Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Notes from a Small Island

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Notes from a Small Island Page: <<   < prev  43 44 [45] 46 47   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/6/2018 11:05:23 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		Can't DS get between KB and his ports and chase him all the way to North America? Too hard to track him?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1321
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/7/2018 1:02:38 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		That's a possibility, especially if he used fuel in a flank speed run (I don't know that yet). But, yes, the downside to that plan is that it's hard to catch a fast TF that doesn't want to be caught. It comes down to dice rolls as to whether he goes north or south or whatever. Am I better off just staying where I am and focusing on the center of the vortex or is it worthwhile to give it a try. A lot of factors go into that decision. I've barely started listing them in my head for decision-making sometime tonight.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1322
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/7/2018 1:04:51 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		It is interesting that Erik went with his hunch that I wouldn't deploy DS to intervene. That's my history but he took a long chance (and the right one, it turns out) in making the decision. Now he knows that I know he has a strong feeling for what I do under these (and other) circumstances. So what does he think I will do next time? What do I think he thinks I'll do.

Games within the game. A great deal of fun.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1323
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/7/2018 1:18:53 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/17/44

Ketoi: This list shows the better ships sunk on the day: TKs and AOs.

The question is whether to send Death Star south to intervene or to keep it on station to deal with Ketoi and the bombardment TFs and all that's going on there. I'm not close to making that decision yet.







Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 6/7/2018 1:23:23 AM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1324
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/7/2018 1:32:04 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		If the enemy carrier TF is the one sighted yesterday south of Hokkaido (as shown two pages back), it moved 16 hexes today - flank speed. Or this might be a different TF that came in from another angle, so that I'd be mistaken in concluding it used flank speed. But I think it probably did.

I think Erik will err on the side of me committing Death Star. I think he'll pull back. But he might not.

I think I'll move Death Star south a bit, rendezvousing with those TFs nearest, while sending those furthest at flank speed to the Aleutians.

That's my early thought, anyhow.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1325
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/7/2018 12:32:29 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		There were two important but incompatible goals for the next turn: (1) get all the big bombardment TFs at Ketoi back to Shikuka to replenish for the next round; and (2) try to offer whatever protection was possible to the Herd of Empties, in light of KB's proximity.

I elected to try both: (1) The bombardment TFs to detach from Death Star and make the run to Shikuka without carrier support (relying on P-38s on LRCAP from that base for cover); and (2) DS to move back into the Pacific, with some Empties TFs rallying to that spot and others moving at full speed towards the Aleutians.

This plan involves all kinds of risks, so I'm anxious to see what happened. I'll be able to run the turn in about two hours.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1326
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/7/2018 2:26:46 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/18/44

Ketoi: The opening moments of a new turn, watching the action but also trying to get a feel for what's where.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1327
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/7/2018 2:46:43 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/18/44

Ketoi: It's pretty clear by this point that Erik has pulled KB back, so that the Empties have a window of at least this day to continue towards safety. Also, it seems that the big bombardment TFs are safely on their way to (or already arrived at) Shikuka.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1328
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/7/2018 3:06:30 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/18/44

Paramushiro: Large Allied sweeps followed by escorting bombing raids vs. heavy enemy CAP. The sweeping fighters perform very well, which is a significant, but enough enemy fighters remain to give the 4EB a hard time.

I get the feeling that Allied fighters are beginning to gain an edge in aerial combat.

This graphic includes all the sweeps but only the two largest escorted raids. There were several smaller ones that suffered modest losses.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1329
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/7/2018 5:11:38 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/18/44

Ketoi: Except for heavy aerial combat over Ketoi and the continued fighting in Burma, it was a quiet turn. That was a good thing.

The next order of business is to set up the infrastructure to allow a long series of bombardments of Ketoi. That should take a couple of days.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1330
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/7/2018 10:39:58 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/19/44

NoPac: There are three main items of interest as this turn opens: (1) getting Death Star back on station without incident; (2) marshalling the Empties Herd to safety; and (3) sweeps against heavy enemy fighter concentration at Sapporo.

As the turn opens, DS indeed makes it's way just inside the Kuriles and it seems that there's no enemy carriers close to the Herd.

The Sapporo sweeps open with this encounter. Subsequent encounters are smaller and less one-sided. Overall, the Allied fighters come out ahead but not by a remarkable margin.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1331
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 2:57:21 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/20/44

Ketoi: This is the first bombardment TF to come straight from Shikuka, as opposed to detaching from DS.

This is to test the logistics - what route does it take, how long does it take, what kind of detection does Erik get, etc.

If this is an accurate test, it's a four-day process: Day 1 depart Shikuka, Day 2 bombard, Day 3 retire towards Shikuka, Day 4 reach Shikuka. If that's the case, I can set up a rotating system so that bombardments occur each day.

Erik will catch on and take countermeasures, so the more enemy subs and MTBs I can take out, the better. Thank goodness for all the subs taken out since the Siege of Shikuka began on September 1.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1332
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 3:01:28 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/20/44

Ketoi: It might be helpful to intermix 4-DD ASW TFs with the bombardment TFs to deal with the threat.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1333
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 3:06:00 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/20/44

Ketoi: Small bombardment has little effect.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1334
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 3:10:40 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/20/44

Ketoi: Allies subs have scored five or six hits on enemy subs over the past six weeks. Sound was turned down, so I don't know if the I-boat went down.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1335
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 3:12:41 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/20/44

Ketoi: The Venturas contribute a bit.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1336
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 3:27:24 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/20/44

KB: In the open waters of the Pacific.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1337
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 3:33:04 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/20/44

Burma: Erik withdrew from Toungoo yesterday, consolidating his forces in the hex to the SW. My forces will take a few days to come up - a few will linger at Toungoo, in hopes that upgrades will take effect.

I hope Erik continues to stand in the jungle, and I think he will. I prefer for the stalemate to continue for the time being, keeping the Japanese MLR very far forward. IMO, it's too far forward. Erik knows exactly what he's doing, recognizes how forward he is, has plans for when and how to retire if various eventualities to crop up.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1338
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 3:36:14 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/20/44

Ketoi: Allied bombardment counterproductive. I'll rest my guys a few days. Then they'll attack, with the primary objective being to reduce the 4 forts.

Reinforcements are prepping at Shikuka, including 6th Division. I may bring in at least a RCT in the near term, hoping that massed LCI(G) gunships will have a positive effect on enemy shoreguns and dug-in infantry.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1339
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 4:56:54 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

10/20/44

Ketoi: It might be helpful to intermix 4-DD ASW TFs with the bombardment TFs to deal with the threat.





3-ship ASW TFs are optimal.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1340
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 5:47:30 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		I didn't know that. Is there some practical reason for that or just a peculiarity of game mechanics?

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 1341
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 6:48:24 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/20/44

Strategic Situation: Erik remains potent and cagey, but I feel good about the Allied position at the moment. Well, "good" in all respects except the actual score.

When I stepped in beginning March 1, 1944, the Allied front lines were pretty far back and their OOB was weighted very heavily to New Guinea and vicinity.

I've managed to leapfrog forward, seize Sikhalin Island, and withstand the furious, prolonged, costly counterattack by the Japanese. (That was an intense and memorable campaign.)

Taking over, I had no expectations about a projected date of victory. I felt like the game would go into 1946. It probably still will but at least I'm in a position where it's possible to attack the Home Islands in strength.

I think the Japanese navy has suffered serious attrition. The Japanese army and air force remain very strong. The Japanese commander remains very formidable.







Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1342
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 7:09:51 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		10/20/44

CV Lexington: This is the only ship damaged in the June naval battles still in a shipyard.

The FM-2 fighter squadron is indicative of the situation at the front. All available Hellcat and Corsair squadrons are aboard carriers or at Toyohara or Shikuka.

VF-9 must have been destroyed during the June clashes, except for a detachment of 5 planes (now whittled to one) that ended up at Shikuka. VF-9 reforms at San Fran in 11 days, so it will take over fighter duties aboard Lex (assuming I can find enough airframes and qualified pilots).






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1343
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 7:13:14 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I didn't know that. Is there some practical reason for that or just a peculiarity of game mechanics?



Apparently a peculiarity of mechanics.

Symon stated long ago that three ships is optimal as the fourth adds nothing to the equation.

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1344
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 7:21:52 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

10/20/44

Ketoi: Allied bombardment counterproductive. I'll rest my guys a few days. Then they'll attack, with the primary objective being to reduce the 4 forts.

Reinforcements are prepping at Shikuka, including 6th Division. I may bring in at least a RCT in the near term, hoping that massed LCI(G) gunships will have a positive effect on enemy shoreguns and dug-in infantry.








You have had at least two good examples now of what I elaborated on earlier.

While you need the overstack to take the heavily defended, heavily fortified base, bombarding while overstacked is counterproductive.

Resting between attacks needs to be full rest w/o bombardments.

I also found that not attacking with the full stack resulted in less massive casualties to the attacker.

In taking heavily fortified Tinian I launched each attack designed to lower the fort by one point each with ONE division, ONE combat engineer regiment, ONE tank battalion and all of the artillery including the artillery organic to the non-attacking divisions.

Next turn, that assault group rests, while another assault group with the same configuration as the first performs a similar attack.

I had three divisions, three combat engineer regiments and three tank battalions.

After three straight days of deliberate attacks reducing the forts by three points I rested for two days and repeated the sequence.

This means each attack group got five days rest before attacking again.

With this technique, I had the forts reduced from 9 to 3 after two full rounds of staggered attacks.

At that point I rested again and shock attacked taking the base.

This is how to take a level 9 fort with 15+ LCU in it.

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1345
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 7:55:40 PM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline 		Excellent advice Hans. Thank you.

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 1346
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 8:21:04 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		Of course the entire duration of attacks and resting was also filled with daily airfield, port and troop bombing and naval bombardments.

The fort reductions can be realized even with 1:2 odds as long as combat engineers are participating.

And of course, eliminating supply before launching attacks, or at least before trying the final shock attack is always beneficial

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 1347
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 8:30:47 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Thanks, Hans.

Before reading your post, I'd already sent the turn back to Erik. It's supposed to include two naval bombardments, air bombings, and an attack by combat engineers combined with armor. Infantry fatigue is still too high for an attack. If forts drop by one, it'll be a success.

Thereafter, I'll see if I can work out a rotation system along the lines you spell out.

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 1348
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 8:56:42 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter
In taking heavily fortified Tinian I launched each attack designed to lower the fort by one point each with ONE division, ONE combat engineer regiment, ONE tank battalion and all of the artillery including the artillery organic to the non-attacking divisions.

Great advice. I just chime in with noting that in assaults tanks' disruption/fatigue accumulates much slower compared to infantry LCUs. So you can attack with tanks again and again.

In fact I suspect that tank LCUs with some infantry squads in them report inflated disruption/fatigue for the unit specifically because infantry guys are such snowflakes. And tank devices are ok even if unit d/f figure is still high.

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 1349
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/8/2018 10:34:26 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		Just so I don't come across as some kind of expert, I didn't go in with that technique in mind.

I learned the hard way that my first approach of an all out shock attack with everything wasn't going to work.
After the initial disastrous shock attack with 4 divisions plus all the assets, the 4th Marine division, which took the brunt of the assault, was gutted to less than 1/2 strength.


I decided to pull it out, to allow it to recover and reduce my over stack a bit.
Then I started experimenting with limited deliberate attacks with the three remaining divisions aimed specifically at fort reduction and came up with the rotation system to facilitate it.


Another small point that I'm sure anyone with decent experience in experimenting with sieges likely already knows, as the forts drop bombing and naval bombardments increase in effectiveness, keeping disruption high, until a critical point is reached where the defenders are ready to collapse and getting a feel for this is critical in knowing when to go ahead with the shock attack.



Land warfare in this game is an interesting model that requires trial and error to get a handle on.

< Message edited by HansBolter -- 6/8/2018 10:47:02 PM >

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 1350
Page:   <<   < prev  43 44 [45] 46 47   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Notes from a Small Island Page: <<   < prev  43 44 [45] 46 47   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.860