RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 93 94 [95] 96 97 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/4/2017 7:12:39 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ43 i1 N searches
started with E Med, but rolls of 8/7 resulted in nc.

In the SW Indian Ocean rolls of 3/6 resulted in the axis finding and destroying the CP.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2821

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/4/2017 7:13:36 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

In the SE Indian Ocean rolls of 1/8 resulted in the destruction of another CP.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2822

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/4/2017 7:16:56 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

No searches in the BoBengal (allies will not have an option). In the last 6 areas the allies have reaction possibilities.

For the Faroes Gap, BoB, and CSV I suggest you pull up the game file and look at your myriad of possible reactions. I have shown the current situation and indicated what I will be reacting out to each zone.

In the S. Asian area, I believe only the Buffalo can react and it has three choices.

Let me know what you would like to do in these areas.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2823

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/4/2017 11:34:52 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

US & CW Reactions.

1. Bay of Biscay. Portsmouth. RN Sunderland to 3-box. RAF Mosquito & Beau fighters to 2-box. Liverpool. RAF spitfire to 0-box. UK[51,24]. USAAF Lightening fighter to 0-box.

2. Faeores Gap. Scapa Flow. RN Swordfish to 0-box.

3. Cape St. Vincent. Cisneros. USAAF Tomahawk FTR and RN Albacore NAV to 1-box. Morocco[84,12]. RN Skua NAV to 0-box.

4. USAAF Buffalo fighter, Victoria, Seychelles. 0-box of West Indian Ocean.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2824

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/5/2017 12:48:00 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

W. Indian Ocean search rolls of 5/10 result in nc

In the Arabian Sea search rolls of 2/7 result in the sinking of the CW CA (missed the damage control roll image - it was a 2 on the X, never got to the D).

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2825

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/5/2017 12:49:52 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

In the Azanian Sea the search rolls of 1/3 resulted in the sinking of the CP

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2826

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/5/2017 12:52:31 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

In CSV rolls of 10/6 resulted in nc

In the Faeroes Gap rolls of 2/10 resulted in 1 CP sunk and 3 aborted in a surface naval action (not shown, I used 4 SP to select the combat type). I took the surface to avoid the 13 ASW factors. For the CW I decided to apply the D to the US CP and the 3 A to the CW CP. I assumed it would be easier to get the CW CP's back into the main theater from Liverpool.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 10/5/2017 12:53:24 AM >

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2827

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/5/2017 12:55:32 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

In the BoB search rolls of 2/5 resulted in the axis finding in round 1. I let it roll to Naval Air and used 2 SP to decrease the allied AA combat. But they rolled well and I applied the DX to the Italian NAV. At this point the Germans abort the A-A combat (not the zone).

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2828

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/5/2017 12:56:54 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Rnd 2 in the BoB rolls of 8/3, allowed the allies to find and sink the submarine. I choose sub combat, but Naval Air would have given me the same result.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2829

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/5/2017 12:58:48 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Round 3 search rolls of 2/4, both finding, made me concerned you may have been upset that I did not have you avoid combat in round 2, but the A-A rolls resulted in effectively ne, since the abort of the Nimrod (CW choice) still left it in the zone. After one round of air combat the allies aborted the A-A combat.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2830

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/5/2017 1:02:28 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

BoB round 4 rolls of 3/6 resulted in nc.

So, my count for the all naval combats is CW: 4xCP and CA sunk, 3xCP aborted. Italians: NAV shot down (pilot survived I believe), and submarine sunk. That is 7 BP lost for allies and 4 BP lost for the axis. Some disruption to supply lines in Asia (CW stuff in Calcutta is out of supply) and resource transportation in the FG.

I'll get back to this later tonight hopefully. Need to get dinner now.

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2831

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/5/2017 1:14:38 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

No rush. Out of the night.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2832

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/9/2017 3:19:31 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Took me longer than expected to get back to this.
4 Ground strikes (2 by artillery and interception was not possible on the two by planes). One was a complete bust, the others were very successful.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 10/9/2017 3:21:09 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2833

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/9/2017 3:22:40 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ43 i1 Land Attacks
Three land attacks. All went well. No air support was possible for the allies.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2834

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/10/2017 3:45:45 AM

Grotius

Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline

Very entertaining AAR, guys! Please keep the posts coming. :)

_____________________________

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2835

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 12:49:03 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Grotius

Very entertaining AAR, guys! Please keep the posts coming. :)

Thanks! I agree it's entertaining. Entertaining like watching a Muhammad Ali fight against an unranked contender and wondering which round this contender was going down. I'm the contender and we're almost 2 minutes into the 10th round. While it's not very pretty I vow to continue "fighting" until I'm KO'ed or until the referee calls it (TKO).

Does anybody know a good cut man?

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 10/11/2017 12:59:37 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Grotius)

Post #: 2836

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 1:17:27 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #2. Actions. Weather.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2837

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 1:47:11 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 23. Allied #2. IJN Wish to Intercept? West Indian Ocean.

A lone CW CP moves from Victoria into the West Indian Ocean.

Do the Japanese wish to attempt an intercept?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2838

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 2:03:13 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 23. Allied #2. Germany wish to Intercept? Bay of Biscay.

RN Amph carrying 6-5 mot and escorted by the Queen Elizabeth moves into the Bay of Biscay.

Does the Luftwaffe wish to attempt an intercept?

I'm not sure that it matters if they are successful but thought I'd better ask to be safe.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2839

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 2:08:20 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 23. Allied #2. Germany wish to Intercept(2)? Bay of Biscay(2).

Again, I'm not sure it matters but does Germany wish to attempt an intercept?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2840

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 2:19:33 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 23. Allied #2. Germany wish to Intercept(3)? Bay of Biscay(3).

I believe this one could matter. Do you wish to attempt to intercept?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2841

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 2:41:37 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 23. Allied #2. Germany wish to Intercept(4)? Bay of Biscay(4).

Attempt intercept?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2842

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 4:30:17 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Turn 23. Allied #2. IJN Wish to Intercept? West Indian Ocean.

A lone CW CP moves from Victoria into the West Indian Ocean.

Do the Japanese wish to attempt an intercept?

yes and commit the sub. Go after the CP, probably via sub combat with your surface units present. At least abort the CP before worrying about saving the sub with any extra SP.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2843

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 4:31:27 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Turn 23. Allied #2. Germany wish to Intercept? Bay of Biscay.

RN Amph carrying 6-5 mot and escorted by the Queen Elizabeth moves into the Bay of Biscay.

Does the Luftwaffe wish to attempt an intercept?

I'm not sure that it matters if they are successful but thought I'd better ask to be safe.

Not at this point.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2844

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 4:32:09 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Turn 23. Allied #2. Germany wish to Intercept(2)? Bay of Biscay(2).

Again, I'm not sure it matters but does Germany wish to attempt an intercept?

Not at this point.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2845

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 4:32:56 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Turn 23. Allied #2. Germany wish to Intercept(3)? Bay of Biscay(3).

I believe this one could matter. Do you wish to attempt to intercept?

No.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2846

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 4:33:38 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Turn 23. Allied #2. Germany wish to Intercept(4)? Bay of Biscay(4).

Attempt intercept?

No, go on through.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2847

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2017 1:34:22 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

Turn 23. Allied #2. IJN Wish to Intercept? West Indian Ocean.

A lone CW CP moves from Victoria into the West Indian Ocean.

Do the Japanese wish to attempt an intercept?

yes and commit the sub. Go after the CP, probably via sub combat with your surface units present. At least abort the CP before worrying about saving the sub with any extra SP.

Intercept attempt roll = 4. Attempt fails. The CP continues on to the Arabian sea, where you'll get another shot at him later this impulse.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2848

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2017 12:08:41 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #2. Post Allied Naval Moves. Contested Sea Areas.

There are 10 contested seas. In 3 of these areas (The Marianas, Bismarck Sea and South China Sea), the allies will attempt to initiate naval combat. In 5 of the remaining 7 (West Indian Ocean, Bay of Bengal, Arabian Sea, Cape St. Vincent and Bay of Biscay) the axis have the opportunity to initiate if they wish. In the remaining 2, the axis don't.

Contested Sea Areas. No Combat. Faeroes Gap and East Med.

The two contested sea areas where no naval combat will occur this impulse.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2849

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2017 12:10:38 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #2. Contested Sea Area. The Marianas.

The USN will attempt naval combat in this sea area. Shown are the planes from both sides that can react.

Instructions for the Marianas?