RE: Notes from a Small Island

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Notes from a Small Island

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Notes from a Small Island

Page: << < prev 45 46 [47] 48 49 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/10/2018 6:18:22 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/23/44

Ketoi: Another SSX.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 1381

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/10/2018 6:22:53 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/23/44

Ketoi: 4EB raids are having an impact.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1382

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/10/2018 6:31:36 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/23/44

KB: Returning to Japan, sinking at least one USN sub en route.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1383

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/10/2018 6:33:13 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/23/44

Ketoi:Decent result on the bombardment. Only arty units bombarded.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1384

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 12:27:55 PM

dave sindel

Posts: 488
Joined: 3/13/2006
From: Millersburg, OH
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

I'm currently reading Barbara Tuchman outstanding Guns of August, about the outbreak and first month of WWI. I believe much of our current world is shaped by the events in this book. Clear, concise ,beautifully written history book. It's like a car crash on ice. you are standing on the brakes, knowing whats is happening, and powerless to change things no matter how hard you try. If any of the major players had done a single thing differently our would today would be entirely different. So may chances for events to turn out differently. The world changed that month.....and a master story teller explains how it happened. Mrs. Tuchman has won the Pulitzer Prize twice, including for this book. She can tell a story. A big book and a great summer read.

I agree with your assessment of The Guns of August. If I may suggest a couple other books of this time period that I think are extremely interesting. Both are by Margaret Macmillan. The War That Ended Peace: How Europe Abandoned Peace for the First World War and Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World. I haven't finished The War That Ended Peace yet. The Paris 1919 book is about the Versailles Peace Conference, and how a lot of the geopolitical problems facing the world today can be traced to decisions made in 1919,

(in reply to JohnDillworth)

Post #: 1385

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 12:55:30 PM

JohnDillworth

Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline

Noted and thank you. Some of the problems go back to the Franco Prussian war and even to Napoleon. Germany and France keep imposing these giant indemnities on whomever lost the last war. Next war it�s payback time. I guess it all had to end in the complete destruction of one or the other

< Message edited by JohnDillworth -- 6/11/2018 12:56:15 PM >

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to dave sindel)

Post #: 1386

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 2:40:27 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/24/45

It's unusual to post long after a turn, but I ran this one late Sunday night, took a break, and fell asleep reading in my chair. Here's what happened:

Ketoi Jima: My amphibious TFs began the day one hex from Ketoi, arrived at Ketoi, and didn't unload. The orders were right, so I have no idea what happened. I've never seen that before. The timing was unfortunate, because the big BB TFs bombarded to good effect. I was counting on the LCI(Gs) to add to that effect, but they didn't. And weather socked in the air forces. So when the time came for the Allied deliberate attack, it didn't accomplish anything, including failing to touch three forts. It was limited to just a copule of units, including 5th Aus. Division, which was already beat up and scheduled to withdraw in favor of the incoming 6th US Division. The attack really messed up 5th Aus. Div., leaving it with no undisrupted squads.

Burma: An Allied 3k AV attacked a big enemy stack in the jungle SW of Toungoo at 1:2 odds. The Japanese took much heavier casualties, and their entire MLR may destabilize. I'm not quite ready for that, as I'd prefer to crack through in a few weeks, but I'll work with it if it happens now.

(in reply to JohnDillworth)

Post #: 1387

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 2:43:02 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/25/44

Ketoi: Erik dropped new minefields at Ketoi. Allied MSWs handled things pretty well, thought at least one ship (PF) took a hit.

Today the amphibs began unloading. As hoped for, the LCI(G)s seemed to have a strong impact. This is the second of two LCI(G) bombardments that seemed to have an out-sized effect during pre-dawn bombardments and landings.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1388

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 2:46:18 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/25/44

Ketoi:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1389

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 3:01:25 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/25/44

Ketoi: Erik posted LRCAP over Ketoi for the first time, claiming quite a few kills against searching SBDs and TBMs. The main Allied sweep performs well.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1390

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 3:05:18 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/25/44

Ketoi: Main Allied air raid on the day, well escorted, performs well against the LRCAP, but the opposition dampens the impact of the raid, limiting damage to minimal.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1391

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 3:16:24 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/25/44

Ketoi: The Japanese bombardment and the subsequent Allied bombardment seem to go well for the Allies.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1392

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 3:18:06 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/25/44

Burma: This is the troubled hex for Japan. I don't think Erik has reinforcements set to arrive short term. As soon as the Allied stack draws full supply, they'll attack again. It may take several attacks. The Japanese are beginning to bend, but Erik may get reinforcements up in time to shore things up.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1393

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 3:23:31 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/25/44

Air Losses: Pretty even, pretty heavy. Many of the Allied losses (B-25s, P-40s, Hurricanes) are in Burma and are "second string." Many of the Japanese losses are "first string" fighters over Ketoi.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1394

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 3:29:20 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

10/25/44

Ketoi: 6th Infantry Division comes ashore in good shape, despite only 44% prep. The 100% Amphib Force HQ is the difference-maker. Note fatigue and disruption are very low.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1395

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 5:14:06 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

What's going on beneath the engine.

Ketoi Jima is stoutly defended. The Allies are making slow progress that gives me some hope that the island fortress is being reduced. I'll know at the time of the next attack, the day after tomorrow, whether the progress will be steady. I've already diverted some units scattered about the Pacific to prep for Ketoi, in case things drag out.

Winter descends in just 35 days. Aren't some of the Kuriles (Paramushiro?) in the Arctic Zone? If so, I need to decided whether the invasions will proceed or whether to divert those units, prepping them for targets outside the Arctic. I consider it unlikely that I'll invade Para this year, but I would like to take a crack at either or both Onnekotan and Shisukotan, the two island next north of Ketoi.

Erik has lots of air bases and lots of aircraft. He's playing cautiously to limit a massive Mariannas Turkey Shoot that might gut his air force. But he's adjusting to the new paradigm and will attack sooner or later, probably sooner.

I, in turn, use his hesitancy to some good effect. I have LRCAP from Death Star and from Shikuka providing cover for all the TFs moving between Shikuka and Ketoi. This is not a perfect system - there are risks and eventually I'll take my hits. But it helps alot to not have Death Star anchored to that particular service.

Taking Ketoi is vital by the medium term, I think, but the real key is maintaining the newly-achieved naval superiority while also working to whittle down Erik's fighter corps.

While Ketoi and all of the Sea of Oktohsk region is the scene of action, things are beginning to ramp up elsewhere, especially in Burma.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1396

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 5:29:54 PM

JohnDillworth

Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline

quote:

Ketoi Jima is stoutly defended. The Allies are making slow progress that gives me some hope that the island fortress is being reduced. I'll know at the time of the next attack, the day after tomorrow, whether the progress will be steady. I've already diverted some units scattered about the Pacific to prep for Ketoi, in case things drag out.

Definitely a bit of a slog. The difference is you will probably throw hit out of here and you troops will replenish and be ready to do this again. He loses everything he send here and it looks like he has some good units.

Thinking long, long term.....this may go into late 1945, 1946. You will get a ton of B-17G's...which are terrific, but don't have the legs of the B-24's and B-29's. Again...you get a ton of them. Plan to base them somewhere where they can make a difference
my 2 cents

_____________________________

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1397

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 5:43:07 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

My guesstimate when taking over was that the game would last into 1946. That's probably the same, though there's a small chance it might end earlier.

Sikhalin Island or Hokkaido or even China/Korea should make for good B-17G bases.

I think the Allies will simply concentrate on taking the Kuriles and eventually move on to Hokkaido, Korea or China. It's a tough nut area but it allows me to combine all my forces - air, sea, ground - most efficiently. If I openeed a new front on Formosa or China, I'd be dividing my forces, allowing Erik to combine and strike more effectively.

(in reply to JohnDillworth)

Post #: 1398

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 6:56:39 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

I'm pretty sure all of the Kuriles are in the Arctic Zone. I think there is a list in the manual. Will look for it.

EDIT: Firstly - here is a piece of the manual showing the cold zone effects:

Cold Zones during the winter impact
ground units the same way as Malaria Zones (above), with the following added penalties:
�� Ships moving in Cold Zones during the winter will suffer
operational system damage at double the normal rate.
�� All base construction in Cold Zones during winter takes twice as long.
�� Air units will fly 25% less aircraft on strike-type Missions.
�� Ground units unloading at an enemy base/beach or into a non-base hex with an
enemy unit will suffer roughly three times the losses they would normally suffer.
The areas covered by the Cold Zones are shown on the weather map.

Now it gets a bit contradictory because the text of the manual prior to this section does not mention the Kuriles in the cold zones at all, but the section above says the weather map shows it. When I look at my Weather Map, the eastern half of the Kuriles from about Shimushiri Jima is shaded for the cold zone area. So I was half right!

< Message edited by BBfanboy -- 6/11/2018 7:05:56 PM >

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1399

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 7:06:22 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

I checked - Uruppu Jima and points west, including Etorofu, are Temperate Zone. Shimishura and points east and north are Cold Zone.

Sikhalin Island is also Cold Zone.

So I have to do some figuring. I have alot of troops prepped for points from Uruppu up to Paramushiro. I'm nearly positive I won't trigger the latter this year. I'll make decisions about the others following the next Allied deliberate attack. I'll lean towards invading at least one and perhaps two of the others.

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 1400

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 8:48:54 PM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

I've never noticed much impact from the winter zone beyond Sys damage on ships.

Any effects on your units are also felt by his units, and you have, as the Geico commercials, MORE.

Construction is slower? Allies don't have to care if they bring enough engineers. Sys damage on ships? Allied ships generally have a smaller "repair density" (they repair faster) and they have more ships. Higher operational losses for planes? OK, this one actually swings towards Japan in some cases, but the Allies have deep pools for some models and also lower service ratings basically across the board.

Etc.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1401

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/11/2018 8:51:55 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

The biggest impact is invasions. Contested invasions are a very bad idea during the winter, as is reinforcing a beachhead.
If I'm going to invade in the Cold Zone, I have to do so by November 30 or wait until March 1.

(in reply to Lokasenna)

Post #: 1402

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/12/2018 2:52:41 PM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

The biggest impact is invasions. Contested invasions are a very bad idea during the winter, as is reinforcing a beachhead.
If I'm going to invade in the Cold Zone, I have to do so by November 30 or wait until March 1.

Why? Winter doesn't affect unload rate, does it?

The extra fatigue/disruption seems minimal.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1403

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/12/2018 2:56:24 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

The rulebook says roughly 3x damage in landing. My experience has been consistent with that, though it's somewhat dated. For those reasons, contested amphibious landings in a Cold Zone get clobbered. Am I wrong?

(in reply to Lokasenna)

Post #: 1404

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/12/2018 3:22:32 PM

Bullwinkle58

Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

The rulebook says roughly 3x damage in landing. My experience has been consistent with that, though it's somewhat dated. For those reasons, contested amphibious landings in a Cold Zone get clobbered. Am I wrong?

I have always believed ("belief" being operative) that the quoted manual section refers to the "17 men and an MG lost over the side while loading"-type messages you get in landings. Maybe five squads, occasionally a tank, three trucks. The manual never speaks to disruption as being "losses." In a multi-division landing 3x the normal level of such losses is not a problem. Certainly not worth waiting four extra months. If you need it, land on it. Time is the enemy.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1405

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/12/2018 3:23:44 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

The rulebook says roughly 3x damage in landing. My experience has been consistent with that, though it's somewhat dated. For those reasons, contested amphibious landings in a Cold Zone get clobbered. Am I wrong?

I have always believed ("belief" being operative) that the quoted manual section refers to the "17 men and an MG lost over the side while loading"-type messages you get in landings. Maybe five squads, occasionally a tank, three trucks. The manual never speaks to disruption as being "losses." In a multi-division landing 3x the normal level of such losses is not a problem. Certainly not worth waiting four extra months. If you need it, land on it. Time is the enemy.

+1

_____________________________

Hans

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)

Post #: 1406

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/12/2018 3:30:13 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

The invasion targets are hugely defended - Erik knows what he's doing. The invasions are tough enough as it is. Taking 3x losses (however those losses occur - disruption, disablements, destroyed, whatever) is a serious consideration.

I've engaged in Cold Zone invasions before, on a smaller scale. They were decimated by the contested landings. John III tried the same in counter invading Paramushiro in one of our early games. His force got mauled.

Have you guys tried it with massed invasions of heavily dug in armies on Cold Zone islands (I emphasize massed only because a division vs. a brigade might not extrapolate well to four divisions against the equivalent of two or three)? I prefer definitive information on the order of "been there, tried it, no issue" before I'd try it. Otherwise, I'd rather wait the three (not four) months. In the meantime, I'll have plenty of other battles ongoing, so I won't be losing/wasting any time.

Does that make sense?

(in reply to HansBolter)

Post #: 1407

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/12/2018 4:22:29 PM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

The invasion targets are hugely defended - Erik knows what he's doing. The invasions are tough enough as it is. Taking 3x losses (however those losses occur - disruption, disablements, destroyed, whatever) is a serious consideration.

I've engaged in Cold Zone invasions before, on a smaller scale. They were decimated by the contested landings. John III tried the same in counter invading Paramushiro in one of our early games. His force got mauled.

Have you guys tried it with massed invasions of heavily dug in armies on Cold Zone islands (I emphasize massed only because a division vs. a brigade might not extrapolate well to four divisions against the equivalent of two or three)? I prefer definitive information on the order of "been there, tried it, no issue" before I'd try it. Otherwise, I'd rather wait the three (not four) months. In the meantime, I'll have plenty of other battles ongoing, so I won't be losing/wasting any time.

Does that make sense?

Checking the dates of my Kuriles invasions, they were in April, so not cold weather.

I am wondering, though, if your previous contested landings (and John's) were not just going to get roughed up anyway, or rolled poorly. I guess the question is really this: do you need the islands? If you need them, it's as Bullwinkle says - time is your enemy, so don't wait 4 months (you only have 16 months remaining to you before the clock expires).

If you don't need them... well, why bother? You've got bombers coming out of your ears, Shikuka can be level 9 and remain outside of feasible IJN bombardments longterm (he can't maintain the price he paid for the last one), and you can just keep the airfields closed while you move on to other targets.

FWIW, in your situation I'd be taking them. Landings may be slightly delayed to allow for further pounding via big guns and bombers, but I don't see the point of subterfuge at this stage and location. Assuming you're prepared for it on any given day, his fleet coming out to offer battle only helps you strategically.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1408

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/12/2018 4:28:23 PM

palioboy2

Posts: 190
Joined: 12/16/2009
From: Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

I'm currently reading Barbara Tuchman outstanding Guns of August, about the outbreak and first month of WWI. I believe much of our current world is shaped by the events in this book. Clear, concise ,beautifully written history book. It's like a car crash on ice. you are standing on the brakes, knowing whats is happening, and powerless to change things no matter how hard you try. If any of the major players had done a single thing differently our would today would be entirely different. So may chances for events to turn out differently. The world changed that month.....and a master story teller explains how it happened. Mrs. Tuchman has won the Pulitzer Prize twice, including for this book. She can tell a story. A big book and a great summer read.

One of the very best history books I have ever read. I think I have read it 3 times now and would suggest it to anyone

(in reply to JohnDillworth)

Post #: 1409

RE: Notes from a Small Island - 6/12/2018 4:36:31 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

It's a complicated situation. I want to take these islands but don't wish to get my troops unnecessarily messed up, beyond the expected battle casualties, in the process. My experience is that Cold Zone landings will well and truly mess them up.

Why do I want these islands? The are on my LOC, of course, but beyond that they hold more than a half million enemy troops. The Allies are here in huge numbers, having succeeded in drawing the Japanese into a decisive battle. It's been a meat grinder, but thus far the Japanese navy has suffered a serious setback. The battle in the air hasn't been one-sided, but the Allies are making progress there. That leaves the ground battle. At some point, sometime, somewhere, the Japanese army must be attacked and defeated. This is the most efficient environment possible - even though the Kuriles are strongly defended, enemy troops are isolated and the Japanese navy and air forces are at a disadvantage, to one extent or another. This is a compact fighting zone that has many advantages over others. Eventually, the Japanese positions will begin to fall, and then Japan will be really hurting. If the Allies go into the spring of '45 having taking most or all of the upper Kuriles, and having in the process whittled away the Japanese navy, air force and army, then they'll be in a strong position to take the war to Japan proper.

I think I'm right about invading in Cold Zones, but more importantly I don't think it's necessary. The current plan is to invade two more Kuriles before winter sets end, giving me plenty to do during the three-month winter effects. If I run out of things to do, I'd turn to Uruppu, which is outside the Cold Zone.

Final plans haven't been made yet. If Ketoi suddenly falls, I may elect to proceed with Paramushrio this year. But if Ketoi drags out, as currently seems likely, I'll focus on two islands during the winter months, with the possibility of Uruppu as a third.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 6/12/2018 4:57:54 PM >

(in reply to palioboy2)

Post #: 1410