Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: RA 7.9

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: RA 7.9 Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: RA 7.9 - 9/29/2017 3:47:32 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Bill: I have tried several times. Need some help from anyone on fixing this.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 691
RE: RA 7.9 - 9/29/2017 3:48:55 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Just got the plane upgrade paths straightened out.

Changed some of the production and research numbers better reflecting what we have been talking about.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 692
RE: RA 7.9 - 9/29/2017 4:09:59 AM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Bill: I have tried several times. Need some help from anyone on fixing this.



It is very easy to do, put a date of 4112 in the resize 1 box and an appropriate size,
24 for fighters, 18 for DBs and 12 for TBs.

I can do it in a few hours if you will send me the files.

My email if you want is Adm.Bill.Brown( at ) gmail (dot) com

Here is a picture




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by BillBrown -- 9/29/2017 4:14:52 AM >

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 693
RE: RA 7.9 - 9/29/2017 1:17:53 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		I have taken that out of the Japanese groups but could easily put it in with the Allies. Think I was confused by what you were asking! Feel a bit like a dolt at the moment now that you posted the screenshot.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 694
RE: RA 7.9 - 9/29/2017 1:31:25 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
Feel a bit like a dolt at the moment






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

If it ain't broke, don't fix it!

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 695
RE: RA 7.9 - 9/29/2017 4:49:23 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Thanks for the SUPPORT Lecivius!

NOT!!!



_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 696
RE: RA 7.9 - 9/29/2017 5:12:58 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown


quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

From the Sub Thread:

quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

So the USN get three that can resize and the IJN gets all of theirs?


No. You inferred. ALL pre-war US CV/CVL ships can: Lex, Sara, King's Mountain, Ely, Langley, Yorktown, Enterprise, Hornet, and Wasp. Make sense? The others come in and do their thing as per normal.


This still has not been done yet. Any chance it could get done this time?


DONE. This time FOR CERTAIN! All US Pre-War CVs and both CLV have this added to their squadrons.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 697
BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/1/2017 1:24:49 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		New files loaded and on the website for both Mods.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 698
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/1/2017 7:35:43 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		ETA on updated ART files??

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 699
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/1/2017 2:59:29 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Will work on that today!

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 700
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/1/2017 4:04:02 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

New files loaded and on the website for both Mods.



A6M5 still upgrades to the George in BtS Lite. In BtS it does not.

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 701
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/1/2017 4:22:34 PM   
InfiniteMonkey

 

Posts: 355
Joined: 9/16/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami

quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

New files loaded and on the website for both Mods.



A6M5 still upgrades to the George in BtS Lite. In BtS it does not.

John, if a comparison report between BTS and BTS Lite would be helpful, let me know. I can generate one pretty quickly. Just let me know what two scenario files you want compared (list link for each). I'll be gone to watch the game this afternoon, but I should be able to do that late this afternoon.

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 702
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/1/2017 5:29:08 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		Disregard... was half-asleep. Sorry for the spam.

< Message edited by Kitakami -- 10/1/2017 5:32:13 PM >

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 703
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/1/2017 9:50:48 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		So it ISN'T like that Kitakami?


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 704
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/2/2017 4:30:15 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Going to leave this open for a few days and then declare work done unless someone finds something.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 705
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/2/2017 12:31:46 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		ART files...ART files....ART files!!

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 706
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/2/2017 3:51:33 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
So it ISN'T like that Kitakami?


Oh, sorry. Yes, it IS like that. There is a difference between BtS and BtS Lite that you should take a look at. The other post I wrote without my brain being totally awake, and had to edit when I realized things were not quite how my brain had processed them.

Will take a deeper look once I get home. Had a wedding over the weekend.

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 707
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/2/2017 11:56:14 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Art Files have been uploaded to the site. They are on the art page and the BTS page listed as "New Art 4.0+"

This art includes Juan's Tosa and Adm Dadman's Ranger, Chichibu, and Chesapeake.

Thanks for the help fellas!


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 708
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/3/2017 1:51:36 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
Art Files have been uploaded to the site. They are on the art page and the BTS page listed as "New Art 4.0+"

This art includes Juan's Tosa and Adm Dadman's Ranger, Chichibu, and Chesapeake.

Thanks for the help fellas!


Having trouble with this. Copied them to the appropriate art folders (I think) but can't see them in-game, when I select those classes. Could someone else please check if they are visible?

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 709
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/3/2017 2:02:49 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		I have them, but not installed until tonight. I would open up the Editor (Ship Class tab) and double check to ensure the new ART has the correct bitmap for each of these new ships.

< Message edited by ny59giants -- 10/3/2017 2:03:22 PM >

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 710
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/3/2017 3:03:33 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

I have them, but not installed until tonight. I would open up the Editor (Ship Class tab) and double check to ensure the new ART has the correct bitmap for each of these new ships.


Ok... new art has numbers 409, 410, 840, 841 (Tosa & Chichibu); 705, 706, 840, 841 (Chesapeake & Ranger).

In the database, Kaga is assigned bitmap 409, Chichibu 840, Cheasapeake 700, and Ranger 840. Only Chesapeake seems to be wrong.

I can see Tosa (Kaga-class), Cheasapeake (although I am probably seeing the wrong image), and Ranger fine. I just can't see an image of Chichibu.

Hope this helps.



_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 711
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/3/2017 3:07:56 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		That is because I shifted them last night to allow for some doubles of the artwork. Since everyone did such nice work I wanted a 1941 piece of ship art and a later piece, reflecting changes, that shows the end configuration.

I keep updating the Mods as I work. Am now on 4.4 as I did the art work changes, worked aircraft research some, and re-arranged some shipping.

Michael or Kitakami: Can either of you take a look at Japanese starting engine production and see if things are good?


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 712
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/3/2017 3:48:41 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
<snip>
Michael or Kitakami: Can either of you take a look at Japanese starting engine production and see if things are good?


I don't see anything too far off. There will have to be expansion, of course, but that is to be expected. The Ha-32 and Ha-35 felt a bit high on the first pass, but after checking both starting production and research, they are not as unnecessarily high as I initially thought. Besides, drains to the Japanese economy tend to make for a good game :)


_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 713
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/3/2017 5:17:48 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Sadly true!

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 714
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/3/2017 7:39:00 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		I plan to wait out the rest of the week while people look around and make comments. If there is no crisis then we'll do the Operational RElease and both Mods. I'll then bring Treaty up-to-date and release it.

RA needs a complete re-tooling and Michael and I will need to do that.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 715
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/4/2017 5:34:39 AM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		(I'll add to this list if and when I find stuff)

1. There is no graphic for the A7M3.
2. I see no production nor replacement rate for the PV-1N Ventura night fighter. In fact, I see no squadrons flying it. Is that as intended?
3. Same with the PV-2 USN bomber.
4. The F6F-3N night fighter does NOT upgrade to the F6F-5N night fighter. Is that correct?
5. There is no graphic for the D4Y5.
6. There is no graphic for the B7A3.
7. There are no graphics for Tokachi and Kushiro.
8. Chichibu has 24!!!! ammo in one of its torpedo banks, and 2 ammo in one of its 25mm AAA batteries.
9. There is no graphic for the G3M4-Q.
10. There is no graphic for the G5M2/3.
11. There is no graphic for the G8N1/2.
12. The service rating for the P1Y1 is 4. Is that correct?
13. There is no graphic for the Yasukuni.
14. Nevada & Oklahoma have zero starting ammo in one of their .5 in AAMG banks.


< Message edited by Kitakami -- 10/4/2017 2:34:41 PM >

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 716
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/4/2017 1:28:59 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Point 7 is the only one I can jump on immediately.

The aircraft art issues shouldn't be. None of those planes SHOULD be missing art. Will check it out.

2-3-4 will be looked at.

Thanks!

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 717
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/4/2017 2:36:30 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		A few more added to the list.

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 718
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/4/2017 4:48:22 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Didn't we discussed the new experimental Japanese 'shotgun' torpedo launcher on Chichibu? One launcher with 24 reloads...BANZAI!

Before the cryers jump in---I shall fix that error ASAP.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 719
RE: BTS--BTSL 4.3 - 10/5/2017 8:37:51 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		OK. Went thru and corrected everything listed by Kitakami.

Does anyone have anything else?


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 720
Page:   <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: RA 7.9 Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.828