Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: String of Pearls Project

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: String of Pearls Project Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: String of Pearls Project - 2/27/2017 7:43:28 PM   
magi

 

Posts: 1529
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline 		Kevin has the forward base being created with the sea base assets ..... it will be able to handle STOL aircraft..... there are enough assets and munitions to complete the Alpha mission of destroying red-base and they're shipping… you will find some support aircraft at the Indian airbase.... However (I believe) it's very challenging as red have layers of defense… And the J 31s are very formidable .....

< Message edited by magi -- 2/27/2017 7:44:53 PM >

(in reply to MichaelJCuozzo)
Post #: 31
RE: String of Pearls Project - 2/27/2017 10:41:38 PM   
kevinkins


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		Additionally, testers, please comment on the sea base mechanics and establishment of the temporary A/F since they will play a big part in the rest of the String of Pearls scenarios if the sea base idea is well received.

Kevin

(in reply to magi)
Post #: 32
RE: String of Pearls Project - 3/9/2017 2:27:28 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		Although it's an economical approach of the (Maritime) Silk Road described in this article, it has important connection for Chinese strategy, and eventually, a potential security network along with its routes.

http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/47175/ssoar-2016-aaltola_et_al-US_and_Chinese_Silk_Road.pdf?sequence=1

For instance, the military logistics need affordable alternatives just as much as the cooperation with neighbors. If all the Silk Road are just as open as civilian trading network, you may expect the convenience for transport and deploying military assets as well.

Especially with some economic corridors nearby China's adversaries, the more alternatives to project military strengths, the more like the economic development could be antagonized as military threat too.

TLDR, should the land based trading routes adding into the String of Pearl Project?

< Message edited by Dysta -- 3/9/2017 2:32:42 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to kevinkins)
Post #: 33
RE: String of Pearls Project - 3/9/2017 1:00:57 PM   
stilesw


Posts: 1497
Joined: 6/26/2014
From: Hansville, WA, USA
Status: offline 		PDF document re "U.S. and Chinese Silk Road initiatives" placed in the reference library. Thanks for the article.

Anyone who would like access to the Dropbox library please PM me with your email address.

-Wayne

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 34
RE: String of Pearls Project - 3/14/2017 12:38:19 AM   
kevinkins


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

TLDR, should the land based trading routes adding into the String of Pearl Project?


Good idea. I just wonder how much "civilian traffic" would get in the way of military strikes. Of course weeding out the military from the civilian might be an interesting problem to solve.

Kevin

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 35
RE: String of Pearls Project - 3/19/2017 4:22:19 AM   
magi

 

Posts: 1529
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline 		Kevin.... i am posting v 2020b4.2 here where i fixed a couple of glitches...... no major changes...

Attachment (1)

(in reply to kevinkins)
Post #: 36
RE: String of Pearls Project - 3/21/2017 2:40:11 AM   
magi

 

Posts: 1529
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline 		here is v 2020b5 with latest command updates....

Attachment (1)

(in reply to magi)
Post #: 37
RE: String of Pearls Project - 6/2/2017 1:04:58 PM   
kevinkins


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		The scenario reside in the "ready" thread.

kevinkin & magi

(in reply to magi)
Post #: 38
RE: String of Pearls Project - 6/3/2017 12:43:03 PM   
jimmyblond

 

Posts: 22
Joined: 3/13/2015
Status: offline 		You have chosen the SV-22A Osprey to do the inital landings. This is the dedicated ASW version of the Osprey. Please use the CV-22A Osprey instead.

(in reply to kevinkins)
Post #: 39
RE: String of Pearls Project - 6/3/2017 1:27:30 PM   
kevinkins


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		Thanks. We will make the correction shortly. Do not swap them now as that might mess up the event coding. Please lets us know any additional thoughts as you conduct operations.

Kevin

(in reply to jimmyblond)
Post #: 40
RE: String of Pearls Project - 6/3/2017 8:46:58 PM   
mikkey


Posts: 3142
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Slovakia
Status: offline 		Nice scenario, thanks Kevin! I noticed one minor issue, that Counter and Supply counter are as a playable sides.

(in reply to kevinkins)
Post #: 41
RE: String of Pearls Project - 6/3/2017 9:45:08 PM   
kevinkins


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		Thanks for pointing that out. I never thought to close those sides down for play. This sim is as complex as the community is understanding of designers.

Kevin

(in reply to mikkey)
Post #: 42
RE: String of Pearls Project - 6/11/2017 4:18:19 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		Another PDF article about Belt and Road, this time it has mentioned can be served as a counter-encirclement, but still dismissive about its potential military purpose:

https://twq.elliott.gwu.edu/sites/twq.elliott.gwu.edu/files/downloads/TWQ_Spring2017_Rolland.pdf

_____________________________


(in reply to kevinkins)
Post #: 43
RE: String of Pearls Project - 6/11/2017 10:32:06 AM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline 		Sent a PM. God's eye is enabled in build B5.

Thanks this looks very interesting.

B

(in reply to kevinkins)
Post #: 44
RE: String of Pearls Project - 6/11/2017 12:30:54 PM   
kevinkins


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		Thanks a million for the PM and I will update the scenario based on the suggestions. For the life of me, I "know" I turned God's Eye off. This has happened a few times now on different scenarios. Maybe there could be a setting to warn folks as they save the file. Or it's just turned off by default.

Kevin

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 45
RE: String of Pearls Project - 6/11/2017 1:20:30 PM   
stilesw


Posts: 1497
Joined: 6/26/2014
From: Hansville, WA, USA
Status: offline 		Dysta,

Thanks for the “Belt and Road Initiative” article. I've added it to the unofficial CMANO Reference Library. Again, anyone who would like to access this DropBox library, pleas PM me with your email address.

-Wayne Stiles

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 46
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: String of Pearls Project Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.938