Macclan5
Posts: 1065
Joined: 3/24/2016 From: Toronto Canada Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Korvar I'll add some historical context here with the disclaimer that WitPAE's algorithms care not one whit about history, although I have found the game tends to mirror history in a general sense, if not all its particulars. Rustysi made a good point about static doctrine because we are really discussing a 'moving target' here. Early in the war, defenses, both AAA and fighter CAPs, were insufficient to effectively defend against any type of even somewhat coordinated strike. 'Find first, kill first' prevailed. That's why it made more sense to separate CVs such that having one be discovered wasn't a guarantee that all of them were discovered. Sometime just before the Battle of the Philippine Sea the battle calculus flipped for the USN. Enough improvements had been made to the quality (Hellcats) and quantity (allocating additional fighters per carrier TF) of fighter CAP, as well as quantity, quality, and fire control of AAA, that concentrated CV TFs could effectively defend themselves and thus it was possible to nullify opposing strikes. Notice that nothing had changed for the IJN - the continued decimation of experienced naval aviators coupled with relatively much weaker AAA meant that it made more sense for the IJN to separate carriers. Yet IJN carrier doctrine had been written such that carriers were combined in order to maximize the size of coordinated strikes, so there was a strong doctrinal temptation for their commanders to keep their carriers together. A very interesting observation. I do not disagree with you; however I will question you out of lack of knowledge on my part. Underlying your statement is that Japan's doctrine didn't change..... But in the game format that WITP AE is as it is ~ and assuming that a Japan Player can: (1) Preserve the KB intact i.e. no Midway and (2) Can preserve trained fight pilot pools of greater depth than in actual history... .... does not the subpar IJN AA and subpar IJN Carrier CAP (quality) improve in late game ?? I have yet to play the IJN side (I intend to) and yet to play PBEM (I intend to) but I would hate to assume that a massed IJN TF in late war is weaker than it actually is ... much to my sorrow.
_____________________________
A People that values its privileges above it's principles will soon loose both. Dwight D Eisenhower.
|