RE: Mythbuster ( HQ Bombing agreements )

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Mythbuster ( HQ Bombing agreements )

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> The War Room >> RE: Mythbuster ( HQ Bombing agreements )

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Mythbuster ( HQ Bombing agreements ) - 4/17/2017 11:37:47 AM

STEF78

Posts: 2094
Joined: 2/19/2012
From: Versailles, France
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: morvael

In my opinion best settings for PvP play are:
- reduced blizzard
- random weather
- Soviet attack +1
- paratroopers and naval landings allowed

+1 except for the paratroopers. If used on railroad, it's a too strong weapon.

I played HardLuckYetAgain with no bonus and non random weather. In his experimented hands it's a I loose button... I don't know if any single player can reach winter. Maybe MT can do it, but really not sure.

Mild Blizzard without +1 is unefficient and non-random weather is a too big advantage for the russian past 1942.

(in reply to morvael)

Post #: 31

RE: Mythbuster ( HQ Bombing agreements ) - 4/17/2017 12:04:46 PM

sillyflower

Posts: 3509
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Back in Blighty
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BrianG

quote:

RE HQ bombing, it has become a lot less effective due to recent patches. Brian G and I have a HR only 1 bombing mission per HQ hex rather than the normal 2. This seems to be a reasonable compromise under current rules. I didn't like it earlier but it was something B was very keen on.

until they nerfed my night bombers. Which you now shoot down like clay pigeons.

MWAHAHA

@ Morvael - your cheque is in the post

_____________________________

web exchange

Post: I am always fearful that when I put this game down on the table and people see the box-art they will think I am some kind of neo-Nazi

Reply: They already know you're a gamer. What other shame can possibly compare?

(in reply to BrianG)

Post #: 32

RE: Mythbuster ( HQ Bombing agreements ) - 5/16/2017 12:35:45 AM

glvaca

Posts: 1312
Joined: 6/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sillyflower

quote:

ORIGINAL: morvael

In my opinion best settings for PvP play are:
- reduced blizzard
- random weather
- Soviet attack +1
- paratroopers and naval landings allowed

I think the almost the opposite

full fat blizzard
fixed weather
no +1 - not so useful these days anyway given loss ratios in '41 attacks by russians vs germans
limited paras (I have max of 1 per turn and 6 in whole game vs Pitaman) + the current restricted standard HR for naval invasions.

RE HQ bombing, it has become a lot less effective due to recent patches. Brian G and I have a HR only 1 bombing mission per HQ hex rather than the normal 2. This seems to be a reasonable compromise under current rules. I didn't like it earlier but it was something B was very keen on.

Interesting info. On which patch level is this based.
Reading your excellent AAR Sillyflower (superb opening in the South by the way), I found numerous thoughts from you and others on this patch or that.
How is the current Beta behaving when weighing options? I.e. 1.10?

(in reply to sillyflower)

Post #: 33

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> The War Room >> RE: Mythbuster ( HQ Bombing agreements )

Page: << < prev 1 [2]