Do you play against the AI?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Do you play against the AI?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> Do you play against the AI?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Do you play against the AI? - 4/14/2003 9:08:41 PM

Gary Tatro

Posts: 1213
Joined: 2/1/2002
From: MA, US
Status: offline

Only in mega campaigns.

_____________________________

"Are you going to do something or just stand there and bleed"

Post #: 1

- 4/14/2003 10:15:43 PM

Irinami

Posts: 746
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Florida, USA
Status: offline

Yes, mostly.

Er... there's no option for that one. :(

_____________________________

Newbies!!
Wild Bill's Tanks at Munda Mini-Campaign. The training campaign for comb

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 2

- 4/15/2003 2:17:35 AM

rbrunsman

Posts: 1837
Joined: 1/31/2002
From: Phoenix, AZ
Status: offline

You "Exclusive AI" players should try PBEM if you haven't. I started PBEM about a year ago after years of solo play (since SP1)and I haven't gone back since (except MCs).

_____________________________

Everyone is a potential [PBEM] enemy, every place a potential [PBEM] battlefield. --Zensunni Wisdom

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 3

- 4/18/2003 8:48:12 AM

TheOverlord

Posts: 337
Joined: 11/13/2002
From: Connecticut
Status: offline

I get bored playing the AI. I cant get into an AI game like I do a pbem. Human opponents are much less predictable and smarter (usually;) ) which of course makes for a better game.

I will set up things to test them out, and even then usually just play against (with :eek: ) myself setting both sides to human control instead of letting the AI do it.

_____________________________

"Sometimes it is entirely appropriate to kill a fly with a sledge hammer. "
-Major Holdridge

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 4

- 4/18/2003 10:01:13 AM

Les_the_Sarge_9_1

Posts: 4392
Joined: 12/29/2000
Status: offline

I picked only in MCs because if I want a great game, I will play my MCs.

The scenarios are good, just the MCs are better.

And Battle mode, well that just don't do it against the AI. The AI just can't think well enough in Battle.

_____________________________

I LIKE that my life bothers them,
Why should I be the only one bothered by it eh.

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 5

Close to 33% play only against the AI... - 4/18/2003 10:41:51 AM

KG Erwin

Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline

...so this reinforces my belief that a competent computer opponent, at least for a third of us, is a main contributor to the lasting popularity of a given title. As far as SPWaW is concerned, the AI leaves a lot to be desired, but there are times when the AI's force-choosing routine works well, and I've been beaten up by it a few times. Of course this applies mainly to set-piece assault missions, as this AI is pretty weak in meeting engagements. I recently played a USMC amphibious assault in the 12th battle of a long campaign, and the Jap AI defenders deployed a cave/artillery position defense in depth that chewed up my men and my Shermans at an alarming rate. I have rarity set to "off" to give the AI a better range of choice, so decisive victories are not so easy to come by. Even after close to 4 years of playing SPWaW, I'm still learning, and I'm still getting surprises.

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 6

- 4/18/2003 3:54:44 PM

Karnaaj

Posts: 243
Joined: 3/17/2002
From: Spokane WA USA
Status: offline

I'm an AI'er, as I haven't gotten up the guts to actually ask someone to put up with my schedule for PBEM. (I tend to run in cycles - love that bipolar disorder - and sometimes go quite a while without playing *anything*. Don't want someone to get involved in obliterating me, and then have me disappear for a month or so...)

What I would *love* to see is an adaptive AI package -=something that game designers could leave a "hook" for it to be added as a third-party item, with lots and lots of options; of course, I'm a greedy bastard, and I want this kind of thing for everything from SPWAW to Starfleet Command to Halflife to...

Prob is that AI is just that: artificial. Automated "bots" for first-person shooters can seem awful smart when they're properly equipped with "route" files, telling them where to go and under what circumstances. (My experience has been mainly for Halflife mods: CounterStrike and Day of Defeat.) Send the bot in without that kind of data, and they can be awfully dumb - they don't have the analysis-of-data functions that humans do, and maybe won't figure out to jump over the fence or whatever. In SPWAW, waypointed AI attacks can be tough... but once past the waypointed stuff, or if there's none programmed, the AI tends to swarm the victory hexes by the shortest possible path, with some small excursion to chase after visible forces. (this can be seen quite blatantly in "Wittman's Gamble", where the majority of British tanks decide to park on the VH - like unto 18 various Cromwells and Fireflys; the ones with limited movement [by way of editing for scenario accuaracy, I expect] are the only ones not to join that particular rave.)

Ah well. Just my whine for the moment, I guess... if I ever get around to humans, it could get entertaining.

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 7

- 4/18/2003 5:49:26 PM

TheOverlord

Posts: 337
Joined: 11/13/2002
From: Connecticut
Status: offline

What the AI lacks is all those little tricks that real players use:
Where to drop smoke, dont charge the woods with your armor, get that tank to spin so you can get a side shot with your AT gun, send out a recon screen first to find the week spot......etc., etc. etc......

All the AI can do is pick a mixed force and then advance with it. It relies on greater numbers to be challenging rather than tactics.

It would be possible to code in the little tactics but there are so many possible ways of dealing with different situations and the considerations (how heavy is the enemy unit, what do I have in the area to deal with it? if there isnt anything in the area, can I afford to bring something from somewhere else to handle it? How heavy of a unit do I need to bring in to hit it etc. etc.)

It could be done but would be a huge effort to accomodate all the situations and to give the AI enough options to not make it too predictable.

Or they can just steal VikinNo2's brain and put it on line for the AI to access:D

_____________________________

"Sometimes it is entirely appropriate to kill a fly with a sledge hammer. "
-Major Holdridge

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 8

AI - Artificial Ignorance - 4/18/2003 8:32:40 PM

moore4807

Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline

I DO play AI almost exclusively and tweak the scales to compensate for the AI weaknesses.

My favorite tactic is to go to the HQ screen and change my armor forces and/or my infantry forces and make them AI too (in the HQ screen), this invariably causes much teeth gnashing as I usually have no idea where my damned AI is going (I dont waypoint them) except sqds dont stay with each other and usually get involved in a furball before I'm ready to support them... makes for interesting fights when you lose 1/3rd of your units 12 turns into the game.

I heartily agree that the AI tends to bunch up on VPs and doesnt perform even basic defensive tactics once they achieve thier objective...

nuff said about that... :)

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 9

- 4/18/2003 9:41:15 PM

Maliki

Posts: 2217
Joined: 12/25/2002
Status: offline

I voted yes,exclusively.Just started playing the game.

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 10

- 4/18/2003 9:54:57 PM

Gallo Rojo

Posts: 731
Joined: 10/26/2000
From: Argentina
Status: offline

ony in campaigns ... and have to be good campaigns.

_____________________________

The bayonet is a weapon with a worker on each end

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 11

- 4/19/2003 1:16:05 AM

peter hellman

Posts: 217
Joined: 7/29/2001
From: Finland
Status: offline

In campaigns(mega). Useful for testing things out, sometimes some scenario, if there's not enough PBEM turns for the day.

_____________________________

"If you want to live in peace, you have to prepare for war" - Adolf Ehrnrooth

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 12

And then there's ... AI vs AI :o - 4/21/2003 3:29:21 AM

Capt. Pixel

Posts: 1219
Joined: 10/15/2001
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

[QUOTE]Originally posted by TheOverlord
[B]I get bored playing the AI. I cant get into an AI game like I do a pbem. Human opponents are much less predictable and smarter (usually;) ) which of course makes for a better game.

I will set up things to test them out, and even then usually just play against (with :eek: ) myself setting both sides to human control instead of letting the AI do it. [/B][/QUOTE]

I'm pretty much the same type of player as TheOverlord. Except that I'll quite often set both sides to AI and see how the various forces work out against each other. It doesn't really give a great picture of how that next PBEM might go, but you can help you readily spot deficencies in your force selection (if you have any). ;)

Most of the scenarios and all of the campaigns (AFAIK) are only suitable to play against the AI. There are a handful of Scenarios that play well from both sides, but most PBEM opponents want to select their own units for mayhem, not play someone else's. No matter how historically accurate. :rolleyes: :cool:

_____________________________

"Always mystify, mislead, and surprise the enemy, if possible. "
- Stonewall Jackson

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 13

- 4/21/2003 3:13:57 PM

Frank W.

Posts: 1958
Joined: 10/18/2001
From: Siegen + Essen / W. Germany
Status: offline

play "russian steel" or "stalingrad" if u think the comp is no challenge....but with "normal" battles i don�t play AI anymore.
PBM is the way to go....i wish HoI could be played by mail, too.

but that is off topic....

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 14

- 4/21/2003 10:30:25 PM

WhiteRook

Posts: 276
Joined: 4/9/2002
From: Minneapolis, MN
Status: offline

AI only - its all I have time for! :)

_____________________________

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 15

- 4/23/2003 7:43:04 AM

Figmo

Posts: 556
Joined: 5/28/2000
From: Pennsylvania, USA
Status: offline

I play mostly against the AI. PBEM takes to long - I lose the flow of the battle. Now if I could find somebody that is on the same time table as me and wants to play on-line - I'd love it. Now to find 2 or 3 hours to do that in.

I even have it set up on 2 computers at home and play my son over the LAN - but he's still learning strategy.

Figmo

_____________________________

"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes ...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, f

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 16

- 4/23/2003 2:38:46 PM

Frank W.

Posts: 1958
Joined: 10/18/2001
From: Siegen + Essen / W. Germany
Status: offline

agreed. would be great to have a bunch of SPWAW players in your near area to do some H 2 H battles.

but i even don�t know ppl. who like wargames in general here :(

(in reply to Gary Tatro)

Post #: 17