"Quiet China" alternative?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

"Quiet China" alternative?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> "Quiet China" alternative?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

"Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 1:23:15 AM

Rusty1961

Posts: 1219
Joined: 2/4/2010
Status: offline

I'm starting another game as the allies, now in March of 42, and my opponent has done essentially nothing in China other than make some demonstration attacks.

What do most Japanese players do instead of China? India?

Post #: 1

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 1:51:34 AM

Jorge_Stanbury

Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline

stockpile oil

(in reply to Rusty1961)

Post #: 2

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 2:14:32 AM

Rusty1961

Posts: 1219
Joined: 2/4/2010
Status: offline

And what do most ALlied players do if the Japanese leave China alone?
I've never faced a QC strategy.

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)

Post #: 3

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 2:38:04 AM

Jorge_Stanbury

Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline

I am playing a QC campaign in my Japanese game... basically it means that other than some token invasions, we will keep the map "as is" for the rest of the game

What you can do is simply conserve supply as much as you can, until the time, much later on, when you can get a big port in or near China.. then you dump millions of supply to "grow" those Chinese gigantic corps LCUs and kick the Japanese out

To conserve supply: do not build, do not bomb, avoid offensives, avoid moving, do not overstack, etc

(in reply to Rusty1961)

Post #: 4

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 6:54:52 AM

belfry

Posts: 18
Joined: 6/19/2010
Status: offline

From a Japanese point of view I at least try and take Changsha plus the cities directly to the west. Of course Sian has oil. I try to secure the rail net and clear out all below that line. HK is then free to accept oil/fuel/resources which can be picked up at Shanghai/Fusan/Keijo. Not doing anything in China will cost you in the long run as allied supplies fill out those hordes/corps and they come back at you in later life....with air support.

(in reply to Rusty1961)

Post #: 5

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 11:31:10 AM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury
... What you can do is simply conserve supply as much as you can, until the time, much later on, when you can get a big port in or near China.. then you dump millions of supply to "grow" those Chinese gigantic corps LCUs and kick the Japanese out ...

This is why most IJ players will attempt to take CHI out of the game ... in '45 the CHI units are as fearsome as the SOV ... one of the goals for IJ is to keep a 17 hex arc around the HI secure. If CHI is in play, in force in '44, I've not figured out how to do that. It is very difficult to keep the burma road closed through '43. Once open, it means that any surviving CHI unit will be in supply and growing rapidly. If CHI still holds Chungking, it means ALL CHI units are back in play ... roughly 40% of the CHI units can 'grow' to 800 AV each. Simply put, they are monsters. Granted they take huge losses in combat, but they also inflict huge losses on IJ unarmored units and they reconstitute easily in a short time.

So, by taking out the CHI, IJ now has a more viable survival strategy on the mainland in '45. Far from perfect as the SOV threat with its ludicrous number of armored units is still tough to stop, but at least it is no longer a 2 - axis threat ... and that does matter a great deal.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)

Post #: 6

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 11:46:31 AM

GetAssista

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline

If Japan is leaving you alone in China, it means that your supply drain is actually surplus. Get your troops into defensive positions in x3 terrain, build up Changsha and Sian airfield to 5+, fly in couple US 4E squadrons and remind him of your existence by making passes on ports or strat bombing his industry ;) It's great if he has to CAP everything deep, less fighters for the front this way and less optimized training. Not to mention if he let you keep Wenchow - you can hit and run Home Islands from there

As for where Japan would go. His China/Makchukuo LCUs are restricted, so the only other employment for them is early rush on Soviets. It is perfectly viable strategy despite massive Soviet army numbers. Look for airfield buildup on the borders. Or maybe your opponent just does not like land combat. There is a reason why "quiet China" AI scenario is there in the game from the start

< Message edited by GetAssista -- 5/25/2017 12:34:57 PM >

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 7

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 1:07:14 PM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

I've never tried this. I do know it would be hard to execute against the AI as even movement in MAN will wake up the CHI AI .... in a PBEM, the first challenge would be the 'agreement' of your 'Quiet China'. It curtails your avenues of attack. Not only direction but the units that can be used. For me, taking on the SOV early without using units from China would be a real challenge. I would have to deplete a lot of other areas and that would be tough to do ... just thinking about it ... having tried it, and as an AI player it wouldn't work in any case so no reason for me to pursue this avenue .... if you try it, write an AAR ... be interesting.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to GetAssista)

Post #: 8

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 2:01:19 PM

GetAssista

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline

Pax, AI AARs focused on land combat are dull =)
AI in this game is programmed to attack over overwhelming odds. So it is really easy to gut his hordes in a well fortified hex, not to mention surround and starve it. I see no problems with subduing Soviet AI if that is what you asked.

As for PBEM, there are several AARs featuring early Soviet activation although most of them are with conquered or greatly reduced China. There was one in the early days of WITPAE, where Japan went north even earlier. These were pretty competitive games AFAIR with a lot of trouble to soviets, with elimination of Vlad pocket and such, mainly thanks to Japan's air superiority.
Certainly there should be a period of preparation. Japan cannot go north right from the start. Defensive positions need to be dug to contain and then starve Vladivostok army, Aleuteans need to be seized and fortified to prevent lend-lease, China preimeter needs to be fortified too. If I did PBEM I would not risk it, it is too novel for my experience, and I doubt it is what's happening in Rusty1961's game too. Just hypothesizing

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 9

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 2:03:16 PM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

I'm starting another game as the allies, now in March of 42, and my opponent has done essentially nothing in China other than make some demonstration attacks.

What do most Japanese players do instead of China? India?

"Quiet China" is how the Japanese AI will approach the Chinese theater of operations, but has no bearing on how a human PBEM partner need approach China.

Personally, China is a sink of victory points for the Japanese-particularly early game. There are a large number of units in the North-Central plains that should be cut off and destroyed before they fall back into good defensible territory. If the Allied opponent doesn't want to be active in China, the Japanese player should avail himself of these units and liquidate them in situ for victory points. Do this early and often enough and Chungking itself-and the whole Chinese theater-can be threatened by 1943.

ETA: As a Japanese player, I'd no sooner agree to a quiet China than the Allies would ever agree to a 'quiet Burma' throughout the war. In the game, it represents an opportunity to avail yourself of VPs and can serve a useful conquest towards autovictory or buttressing your points for the inevitable defensive aspect of the game in late war.

Kind of like Burma for many Allied players-it's an area to fight with the opponent in a limited ground game and put pressure on them earlier than a mid-Pacific campaign can be staged.

< Message edited by Chickenboy -- 5/25/2017 2:18:10 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Rusty1961)

Post #: 10

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 2:09:59 PM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

Pax, AI AARs focused on land combat are dull =)
AI in this game is programmed to attack over overwhelming odds. So it is really easy to gut his hordes in a well fortified hex, not to mention surround and starve it. I see no problems with subduing Soviet AI if that is what you asked.

As for PBEM, there are several AARs featuring early Soviet activation although most of them are with conquered or greatly reduced China. There was one in the early days of WITPAE, where Japan went north even earlier. These were pretty competitive games AFAIR with a lot of trouble to soviets, with elimination of Vlad pocket and such, mainly thanks to Japan's air superiority.
Certainly there should be a period of preparation. Japan cannot go north right from the start. Defensive positions need to be dug to contain and then starve Vladivostok army, Aleuteans need to be seized and fortified to prevent lend-lease, China preimeter needs to be fortified too. If I did PBEM I would not risk it, it is too novel for my experience, and I doubt it is what's happening in Rusty1961's game too. Just hypothesizing

Sorry I wasn't clear. OP is PBEM. I have never read an AAR where there was a 'quiet china' HR in place AND the IJ went after the SOV early. I know in an AI game, this can't be done, the AI would 'wake up'. In a PBEM game, it is theoretically possible. However, I think it would be very difficult if you cannot use the units tied down in a 'quiet china' HR.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to GetAssista)

Post #: 11

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 3:24:54 PM

DanSez

Posts: 1023
Joined: 2/5/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista
Pax, AI AARs focused on land combat are dull =)

Well....
while I agree with your basic premise, a creative writer can make a receipe sound exciting while most of use just struggle along reporting events and asking advice.

One of the most entertaining AARs is predominately about a bunch of conflicted characters trying to keep boilers working and planes flying on one ship. A good writer can find a story in the strangest of places.
We also are graced with some comic AAR writers who could make the mess of China read like a Keystone Cops/Charlie Chaplin slapstick battle.

Maybe someday there will be 'the Little Mixed Bgd. Who Could'
A tough writing assignment? Yes, but maybe someone will take the challenge.

(in reply to GetAssista)

Post #: 12

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 4:45:07 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

Pax, AI AARs focused on land combat are dull =)
AI in this game is programmed to attack over overwhelming odds. So it is really easy to gut his hordes in a well fortified hex, not to mention surround and starve it. I see no problems with subduing Soviet AI if that is what you asked.

As for PBEM, there are several AARs featuring early Soviet activation although most of them are with conquered or greatly reduced China. There was one in the early days of WITPAE, where Japan went north even earlier. These were pretty competitive games AFAIR with a lot of trouble to soviets, with elimination of Vlad pocket and such, mainly thanks to Japan's air superiority.
Certainly there should be a period of preparation. Japan cannot go north right from the start. Defensive positions need to be dug to contain and then starve Vladivostok army, Aleuteans need to be seized and fortified to prevent lend-lease, China preimeter needs to be fortified too. If I did PBEM I would not risk it, it is too novel for my experience, and I doubt it is what's happening in Rusty1961's game too. Just hypothesizing

The opposite is true as well. A player controlled SU versus an AI controlled Japan results in the complete loss of Manchuria and Korea within a year.
The AI simply can't manage a land combat strategy.

_____________________________

Hans

(in reply to GetAssista)

Post #: 13

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 4:45:18 PM

GetAssista

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
Sorry I wasn't clear. OP is PBEM. I have never read an AAR where there was a 'quiet china' HR in place AND the IJ went after the SOV early. I know in an AI game, this can't be done, the AI would 'wake up'. In a PBEM game, it is theoretically possible. However, I think it would be very difficult if you cannot use the units tied down in a 'quiet china' HR.

Ah, now I see. Well, do we have any examples of PBEMs with any sort of quiet China agreement coined out at all? The only HR I see now and then is a strat bombing restriction. I've seen AARs with Japan passive, but that was a choice not a HR. As esteemed Poultry guy outlined it is not in Japan's interest at all to be timid in China at start.

Anyway, given OP is Allied, has no China HR of any sort and wonders what might be going on on Japan's side (my guess is lazy Japan), discussing the intricacies of Japan engaging Soviets is borderline offtopic ) Though it is interesting, yes

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 14

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 4:49:08 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
Sorry I wasn't clear. OP is PBEM. I have never read an AAR where there was a 'quiet china' HR in place AND the IJ went after the SOV early. I know in an AI game, this can't be done, the AI would 'wake up'. In a PBEM game, it is theoretically possible. However, I think it would be very difficult if you cannot use the units tied down in a 'quiet china' HR.

Ah, now I see. Well, do we have any examples of PBEMs with any sort of quiet China agreement coined out at all? The only HR I see now and then is a strat bombing restriction. I've seen AARs with Japan passive, but that was a choice not a HR. As esteemed Poultry guy outlined it is not in Japan's interest at all to be timid in China at start.

Anyway, given OP is Allied, has no China HR of any sort and wonders what might be going on on Japan's side (my guess is lazy Japan), discussing the intricacies of Japan engaging Soviets is borderline offtopic ) Though it is interesting, yes

Some players just don't 'get into' the land combat engine in this game.
Look at how little John III has done against China in his game against Canoerebel as an example.
Personally I really enjoy the nuances of the ground combat engine and thoroughly enjoy clearing the Japanese AI out of China in 1942.

_____________________________

Hans

(in reply to GetAssista)

Post #: 15

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 5:12:18 PM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter
Personally I really enjoy the nuances of the ground combat engine

Me too.

quote:

and thoroughly enjoy clearing the Chinese AI out of China in 1942.

I fixed that for you.

_____________________________

(in reply to HansBolter)

Post #: 16

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 7:53:05 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

Pax, AI AARs focused on land combat are dull =)
AI in this game is programmed to attack over overwhelming odds. So it is really easy to gut his hordes in a well fortified hex, not to mention surround and starve it. I see no problems with subduing Soviet AI if that is what you asked.

As for PBEM, there are several AARs featuring early Soviet activation although most of them are with conquered or greatly reduced China. There was one in the early days of WITPAE, where Japan went north even earlier. These were pretty competitive games AFAIR with a lot of trouble to soviets, with elimination of Vlad pocket and such, mainly thanks to Japan's air superiority.
Certainly there should be a period of preparation. Japan cannot go north right from the start. Defensive positions need to be dug to contain and then starve Vladivostok army, Aleuteans need to be seized and fortified to prevent lend-lease, China preimeter needs to be fortified too. If I did PBEM I would not risk it, it is too novel for my experience, and I doubt it is what's happening in Rusty1961's game too. Just hypothesizing

Sorry I wasn't clear. OP is PBEM. I have never read an AAR where there was a 'quiet china' HR in place AND the IJ went after the SOV early. I know in an AI game, this can't be done, the AI would 'wake up'. In a PBEM game, it is theoretically possible. However, I think it would be very difficult if you cannot use the units tied down in a 'quiet china' HR.

Way back when, Castor Troy (IIRC) trumpeted that he had taken all of the Soviet Union easily, because the Russian AF was so poorly trained and equipped he could eliminate it and bomb at will. I am not sure if the changes made to the game since then have made this more difficult or not.
I don't recall if CT was playing the AI or PBEM. I have used the Russians against the AI (I made the AI fly a recon flight over a Russian base to trigger it), and the Russian armour and artillery is awesome!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 17

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 9:07:08 PM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

Yeah, there is (was?) an AAR going (well sorta, I think it is now page 2 or 3 between two relative newbie's with a quiet china HR ... but i don't think the IJ player had any intent of an early SOV strike ... think they were just figuring out the naval side of htings ...

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 18

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 9:37:57 PM

rustysi

Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline

I mean I could be wrong, but the more I play the more a I realize how important taking most of China, if not all is to Japan. She has a huge amount of resources that the Japanese need. I don't see how you could keep it 'quiet'. Let alone what will eventually happen if you ignore the place. To have the Chinese 'wake up' when they do in the game is a time that Japan will most likely have her plate full just trying to fend off all other pressures on the empire.

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 19

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 5/25/2017 10:05:36 PM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rustysi

I mean I could be wrong, but the more I play the more a I realize how important taking most of China, if not all is to Japan. She has a huge amount of resources that the Japanese need. I don't see how you could keep it 'quiet'. Let alone what will eventually happen if you ignore the place. To have the Chinese 'wake up' when they do in the game is a time that Japan will most likely have her plate full just trying to fend off all other pressures on the empire.

+1

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to rustysi)

Post #: 20

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 6/2/2017 1:30:22 PM

mind_messing

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline

Leaving China in the war is the greatest strategic mistake that Japan can make in the game.

It's perfectly possible to knock China out of the war before 1944 given the units already deployed there, and to not do so is a monumental mistake.

Some players hum and haw about it costing too much supply, but the supply offset of combat operations in China is partially remunerated by captured Chinese industry and the massive quantities of units released for deployment elsewhere upon China's fall.

If you're Japan, take out China.

If you're the Allies, make China as time consuming and costly as possible.

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 21

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 6/24/2017 9:52:33 AM

Alpha77

Posts: 2116
Joined: 9/24/2010
Status: offline

When Chungking is taken will the destroyed CH units still respawn at a different place ?

(in reply to mind_messing)

Post #: 22

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 6/24/2017 12:16:21 PM

szmike

Posts: 345
Joined: 8/30/2009
Status: offline

not until it's liberated afaik

(in reply to Alpha77)

Post #: 23

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 6/24/2017 11:45:41 PM

jwolf

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline

I think they can respawn at Chengtu, which is NW (on the map) from Chungking, right up against the mountains.

(in reply to szmike)

Post #: 24

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 6/25/2017 8:45:16 AM

GetAssista

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline

Chungking and Chengtu are the only two respawn points for Chinese. LCUs respawn in the first until it is unavailable, then they respawn in the second. When both are unavailable, nothing respawns. As long as one of the two is liberated, all hell breaks loose

(in reply to jwolf)

Post #: 25

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 6/25/2017 5:58:07 PM

Rusty1961

Posts: 1219
Joined: 2/4/2010
Status: offline

On a side note: recently, my opponent has sent 2 divisions and an arty regiment deep into the forest and I have encircled him in China. No relief forces in sight.

Is it worth destroying these units by expending the supplies or is 2 INF DIV a drop in the bucket for the Japanese?

(in reply to GetAssista)

Post #: 26

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 6/25/2017 6:45:07 PM

GetAssista

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
Is it worth destroying these units by expending the supplies or is 2 INF DIV a drop in the bucket for the Japanese?

Is it 42 or 45?
42: Early Chinese are crap in attack plus no supply, you would have hard time destroying dug in Japs, and he can supply them by air, there is nont that much other work for IJ transports early. Better make this pocket a bait. Just put forces on the incoming routes, fortify, and wait for your opponent to try save them. This way you can inflict more damage on your opponent
44-45: stomp 'em

(in reply to Rusty1961)

Post #: 27

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 6/26/2017 2:12:29 PM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

On a side note: recently, my opponent has sent 2 divisions and an arty regiment deep into the forest and I have encircled him in China. No relief forces in sight.

Is it worth destroying these units by expending the supplies or is 2 INF DIV a drop in the bucket for the Japanese?

Agree with GetAssista's previous.

In general, where you *can* destroy Japanese LCUs, you *should*. By destroying units, you hit him threefold: You make him use his replacements (at lower experience), you make him burn HI and supply in producing more units (e.g., more vehicles, guns) and you increase your VP cushion that ensures that you will be around (and not auto-victoried) later in the game.

_____________________________

(in reply to Rusty1961)

Post #: 28

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 6/26/2017 2:16:20 PM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

One other dirty trick for you to consider. If you encircle him and he *does* opt to fly in supplies, see if you can LRCAP it from a base <5 hexes distance to intercept / interdict transports. It's exceedingly unlikely that he'll fighter sweep the hex before doing an air supply mission and you could, at least once, net some injudicious transport aircraft.

_____________________________

(in reply to Chickenboy)

Post #: 29

RE: "Quiet China" alternative? - 6/26/2017 3:30:57 PM

Rusty1961

Posts: 1219
Joined: 2/4/2010
Status: offline

Good ideas, guys. Thanks.

(in reply to Chickenboy)

Post #: 30