Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs bristolduke (J)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs bristolduke (J) Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/8/2017 5:02:47 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
The reason I say KB might have other plans is this sigint report.

1st Maizuru Assault/ Division is loaded on a Japanese AK moving to Midway Island

Which is really annoying, because I'd bet Mike $10 that KB would go to Midway next, but he wasn't so sure. He's never going to take the bet now that we have seen that report.

Not much we can do about it if he sends KB to Midway with a division. Instead we're shoring up our position in the Aleutians, which is where he could strike next, and waiting.

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 121
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/8/2017 5:05:45 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Those SNLF Assault Divisions are actually Brigades with AV a little over 200. Due how the game editor works I had to set them up as Divisions so they could divide down to three elements. Just FYI...


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 122
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/13/2017 3:08:25 AM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
Dec 19, 41

Taking a while to get turns back at the moment, only seen one since Friday. But as I was away for a long weekend it has worked out okay.

Dec 19 is probably the quietest turn we've had so far in an otherwise action packed start to the war. The Japanese haven't done been pushing forward particularly hard anywhere after their push on Rabaul was bloodily repulsed. KB has also disappeared since Wake.

There are still a lot of Japanese subs hanging around off Pearl. We have several ASW groups out looking for them, and every turn there are many torpedoes fired, and many depth charges dropped, all apparently with no effect. This day was fairly typical -- five engagements, 10 torpedoes fired, countless depth charges dropped.

MacArthur's fear about the destruction of Manila is being realised, even as he speeds towards Soerabaja in a PT boat. For the first time, waves of Bettys fly in and start bombing the defenses, causing many casualties and razing whole districts of the city.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Asiatic Fleet , at 79,77 (Manila)

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid spotted at 38 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 14 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 40
G3M2 Nell x 27
G4M1 Betty x 53

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 3 damaged
G4M1 Betty: 1 destroyed by flak

Allied ground losses:
301 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 25 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


This is the largest of several bombing raids throughout the day, and there is no air cover in place to meet these. High command felt better use could be found of the planes and pilots than in a doomed defense.

Despite their dire situation, the defenders of Manila aren't giving up. Japanese forces push deeper into the city, but at heavy cost.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Manila (79,77)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 27290 troops, 193 guns, 268 vehicles, Assault Value = 947

Defending force 41667 troops, 407 guns, 174 vehicles, Assault Value = 850

Japanese adjusted assault: 230

Allied adjusted defense: 729

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 3 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1783 casualties reported
Squads: 32 destroyed, 48 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 36 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 71 (37 destroyed, 34 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
838 casualties reported
Squads: 31 destroyed, 19 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 34 disabled
Engineers: 21 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 16 (1 destroyed, 15 disabled)
Vehicles lost 23 (2 destroyed, 21 disabled)


The ability of the Allies to strike back is diminishing, but we take our chances where we can, with bombing of Palembang. British Hurricanes continue to dominate the skies, clearing the way for B17s to keep pounding the oilfields. Another 8 hits on the oilfields. These are now showing as 887 (114), which seems like a lot of damage. Unless he does something soon to shut down these bombing runs, there is not going to be much oil left for shipping back to the home islands.

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 123
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/13/2017 3:20:51 AM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
It feels a bit like the calm in the eye of the hurricane at the moment. No major Japanese task forces are spotted moving on anywhere.

To shake things up, the Renown is leading a major task force north from Soerebaja to go look for trouble around Balikpapan. It looks like the carriers in the area have left, almost certainly to replenish after spending most of nearly two weeks sinking transports in the Celebes Sea. There are still enemy cruisers south of Balikpapan, so a fight looks likely.

The hapless Inglewood has been sacked as TF commander following the light carrier debacle, and replaced with the rather more useful Collinson. At Leadership 64, Naval 64 and Aggression 70, this is the man you want leading the charge. We hope.

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 124
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/13/2017 8:35:27 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelU

It feels a bit like the calm in the eye of the hurricane at the moment. No major Japanese task forces are spotted moving on anywhere.

To shake things up, the Renown is leading a major task force north from Soerebaja to go look for trouble around Balikpapan. It looks like the carriers in the area have left, almost certainly to replenish after spending most of nearly two weeks sinking transports in the Celebes Sea. There are still enemy cruisers south of Balikpapan, so a fight looks likely.

The hapless Inglewood has been sacked as TF commander following the light carrier debacle, and replaced with the rather more useful Collinson. At Leadership 64, Naval 64 and Aggression 70, this is the man you want leading the charge. We hope.

A great leader will help, but crew experience counts too. Renown should have good crew experience if modeled correctly. Good Luck!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 125
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/13/2017 10:22:41 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
A great leader will help, but crew experience counts too. Renown should have good crew experience if modeled correctly. Good Luck!


Crew experience is 76/58, so yeah, the crew are good, the commander is good.

What happened though is that I had set the destination as Balikpapan, and rather than go in, the TF cruised up to one sprint away, ready to run in for a night attack. I thought they only did that when you were planning a shore bombardment, but apparently not. Lesson learnt.

Anyway, they haven't been spotted, the targets are still there, so we will have another go this turn.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 126
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/14/2017 1:13:46 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
The bombardment AI has the run-in, run-out algorithm that requires the TF to get a certain distance away and therefore stages the run-in from a close enough point. That should not happen for a SCTF - no special AI for that. If it was sprinting up to Balikpapan it may have had to refuel the DDs.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 127
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/14/2017 2:15:11 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
Dec 20, 41

Ouch and double ouch. The poor old Detroit, just one hex out of Pearl Harbor, sucks another three torps and goes straight to the bottom. Boo.

But imagine our horror when we see this.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Lahaina at 183,108

Japanese Ships
SS I-174

Allied Ships
CVE Langley, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
DD Le Triomphant


Grim stuff, and I'd written off the Langley for sure. But amazingly she is still going, with 56 float damage. She will pop straight into Lahaina while move in some ASW task forces to try clear the sub menace. Then she is going to have to make a run for Pearl and some extended yard time.

That was definitely the major excitement for the turn. In a not very nice way.

Things were exciting for our Hong Kong MTBs, but again not in a nice way. You'd think when the engagement opens at 1,000 yards they might get a couple of torpedo hits in, but it is not to be.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Balikpapan at 64,98, Range 1,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CA Myoko
CA Haguro
CA Nachi
CA Ashigara
DD Mutsuki
DD Kisaragi
DD Yayoi
DD Mochizuki
DD Mazabuki

Allied Ships
MTB 7
MTB 8, Shell hits 1, and is sunk
MTB 9
MTB 10
MTB 11, Shell hits 1, and is sunk
MTB 12


Japanese bombers continue to pound Manila, but the defenders cling on tenaciously.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Manila (79,77)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 29665 troops, 233 guns, 204 vehicles, Assault Value = 939

Defending force 40883 troops, 405 guns, 172 vehicles, Assault Value = 813

Japanese adjusted assault: 104

Allied adjusted defense: 721

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 6 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1533 casualties reported
Squads: 40 destroyed, 138 disabled
Non Combat: 26 destroyed, 24 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled
Guns lost 11 (5 destroyed, 6 disabled)
Vehicles lost 83 (66 destroyed, 17 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
915 casualties reported
Squads: 20 destroyed, 26 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 24 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Guns lost 22 (3 destroyed, 19 disabled)


The longer we can hold out here, and the more Japanese troops we can kill, the better for our DEI situation. We really don't want these troops loading up in Manila and invading Java.

Other than some light bombing of the Chinese units, and of the Palembang oilfields, not much to report in terms of action.

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 128
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/14/2017 2:18:26 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

The bombardment AI has the run-in, run-out algorithm that requires the TF to get a certain distance away and therefore stages the run-in from a close enough point. That should not happen for a SCTF - no special AI for that. If it was sprinting up to Balikpapan it may have had to refuel the DDs.


Don't think that was the case either, it had just come out of Soerebaja and everyone was fueled to the max. But despite being a SCTF and being ordered to move the 10 hexes to Balipapan at full speed, the force ended the turn 8 hexes off Balkipapan, or one full speed move away. Exactly the behaviour I would expect from a bombardment TF.

I thought I may have made a mistake and set it to bombardment mission, but that was not the case.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 129
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/14/2017 3:14:20 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
Look who has turned up just off Midway Island. Yes, it's our old friends KB. While it is always terrifying seeing these guys, it is also something of a comfort to know where they are. There is a lot of unloading going on at Dutch Harbor, and this will soon be suspended and transports running for the hills. Saratoga was also up there, training air groups and just waiting for an unescorted attempt to take Adak. But it looks like she will also be vacating the area shortly.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 130
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/14/2017 3:26:33 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
And here is the DEI situation. In red you can see the enemy dispositions. The two light carrier groups that have spent much time in the Celebes Sea are in or heading towards Badelboab. They're either replenishing for a push against Rabaul, or to come back to support DEI, or maybe even both. Time will tell.

While the cat is away etc, so this looks like a good turn to bring the Indomitable task force, consisting of it, the Hermes and the Jacksonville, north to try hit the enemy cruisers. At the same time the Renown is going to steam in looking for trouble. A good slapping for that cruiser task force would go some way to slowing down any further push on Java.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 131
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/14/2017 4:47:57 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelU


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

The bombardment AI has the run-in, run-out algorithm that requires the TF to get a certain distance away and therefore stages the run-in from a close enough point. That should not happen for a SCTF - no special AI for that. If it was sprinting up to Balikpapan it may have had to refuel the DDs.


Don't think that was the case either, it had just come out of Soerebaja and everyone was fueled to the max. But despite being a SCTF and being ordered to move the 10 hexes to Balipapan at full speed, the force ended the turn 8 hexes off Balkipapan, or one full speed move away. Exactly the behaviour I would expect from a bombardment TF.

I thought I may have made a mistake and set it to bombardment mission, but that was not the case.

The only other thing I can think of is that the routing was not set to "Direct/Absolute", so the TF balked at nearby enemy air threats? That can happen even if the air threat has not been detected by you (the AI knows it is there).

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 132
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/15/2017 4:43:49 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
Dec 21, 1941

The battle of Makassar Strait, captured for posterity in the picture below, is the biggest surface combat of the war to date, and probably for a long time to come. It was always likely to decide the future course of Japan's DEI ambitions -- a bad result here could have held him up for some time. So it's unfortunate we got owned.

It's a daytime surface combat where the Renown TF gets an opportunity to put aside the embarrassment of not smashing up the light carriers. But the embarrassment just keeps coming.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Time Surface Combat, near Balikpapan at 65,98, Range 21,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CA Myoko, Shell hits 7
CA Haguro, Shell hits 17, heavy fires, heavy damage
CA Nachi, Shell hits 1
CA Ashigara, Shell hits 1
DD Mutsuki
DD Kisaragi, Shell hits 1, on fire
DD Yayoi, Shell hits 2, on fire
DD Mochizuki
DD Mazabuki, Shell hits 1

Allied Ships
BC Renown, Shell hits 2
CA Cornwall, Shell hits 3, on fire
CA Exeter, Shell hits 6, heavy fires
CL Tromp, Shell hits 5, heavy fires
CL Danae, Shell hits 15, heavy fires, heavy damage
CL Glasgow, Shell hits 14, heavy fires
DD Tenedos
DD Sands, Shell hits 8, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD King, Shell hits 1, on fire
DD Lawrence, Shell hits 1, on fire
DD John Barry, Shell hits 1


At the end of the battle, the Danae and Sands sink, the Tromp is limping badly, and just about every other ship is looking battered to some degree. With the exception of the Renown, which has taken only superficial damage. It's back to Soerebaja for initial repairs, and then the long haul to shipyards for a lot of these guys.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 133
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/15/2017 4:48:42 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
It is not appallingly bad though. The Adelaide, lurking off northern Borneo, surprises and sinks a transport heading into Wewak.

And it looks like we have discovered the invasions force inbound for Midway.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Wake Island at 144,91

Japanese Ships
xAK Otori Maru, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage
xAK Yosida Maru #1
DD Yakaze

Allied Ships
SS Argonaut

Japanese ground losses:
8 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


The weird thing is that with all the careful positioning of subs, this is one that was heading back to Pearl Harbor for conversion and just happened to stumble onto this group. Still, we'll take the hits when we can get them.
It's amazing we have got no sub attacks in the Makassar Straits. The Japanese forces are sailing across a carpet of submarines -- the CAs we just fought end the turn in the same hex as two of them.

And the ground combats just get worse for the Japanese at Manila. He is going to have to reinforce if he wants to take it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Manila (79,77)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 32182 troops, 266 guns, 129 vehicles, Assault Value = 831

Defending force 40468 troops, 402 guns, 171 vehicles, Assault Value = 776

Japanese adjusted assault: 67

Allied adjusted defense: 811

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 12 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
2608 casualties reported
Squads: 50 destroyed, 110 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 49 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 24 (20 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Vehicles lost 36 (9 destroyed, 27 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1024 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 51 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 52 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 12 (3 destroyed, 9 disabled)

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 134
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/15/2017 5:25:20 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Those Japanese CAs are very tough opponents - great experience too and good leaders. Looks like Haguro might sink (check IJN FP losses) which would make the battle a plus for you.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 135
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/15/2017 6:15:58 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Those Japanese CAs are very tough opponents - great experience too and good leaders. Looks like Haguro might sink (check IJN FP losses) which would make the battle a plus for you.


Tracker shows 2 Petes and 1 Jake lost. Which is the float plane complement of the Haguro. Now I'm not feeling so bad about the outcome of the battle.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 136
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/15/2017 6:19:52 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
Looks like the fun in Palembang will be coming to an end soon. Two or three Japanese forces seem to be heading that way, and we don't really have much to stop them. Once he gets some proper air support in there he can pack the place with fighters. For now though, our Hurricanes continue to rule the skies, putting down 6 Oscars this turn for just 1 loss.

It also looks like he is gathering his light carriers at Badelboab, and we expect the next push on Rabaul to have copious carrier backing.

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 137
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/16/2017 1:14:08 PM   
Dirtnap86


Posts: 95
Joined: 10/3/2016
Status: offline
Honestly, an obsolete CL and DD for a modern IJN CA?

Pretty good trade, imo. Danae is a 'D' Class cruiser, 1920s vintage and DD Sands is about the same. He only gets the heavy cruisers he starts with; with I think one more in the pipe (Ibuki), at least in stock. Not sure if BTS gives them more heavy cruisers in the build queue or not. The Agano class CLs are pretty good (and I'm partial to Oyodo if only for her uniqueness), but the IJN doesn't get a lot of sub-capital cruisers.

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 138
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/16/2017 2:00:40 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
2 at start and 4 more to be built of the Niitaka Class CA.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 139
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/16/2017 2:48:06 PM   
Dirtnap86


Posts: 95
Joined: 10/3/2016
Status: offline
Whew 4 triple 8" turrets along with murderous 10cm DP secondary battery.

Does the USN get Montanas to compensate for these? [:P]

(I play World of Warships, and that's the top Cruiser for the Japanese line, the Zao. The USN line tops out at the Des Moines, auto loaded 8" guns are fun.)

I'd rather see more of the 40mm bofors knock offs than more 10cm DP guns, but if wishes were fishes and all.

I do wonder besides the conversions, what new toys the USN gets, her old cruisers can't even remotely stand up to a beast like that, I think even a Baltimore would have trouble. I'll have to go look up the mod.

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 140
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/16/2017 3:06:45 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
I’ll have almost all large warships for Japan built by end of 43. M & M should expect to face the same.

(in reply to Dirtnap86)
Post #: 141
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/18/2017 12:32:54 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
I'm starting to wonder about new cruisers for the USN as well, after seeing the stats for that beast. Yowzer!

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 142
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/18/2017 12:59:31 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
Dec 22-23, 1941

Despite the shock to our morale of seeing the lovely new cruisers the Japanese get, we continue to soldier on. Now that I know for certain that the Haguro is a goner, I'm feeling a bit better about the recent exchange. What it has done though is leave us with a lot less firepower to take on the next invasion. While most of our ships survived, almost all took enough damage to take them out of the fight. The Renown remains in top fighting form, but two heavy cruisers and several light cruisers will be looking for a shipyard.

We did get more reinforcements sailing into Batavia, so we've added three more British light cruisers to our lineup. And lost two.

He is closing down our fun in north Borneo. The CL Durban, looking for transports around Singakawang/Kucking, instead finds the Nagato and Mutsu, and the end is swift.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Singkawang at 56,87, Range 10,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
BB Nagato
BB Mutsu
CA Takao
CL Suzuya
CL Kumano
CL Tone
DD Nowaki
DD Arashi
DD Hagikaze

Allied Ships
CL Durban, Shell hits 8, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Van Nes, Shell hits 1, and is sunk


Poor old Van Nes, one hit was enough to send her to the bottom.

The SS Perch, after about ten tries, does finally manage to get a torpedo into the DMS clearing mines off Balipapan. The DMS had already been damaged by the coastal guns, so I don't give much chances for her survival. Hopefully this will slow down his mine clearing at yet another important oil centre. It is also the fourth DMS he has lost.

Other than this, there is some bombing of oilfields at Miri, Balipapan and Palembang. The only one with any fighter cover is Palembang, and our Hurricanes are smashing these guys no problem.

There is now a TF about 5 hexes out of Palembang, so I imagine there is some reinforcement coming -- either more air support, some AA guns, or both. I will do as much as I can to give these guys a warm welcome, given my rather grim lack of resources in the area.

KB continues to lurk north of Midway, not doing very much but ensuring we don't try anything as the transports inexorably creep forward. Brace yourselves lads, this is going to get ugly.

More bases fall, including Samarinda and a few spots in the Philippines. But Manila weathers another attack, with major damage to the attackers.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Manila (79,77)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 32564 troops, 301 guns, 103 vehicles, Assault Value = 826

Defending force 43578 troops, 417 guns, 171 vehicles, Assault Value = 890

Japanese adjusted assault: 123

Allied adjusted defense: 745

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 6 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
3160 casualties reported
Squads: 49 destroyed, 139 disabled
Non Combat: 22 destroyed, 89 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled
Guns lost 17 (3 destroyed, 14 disabled)
Vehicles lost 48 (23 destroyed, 25 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Allied ground losses:
834 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 81 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 37 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 15 (2 destroyed, 13 disabled)
Vehicles lost 18 (2 destroyed, 16 disabled)


See the unit destroyed? Hopefully it's one of those tank regiments. Is there any good way to tell? Even if not destroyed, those guys must have been gutted.

We now have nearly 900 AV dug into level 2 forts with 33,000 supply. He is either going to have to bring a lot more troops, or starve us out. Hell, if things continue this way we might even start to lose that experience negative that has plagued us all game.

This is the really weird one though. If anyone can explain how the defenders of Bataan have managed to hold out for 2 of these attacks, I'd be very interested.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Bataan (78,77)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3794 troops, 25 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 122

Defending force 2296 troops, 110 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2

Japanese adjusted assault: 47

Allied adjusted defense: 35

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
81 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
48 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled

Assaulting units:
42nd Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
Manila Bay Defenses
Bataan USN Base Force


(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 143
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/18/2017 7:31:47 PM   
Dirtnap86


Posts: 95
Joined: 10/3/2016
Status: offline
quote:


This is the really weird one though. If anyone can explain how the defenders of Bataan have managed to hold out for 2 of these attacks, I'd be very interested.


Bataan is x3 terrain if I remember right. Manila is as well. The IJA needs to bring some serious weight to break you. Otherwise your troops stay supplied and can fight pretty effectively. The 37mm AT gun most forces in the PI have is enough to break those piddly little toys the IJA calls tanks.

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 144
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/18/2017 8:47:44 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
What I found hard to work out is that the attackers started with AV 122, and the defenders with AV 2. And yet we ended up with a draw. 3x terrain doesn't explain how it went from 66-1 to 1-1, which is why I was rather scratching my head.

By rewatching the replay of the Manila battle, it seems that the destroyed unit is the 2nd Tank Regiment. The 4th tank regiment is showing an AV of zero, so it isn't in much better shape. Those 37mm AT guns must be doing fearsome work in the narrow, rubble strewn streets.

(in reply to Dirtnap86)
Post #: 145
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/18/2017 9:52:24 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelU

What I found hard to work out is that the attackers started with AV 122, and the defenders with AV 2. And yet we ended up with a draw. 3x terrain doesn't explain how it went from 66-1 to 1-1, which is why I was rather scratching my head.

By rewatching the replay of the Manila battle, it seems that the destroyed unit is the 2nd Tank Regiment. The 4th tank regiment is showing an AV of zero, so it isn't in much better shape. Those 37mm AT guns must be doing fearsome work in the narrow, rubble strewn streets.

That battle was in Bataan - a jungle-rough peninsula. You got a plus for terrain and leaders (perhaps because of nearby HQ), and he got a minus for fatigue. If he pushed his exhausted troops too hard, the lopsided result is on him.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 146
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/18/2017 11:16:16 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
When defending, 10 Support (both kinds) = 1 Assault Value. So, those two BFs have some support troops to add before terrain (x3) is figured in.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 147
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/19/2017 12:27:10 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

When defending, 10 Support (both kinds) = 1 Assault Value. So, those two BFs have some support troops to add before terrain (x3) is figured in.


Cooks grabbing rifles to defend against banzai charges. I like it. There will be a heroic tale to tell of the cooks of Bataan.

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 148
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/19/2017 3:25:54 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MichaelU


quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

When defending, 10 Support (both kinds) = 1 Assault Value. So, those two BFs have some support troops to add before terrain (x3) is figured in.


Cooks grabbing rifles to defend against banzai charges. I like it. There will be a heroic tale to tell of the cooks of Bataan.

Stock pot lids are bulletproof? Hot potatoes can be lobbed using ladles? S**t on a shingle can make the enemy gag?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to MichaelU)
Post #: 149
RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs ... - 12/20/2017 2:43:44 PM   
MichaelU

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 9/8/2009
Status: offline
Dec 24, 41

Looks like the Japanese submariners have finally spread their tentacles a bit. Previously we hadn't seen much activity from them beyond Pearl Harbor, but SS I-156 pops up at Port Blair and torpedoes both transports unloading there, sending both to the bottom. But it doesn't get it all it's own way -- the sub surfaces to finish off xAK Hermion, and the brave merchant mariners manage to put a shell into it and set it on fire.

We've been happily sailing lots of unescorted transport groups around, but it looks like we are going to have to start getting a little more cautious.

We've been running an operation out of Sabang, on the northern tip of Sumatra, to use the Dutch transports to lift out elements of the Indian infantry units for use in the defense of the subcontinent. But that has also been brought to a grinding halt by today's action. A series of sweeps by Oscars, followed by a massive airfield bombing, has wipes out the one squadron of Buffaloes guarding the air and smashed up most of the Lodestars on the ground. We also had some Catalinas there keeping an eye on the straits, and they get hammered as well.

Air losses for the turn include 10 Lodestars, 7 Buffaloes and 4 Catalinas. Ouch.

AVG keeps doing a sterling job in China though. Japanese bombers trying to pick on defenceless Chinese peasants are taught why this is a bad thing. So 6 Sonias and 4 Idas are taken as revenge.

It appears the Japanese are starting to use fast transport groups to get troops into forward bases. Last turn we got a report that an airfield unit was loaded on a CL and headed to Balikpapan, this turn a group of CAs turns up at Kavieng. I can't think of any reason for them to be there than unloading something. For their pains, a Banshee puts a 1,000 lb bomb into the CA Yoshino.

It looks like the Japanese player is also getting a bit more cautious, and is bringing the hammer. A TF unloading at Singakawang includes teh BB Tosa, and the supporting bombardment really knocks our troops around. Given that he is bringing a base group, I expect Singakawang to fall soon and be turned into a base for bombers.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Invasion action off Singkawang (56,88)

7 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
BB Tosa
CL Jintsu
DD Minegumo
xAK Sumanoura Maru
DD Asagumo

Allied ground losses:
137 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 12 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

BB Tosa firing at 1e-VLG-V Sup Afd
CL Jintsu firing at 1e-VLG-V Sup Afd
DD Minegumo firing at 1e-VLG-V Sup Afd
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 4,000 yards
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 1,000 yards


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphibious Assault at Singkawang (56,88)

TF 3 troops unloading over beach at Singkawang, 56,88

15 Naval Support troops lost in surf during unload of 9th Base Force /2


The defenders of Midway Island also takes a major knock, losing nearly 600 troops to a bombardment by BBs Hyuga and Ise and also getting hit by a carrier strike.

The cooks of Bataan are finally overwhelmed, but only just with a 2-1 result. Now starts their long march.

The defenders at Midway hold on, but just barely. Clearly they were badly shaken up by the bombardment, because despite being stuck behind level 2 forts they get hammered. Disruption seems to have done for them, and I would not give much for their chances next turn.

Despite about a million subs in the area, there is one desultory attack by SS Argonaut. I know Mike is not going to be very impressed when he sees the turn.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Midway Island (158,91)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 2540 troops, 32 guns, 12 vehicles, Assault Value = 71

Defending force 2917 troops, 63 guns, 10 vehicles, Assault Value = 59

Japanese adjusted assault: 40

Allied adjusted defense: 17

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), leaders(+), disruption(-), preparation(-)
experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
46 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 5 (1 destroyed, 4 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
275 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 31 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 15 (1 destroyed, 14 disabled)

Assaulting units:
1st Maizuru Assault/A Div /1
2nd Naval Pioneer Battalion


Got this in Sigint. 3rd Air Division is located at Kompong Trach(57,70). These are the guys who give Bettys torpedoes? I really need to keep a very close eye out for where these units are so that I don't run into torpedo armed Bettys by mistake.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Going The Distance: BTS 4.6 MichaelU/lb4269 (A) vs bristolduke (J) Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.188