RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 92 93 [94] 95 96 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/27/2017 11:07:15 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

No ground support.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2791

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/28/2017 12:09:46 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA43 i8 Land attacks.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2792

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/28/2017 12:10:30 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA43 i8 EOT roll - ended turn

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2793

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/28/2017 12:11:50 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA43 EOT Partisan. A partisan showed up in Poland. Resources in ZOC. Lodz was open, so I placed him there - denying the Germans the use of the red factory this turn. You may change that if you wish.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2794

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/28/2017 1:34:59 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

MA43 i8 Land attacks.

Pat, I have a question on the +14 land combat next to Leningrad. Why didn't you include the two Finnish units in the attack? Being snow weren't they able to attack across the frozen lake or do I have this wrong?

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/28/2017 1:36:47 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2795

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/28/2017 6:23:40 PM

Centuur

Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline

It's sea and not lake...

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2796

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/28/2017 10:58:58 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

It's sea and not lake...

Well that explains it. Thanks.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Centuur)

Post #: 2797

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/29/2017 1:02:57 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

End of Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Destroyed & Repair Pools.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2798

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/29/2017 9:38:20 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

End of Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. IJN Intercept Attempt. Arabian Sea.

The RN heavy cruiser Edinburgh moving at flank speed through the Arabian Sea easily avoids an IJN intercept attempt.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2799

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/29/2017 10:47:56 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Asleep at the helm again.

Axis oil usage for MA43. Japan has to stop being so active.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2800

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2017 12:00:03 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

End of Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied. Use Oil.

Only the US and CW had units that required oil to reorganize. The CW required 6 oil points, 3 of which they got from the USA. The USA required an additional 9 oil points, for a total of 12 used this turn. That's the bad news ...

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/30/2017 12:08:03 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2801

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2017 12:04:36 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

The good news is that the allied forces in and around Australia, the Solomons and the Coral Sea are back in supply, reorganized and ready to fight!

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/30/2017 12:08:22 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2802

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2017 7:24:40 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

No, No, No, You have good and bad news backwards. Heavy use of allied oil is good news and having allied units re-organized is bad news.

Axis Final Production numbers:
GE: 34 factories (miss the Lodz factory due to partisan activity) producing 51 BP. 7 oil saved for making 8 oil saved on the map.
IT: All 11 factories producing for 17 BP. Saved 2 oil for a total of 3 being saved on the map.
JP: All 22 factories are producing for a total of 33 BP. 1 additional oil saved bring the on map total to 1.

Euro axis oil situation is much improved and getting better. The Japanese no longer have to use oil to keep factories producing, but have spent their reserve on keeping the active fleet organized. Probably need better control of those admirals.

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 9/30/2017 7:25:52 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2803

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2017 5:53:11 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

No, No, No, You have good and bad news backwards. Heavy use of allied oil is good news and having allied units re-organized is bad news.

Axis Final Production numbers:
GE: 34 factories (miss the Lodz factory due to partisan activity) producing 51 BP. 7 oil saved for making 8 oil saved on the map.
IT: All 11 factories producing for 17 BP. Saved 2 oil for a total of 3 being saved on the map.
JP: All 22 factories are producing for a total of 33 BP. 1 additional oil saved bring the on map total to 1.

Euro axis oil situation is much improved and getting better. The Japanese no longer have to use oil to keep factories producing, but have spent their reserve on keeping the active fleet organized. Probably need better control of those admirals.

Axis production is staggering. Hitler, Mussolini and Tojo must be ecstatic. Wait, here's a picture of the three discussing how to split up the world with some other fellow in the background.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2804

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2017 6:09:38 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

End of Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Final Production. Allies.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2805

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2017 7:15:27 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA43 Axis Builds

Germany (51 BP)
4x pilots
4x FIG2
LND4
ARM
MTN
MOT
mot-div
2x inf-div
rep CA
sub-fu
sub-fd
8 saved BP (in Berlin if possible, Hamburg otherwise).

Italy (17 BP)
3x pilot
2x FIG2
LND4
CP
TERR

Japan (33 BP)
3x pilot
3x FIG2
NAV3
CVP2
3xCP
sub-fd
INF
inf-div
7 BP saved (Fukuoka and Osaka)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2806

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2017 8:15:39 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

MA43 Axis Builds

Germany (51 BP)
4x pilots
4x FIG2
LND4
ARM
MTN
MOT
mot-div
2x inf-div
rep CA
sub-fu
sub-fd
8 saved BP (in Berlin if possible, Hamburg otherwise).

Italy (17 BP)
3x pilot
2x FIG2
LND4
CP
TERR

Japan (33 BP)
3x pilot
3x FIG2
NAV3
CVP2
3xCP
sub-fd
INF
inf-div
7 BP saved (Fukuoka and Osaka)

End of Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Axis Production Pools.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/30/2017 8:17:22 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2807

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2017 8:21:20 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

End of Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied Production Pools.

Allied builds (Mar/Apr 1943).

CW (35 BPs): Inf HQ(5), Terr(3) x 2, FTR(3), CVP(0), LND(3), BB 2nd(3), TRS 2nd(4), CP(1) x 2, Mech Div(3), Pilot(2) x 3

France (0 BPs):

USA (62 BPs): O-chit(15), Sub 2nd(1) x 2, Amph 2nd(4), BB Repair(4), CW CA Repair(1), French CA Repair(1) x 3,
CP(1) x 2, Mech Div(3), Pilot(3) x 2

USSR (28 BPs): Mech(5), Inf(3) x 7, Mech(2)

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2808

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2017 8:24:05 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

End of Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Victory Totals.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2809

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2017 8:24:34 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

End of Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Global Maps.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2810

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2017 8:25:50 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

End of Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Surrender South Africa to Italy?

WTF? No, I'm not going to surrender South Africa to Italy!

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2811

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2017 8:27:56 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

End of Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Factory Destruction Phase.

Desperate times for the Soviets. A lone Soviet division holds the Gronzy oil wells (2 oil RP's) while elements of that division set half the oil wells (i.e., destroys 1 oil RP) on fire before the German's can capture them.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/30/2017 9:07:12 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2812

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/1/2017 4:58:06 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ43 German Reinforcements.
Note, there were no changes to allied or axis lending.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 10/1/2017 4:59:15 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2813

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/1/2017 4:59:59 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ43 Italian Reinforcements

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2814

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/1/2017 5:01:56 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ43 Japanese Reinforcements. (Note, on all three posts I edited the fly out boxes to only show reinforcement units, so there could be other units in the hex as well. I also only used the fly out boxes if there was more than one reinforcement in the hex)

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2815

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/1/2017 5:03:05 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ43 Initiative Rolls
Per directions that allies did not demand a re-roll and the axis decided to move first.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2816

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/1/2017 5:05:04 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ43 i1 weather roll. Axis decision to move first may pay off.
I will have to stop here tonight and may not get back to this till Monday evening. Need to think hard about what to do and whether it is time to use a GE offensive chit.