Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: JFB in charge of the USN???

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/4/2017 2:06:52 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
Airframe losses were consequently low. Due to the need of continued air operations, my esteemed opponent's losses are higher than mine, even when I do not contest the skies. I will do so, in my terms, not his, and not right now.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 361
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/4/2017 2:10:06 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
Naval losses were the product of Japanese aggressive moves with carriers and my forgetting that we were doing two day turns. So, a number of invaluable ships and their crews paid the price. AV Wright will be sorely missed.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 362
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/4/2017 2:20:03 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
The DEI:

Japan has been slowly making gains in both Borneo and Celebes. As I wrote above, I decided not to contest those, in favor of a stronger position in Java. Java's defense is centered around three fortresses:

- Batavia, the obvious one, and the one Falken has been bombarding with ships and planes. AV of 219 with forts of 2.05. It will do its job, but it will not last long against a determined attack. Airfield is damaged and basically unuseable.
- Bandoeng, unreachable by BB bombardment, is a bit harder to crack. AV of 278 with forts of 2.27. The lack of engineers in Java is dire.
- Soerbaja, reachable by BBs should they care to pay the price. AV of 705 with forts of 2.99. This will be the island's last stand, I guess.

The Lt CarDiv in the area seems to be screening Soerbaja. My esteemed opponent does not want me to fuel ships there, I guess.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 363
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/4/2017 2:24:23 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
Malaya:

Intel reports indicate that Japanese force levels in Singapore are lower than expected (see map). The also indicate 26 units in Johore Bharu. Could it be that Falken is pulling out? Allied AV in Singapore is 933, with no residual airfield service damage. Fort level remains at 3.62




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 364
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/4/2017 2:26:19 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
First 6 months of war the Allies need construction engineers everywhere.
May '42 the first of many SeaBees arrive.
Jan '43 the Allied player is asking where to build the beach side condos!
*Note* - wait to you see the size and engineering power of a full SeaBee Rgt.

My general rule of thumb is for the SeaBees (naval construction) stay in Pacific. The EAB units go to India.

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 365
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/4/2017 2:55:02 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
The Philippines:

Manila was swept, bombed, and attacked, and I did not fare that badly. If things continue like this, the city will last a bit longer than expected:

Japanese Deliberate attack at Manila (79,77) DAY ONE
Japanese ground losses:
* 4008 casualties reported
*** Squads: 128 destroyed, 306 disabled
*** Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 65 disabled
*** Engineers: 5 destroyed, 58 disabled
*** Guns lost 49 (3 destroyed, 46 disabled)
*** Vehicles lost 5 (1 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
* 97 casualties reported
*** Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
*** Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Japanese Bombardment attack at Manila (79,77) DAY TWO

Japanese ground losses:
*** Guns lost 22 (15 destroyed, 7 disabled)
*** Vehicles lost 3 (2 destroyed, 1 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
* 15 casualties reported
*** Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
*** Engineers: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)


Burma:

There are now 5 Japanese units totaling 26k troops, 154 guns and 67 AFVs on my side of the river. The 7th Armoured will arrive a but late, but them be the breaks. Moving troops that way to compensate. We will see what can be done.


China:

Japanese attacks have come down, but Chengchow is still a target. I am sure it will fall soon.

Japanese Deliberate attack at Chengchow (88,44) DAY ONE

Japanese ground losses:
* 830 casualties reported
*** Squads: 4 destroyed, 191 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 17 disabled
*** Engineers: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled
*** Vehicles lost 15 (1 destroyed, 14 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
* 1581 casualties reported
*** Squads: 26 destroyed, 117 disabled
*** Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 54 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
*** Guns lost 26 (2 destroyed, 24 disabled)

Japanese Bombardment attack at Chengchow (88,44) DAY TWO

Japanese ground losses:
* 60 casualties reported
*** Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Engineers: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
Allied ground losses:
* 42 casualties reported
*** Squads: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled
*** Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


SW Pacific:

The KB CarDiv that sank Lady Lex is not to be seen. Did it turn back, or is it prowling unseen by the Catalinas?


Central Pacific:

The final IJN Hvy CarDiv is 6 hexes NW of Palmyra. Could be screening an invasion of Baker and Canton. We will see.

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 366
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/4/2017 2:55:54 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants
First 6 months of war the Allies need construction engineers everywhere.
May '42 the first of many SeaBees arrive.
Jan '43 the Allied player is asking where to build the beach side condos!
*Note* - wait to you see the size and engineering power of a full SeaBee Rgt.

My general rule of thumb is for the SeaBees (naval construction) stay in Pacific. The EAB units go to India.

That sounds like a rule of thumb that is worth following!


_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 367
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/4/2017 10:09:17 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
Feb 1st, 1942:

It is now February, and I have started to feel the crunch. I have been able to plug the dike with my finger so far, but when it breaks, it will not be nice. These are things I expect to happen this month:

- A fresh IJA Inf Div reinforcing Palembang. I have no more troops to pur in, and it would be too dangerous to do so anyways, with heavy enemy forces in the area.

- Continued naval bombardment of Manila, which will erode at my supply levels until my forces are forced to surrender.

- The loss of Chengchow, Loyang, Wuchow, and Liuchow.

- The loss of the southern half of Burma.

- The loss of Singapore.

It will not happen all at once, but I am fairly certain that all of it will happen. But if I am lucky, my esteemed opponent will bleed his invading divisions badly, and his attack will begin to lose steam.

Airframe losses picked up due to the naval bombardment of Manila, courtesy of Nagato and Mutsu. Those ponderous battlewagons were tailor-made for such a task.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 368
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/4/2017 10:11:35 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
No Allied naval losses and, for a change, a maru is reported sunk.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 369
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/4/2017 10:53:43 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
Lost Bases:

Wau, Melak, Palopo.


The DEI:

Not much action here, with the exception of largely ineffectual Japanese artillery bombardments in Palembang, which is fine by me. There is a large concentration of Japanese ships in Samarinda, though, including a surface task force. All three CarDivs that have been sighted in the region are nowhere to be seen.


The Philippines:

Manila was bombed, bombarded, bombed again, and then the kitchen sink was thrown at it:

Japanese Bombardment attack at Manila (79,77) DAY ONE

Japanese ground losses:
*** Guns lost 8 (1 destroyed, 7 disabled)
*** Vehicles lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
* 18 casualties reported
*** Squads: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Naval bombardment of Manila at 79,77 DAY TWO

Allied aircraft losses
*** P-40B Warhawk: 16 damaged, 3 destroyed on ground
*** Stearman 75M: 7 damaged, 1 destroyed on ground
*** O-47A: 2 damaged, 1 destroyed on ground
*** SOC-1 Seagull: 6 damaged
Japanese Ships
*** BB Mutsu
*** BB Nagato
Allied Ships
*** SS Sealion, hits 1, heavy damage
Allied ground losses:
* 696 casualties reported
*** Squads: 1 destroyed, 9 disabled
*** Non Combat: 18 destroyed, 47 disabled
*** Engineers: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
*** Guns lost 16 (8 destroyed, 8 disabled)
*** Vehicles lost 5 (2 destroyed, 3 disabled)
Airbase hits 15
Airbase supply hits 8
Runway hits 28
Port supply hits 1

Japanese Bombardment attack at Manila (79,77) DAY TWO

Allied ground losses:
* 36 casualties reported
*** Squads: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Taking into account that Manila is being attacked by 65th Bde, 16th Div, 48th Div, and 7th Rgt, the last artillery bombardment leads me to think that those units are disrupted, depleted, or both.


Burma:

There are 24k Japanese troops in the hex NE of Pegu, along 160 guns and 5 AFVs. There is an additional unit crossing the river. In the hex I have the 17th Indian Inf Div, 46th Indian Inf Bde, and British 7th Armoured Bde. My AV is 487, and the British tank boys are both experienced and in good spirits. We will see.

Japanese Bombardment attack at 56,52 (near Pegu) DAY ONE
Japanese ground losses:
* 23 casualties reported
*** Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Allied ground losses:
* 23 casualties reported
*** Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Engineers: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled

Japanese Bombardment attack at 56,52 (near Pegu) DAY TWO
Japanese ground losses:
* 8 casualties reported
*** Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Allied ground losses:
* 229 casualties reported
*** Squads: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled

Disabled squads on day 2 were high because the 7th and 46th arrived that day in movement mode (only way to get them there fast). They should not take so many losses from now on.


China:

Three Japanese units arrived at Wuchow, but did not attack. They probably will next turn. Chengchow was not as lucky, but combat there has been bloody:

Japanese Deliberate attack at Chengchow (88,44) DAY ONE
Japanese ground losses:
* 3178 casualties reported
*** Squads: 47 destroyed, 192 disabled
*** Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 55 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 14 disabled
*** Guns lost 35 (4 destroyed, 31 disabled)
*** Vehicles lost 10 (1 destroyed, 9 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
* 2358 casualties reported
*** Squads: 22 destroyed, 161 disabled
*** Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 35 disabled
*** Engineers: 2 destroyed, 17 disabled

Japanese Deliberate attack at Chengchow (88,44) DAY TWO
Japanese ground losses:
* 2302 casualties reported
*** Squads: 97 destroyed, 57 disabled
*** Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 28 disabled
*** Engineers: 2 destroyed, 27 disabled
Allied ground losses:
* 1723 casualties reported
*** Squads: 11 destroyed, 176 disabled
*** Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 31 disabled
*** Engineers: 4 destroyed, 10 disabled

Every turn I fear the city will fall, and every turn those Chinese troops surprise me and keep hanging on, while bloodying the enemy. 144 IJA squads destroyed last turn!


SW Pacific:

The Japanese CarDiv is npowhere to be seen, but I am not risking it. Ships are doing only critical missions in the area.


Central Pacific:

There is a Japanese CarDiv 5 hexes west of Jarvis Island. All Allied shipping has been ordered to flee for their lives.

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 370
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/5/2017 12:11:47 AM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
A question for the peanut gallery:

Can local commanders disobey combat orders? I ask, because Japanese forces in Chengchow changed from bombard to shock attack in the second day of the turn. The result was a hefty Chinese victory. But it has Falken and I wondering the why of it.

Thanks! :)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 371
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/5/2017 3:20:51 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami

A question for the peanut gallery:

Can local commanders disobey combat orders? I ask, because Japanese forces in Chengchow changed from bombard to shock attack in the second day of the turn. The result was a hefty Chinese victory. But it has Falken and I wondering the why of it.

Thanks! :)

Yes, a leader with very high aggression will sometimes initiate an attack without orders. I am not sure if any other conditions (like the AV ratio) contribute to the change of ops orders.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 372
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/5/2017 12:28:42 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami
A question for the peanut gallery:

Can local commanders disobey combat orders? I ask, because Japanese forces in Chengchow changed from bombard to shock attack in the second day of the turn. The result was a hefty Chinese victory. But it has Falken and I wondering the why of it.

Thanks! :)

Yes, a leader with very high aggression will sometimes initiate an attack without orders. I am not sure if any other conditions (like the AV ratio) contribute to the change of ops orders.

Thanks!


_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 373
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/7/2017 2:13:14 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
Feb 3rd, 1942

Both Falken and I have had very busy weeks, so this past turn took longer than usual. Still, the war goes on, with a bit of good news for the allies:

Dutch sub attack near Terempa at 55,85
Japanese Ships

* CVL Ryujo, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
* CA Atago
* CL Abukuma
* DD Shinonome
* DD Yudachi
* DD Murasame
* DD Asagumo
Allied Ships
* SS KVIII

I don't think she will sink, but she will be out of commission for a few months, which is very good news at this stage. Lt. Cdr. Caspers received the Military William Order, 4th Class, for the action.

On less satisfactory news, the USN S-37 sank off the coast of Bataan, as her pumps failed to keep up, and she flooded. She was trying to escape the continual bombardments of Manila Port.

Baybay, Donggala, and Misool fell to the enemy last turn.

< Message edited by Kitakami -- 12/7/2017 2:14:39 PM >


_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 374
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/7/2017 2:19:30 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
Pilot losses continue to be light, even though the air war over Burma has started. I still have to twink my orders, but I am working on it.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 375
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/7/2017 2:21:42 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
Air losses will begin to mount once again, as I try to keep pressure on IJA units in Burma. Some bombers flew unescorted, and paid the price for their foolishness, and I am not certain why. Have twinked fighter squadron orders. Let's see what happens... especially when the P-38s arrive.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 376
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/7/2017 2:29:53 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
The DEI:

Two events of note. The first, that IJA units in Palembang attacked, and my esteemed opponent says they did not have orders to do so. It was not pretty for the attackers:

Japanese Deliberate attack at Palembang (48,91) DAY ONE
Japanese ground losses:
* 2421 casualties reported
*** Squads: 55 destroyed, 87 disabled
*** Non Combat: 6 destroyed, 45 disabled
*** Engineers: 13 destroyed, 5 disabled
*** Guns lost 40 (36 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
* 313 casualties reported
*** Squads: 14 destroyed, 22 disabled
*** Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 19 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

The loss of those combat squads and artillery pieces will hurt Japan, and not only in Palembang. The base is now at 483 AV and 3.05 forts.

The second event of note was the two torpedoes swallowed by CVL Ryujo. This makes for a much diminished Lt. CarDiv, which helps me breathe easier.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 377
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/7/2017 2:45:02 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
The Philippines:

Manila's defenders are having a rough time, but they are still dishing it out on the ground. Problem is, supply will eventually run out, and that is when things will get tough.

Japanese Night Naval bombardment of Manila at 79,77 DAY ONE

Allied aircraft losses
* P-40B Warhawk: 20 damaged
* O-47A: 3 damaged
* Stearman 75M: 2 damaged
* SOC-1 Seagull: 4 damaged
Japanese Ships
* BB Mutsu
* BB Nagato
* DD Murakumo
* DD Shirayuki
* DD Isonami
* DD Shirakumo
Allied Ships
* SS Sealion, hits 2, heavy damage
* ARD YFD-1 Dewey, Shell hits 1, heavy damage
Allied ground losses:
* 222 casualties reported
*** Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
*** Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 18 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Manpower hits 1
Fires 37
Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 3
Runway hits 52
Port hits 4

I just wished those battlewagons would hit the industry for a change. At least they only bombarded on day one, and then left.

Japanese Bombardment attack at Manila (79,77) DAY ONE

Japanese ground losses:
* 188 casualties reported
*** Squads: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
*** Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 2 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
*** Guns lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
* 7 casualties reported
*** Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Vehicles lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Japanese Bombardment attack at Manila (79,77) DAY TWO

Japanese ground losses:
* 153 casualties reported
*** Squads: 1 destroyed, 11 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Guns lost 4 (2 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
* 15 casualties reported
*** Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 378
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/7/2017 2:51:13 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
Burma:

IJA 33rd and 55th Inf. Divs. plus a few Art. units, ship eng. coys. and 15th Army HQ are at 56,52. They are currently bombarding 17th Indian Inf. Div, 46th Indian Inf. Bde, and British 7th Arm. Bde. Some allied reinforcements are moving that way, but I do not think they will be able to break the line without at least one more division. The grind has started.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 379
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/7/2017 3:03:24 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
China:

With the exception of Chengchow, it was a quiet turn in China. But some Japanese general o other decided that bombarding the Chinese was too slow, and lead a banzai charge against the Chinese lines. For his performance, GeneralissimovChiang Kai-shek sent the Commander of the China Expeditionary Army, who was leading the attack, the B-2 Medal of Victorious Garrison, for his contributions to the defense of the Middle Kingdom.

Japanese Bombardment attack at Chengchow (88,44) DAY ONE

Allied ground losses:
* 40 casualties reported
*** Squads: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Japanese Shock attack at Chengchow (88,44) DAY TWO

Japanese ground losses:
* 6014 casualties reported
*** Squads: 60 destroyed, 355 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 51 disabled
*** Engineers: 5 destroyed, 35 disabled
*** Guns lost 27 (1 destroyed, 26 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
* 113 casualties reported
*** Squads: 2 destroyed, 8 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Those Chinese defenders keep astonishing me with their resilience!

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 380
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/7/2017 3:06:02 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
SW Pacific:

No action during the turn, but the Hvy. CarDiv has reappeared. I will track its movements, to see what it is up to.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 381
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/7/2017 3:09:16 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
Central/South Pacific:

Also a quiet theater, tracking the movements of the other Hvy. CarDiv. So far, I have seen no other enemy ships in the region, so either Falken is trying to disrupt my LOC, or he is hunting for CVs.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 382
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/8/2017 12:14:35 AM   
Dirtnap86


Posts: 95
Joined: 10/3/2016
Status: offline
If you can, check the # of planes lost. RJ is only a baby CV and Japanese damcon is pretty poor. I think she carries 30 zeroes and 18 kates, see how many were lost on the ground after that last turn.

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 383
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/8/2017 3:57:29 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Heck of a defense you are putting up Sir! You are presenting an excellent case for why PALEMBANG must be grabbed within days of the war starting. Waiting is suicide for the Japanese player.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Dirtnap86)
Post #: 384
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/8/2017 7:59:46 AM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dirtnap86
If you can, check the # of planes lost. RJ is only a baby CV and Japanese damcon is pretty poor. I think she carries 30 zeroes and 18 kates, see how many were lost on the ground after that last turn.

She hasn't sunk... unfortunately!


_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Dirtnap86)
Post #: 385
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/8/2017 8:03:39 AM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
Heck of a defense you are putting up Sir! You are presenting an excellent case for why PALEMBANG must be grabbed within days of the war starting. Waiting is suicide for the Japanese player.

Agreed, for two reasons: First, because it throws the Japanese timetable off. Second, because the 93 engineers I have in the hex might damage a lot of stuff when I am finally kicked out.

In my humble opinion, the possible sacrifice of the British 18th is well worth it.


_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 386
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/8/2017 2:31:51 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
Feb 3rd, 1942

Last turn was an interesting one. Falken sent the combat report to me saying that it had gone to the Allies but, when I ran it, I did not see anything spectacular. I mean, it was good, but not spectacular. That was until last night when I was reading the combat report, and I read this:

TF 176 encounters mine field at Bataan (78,77) DAY ONE
* BB Hyuga, Mine hits 1
* BB Ise, Mine hits 2

TF 176 encounters mine field at Manila (79,77) DAY TWO
* DD Umikaze, Mine hits 1, heavy damage
* CL Yubari, Mine hits 2, heavy damage
* BB Ise, Mine hits 1

Now, I do not expect Ise to sink with three mines. I am more hopeful about Yubari, though. She just might. This might give the defenders of Manila a breather, though.

Besides that, I lost San Jose, Siargao, Mussau Island, and Balikpapan. All of Borneo's oilfields are now in the hands of the Empire.

In the air I am still playing turtle. I need to repair fighters, rest crews, etc. So far it has worked, except for Manila. Those naval bombardments I did not expect, and have basically closed down the airfield.



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kitakami -- 12/8/2017 2:32:52 PM >


_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 387
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/8/2017 2:35:31 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
The air battle of Burma has begun. Thankfully, it is being fought on my terms, at least for now. This means air losses are once again in my favour. Last turn it was 26 to 1.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 388
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/8/2017 2:46:46 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
Malaya:

I know I am fighting a losing battle, one I must measure in time more than anything else, so it has been a bit difficult not to attack, wait, and be patient. Still, results have been good until now. The fighting in Singapore was not an Allied Victory last turn, though. There is still ample supply, but losses were much heavier than I would have wanted.

Japanese Deliberate attack at Singapore (50,84) DAY ONE

Japanese ground losses:
* 4818 casualties reported
*** Squads: 38 destroyed, 167 disabled
*** Non Combat: 80 destroyed, 75 disabled
*** Engineers: 3 destroyed, 71 disabled
*** Guns lost 31 (12 destroyed, 19 disabled)
*** Vehicles lost 35 (6 destroyed, 29 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
* 2355 casualties reported
*** Squads: 50 destroyed, 91 disabled
*** Non Combat: 28 destroyed, 71 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 28 disabled
*** Guns lost 40 (5 destroyed, 35 disabled)
*** Vehicles lost 52 (2 destroyed, 50 disabled)
* Units destroyed 1

Japanese Deliberate attack at Singapore (50,84) DAY TWO

Japanese ground losses:
* 4718 casualties reported
*** Squads: 29 destroyed, 202 disabled
*** Non Combat: 39 destroyed, 69 disabled
*** Engineers: 87 destroyed, 108 disabled
*** Guns lost 37 (6 destroyed, 31 disabled)
*** Vehicles lost 16 (1 destroyed, 15 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
* 1397 casualties reported
*** Squads: 73 destroyed, 36 disabled
*** Non Combat: 11 destroyed, 57 disabled
*** Engineers: 4 destroyed, 7 disabled
*** Guns lost 25 (17 destroyed, 8 disabled)
*** Vehicles lost 16 (2 destroyed, 14 disabled)

Now, it was not a disaster, as I am still giving as much as I am taking, but I see the writing on the wall. It is just a matter of time. The real question is not if Singapore will fall (it most definitely will), but rather how long it will last, and how badly mauled will the IJA units be after they take it. If I only knew the answers to those questions, I could plan much, much better.

(capture is before day 2's attack)



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kitakami -- 12/8/2017 2:49:15 PM >


_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 389
RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? - 12/8/2017 2:52:59 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
The DEI:

Borneo is now lost, with the exception of undefended bases in the west coast.

Ground combat at Balikpapan (64,97) DAY ONE
Japanese forces CAPTURE Balikpapan !!!

Japanese ground losses:
* 117 casualties reported
*** Squads: 1 destroyed, 9 disabled
*** Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
*** Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Allied ground losses:
* 1572 casualties reported
*** Squads: 27 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Non Combat: 90 destroyed, 1 disabled
*** Engineers: 19 destroyed, 0 disabled
*** Guns lost 28 (27 destroyed, 1 disabled)
*** Vehicles lost 4 (4 destroyed, 0 disabled)
* Units retreated 3
* Units destroyed 2

Japanese efforts to clear the minefields have already begun.

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 390
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: JFB in charge of the USN??? Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.469