Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Is Game an Orphan?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Brother against Brother: The Drawing of the Sword >> RE: Is Game an Orphan? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is Game an Orphan? - 2/14/2019 12:13:48 AM   
Bamilus


Posts: 973
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: The Old Northwest
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gil R.

Thank you for your ongoing interest, and (quite possibly undeserved) loyalty. I suspect that an apology will fall flat among some, but nevertheless do apologize for my silence, and the general lack of updates. Eric has already addressed this a bit, but I should too, of course.

First, the good news is that, as Eric wrote, we do indeed intend to continue BAB, though unless sales are markedly better we would have to scale back the number of releases, focusing more on the major battles and having fewer of the lesser ones (which can take about as much time to develop, but don’t lead to greater sales). Personally, I hope that our next release sells well enough that we can keep to our original plan, since I tremendously enjoy working on all of these battles, even ones as small as Mill Springs. (I would right now add something about enjoying it so much that I would produce maps and scenarios without any hope of compensation, if I didn’t know that Eric might read this thread again.)

Now, of course, I recognize that our lack of response in the forum will make it that much more difficult to succeed, and there is no good explanation, other than that until quite recently for the past year or so I’ve had to disengage from all WCS activities for professional and personal reasons, but that is now behind me; as for our total silence for the past several months, I will just vaguely write that there was some confusion regarding the care of the forum. In fact -- scout’s honor, if you’ll take the word of a mere cub scout, and a failed one at that -- just this past weekend, oblivious to the existence of this thread, I was discussing with Eric changes that I need to have made to the map-editor so that I can continue with our 2nd Manassas release.

To sum this up:
* I have every intention of doing everything I can to have our next release come out this winter (though sooner would be nice).
* The disenchantment with WCS (though not our games, I’m glad to see), is understandable, and we will do what we can to win back everyone who needs to be won back. To which I’ll add, in response to the comments about customer service, that WCS has historically been outstanding in terms of our customer service and listening to feedback and implementing suggestions into patches -- a few minutes skimming through the old “Forge of Freedom” and “Crown of Glory” forums should demonstrate that.
* When BAB does come to a close we will announce it formally -- we will not simply walk away from it.

Finally, I’ll add that even if I am not on the forum I do respond to e-mails sent via this website, as well as to pm’s. Though in the case of the latter it looks as if my inbox might be full -- if anyone did try to reach me but heard back nothing I apologize for that. I have never knowingly failed to respond to a direct message.



Kind of crazy Gil hasn't posted nor logged on since this message and Ericbabe hasn't logged on in over a year. I guess we can officially declare the series dead, which is a shame.

_____________________________

Paradox Interactive Forum Refugee

(in reply to Gil R.)
Post #: 61
RE: Is Game an Orphan? - 2/14/2019 6:27:46 AM   
zakblood


Posts: 22687
Joined: 10/4/2012
Status: offline
sad times, hopefully someone from staff will post a official statement on affairs

(in reply to Bamilus)
Post #: 62
RE: Is Game an Orphan? - 2/14/2019 5:07:28 PM   
bazjak

 

Posts: 263
Joined: 9/1/2014
From: Wales UK
Status: offline
Would have sold a lot better if it had a walkthrough tutorial
Theres an old saying "i told you so" but people kept saying theres good tutorials on YT
I dont like videos I wanted hands on tutorials like a lot of other games. Combat Mission tutorials springs to mind

(in reply to zakblood)
Post #: 63
RE: Is Game an Orphan? - 2/15/2019 12:12:08 AM   
nicwb

 

Posts: 518
Joined: 4/26/2010
Status: offline
quote:

sad times, hopefully someone from staff will post a official statement on affairs


Yes -sorry to see this game meet such a fate. Hopefully something may change. The game had a unique take on ACW regimental gameplay and was pretty easy to learn.

(in reply to bazjak)
Post #: 64
RE: Is Game an Orphan? - 2/15/2019 8:22:12 AM   
bazjak

 

Posts: 263
Joined: 9/1/2014
From: Wales UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: nicwb

quote:

sad times, hopefully someone from staff will post a official statement on affairs


Yes -sorry to see this game meet such a fate. Hopefully something may change. The game had a unique take on ACW regimental gameplay and was pretty easy to learn.


That comment defeats what i have been saying the last couple of years
I am sure it never sold very well as there was no tutorial
Why cant people understand that
For some (like yourself maybe ) it may be easy to learn but me i found it very frustrating

(in reply to nicwb)
Post #: 65
RE: Is Game an Orphan? - 2/19/2019 7:11:03 AM   
nicwb

 

Posts: 518
Joined: 4/26/2010
Status: offline
quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: nicwb

quote:

sad times, hopefully someone from staff will post a official statement on affairs


Yes -sorry to see this game meet such a fate. Hopefully something may change. The game had a unique take on ACW regimental gameplay and was pretty easy to learn.


That comment defeats what i have been saying the last couple of years
I am sure it never sold very well as there was no tutorial
Why cant people understand that
For some (like yourself maybe ) it may be easy to learn but me i found it very frustrating



OK - I understand your frustration - I used to get that way with the earlier AEGOD games - what it took was time, persistence and a bit of trial and error. Especially as I think the game has an unusual take on gameplay mechanics.


As for sales - my opinion is that the problem is its a niche game in in niche section of computer wargaming. Not many people play tactical wargames outside of things like Total War or Crusader Kings. Games such as the ones Matrix puts out only appeal to a small section of the gaming community. Also, B v B covers a small part of a single war and only at tactical level. To cap it off, the battles represented aren't particularly well known ones (apart from 1st Manassas) unless you have an interest in ACW.


I think this was discussed in an earlier thread but the devs may have been better off covering a well known battle - like (it tires me to say it) Gettysburg. Most gamers have at least a familiarity with the name. Essentially, I think the game was a victim of marketing rather than anything else.

(in reply to bazjak)
Post #: 66
RE: Is Game an Orphan? - 2/19/2019 8:42:52 AM   
bazjak

 

Posts: 263
Joined: 9/1/2014
From: Wales UK
Status: offline
JTS do very simple tutorials that can be printed out and followed
Something very similer on those lines would would have worked wonders
Anyway wont go on about tutorials any more as it not going to be remidied

(in reply to nicwb)
Post #: 67
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Brother against Brother: The Drawing of the Sword >> RE: Is Game an Orphan? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.656