2577
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2017 2:09:30 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Good Choice.
You passed your A and I failed the D and enough A's to send everybody home.

In the Arabian Sea search rolls of 9/2 resulted in no combat. (I reacted another plane out to this zone).
In the SE Indian Ocean search rolls of 7/3 resulted in no combat.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2578
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2017 2:35:16 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND43 i1 Ground Strikes
3 ground strikes: Lisbon, Stavropol, and Vlad. You can only intercept at Lisbon.
A lone Italian FB is bombing Lisbon, image below shows the situation and potential interceptors. What to you wish to do?
{There are probably US interceptors as well, I forgot to look for those}




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2579
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/16/2017 11:09:30 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		I'll intercept with the RAF 6-strength Mosquito II fighter based two hexes south of Lisbon.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2580
Page:   <<   < prev  84 85 [86] 87 88   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  84 85 [86] 87 88   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.766