jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013 Status: offline
|
quote:
Pray tell... I don't. That's why I used the word "ideally" in my post. I was not attempting to give any orders to coders and game designers, merely giving my opinion as to what I believe is or is not a reasonable outcome. As to your most substantive question, to wit quote:
On what basis do you deem which ownership changes are OK and which aren't? I would make no attempt to give a comprehensive answer. However, for the specific instance of Soviet owned or occupied bases, we have abundant historical evidence that the answer is very clear: no, never, absolutely never would they cede anything to anyone not directly under their control, and certainly not to one of the Western powers. Now as to this game -- as far as I know, no house rules and anything possible in the game engine is permitted. If the two players are happy, great. Nevertheless, I freely confess as a fan that I was flatly incredulous at this turn of events. Maybe that just shows my own ignorance or lack of imagination; if so, fine. My apologies, Lowpe, for the thread hijack. Whatever happens in your game, it is an amazing spectacle to watch and your AAR is, as ever, really well done.
|