Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >>

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

- 5/29/2003 9:33:50 AM

Drongo

Posts: 2205
Joined: 7/12/2002
From: Melb. Oztralia
Status: offline

[QUOTE] I am simply quoting from the Matrix patch notes. Read them. Jap subs used to match USN subs. They were delibretly
made less effective. It is in the notes.
[/QUOTE]

Where does it say the Japanese subs have been hard coded to be less effective? Which patch item are you reading and which patch is it from.

Are you sure you're not getting confused about the fact that the ASW ability of IJN surface escorts was reduced in one of the earlier patches?

_____________________________

Have no fear,
drink more beer.

(in reply to wpurdom)

Post #: 31

- 5/29/2003 9:43:13 AM

Chiteng

Posts: 7666
Joined: 2/20/2001
From: Raleigh,nc,usa
Status: offline

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Drongo
[B]Where does it say the Japanese subs have been hard coded to be less effective? Which patch item are you reading and which patch is it from.

Are you sure you're not getting confused about the fact that the ASW ability of IJN surface escorts was reduced in one of the earlier patches? [/B][/QUOTE]

I will go look again, that is possible. I am hardly infallible.

_____________________________

�It is clear that the individual who persecutes a man, his brother, because he is not of the same opinion, is a monster.�

Voltaire

'For those with faith, no proof is needed. For those without faith, no proof is enough'

French Priest

"Statistic

(in reply to wpurdom)

Post #: 32

- 5/29/2003 12:04:04 PM

madflava13

Posts: 1530
Joined: 2/7/2001
From: Alexandria, VA
Status: offline

Not to try and wrap this whole thing up a bit, but is it possible we're making much ado about nothing, considering we don't know anything about the production model? I mean if we're limited in the number of heavy bomber units availible, for example, then this isn't really an issue anymore, is it?

I say we wait and see what's going on with production and then resume this at that time, if necessary...

And to quote some of the (I think Aussie) posters, drink more beer!

_____________________________

"The Paraguayan Air Force's request for spraying subsidies was not as Paraguayan as it were..."

(in reply to wpurdom)

Post #: 33

- 5/29/2003 6:49:09 PM

Chiteng

Posts: 7666
Joined: 2/20/2001
From: Raleigh,nc,usa
Status: offline

[QUOTE]Originally posted by madflava13
[B]Not to try and wrap this whole thing up a bit, but is it possible we're making much ado about nothing, considering we don't know anything about the production model? I mean if we're limited in the number of heavy bomber units availible, for example, then this isn't really an issue anymore, is it?

I say we wait and see what's going on with production and then resume this at that time, if necessary...

And to quote some of the (I think Aussie) posters, drink more beer! [/B][/QUOTE]

It would be easier to fix the B-17 attack profile AND give us the ability to make more at the same time.

I LIKE the B-17, just not the anti-ship modeling.

_____________________________

(in reply to wpurdom)

Post #: 34