RE: Notes from a Small Island

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Notes from a Small Island

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Notes from a Small Island

Page: << < prev 29 30 [31] 32 33 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 6:33:00 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/1/44

Battle of Shikuka: Allied subs are present (they've managed a few hits the past three days but against nothing larger than riff-raff).

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 901

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 6:35:43 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/1/44

Battle of Shikuka: Seal scores three hits against this cripple. So the silent service scores against something larger than riff-raff.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 902

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 6:42:04 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/1/44

Battle of Shikuka: It's daylight phase now. NavSearch reports enemy TFs all over the place. And, most disconcerting to me, my Fletcher TF is a hex SE of Shikuka - if she doesn't come back during the turn, she can't replenish. That's critical.

Erik's cruisers come again, this time facing minesweepers configured as a combat TF, meant to address enemy riff-raff.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 903

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 6:43:55 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/1/44

Battle of Shikuka: Astoria/Nashville deal effectively with a lone DD.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 904

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 6:48:21 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/1/44

Battle of Shikuka: Sub whittling riff-raff.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 905

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 6:51:50 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/1/44

Battle of Shikuka: Astoria/Nashville TF still going strong - all four enemy DD show HF/HD.

But will the good guys have any ammo left when the big boys come calling?

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 906

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 6:54:35 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/1/44

Battle of Shikuka: The Fletchers finish the job. What's really encouraging is that this takes place at Shikuka - the Fletchers can replenish, unless they leave the hex again, which is a possibility in this cauldron.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 907

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 6:57:48 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/1/44

Battle of Shikuka: PT TF working on riff-raff. To this point in the turn (still early), I don't think I've lost very many PTs. If that trend continues, I have some hope of keeping some kind of defense together for coming turn or turns.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 908

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 7:02:21 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/1/44

Battle of Shikuka: A nice avoidance of danger here, but darn it, Astoria TF is a hex from Shikuka. This bodes very bad for tomorrow - she'll have no ammo left.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 909

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 7:33:52 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

The first thing I checked in opening the next-turn file was the Astoria TF's location. It's indeed a hex SE of Shikuka, which bodes ill. Erik might not connect all the dots there, or his TFs may be too low on ammo to take advantage of the situation....but Astoria TF has 27% ammo and 0 torps.

As for the balance of the combat TFs, they remain at Shikuka and are fully replenished. Santa Fe has 32/42/7 damage, so I'll keep her disbanded in port. One other DD was reduced to 25 knots, so she'll join my CA Boston TF, which consists of walking wounded - the hospital-bound in Zulu. Maybe there's an Ezekiel in the bunch. (Boston has 72 SYS damage but can make 27 knots - I wouldn't use her if the situation wasn't dire beyond belief.)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 910

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 7:35:53 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

With the notable exception of Astoria TF's location woes, today was a pretty significant victory for the Allies at Shikuka. Withstood a not-quite-everything onslaught, administered much more damage than they took, and possibly lowered enemy ammo stores and small combat ship numbers sufficiently to persuade Erik to pull back. That's what I'm hoping for but not what I'm planning for.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 911

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 7:58:21 PM

jwolf

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline

Awesome! Thanks for the presentation. You must have had sweat dripping from your brow as you watched that turn play out! Do you have any good recon on where his BBs are or might be?

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 912

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 8:03:04 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

His BBs and other combat TFs are two hexes SE of Shikuka. They've been in that vicinity the past three days. They haven't expended much ammo but his riff-raff and smaller DD/CL TFs have been attritioned or are low on ammo. So does he pull the trigger or not? I don't have much left to defend Shikuka. But I think Erik's in pretty bad shape at the moment. If he attacks, it's out of sheer frustration and desperation at this point.

On the day, I lost 10 PT boats (more than I had expected). I lost a handful of LSTs and xAKs each. I don't think I lost any combat ships.

Erik's confirmed losses today: 10 DDs, CL Oi, six E-class, one sub (plus an AO down at Sabang).

During the First Full Moon Phase Attack last month, Erik lost about 25 DDs. I think he's lost another 15 or so this time.

He can still overwhelm my defenses at Shikuka, no doubt. But he's bleeding pretty profusely and it won't be long before "the cavalry" arrives.

(in reply to jwolf)

Post #: 913

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 8:39:55 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

This has been a crazy campaign, with measures and countermeasures and measures within other measures, etc.

In Moon PHase One, Erik sank three BBs, several CAs, and wiped out almost 100 B-29s plus alot of invaluable fighters.

But he wasn't able to overcome the final redoubt, leaving it alone for a month to recover and prepare for another onslaught. And he lost two CAs, 7 CLs, 25 DDs, nearly as many subs, and lots of aircraft and rirr-raff, thus reducing his ability to fight against the Allies later.

He comes again, in Moon Phase Two, more tentatively. He takes considerable losses at sea (1 CL, 15 DDs, plus useful riff-raff). The core of his combat ships are fairly low on ammo, and he's probably reduced his ability to effectively deal with Death Star, should it arrive.

He's almost overwhelmed the Allied defenses again...but I think he's concerned about his ship losses and ammo stores.

He knows Death Star may be out there somewhere, but I don't think he knows where or just how close.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 914

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 8:58:24 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

Upon further consideration, I'm going to do it.

I'm going to transfer a lot of strike aircraft and fighters to Shikuka and hope for a big strike vs. KB or IJN BBs.

They may choose riff-raff, but riff-raff seems to be pulling out. And riff-raff will always be an issue in these waters, so seeking a carrier battle isn't a better solution.

The biggest factor may be that aircraft transferring won't have enough "points" left to fly strikes tomorrow. BUt I already have 900 fighters and perhaps 200 strike aircraft at Shikuka.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 915

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/19/2018 10:22:47 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

I think Eric's intention might have been to destroy more B-29s because you get a limited number of them. He seemed to wait until your B-29s came back to Shikuka to send his waves of riff-raff and followed them a few days later with bombardment-capable ships. I think you should fly out your B-29s until DS is back.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 916

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/20/2018 12:44:56 AM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

There aren't any B-29s at Shikuka. I moved them all to Adak. Some have now moved forward to Shemya, from which they're bombing the Kuriles. I think Erik can see the bomber vectors and knows that only the Liberators are based at Shikuka.

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 917

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/20/2018 2:03:01 AM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

Configuring things for the October 2 turn. Lots of moving parts.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 5/20/2018 2:05:21 AM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 918

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/20/2018 3:52:50 AM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

His BBs and other combat TFs are two hexes SE of Shikuka. They've been in that vicinity the past three days. They haven't expended much ammo but his riff-raff and smaller DD/CL TFs have been attritioned or are low on ammo. So does he pull the trigger or not? I don't have much left to defend Shikuka. But I think Erik's in pretty bad shape at the moment. If he attacks, it's out of sheer frustration and desperation at this point.

On the day, I lost 10 PT boats (more than I had expected). I lost a handful of LSTs and xAKs each. I don't think I lost any combat ships.

Erik's confirmed losses today: 10 DDs, CL Oi, six E-class, one sub (plus an AO down at Sabang).

During the First Full Moon Phase Attack last month, Erik lost about 25 DDs. I think he's lost another 15 or so this time.

He can still overwhelm my defenses at Shikuka, no doubt. But he's bleeding pretty profusely and it won't be long before "the cavalry" arrives.

This is what killed my chances after Sumatra. The DD attrition cannot be handled by Japan. You are winning by doing this. Pretty simple and brutal math...

< Message edited by John 3rd -- 5/20/2018 3:53:02 AM >

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 919

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/20/2018 2:40:40 PM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Upon further consideration, I'm going to do it.

I'm going to transfer a lot of strike aircraft and fighters to Shikuka and hope for a big strike vs. KB or IJN BBs.

They may choose riff-raff, but riff-raff seems to be pulling out. And riff-raff will always be an issue in these waters, so seeking a carrier battle isn't a better solution.

The biggest factor may be that aircraft transferring won't have enough "points" left to fly strikes tomorrow. BUt I already have 900 fighters and perhaps 200 strike aircraft at Shikuka.

I was going to comment before about strike planes choosing riff-raff.

Typically this means the DL on the bigger targets was not high enough.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 920

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/20/2018 2:59:15 PM

Bearcat2

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline

Are you flying any searches at night? Any night naval attacks?

_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to Lokasenna)

Post #: 921

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/20/2018 4:09:42 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

Several PBYs are flying night searches, as are a number of BB/CA/CL floatplane squadrons. I'm getting good nav search reports during the nighttime phase.

I don't have any strike squadrons set to naval strike at night, mainly because I didn't think of it (I do have some Brit B-24s flying night missions against Onnekotan's airfield).

I have high detection on KB and Kaigun and riff-raff, so hopefully my guys will coordinate well and choose good targets. I think there's a 50/50 change Erik won't retire this turn, which means there's an equal chance he will, of course.

(in reply to Bearcat2)

Post #: 922

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/20/2018 9:12:21 PM

crsutton

Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

My focus as the Allied player is to sink Japanese DDs. Without sufficient DDs, the Japanese Navy becomes very easy to kill. You have sunk a heck of a lot of DDs.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 923

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/20/2018 9:46:02 PM

jwolf

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton

My focus as the Allied player is to sink Japanese DDs. Without sufficient DDs, the Japanese Navy becomes very easy to kill. You have sunk a heck of a lot of DDs.

I'm curious about this and similar comments above. Speaking from near total ignorance of the Japanese side, I know they have some control over ship building. Can the Japanese player, if he chooses, build more destroyers instead of some of the more glamorous CV and BB types? And if so, would that be a better investment for the Japanese player?

(in reply to crsutton)

Post #: 924

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/20/2018 10:58:37 PM

T Rav

Posts: 387
Joined: 5/29/2004
Status: offline

I love the phrase "Brutal Math." More people should know it.

(in reply to jwolf)

Post #: 925

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/20/2018 11:20:55 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/2/44

The new turn is in. I haven't run the replay; I've only seen the Combat Report.

It is brutal.

I'm going to post the same way that I did yesterday's turn. It'll take hours, which in turn will be interrupted by dinner, family time, etc., so it may be awhile before I get started and after midnight when I finish. But keep these three keys in mind:

1. Has Erik succeeded in overwhelming the remaining Allied defenses at Shikuka, so that it's a defenseless, open target.
2. What cost has he paid?
3. Will this materially impact what's about to happen?

(in reply to T Rav)

Post #: 926

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 5/20/2018 11:26:08 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/2/44

Shikuka: The night phase opens with this little clash, which tells me two things - at least some of Erik's BBs are on the move towards Shikuka....and, just to the west, his carriers are still in place.