Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  86 87 [88] 89 90   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2017 11:29:39 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #3. Ground Strikes. 1 of 3.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2611
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2017 11:30:03 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #3. Ground Strikes. 2 of 3.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2612
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2017 11:31:20 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #3. Ground Strikes. 3 of 3.

The three allied ground strikes were a bust. That is, totally ineffective with the exception that a German fighter was downed (in ground strike #2).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2613
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2017 11:31:57 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #3. ETO.

Or what there is of it ...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2614
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2017 11:33:10 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #3. Naval Reorg.

The CW uses an empty Amph and TRS to reorganize one of their fighter.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2615
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2017 11:33:50 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #3. USSR.

Another blue factory railed Eastwards.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2616
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2017 11:34:28 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #3. The Soviet Eastern Front.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2617
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2017 11:35:12 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #3. The Soviet Asian Front.

Or what's left of it.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2618
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2017 11:36:45 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Axis #5. Weather.

Naturally. I guess it's too much to ask for snow or even blizzard in the Arctic and North Temperate during the Jan/Feb turn!

This could be a back breaker for the allies.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2619
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2017 4:16:20 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		JF43 i5:
Axis actions: Italy and Japan take combined arm actions and Germany takes a land action.
Italy moves a NAV to the 4-box of the E. Med
Italy moves a fleet from La Spezia carry a Germany Mar-div to the 4-box of the E. Med
Japan moves two fleets into the Sea of Japan. Two transports from the Korean peninsula and a mixed battleship and carrier fleet from Fukuoka. They are carrying a MAR, MIL and inf-div.

For the naval combat, I do not initiate in three areas. The E. Med will await the outcome in the Arabian Sea.
Arabian Sea the axis find on rolls of 2/10. Decide to engage only the 0-box with 13 surprise points.
Choose Naval Air combat and use surprise to move up 5 columns and 3 to select the target for the 2nd effect on the CW.
Next post images show the result. Royal Sovereign and the CP were sunk. The York was aborted.

The axis stay for round 2, will the Allies?






Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2620
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2017 4:17:04 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		2nd half of the naval combat images.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2621
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2017 12:36:21 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Yes, the CW stays.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2622
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2017 1:00:14 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Axis found in round 2 on rolls of 5/9. I avoid combat.
Where would you like the York to abort?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2623
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2017 1:02:30 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		With the Arabian Sea results, you are out of supply in the E. Med, so I will not initiate combat there. You can initiate combat if you wish. The image below shows what is in the sea zone.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2624
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2017 10:44:56 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Abort the York to the closet port still in supply.

The RN will NOT attempt to initiate in the East Med.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2625
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2017 11:10:39 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Abort the York to the closet port still in supply.
Sent it to Victoria (in the Seychelles). India would be in supply, but I am not sure it would have access to the oil needed to reorganize there.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2626
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2017 11:25:50 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		JF43 i1, 1 Ground Strike on Moscow with the ART. Decent results.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2627
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 12:35:23 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Getting ready for attacks.
One in Russia against an out of supply disorganized ARM (1 defense factor). Attacking with 20 factors so you adding air support does not make since 20:2 is still +20, but you can if you wish (bomber in Saratov). Also attacking Vlad again (moved two corp and a division ashore).
And I'm invading Cypress with a GE mar div. Currently Cypress is out of supply and the notional is 0. However, I got this screen asking about HQ Emergency supply for Wavell in Egypt (I have been answer no to this as a matter of practice, but here it may make a difference if it allows the CP to supply the notional). Do you want to use the Emergency supply (Wavell will be disorganized). If so, this is the first time I'd see HQ emergency supply used in a game I've played.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2628
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 12:45:35 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Well this may be a "forget it moment". Reading the rules I would think the notional could get supply this way, but I tried a sample case here and when I selected Wavell for HQ Emergency supply it would only give me the option of supplying the 1-4 mot-div and not the notional.

Do any of the experts know if this is correct?

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2629
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 11:22:04 AM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Well this may be a "forget it moment". Reading the rules I would think the notional could get supply this way, but I tried a sample case here and when I selected Wavell for HQ Emergency supply it would only give me the option of supplying the 1-4 mot-div and not the notional.

Do any of the experts know if this is correct?


RAW:

To trace a basic supply path overseas, the unit must be in a coastal hex
or trace the path via a port. (...)
From the coastal hex or port, you trace the supply path via any number
of consecutive sea areas to a friendly controlled port which is a supply
source itself or from which you can continue the supply path overland
to a supply source.

Since Wavell is in the desert to far from a port hex, he can't provide emergency supply to Cyprus.



_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2630
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 12:31:54 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

One in Russia against an out of supply disorganized ARM (1 defense factor). Attacking with 20 factors so you adding air support does not make since 20:2 is still +20, but you can if you wish (bomber in Saratov).
No ground support.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2631
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 6:07:34 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Since Wavell is in the desert to far from a port hex, he can't provide emergency supply to Cyprus.
Thanks Peter.

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 2632
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 7:19:06 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		JF43 i5:
Land Attack rolls were all below average. The worst was the Vlad attack, I did take the hex, but lost another two units (5 attackers lost over two impulses to take the city - I can just see Banzai charge after Banzai charge).
Other two attacks were complete successes because of the over whelming odds, not the brilliance of the die.

I moved the two subs in Vlad to Magadan along the Siberian coast. They could have gone south to some unoccupied allied territory, so feel free to move them via edit (note, they cannot be in Australia or India proper because of home country cooperation rules). The port would need to be within 6 movement range of Vlad.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2633
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 11:29:06 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #6. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2634
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 11:34:05 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #6. USN Naval Move 1/3.

The first of their three naval moves by the USN is to move a transport from the Reunion islands to the 1-box of the Arabian Sea. This puts the allied forces in the East Med back in supply (for now).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2635
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 11:37:22 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #6. The Arabian Sea. No Combat.

The USN will not attempt to initiate a naval combat in the Arabian Sea and since all Japanese forces there are disorganized the axis won't have the opportunity thus ending any potential naval combat there for this impulse.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2636
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 11:40:31 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #6. USN Naval Move 2/3.

The USN uses their second of three naval moves to move the BB's North Carolina and Washington from Pearl to the 3-box of the Marianas, joining up with the forces moved their last allied impulse.

The USN will attempt to initiate a naval combat in this sea area. Shown are the Japanese and USA planes that can react.

What are your instructions?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2637
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 11:41:33 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #6. USN Naval Move 3/3.

The USN uses their third and final naval move to send a raiding force from Pearl into the 2-box of the Bismark Sea.

The USN will attempt to initiate a naval combat in this sea area. Shown are the Japanese planes that can react.

What are your instructions?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2638
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 11:51:59 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #6. USN Naval Move 2/3.

The USN uses their second of three naval moves to move the BB's North Carolina and Washington from Pearl to the 3-box of the Marianas, joining up with the forces moved their last allied impulse.

The USN will attempt to initiate a naval combat in this sea area. Shown are the Japanese and USA planes that can react.

What are your instructions?
no reactions. Avoid combat if possible.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2639
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2017 11:54:05 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied #6. USN Naval Move 3/3.

The USN uses their third and final naval move to send a raiding force from Pearl into the 2-box of the Bismark Sea.

The USN will attempt to initiate a naval combat in this sea area. Shown are the Japanese planes that can react.

What are your instructions?

React out the A6M5 (9 range fighter) to the 2-box. Avoid combat if possible.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2640
Page:   <<   < prev  86 87 [88] 89 90   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  86 87 [88] 89 90   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.672