RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 7 8 [9] 10 11 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/13/2016 6:48:30 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Three attacks: lone division in mountains of central China; Warsaw; and Brussels.
At Brussels I am flying two bombers in support (one fighter can intercept) and I am providing HQ support.
You can fly the units below. I am off to bed now. Finish in the morning.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 241

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/13/2016 9:11:01 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Fly all planes and use artillery division for defensive ground support. Wellesley is lead bomber. Gladiator flies as fighter. German fighter first priority in air to air, with RAF objective of getting as many bombers through in air to air. Bombers will abort if not cleared, Gladiator fighter cover is shot down or aborted and German fighter still up.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/13/2016 9:14:38 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 242

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/13/2016 5:03:17 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Here is the result of the Brussels attack. Another great A-A roll, 3, for the allies. The Germans have lost three planes this turn. On the positive side, I took Brussels and Warsaw (next post).

Engineers are not meant to survive. Earlier, the Japanese lost their's in the first attack with it and here the Germans lost theirs in its first usage.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 243

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/13/2016 5:04:10 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Here are the other two attacks.
Rolled a 5 for end of turn, so it doesn't.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 7/13/2016 5:09:54 PM >

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 244

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/14/2016 12:30:15 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

ND39. Allied #11. Actions.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 245

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/14/2016 12:33:44 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

ND39. Allied #11. Nationalist Chinese. Land Combat.

So I see that Pat has a 1-4 IJA division in place to take Chihkiang if the Nationalist Chinese don't do something. And the only thing they can do is attack with a 3-2 infantry army at low, but positive odds. I really was hoping for an exchange but actual got a result that helps the 1-4 IJA division closer to their objective, which is the city of Chihkiang.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/14/2016 5:05:33 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 246

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/14/2016 12:34:29 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

ND39. Allied #11. China.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 247

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/14/2016 12:34:56 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

ND39. Allied #11. East Med.

Post movement, no combat.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/14/2016 12:38:21 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 248

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/14/2016 12:35:18 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

ND39. Allied #11. West Med.

Post movement, no combat.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/14/2016 12:38:33 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 249

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/14/2016 12:36:50 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

ND39. Allied #11. RAF Strategic Bombing.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 250

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/14/2016 12:37:18 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

ND39. Allied #11. Europe.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 251

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/14/2016 12:37:43 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

ND39. Allied #11. End of Turn.

The turn continues.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 252

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/14/2016 12:38:10 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

ND39. Axis #13. Weather.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 253

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/14/2016 5:48:31 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Here are the Axis actions. Company over tonight, so this is about all I can get through tonight.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 254

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/14/2016 8:58:18 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

No attacks in Europe, two in China. Chiang can support either one of them or none. Do you wish to support either (Yamato can support the Northern attack, but that has not been committed yet.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 255

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/14/2016 11:56:25 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

No attacks in Europe, two in China. Chiang can support either one of them or none. Do you wish to support either (Yamato can support the Northern attack, but that has not been committed yet.

No thank you. Chiang respectively declines to provide support to either attack. He has full confidence in his forces to turn away the Japanese attackers without any personal involvement on his part.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 256

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/15/2016 12:04:03 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

By the way, the lone division chooses the assault table and the stack northeast of Chiang chooses the blitz table.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/15/2016 12:07:34 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 257

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/15/2016 5:39:08 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Here are the attacks. Nothing can hurt good rolls :-)
Also, Japanese occupied the city (first attack), but it did not result in a entry draw - I forgot to copy the die roll and actually don't remember the number rolled.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 258

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/15/2016 5:42:33 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

The turn did end. No partisans were placed.

Fall Gelb turned into Fall nowhere, but it is going well enough in China. If I can get the initiative and move first, Chiang could be in personal trouble.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 259

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/15/2016 5:55:07 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Here are the map situations. Ethiopia is being threatened as is FR Somaliland (forgot to move the Eritrean once, or he would be one move away as well).

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 260

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/15/2016 6:01:00 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

RU markers choice. I cannot save the game at this point to send you the file (would be perfect, since the next choices are yours). I put both GE markers on the offensive side.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 261

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/15/2016 6:13:21 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Here are pools of interest. Chinese took a lot of losses and the Germans lost a 3 air units, though they saved a couple of pilots.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 262

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/15/2016 7:24:46 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

Heavy losses for China and Germany.

This is interesting... Keep it going guys

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 263

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/15/2016 11:08:01 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

RU markers choice. I cannot save the game at this point to send you the file (would be perfect, since the next choices are yours). I put both GE markers on the offensive side.

Put chit in the defensive pool.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 264

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/16/2016 1:48:02 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

The previous instructions for return to base remain, repeated here
All subs will return to base.
Baltic, Scharnhorst and CP (obvious) will stay at sea
W. Med fighter and Eugenio will stay at sea
E. Med, both CA will stay at sea

All German units return to Kiel and all Italians to La Spezia

For the prelimnary production, just ensure that all CP's remain at sea. I believe I should be able to alter oil use in the final production phase.

Post Return to Base, Active Convoys. Does not include USA and USSR CPs as they are still neutral.