Ron Saueracker
Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002 From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece Status: offline
|
The English and French had some excellent ship naming practices, at least for their major capital ships. Names like Devastation, Terror, Monarch, Warspite, Illustrious, Victory, Swiftsure, Dreadnought, Revenge, La Fantastique, Heros, Vengeur, Terrible, Temeraire...the list goes on. Very inspirational. Japanese destroyers and aircraft carriers were named well too. Naming subs after fish makes sense. Ships named for famous warriors and leaders like the German practice for capital ships and American destroyers also has great merit. Commemorating famous battles should be a given. However, there is nothing more boring than naming ships after places. :rolleyes: Moreover, there is also nothing more annoying than not following a standard for ship classes. What were they thinking when the Yorktown class is named respectively after a Revolutionary battle, an endeavour, and a bug? Or the Seawolf class is named after a fish, a state, and a president who dabbled in nuclear physics? Have a plan...one that politicians can't frig around with! Worst name for a ship in your opinion? Mine is the Flower Class corvette HMS PINK!:eek: How would a German U Boat Commander say "Take a dink and stick it in the PINK", possibly something said as a torpedo is fired at the corvette.:D
_____________________________
Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
|