RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo)

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo)

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo)

Page: << < prev 6 7 [8] 9 10 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/11/2017 12:09:11 AM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

Very nice series of posts about units and training. I love that stuff!

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 211

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/11/2017 12:10:10 AM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

For 3 days, recon has been showing a buildup of fighters at Singapore. A large wing Nates of was upgraded recently to the Oscar IC. The mechanics finished work on the last of the planes last night, so, fresh from the factory, the first real action for the Oscar Ic. (There have been 12 in service in Malaysia previously and 12 in China, but the airframe has seen little action in either theater). About half of the pilots have been through the Topsy training program. The other half have not. They handled the new planes well. I was expecting a squadron of AVG, so it was nice for the Oscar to get its first action in against the Buffalos and get the IJA fighters into the war. The navy and the Zero has been carrying the action so far.

Morning Air attack on Singapore , at 50,84

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 47 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 16 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 41

Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 34

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 11 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
30 x Ki-43-Ic Oscar sweeping at 15000 feet

CAP engaged:
No.21 Sqn RAAF with Buffalo I (0 airborne, 9 on standby, 5 scrambling)
4 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 10000 and 20000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 23 minutes
No.243 Sqn RAF with Buffalo I (0 airborne, 8 on standby, 5 scrambling)
3 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 14000 and 20000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 20 minutes

< Message edited by Aurorus -- 4/11/2017 12:11:14 AM >

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 212

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/11/2017 12:17:50 AM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Very nice series of posts about units and training. I love that stuff!

It's tough to post a lot of behind-the-scenes information, since I told Bob he could read the AAR and contribute when he likes. When I think of something that does not give too away too much information and that may help a first-time Japanese player, I think it is a good idea. Try to help build up a base of players who understand the basics. I have learned a lot reading other people's AARs and from their advice, so when I do something unusual or different, I try to share it.

(in reply to Lowpe)

Post #: 213

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/11/2017 8:22:34 AM

821Bobo

Posts: 2311
Joined: 2/8/2011
From: Slovakia
Status: offline

quote:

For 3 days, recon has been showing a buildup of fighters at Singapore. A large wing Nates of was upgraded recently to the Oscar IC. The mechanics finished work on the last of the planes last night, so, fresh from the factory, the first real action for the Oscar Ic. (There have been 12 in service in Malaysia previously and 12 in China, but the airframe has seen little action in either theater). About half of the pilots have been through the Topsy training program. The other half have not. They handled the new planes well. I was expecting a squadron of AVG, so it was nice for the Oscar to get its first action in against the Buffalos and get the IJA fighters into the war. The navy and the Zero has been carrying the action so far.

Morning Air attack on Singapore , at 50,84

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 47 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 16 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 41

Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 34

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 11 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
30 x Ki-43-Ic Oscar sweeping at 15000 feet

CAP engaged:
No.21 Sqn RAAF with Buffalo I (0 airborne, 9 on standby, 5 scrambling)
4 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 10000 and 20000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 23 minutes
No.243 Sqn RAF with Buffalo I (0 airborne, 8 on standby, 5 scrambling)
3 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 14000 and 20000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 20 minutes

This was quite a disappointment for me. The sweep was not surprise, I've been expecting it. What I did not expect is the poor performance of my pilots. Especially if I consider the experience of all participating groups. IJA groups equipped with Nates are not the best groups if I recall, Brits and Aussies should be more than a match for them. If I have had lost the engagement with ratio 2:1 ok, but 11:2?

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 214

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/11/2017 10:44:36 AM

GetAssista

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurorus
Here is one of the most important units that Japan has: 5th Fleet. It is a Command HQ with naval support. The current admiral in charge of this unit is Boshiro. He is one of the best admirals in the Japanese navy. He will not remain in command of this unit after the fall of Bataan.

Note that he has poor Land skill, so not giving all bonus it can. It you plan to chnage him later, you can as well do it now, PP permitting ofc.
In general, unrestricted Command HQs are precious to Japan, as there are few in standard scenarios and you need HQ bonus everywhere.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurorus
They are training: general training. Why are some of the best fighter pilots in the IJA training on transport planes in Korea?

I like doing this, mostly with IJN fighter pilots honing their skill in FP groups. Though this is taking advantage of a loophole of pilots circumventing the penalties and not losing Xp when transfered through "Request veteran->Release pilot" to a different type airgroup. Also, training sweep on 100ft seems to train defence quicker than training other skills, so i prefer pilots with non-maxed-out Staf to do that instead.

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 215

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/11/2017 5:03:45 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurorus
Here is one of the most important units that Japan has: 5th Fleet. It is a Command HQ with naval support. The current admiral in charge of this unit is Boshiro. He is one of the best admirals in the Japanese navy. He will not remain in command of this unit after the fall of Bataan.

Note that he has poor Land skill, so not giving all bonus it can. It you plan to chnage him later, you can as well do it now, PP permitting ofc.
In general, unrestricted Command HQs are precious to Japan, as there are few in standard scenarios and you need HQ bonus everywhere.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurorus
They are training: general training. Why are some of the best fighter pilots in the IJA training on transport planes in Korea?

I like doing this, mostly with IJN fighter pilots honing their skill in FP groups. Though this is taking advantage of a loophole of pilots circumventing the penalties and not losing Xp when transfered through "Request veteran->Release pilot" to a different type airgroup. Also, training sweep on 100ft seems to train defence quicker than training other skills, so i prefer pilots with non-maxed-out Staf to do that instead.

Not sure that it is a loophole. Why would a pilot lose experience flying different types of airplanes? Seems to me that they would gain experience. I have a friend who is an amateur pilot, and he has flown everything from home-made biplanes to the large fire-fighting plane we have for emergencies here. He gains experience, by his own testimony, with each different type of plane that he flies.

They are general training at 1000 ft. Any low altitude, i.e. below 5000 ft., training seems to improve defense faster. General training often works as well or better than others, because at times, pilots will gain 2 skill ranks while general training, which offers 2 opportunities to increase defense. General training is not something that I normally do, since I have no control over the skill gains. Most fighter pilots train "air," then LNavB," and then "Straf." Getting 3 skills to 60+ is usually enough to get defense to 70. Later in the war, I will set up remedial training squadrons for those pilots who do not reach 70 def. in the traditional program. As pilots run short, I often pull precocious pilots from the "Straf" and "LNavB" training who have already reached 70 def. In fact, I value defense over even "air" and "experience."

As to Boshiro Hosagaya, believe it or not, he has a high "land" rating for an admiral. Tanaka is the exception with a 71 land rating, if I recall correctly. Most of the admirals are in the 30s, so his 41 "land" is among the best of the admirals. He has a high combined leadership and inspiration. The check to add the bonus is a leadership check, and the inspiration helps units recover: morale, fatigue, etc. Luzon is a malaria zone, and the idea is to take it quickly. It will take several attacks with large amounts of disruption et al to do so. That is why I spent the 30 PPs or so necessary to place him in temporary command of 5th fleet. The commander of 5th Fleet to start the war is dreadful, at everything, if I remember correctly.

(in reply to GetAssista)

Post #: 216

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/11/2017 5:05:13 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 821Bobo

quote:

For 3 days, recon has been showing a buildup of fighters at Singapore. A large wing Nates of was upgraded recently to the Oscar IC. The mechanics finished work on the last of the planes last night, so, fresh from the factory, the first real action for the Oscar Ic. (There have been 12 in service in Malaysia previously and 12 in China, but the airframe has seen little action in either theater). About half of the pilots have been through the Topsy training program. The other half have not. They handled the new planes well. I was expecting a squadron of AVG, so it was nice for the Oscar to get its first action in against the Buffalos and get the IJA fighters into the war. The navy and the Zero has been carrying the action so far.

Morning Air attack on Singapore , at 50,84

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 47 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 16 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 41

Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 34

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 11 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
30 x Ki-43-Ic Oscar sweeping at 15000 feet

CAP engaged:
No.21 Sqn RAAF with Buffalo I (0 airborne, 9 on standby, 5 scrambling)
4 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 10000 and 20000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 23 minutes
No.243 Sqn RAF with Buffalo I (0 airborne, 8 on standby, 5 scrambling)
3 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 14000 and 20000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 20 minutes

This was quite a disappointment for me. The sweep was not surprise, I've been expecting it. What I did not expect is the poor performance of my pilots. Especially if I consider the experience of all participating groups. IJA groups equipped with Nates are not the best groups if I recall, Brits and Aussies should be more than a match for them. If I have had lost the engagement with ratio 2:1 ok, but 11:2?

These were no Nates. These were the new Oscar IC. It is a good early war plane: essentially a Zero with less armament. They are under-gunned, but otherwise, better than anything the allies have in early 42.

(in reply to 821Bobo)

Post #: 217

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/11/2017 5:35:46 PM

821Bobo

Posts: 2311
Joined: 2/8/2011
From: Slovakia
Status: offline

quote:

These were no Nates. These were the new Oscar IC. It is a good early war plane: essentially a Zero with less armament. They are under-gunned, but otherwise, better than anything the allies have in early 42.

I know that were Oscars, but the Nate group pilots if I recall have exp around 60. The same as mine.

btw. I am biased against Japanese planes, they were all crap and I would rather be flying P-40 than Zero

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 218

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/11/2017 5:53:41 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 821Bobo

quote:

These were no Nates. These were the new Oscar IC. It is a good early war plane: essentially a Zero with less armament. They are under-gunned, but otherwise, better than anything the allies have in early 42.

I know that were Oscars, but the Nate group pilots if I recall have exp around 60. The same as mine.

btw. I am biased against Japanese planes, they were all crap and I would rather be flying P-40 than Zero

Jajaja... what was wrong with Japanese planes? They were better than allied planes in 1941, early 1942. U.S. and British aircraft research was very good and generally one step ahead of the Japanese throughout the war. The problem with the Japanese aviation research was that it was not focused. They tried many different things and as a result, they have a wide range of aircraft that are not very good. They also had an obsession with fuel economy in their engines, which the British and U.S. did not have. The British and U.S. were concerned with speed. These biases remain in Japanese and U.S. automobile manufacturing to this day. The problem for the Japanese was that "speed kills" as they learned, about 6 months too late, which is why their aircraft designs always arrive about 6 months after the comparable U.S. or British model. As the Japanese player in this game, you can offset this by emphasizing the faster fighter models: especially the Frank.

The Argentines have great respect for the automobiles and engines of two nations in particular: the U.S. and Japan. Though there are many Italian motocycles and French automobiles on the streets here, everyone wants a U.S. or Japanese car or motorcycle. Why? Because they are better.

< Message edited by Aurorus -- 4/11/2017 5:59:47 PM >

(in reply to 821Bobo)

Post #: 219

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/11/2017 6:56:49 PM

821Bobo

Posts: 2311
Joined: 2/8/2011
From: Slovakia
Status: offline

I am not an expert but the success of Japanese fighters in 41/42 was due to the:
1. really high exp pilots(especially the navy)
2. poor allied tactics in air

If we take P-40 and Zero then Zero had better only climb rate(important) and horizontal turn on low speeds(less important or I would even say useless). P-40 had better max speed, far better never exceed speed(if needed you could disengage and Zero or actually any Japanese plane could not follow you) and far better roll rate(most important for advanced flying/acrobatics). Unless you have been surprised by Zero, especially low and slow(which means you have made something really wrong), your chances to survive/win are good.

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 220

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/12/2017 4:06:35 AM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

Jan. 13th

A U.S. sub finds a cargo ship and scores a hit.

Submarine attack near Shimonoseki at 104,56

Japanese Ships
xAK Hirota Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Seawolf

xAK Hirota Maru is sighted by SS Seawolf
SS Seawolf launches 2 torpedoes at xAK Hirota Maru

In the DEI, Japanese ASW continues to perform admirably.

ASW attack near Donggala at 69,96

Japanese Ships
DD Shigure
CS Mizuho
DD Kawakaze
DD Yamakaze

Allied Ships
SS KVII, hits 2

SS KVII launches 2 torpedoes at DD Shigure
DD Kawakaze fails to find sub and abandons search
DD Yamakaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Yamakaze attacking submerged sub ....
DD Yamakaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Yamakaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Yamakaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

(in reply to 821Bobo)

Post #: 221

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/12/2017 4:09:16 AM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

The air raids on my units in Oosthaven continue to cause problems. I decided to begin taking the initiative in the theater with a fighter sweep of Batavia, which nets a few Buffalos and Dutch fighters

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Batavia , at 49,98

Weather in hex: Thunderstorms

Raid spotted at 30 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 18

Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 7
B-339D x 7

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 2 destroyed
B-339D: 1 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x A6M2 Zero sweeping at 15000 feet

Meanwhile, the 4th Inf. Reg. takes another beating from the Dutch, who fly despite poor weather.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Yokosuka 2nd SNLF, at 48,96 (Oosthaven)

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 8,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Allied aircraft
139WH-3 x 9
B-339D x 12

No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
58 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x 139WH-3 bombing from 4000 feet
Ground Attack: 3 x 300 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Yokosuka 2nd SNLF, at 48,96 (Oosthaven)

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 12 NM, estimated altitude 8,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Allied aircraft
139WH-3 x 8

No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
33 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
8 x 139WH-3 bombing from 4000 feet
Ground Attack: 3 x 300 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 4th Ind.Mixed Regiment, at 48,96 (Oosthaven)

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 7,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Allied aircraft
139WH-3 x 9

No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
26 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x 139WH-3 bombing from 4000 feet
Ground Attack: 3 x 300 kg GP Bomb

< Message edited by Aurorus -- 4/12/2017 4:15:03 AM >

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 222

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/12/2017 4:12:27 AM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

At Singapore, Sallies follow up the sweep of yesterday by bombing the damaged Buffalos on the airfield. The heavy flak causes more damage to the Sallies than the Sallies inflict on the Buffalos, but the airfield damage will keep the engineers there busy for a few more days. They have had 2 or 3 days without damage to the airfield to work on fortifications while I waited for the Oscars to repair and sweep the base, so I could not allow the work to continue for much longer.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Singapore , at 50,84

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 39 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 52
Ki-43-Ia Oscar x 19
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 30

Allied aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 12 damaged
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 2 destroyed by flak

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 2 damaged
Buffalo I: 1 destroyed on ground

Airbase hits 9
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 26

Aircraft Attacking:
26 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 12000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
25 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 12000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

Morning Air attack on Singapore , at 50,84

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 33 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 27

Allied aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 18 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 3 damaged

Allied ground losses:
14 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Airbase hits 4
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 15

Aircraft Attacking:
27 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 12000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Singapore , at 50,84

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid spotted at 38 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 31

Allied aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 16 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 2 damaged

Allied ground losses:
7 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Airbase hits 9
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 17

Aircraft Attacking:
31 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 12000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 223

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/12/2017 4:19:08 AM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

CV-based Kates and Nells from Manado fly over Ambon once again, and the 146th goes over the top for a second consecutive day. The base falls, surprising me.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Ambon (76,109)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3816 troops, 32 guns, 17 vehicles, Assault Value = 146

Defending force 2969 troops, 42 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 90

Japanese adjusted assault: 112

Allied adjusted defense: 55

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Ambon !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
200 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 18 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Allied ground losses:
3147 casualties reported
Squads: 60 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 202 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 23 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 37 (37 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 4

Assaulting units:
146th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
Molukken Garrison Battalion
Gull Battalion
4th Coastal Gun Battalion
Ambon Base Force

Splendid job by the 146th and really a fortunate die roll. Notice the odds. I achieved the 2:1 by 2 AV. I had a SNLF prepping and was certain that I would need to reinforce the 146th. I did not expect to see the Australians there, since I noticed nothing coming or going from the port, but in this case, fortune favored the unprepared.

< Message edited by Aurorus -- 4/12/2017 4:20:40 AM >

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 224

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/12/2017 4:26:19 AM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

Over China, a battle has been brewing for a few days at Nanyang. Today, the Oscars found a squadron of AVG on LRCAP over Nanyang with a fighter sweep that came in ahead of the bombers. The Oscars performed well.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 92nd Chinese Corps, at 85,45 (Nanyang)

Weather in hex: Thunderstorms

Raid spotted at 28 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 10

Allied aircraft
H81-A3 x 9

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
H81-A3: 2 destroyed

CAP engaged:
AVG/2nd Sqn with H81-A3 (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 9 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 15000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 15000.
Raid is overhead

The IJA starts the game with about 65 pilot of 70 exp. or a little better. These pilots all go into Oscars, and in some cases, the Topsy training program as quickly as possible. Here are the pilots of the 10 Chutai who got the best of AVG in this engagement.

Notice the defense. All but 1 has defense above 70. The lone 61 exp. pilot is a throw-in to give the squadron an extra pilot. He is the 13th man in a 12 plane squadron. The majority of these pilot were hand-selected for their defense, because I expected an engagement with AVG when assembling this group.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Aurorus -- 4/12/2017 4:46:07 AM >

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 225

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/12/2017 4:36:31 AM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

Ground Support by Sallies and Sonias followed the sweep, and a shock attack was ordered. This time the dice were against the Japanese, and the attack came off poorly with heavy casualties on the Japanese side. A deliberate attack would have been much better.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Nanyang (85,45)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 34253 troops, 274 guns, 61 vehicles, Assault Value = 1211

Defending force 27788 troops, 114 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 937

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 2

Japanese adjusted assault: 936

Allied adjusted defense: 318

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
4687 casualties reported
Squads: 12 destroyed, 417 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 35 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Guns lost 25 (2 destroyed, 23 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
2613 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 186 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 53 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled
Guns lost 15 (1 destroyed, 14 disabled)

Assaulting units:
14th Ind.Mixed Brigade
3rd Division
1st Ind.Mixed Brigade
15th Tank Regiment
13th Ind.Mixed Brigade
58th Infantry Regiment
1st Army
51st Road Const Co

Defending units:
90th Chinese Corps
41st Chinese Corps
92nd Chinese Corps
5th War Area
22nd Group Army

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 226

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/12/2017 4:42:30 AM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

In other war news, the Japanese took Tarawa. This seemed a step too far in the first few days with U.S. CVs so close, so the attack was postponed and the amphibious group rerouted to Nauru island. Despite the heavy bombing and disruption, the 4th Inf. Reg., reinforced by the Yokosuki 2nd SNLF were able to take Oosthaven, and in North China, things went a little better for the Japanese who were able to inflict some losses on the Chinese corps that has been trying to escape isolation for a couple weeks.

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 227

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/12/2017 4:50:58 AM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

Jan. 14th

A relatively quiet day after all of the action on the 13th. Bombing continued at Nanyang and the Sallies flew over Singapore again. The assembly of flak there is very impressive.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Singapore , at 50,84

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 15,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 48
Ki-43-Ia Oscar x 19

Allied aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 22 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 1 damaged

Allied ground losses:
13 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Airbase hits 5
Runway hits 13

Aircraft Attacking:
24 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 12000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
24 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 12000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 228

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/12/2017 11:07:22 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

Jan. 16th.

A strange day and a strange encounter in the South Pacific. I sent out some AMCs to patrol allied shipping lanes, hoping to catch some lightly escorted troop ships heading west. Indeed, I did find some troop ships and the BB Warspite. The armor on the AMCs proved sufficient as the BB shells only came through one side and did not completely pierce the ship. The good news is the the ocean quickly doused the flames on the Kinryu Maru. These are not AndyMac AMCs.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Time Surface Combat, near Ta'u at 154,160, Range 15,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
AMC Kinryu Maru, Shell hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
AMC Kongo Maru, Shell hits 1

Allied Ships
BB Warspite
AP Hugh L. Scott
AP Crescent City, Shell hits 3, heavy fires
AK Bellatrix
AK Betelgeuse, Shell hits 2
AK Arcturus, Shell hits 1, on fire
xAK Henry S Grove

Allied ground losses:
61 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 19 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Reduced visibility due to Rain
Maximum visibility in Rain: 15,000 yards
Range closes to 21,000 yards...
Range closes to 19,000 yards...
Range closes to 17,000 yards...
Range closes to 15,000 yards...
CONTACT: Japanese lookouts spot Allied task force at 15,000 yards
CONTACT: Allied lookouts spot Japanese task force at 15,000 yards
Range closes to 12,000 yards
AMC Kongo Maru engages AP Crescent City at 12,000 yards
AMC Kinryu Maru engages AP Crescent City at 12,000 yards
AMC Kinryu Maru engages AP Hugh L. Scott at 12,000 yards
AMC Kinryu Maru engages AK Betelgeuse at 12,000 yards
Range closes to 9,000 yards
AMC Kinryu Maru engages AP Crescent City at 9,000 yards
Range closes to 8,000 yards
AMC Kongo Maru engages AP Crescent City at 8,000 yards
AMC Kinryu Maru engages AK Betelgeuse at 8,000 yards
Range increases to 12,000 yards
AMC Kinryu Maru engages AP Crescent City at 12,000 yards
AMC Kinryu Maru engages AK Arcturus at 12,000 yards
AMC Kinryu Maru engages AK Betelgeuse at 12,000 yards
Range increases to 17,000 yards
BB Warspite engages AMC Kongo Maru at 17,000 yards
AMC Kinryu Maru engages AK Arcturus at 17,000 yards
Range increases to 19,000 yards
BB Warspite engages AMC Kinryu Maru at 19,000 yards
AMC Kinryu Maru engages AK Betelgeuse at 19,000 yards
Range increases to 23,000 yards
BB Warspite engages AMC Kinryu Maru at 23,000 yards
Hagisu, S. orders Japanese TF to disengage
Range increases to 30,000 yards
Task forces break off...

It has been a hard war for Japanese AMCs.

< Message edited by Aurorus -- 4/12/2017 11:09:23 PM >

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 229

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/12/2017 11:13:23 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

A lot of submarine action around the Pacific. Allied ASW scores near Sidney.

ASW attack near Newcastle at 94,169

Japanese Ships
SS I-23, hits 1

Allied Ships
DD Whipple
DD Stewart

Japanese ASW scores at Tarawa.

ASW attack near Tarawa at 136,128

Japanese Ships
xAP Hie Maru
DD Yunagi
DD Asanagi

Allied Ships
SS Trout, hits 4

SS Trout is sighted by escort
Trout bottoming out ....
DD Yunagi fails to find sub and abandons search
DD Asanagi fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Asanagi fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Asanagi fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Asanagi attacking submerged sub ....
DD Asanagi fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Asanagi fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

Near Truk, the subs win one.

ASW attack near Truk at 112,109

Japanese Ships
DD Kagero, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage
DD Tokitsukaze

Allied Ships
SS Tautog

SS Tautog launches 4 torpedoes at DD Kagero
Tautog diving deep ....
DD Tokitsukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tokitsukaze attacking submerged sub ....
DD Tokitsukaze is out of ASW ammo
DD Tokitsukaze is out of ASW ammo
DD Tokitsukaze is out of ASW ammo
DD Tokitsukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tokitsukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tokitsukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 230

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/13/2017 7:28:21 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

Jan. 17, 1942

A slow day in the war. The night action started off with this gem: a hit, but alas the torpedo was a dud.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 17, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submarine attack near Channel Islands at 216,88

Japanese Ships
SS I-2

Allied Ships
xAP Rangitiki

xAP Rangitiki is sighted by SS I-2
SS I-2 launches 2 torpedoes at xAP Rangitiki

I was just thinking about repositioning my Pacific subs a bit, since they have not found many troop ships.

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 231

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/13/2017 7:30:53 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

Lillies from Tarakan and CV-based Kates fly ground support for the river crossing from Samarinda to Balikpapan, and the base falls.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Balikpapan (64,97)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 2652 troops, 27 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 100

Defending force 1395 troops, 47 guns, 3 vehicles, Assault Value = 31

Japanese adjusted assault: 28

Allied adjusted defense: 3

Japanese assault odds: 9 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Balikpapan !!!

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
139WH-3: 1 destroyed
OS2U-3 Kingfisher: 2 destroyed

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), disruption(-), preparation(-), morale(-)
experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
86 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
950 casualties reported
Squads: 21 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 149 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 13 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 33 (31 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Vehicles lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 2
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
Miura Det
Yokosuka 4th SNLF

Defending units:
VI KNIL Battalion
Balikpapan Base Force
Samarinda Base Force

20 oil total damaged at Samarinda and Balikpapan. 12 was damaged at Brunei, so the total thus far is 32 damaged oil: not too bad. Java is still to go.

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 232

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/13/2017 7:34:02 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

On Mindanao, the 110th PI division, which had retreated from Zamboanga turned up at Oroquieta and was destroyed. The base force from Zamboanga is the only allied unit remain ing on Mindanao.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Oroquieta (78,88)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 2578 troops, 32 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 78

Defending force 295 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 13

Japanese adjusted assault: 140

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 140 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Oroquieta !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), fatigue(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Allied ground losses:
380 casualties reported
Squads: 26 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 17 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
Kimura Det

Defending units:
101st PA Infantry Division

Panay (Iloilu) was cleared of allied units 3 weeks ago, so 2 of the larger Phillipine islands are entirely in Japanese hands.

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 233

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/13/2017 8:06:59 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

I reviewed the entire Japanese order of battle for their air force last night in PDU:off, including reinforcements. In PDU:off, there are surprisingly few Tojo units. 2 at-start squadrons upgrade to the Tojo IIc, and 2 to the Tojo IIA. There is little or no reason, that I can see, to research Tojo beyond the one 30 factory that I have set up to begin producing Tojos when the IIa arrives. There are a surprising number of Tony units, and several squadrons must go to the Tony 1D before going to the Frank. If I research any fighter other than Oscars and Franks, Tony does seem to be a good choice. I have one 30 factory repairing on Tony 1As, but I may set up 2 or 3 more. I will probably want about 45 Tonies in production regardless of research, so at least 2 30-factories seems to be an efficient use of supply. The decision is really between placing more into Tony, more into Frank, or get some factories started repairing now on a very late-war model, the KI-94. I do not have as much supply on Honshu as most Japanese players at this point because I moved so much to forward areas, so the expansion of many of the later war research and production factories has been delayed.

I am pursuing the Oscar line and the A6 line with six 30-factories in each. The A6 factories are all set to the Rufe and about 50% repaired. The Oscar factories are at about 5 out of 30 repaired. I will move down the line for each plane systematically, one step at a time, and will not jump directly to A6M5cs or M8s, since in PDU:off each squadron must go through each upgrade in turn. I may halt Oscar R&D at the Oscar IIIa, since many squadrons jump directly from this to the Frank. The Oscar R&D factories probably will then be converted over to the KI-94 after I have the IIIa. I have three 30-factories on Judy and 2 on Jill. I am mostly concerned with accelerating these airframes just enough to get them online for the incoming CVL squadrons, because the CVLs have also been accelerated. Once the Shoho is in play, naval points should be sufficient to accelerate the Shinano (Yes, I not only build the Shinano, I accelerate it). I will say nothing of my plans for the Yamato-class BBs.

I have two 30 factories repairing on the Nick nightfighter, one 30 factory on the Zero nightfighter, and one 30 factory on the Dinah nightfighter. At present, I have 5 factories working on Frank. The question on Frank really is what will my production be in 1944 per month on the Frank, since in PDU:off Japan will be putting over 1,000 Franks in the air at some point. For those who have experience playing Japan in a PBEM in PDU:off, what should I expect for Frank production in 1944? 180, which is where I am at right now, seems about right, but maybe a little more? 210 or even 270 does not seem unreasonable.

I have one 30 factory working on the NIK and have not bothered at all with Jack research, since nothing upgrades to it. It does not seem that I will ever need to produce more than 20 Jacks in a month. Three 30 factories are set to A7M2, and all of the Zero factories will convert to that model once the M8 is available.

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 234

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/14/2017 6:04:05 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

Jan. 18th

75 Betties, 30 Sallies, 25 Anns, and 15 Sonias bomb Bataan under light clouds as the Japanese move into position to assault the allies there. The bombing does not prevent the heavy guns from Bataan from taking a toll on the Japanese ground forces.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Bataan (78,77)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2419 troops, 170 guns, 80 vehicles, Assault Value = 482

Defending force 74699 troops, 881 guns, 997 vehicles, Assault Value = 2419

Japanese ground losses:
418 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 29 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled

Allied ground losses:
40 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 9 (4 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Assaulting units:
31st PA Infantry Division
31st Infantry Regiment
57th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
14th PS Engineer Regiment
21st PA Infantry Division
45th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
194th Tank Battalion
4th PA Constabulary Regiment
4th Marine Regiment
26th PS Cavalry Regiment
91st PA Infantry Division
2nd PA Constblry HW Regiment
803rd Engineer Aviation Battalion
88th PS Field Artillery Regiment
USAFFE
Clark Field USAAF Base Force
Subic Bay Defenses
Manila Bay Defenses
301st Construction Battalion
202nd PA Construction Battalion
1st USMC AA Battalion
Bataan USN Base Force
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
I Philippine Corps
Far East USAAF
201st PA Construction Battalion
Provisional GMC Grp

Defending units:
3rd Ind. Engineer Regiment
8th Tank Regiment
4th Division
113th Infantry Regiment
21st Ind. Engineer Regiment
33rd Division
4th Infantry Regiment
21st Division
38th Division
1st Formosa Inf. Regiment
4th Tank Regiment
2nd Tank Regiment
7th Tank Regiment
56th Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Mortar Battalion
48th Field Artillery Regiment
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
Botanko Hvy Gun Regiment
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
14th Army
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
1st Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
17th Medium Field Artillery Regiment

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 235

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/14/2017 9:18:01 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

Jan. 19th

The Betties, Sallies, and Sonias were assigned to fly over Bataan again today, but failed to do so. One of several failures to perform at Luzon, so the ground troops launched an unsupported attack at Bataan. They managed to inflict even casualties in the assault despite the lack of support from their air corps and navy.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Bataan (78,77)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 71897 troops, 881 guns, 920 vehicles, Assault Value = 2410

Defending force 23702 troops, 416 guns, 360 vehicles, Assault Value = 492

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 1322

Allied adjusted defense: 569

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1747 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 168 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 31 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 32 disabled
Guns lost 15 (1 destroyed, 14 disabled)
Vehicles lost 36 (6 destroyed, 30 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
3388 casualties reported
Squads: 159 destroyed, 93 disabled
Non Combat: 113 destroyed, 110 disabled
Engineers: 23 destroyed, 35 disabled
Guns lost 69 (43 destroyed, 26 disabled)
Vehicles lost 36 (4 destroyed, 32 disabled)

Assaulting units:
4th Tank Regiment
4th Infantry Regiment
21st Division
113th Infantry Regiment
2nd Tank Regiment
4th Division
1st Formosa Inf. Regiment
21st Ind. Engineer Regiment
38th Division
8th Tank Regiment
3rd Ind. Engineer Regiment
33rd Division
7th Tank Regiment
56th Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Mortar Battalion
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
Botanko Hvy Gun Regiment
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
48th Field Artillery Regiment
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
14th Army
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
2nd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
1st Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
17th Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
91st PA Infantry Division
31st PA Infantry Division
14th PS Engineer Regiment
21st PA Infantry Division
4th Marine Regiment
4th PA Constabulary Regiment
31st Infantry Regiment
57th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
194th Tank Battalion
26th PS Cavalry Regiment
45th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
2nd PA Constblry HW Regiment
201st PA Construction Battalion
Subic Bay Defenses
Bataan USN Base Force
88th PS Field Artillery Regiment
202nd PA Construction Battalion
301st Construction Battalion
Clark Field USAAF Base Force
Manila Bay Defenses
I Philippine Corps
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
USAFFE
Far East USAAF
803rd Engineer Aviation Battalion
1st USMC AA Battalion
Provisional GMC Grp

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 236

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/14/2017 9:20:09 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

After days of intensive bombing from Sallies, the position at Nanyang has been reduced to the point where I felt that a second attack was warranted. This time, I should have used a shock attack, as the stronger Chinese units withdrew and what remained was in poor condition to fight.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Nanyang (85,45)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 27962 troops, 235 guns, 93 vehicles, Assault Value = 938

Defending force 22957 troops, 111 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 582

Japanese adjusted assault: 1553

Allied adjusted defense: 139

Japanese assault odds: 11 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Nanyang !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), disruption(-), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
315 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 31 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 6 (2 destroyed, 4 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
8127 casualties reported
Squads: 430 destroyed, 62 disabled
Non Combat: 437 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 74 destroyed, 7 disabled
Guns lost 23 (18 destroyed, 5 disabled)
Units retreated 4

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
9th Armored Car Co
1st Ind.Mixed Brigade
15th Tank Regiment
13th Ind.Mixed Brigade
3rd Division
58th Infantry Regiment
1st Army
51st Road Const Co

Defending units:
41st Chinese Corps
90th Chinese Corps
92nd Chinese Corps
22nd Group Army

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 237

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/14/2017 9:23:23 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

It is now Jan. 19th, nine days after the initial attack on Clark Field, and one week after the broken units from that assault have arrived in Manila to regroup, so I thought that we would revisit our old friends: the 2nd Formosa Infantry Brigade and the 48th Engineer to see how they have fared in the past week. Here is the 2nd Formosa Infantry Regiment. It's experience has taken a major blow, but it is now up to 61 able squads of infantry, with all support and the HMGs back online: quite the recovery in one week.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Aurorus -- 4/14/2017 9:25:01 PM >

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 238

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/14/2017 9:27:07 PM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

Here are Goto's engineers. They had 2 undisabled squads after the initial attack on Clark Field. In the last post, from 8 days ago, they had 6. Here they are 8 days later. Goto has done a fine job reorganizing this unit. They are up to 38 able squads... so they have recovered at 4 squads per day, or about 8% of unit strength each day.

There are major advantages to having a network of interlocking bases with 20K supply and placing good administrative officers in charge of broken units. Iba, Clark, Manila, and Batangas all have 20K+ supply. I made a mistake in landing engineers and did not include engineers to upgrade San Fernando. Otherwise I would have 5 bases ready to store more than 20K supply without spoilage. Engineers are currently at work on San Fernando, and there should be 5 bases ready to serve the unit from Bataan. There is almost 200K total supply on Luzon at the moment, so there will be plenty for all the units to draw replacements and to regroup after Bataan, while still maintaining 4 or 5 bases at 20K+.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Aurorus -- 4/14/2017 9:34:37 PM >

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 239

RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo) - 4/15/2017 3:50:36 AM

Aurorus

Posts: 1314
Joined: 5/26/2014
Status: offline

Jan. 20th. The BBs came in to support along with the air corps at Bataan. Then, for the second consecutive day, the Japanese come over the top at Bataan, and it is over. 44 days into the war and Luzon falls. There is still a small stack of units to clean up east of Manila, but the Japanese control Luzon and the approach to Manila.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Bataan at 78,77 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

16 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
BB Hyuga
BB Ise

Allied ground losses:
52 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 5 (2 destroyed, 3 disabled)

Manila Bay Defenses firing at BB Hyuga
BB Hyuga firing at Manila Bay Defenses
BB Ise firing at Manila Bay Defenses
Manila Bay Defenses firing at BB Ise

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Manila Bay Defenses , at 78,77 (Bataan)

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 71 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 24 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 18
G4M1 Betty x 75

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
17 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
25 x G4M1 Betty bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb
25 x G4M1 Betty bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb
25 x G4M1 Betty bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb

Also attacking Subic Bay Defenses ...
Also attacking Manila Bay Defenses ...
Also attacking Subic Bay Defenses ...
Also attacking Manila Bay Defenses ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 81st PA Infantry Division, at 80,86 (Cebu)

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 8 NM, estimated altitude 8,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 2 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-51 Sonia x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-51 Sonia: 1 damaged

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x Ki-51 Sonia bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 50 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on Subic Bay Defenses , at 78,77 (Bataan)

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid detected at 97 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 28 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 23
Ki-30 Ann x 23
Ki-51 Sonia x 13

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
5 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
23 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 12000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
23 x Ki-30 Ann bombing from 12000 feet
Ground Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
13 x Ki-51 Sonia bombing from 12000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 50 kg GP Bomb

Also attacking Manila Bay Defenses ...
Also attacking Subic Bay Defenses ...
Also attacking Manila Bay Defenses ...
Also attacking Subic Bay Defenses ...
Also attacking Manila Bay Defenses ...
Also attacking Subic Bay Defenses ...
Also attacking Manila Bay Defenses ...
Also attacking Subic Bay Defenses ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Bataan (78,77)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 70462 troops, 881 guns, 917 vehicles, Assault Value = 2244

Defending force 20568 troops, 381 guns, 355 vehicles, Assault Value = 325

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 1351

Allied adjusted defense: 437

Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Bataan !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1520 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 177 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 28 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 35 disabled
Vehicles lost 31 (2 destroyed, 29 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
10127 casualties reported
Squads: 807 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 2573 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 129 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 567 (567 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 352 (352 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 27

Assaulting units:
4th Infantry Regiment
3rd Ind. Engineer Regiment
38th Division
33rd Division
21st Division
1st Formosa Inf. Regiment
2nd Tank Regiment
4th Tank Regiment
4th Division
21st Ind. Engineer Regiment
113th Infantry Regiment
8th Tank Regiment
7th Tank Regiment
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
1st Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
48th Field Artillery Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
14th Army
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Mortar Battalion
56th Field Artillery Regiment
Botanko Hvy Gun Regiment
17th Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
4th Marine Regiment
4th PA Constabulary Regiment
194th Tank Battalion
26th PS Cavalry Regiment
21st PA Infantry Division
45th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
57th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
31st Infantry Regiment
2nd PA Constblry HW Regiment
I Philippine Corps
91st PA Infantry Division
Manila Bay Defenses
Clark Field USAAF Base Force
301st Construction Battalion
31st PA Infantry Division
Far East USAAF
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
Subic Bay Defenses
USAFFE
1st USMC AA Battalion
14th PS Engineer Regiment
88th PS Field Artillery Regiment
803rd Engineer Aviation Battalion
202nd PA Construction Battalion
Bataan USN Base Force
201st PA Construction Battalion
Provisional GMC Grp

(in reply to Aurorus)

Post #: 240

Page: << < prev 6 7 [8] 9 10 next > >>

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Argentina vs. Slovakia (Aurorus against 821Bobo)