Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> The Operational Art of War IV >> After Action Reports >> RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/21/2018 7:35:44 PM   
700851McCall

 

Posts: 171
Joined: 1/7/2018
From: Staffordshire, England.
Status: offline 		I think it is possibly to simulate the fact that the Soviets liked to attack the German lines where the minors where holding them. Every time they did that they broke through. Single stacking may be the only way to simulate that effectively. I've only been playing with this rule for a few turns but it has already caused me problems defensively.

< Message edited by 700851McCall -- 3/21/2018 7:37:29 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 331
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/21/2018 9:28:18 PM   
TPOO

 

Posts: 180
Joined: 11/15/2007
From: Garden Grove, CA
Status: offline 		Finland is not an Axis Minor so the rule does not apply to them. Common sense plays here so auxillary units are not part of the stacking rule. Units that have been divided the rule does not apply. It is for division level ground units.
700851McCall is 100 percent correct in his analogy. If this were a PBEM scenario there would be no house rules but the PO in TOAW is not that capable in making its own decisions and sometimes the scenario designers have to help it out when possible. Me and Steve put this rule in almost 10 years ago and it was also a rule in the original FITE scenario.
That said everyone is free to play the scenario the way they wish, this is just to make the scenario more historic in playability,

(in reply to 700851McCall)
Post #: 332
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/22/2018 12:06:22 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline
quote:

700851McCall is 100 percent correct in his analogy. If this were a PBEM scenario there would be no house rules but the PO in TOAW is not that capable in making its own decisions and sometimes the scenario designers have to help it out when possible. Me and Steve put this rule in almost 10 years ago and it was also a rule in the original FITE scenario.


Ok, it makes sense now. Thanks for explaining your thinking behind the rule. I'll try to follow the rule when possible. Thanks again for a great scenario. You have been doing a great work putting it all together.

(in reply to TPOO)
Post #: 333
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/22/2018 12:44:07 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Situation on 10/4/42 after 135 turns.

Fall rasputitza begins on turn 136.

AGN: Situation remains stable
AGC: Situation remains stable
AGB: We have established a bridgehead over Volga River.
AGA: Grozny is surrounded. We have isolated Caucasus area. Our next objectives are Sukhumi and Makhachkala.

Losses in the first 135 turns: (last 5 turns in parenthesis) [replacements in 5 turns]

70995 (+1610) Heavy Rifle Squads [repl 2155]
7701 (+112) Rifle Squad – Rum [repl 280]
2949 (+0) Rifle Squad – Hun [repl 155]
5142 (+8) Rifle Squad – Fin [repl 125]
986 (+0) Rifle Squad – Ita [repl 90]
9698 (+181) Engineer Squads [repl 225]
2430 (+45) Panzers (all types) [repl 425]
3438 (+140) Fighters (all types) [repl 205]
719 (+36) Stukas & Hs-129 [repl 75]
3407 (+134) Bombers (all types) [repl 105]





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 334
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/22/2018 12:59:37 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Situation on 10/21/42 after 140 turns.

Rasputitza continues. All activity is suspended.

Losses in the first 140 turns: (last 5 turns in parenthesis) [replacements in 5 turns]

71290 (+295) Heavy Rifle Squads [repl 2155]
7701 (+0) Rifle Squad – Rum [repl 280]
2949 (+0) Rifle Squad – Hun [repl 155]
5148 (+6) Rifle Squad – Fin [repl 125]
986 (+0) Rifle Squad – Ita [repl 90]
9726 (+28) Engineer Squads [repl 225]
2430 (+0) Panzers (all types) [repl 425]
3513 (+75) Fighters (all types) [repl 205]
730 (+11) Stukas & Hs-129 [repl 75]
3407 (+0) Bombers (all types) [repl 105]





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 335
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/22/2018 1:13:24 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Turn 142, 10/28/42 AGA

Gagra was captured. Railhead has reached the frontline. We are receiving supplies despite rasputitza.

We are now receiving new FW-190A/D planes, 23 planes per turn.

We got our first Tiger I battalion. Tiger I production is only 4 per turn.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 336
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/22/2018 1:23:43 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Turn 144, 11/4/42 AGA

Rasputitza is over. Railhead is already near Gudermes. It’s time to continue towards Baku. 8th SS division reached the Caspian Sea!





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 337
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/22/2018 1:27:22 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Turn 144, 11/4/42 AGA

Our troops capture Sukhumi airfield. Mountain divisions move to Marukh Pass.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 338
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 3:06:43 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Turn 145, 11/8/42 AGC

Soviet winter offensive begins near Moscow. We had to withdraw two places, near Zagorsk and near Kolomna. Reinforcements arrive by train.







Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Jukipo -- 3/25/2018 3:07:56 PM >

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 339
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 3:14:20 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Turn 146, 11/11/42 AGC

It seems that Soviet winter offensive is over after only two turns. My shock level is 105%, theirs 98%. Is there a bug? Scenario briefing said Soviet shock 120% would last 10 turns. I took Grozny on turn 145, adding my supply +2%. Maybe capturing Grozny messed soviet shock?





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 340
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 3:25:20 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Turn 147, 11/15/42 AGA

Panzers are roaming free along the coast of Caspian Sea. Grozny was captured. Makhachkala is surrounded. There is 90 km to Astrakhan. 350km to Baku.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 341
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 3:31:10 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Turn 147, 11/15/42 AGA

Sukhumi was captured. We have gone through that narrow coastal strip between the Black Sea and Caucasus mountains. Now we’ll have more space to maneuver. It’s more difficult to stop us now. Only 140 km to Batumi.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 342
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 3:40:32 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Axis Overwhelming Victory! Soviet Union Unconditional Surrender! Stalin Dead!

My victory level is 4472 of 4400. It’s overwhelming victory. Soviets are unable to hurt me, and I can destroy their units at will. I have beaten the Red Army. I could continue to the Urals, but there is no challenge anymore. They don’t have enough units to defend the whole front. I think I could have captured Baku, Gorky and Yaroslav during the winter 42-43.

I'll post some statistics later.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 343
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 4:09:36 PM   
DanNeely

 

Posts: 489
Joined: 10/18/2005
Status: offline 		Congratulations!

Now that the game's over, would you mind posting a save? I'd like to poke around what's left of the Russians and see exactly what the Turkish intervention with the fall of Makhachkala is.

_____________________________

Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man ... weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not [it] an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 344
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 5:23:12 PM   
Kursk1943

 

Posts: 445
Joined: 3/15/2014
From: Bavaria in Southern Germany
Status: offline 		Hurrah, well done! Your AAR is an excellent incentive to play this scenario, showing how to win as Axis. Is it possible as in War in the East and occupy all territory or is it game over with the surrender?

(in reply to DanNeely)
Post #: 345
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 6:15:45 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline
quote:

Now that the game's over, would you mind posting a save? I'd like to poke around what's left of the Russians and see exactly what the Turkish intervention with the fall of Makhachkala is.


Sure, here is the file.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to DanNeely)
Post #: 346
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 6:38:40 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Here is the situation in the North from Ladoga to Ryazan. There are a lot of enemy troops near Moscow and near Volkhov. Other sectors of the front are not so strong.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 347
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 6:42:21 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Here is the situation in the Center from Ryazan to Stalingrad. The enemy is weak in this area.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 348
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 6:45:26 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Here is the situation in the South from Stalingrad to Batumi. There are not enough Soviet units to defend this area.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 349
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 7:35:26 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Here is the inventory of the most important weapon systems.

Axis strength on turn 147:
infantry squads (all types) - 104400
artillery tubes over 100mm - 15500
panzers - 9776
fighter-bombers - 1166
dive-bombers - 593
level-bombers - 1125

Soviet strength on turn 147:
infantry squads (all types) - 79200
artillery tubes over 100mm - 3300
tanks - 11924
fighter-bombers - 5577
level-bombers - 1665

So, I had about 30% more infantry and almost five times more artillery. The Soviets had 20% more tanks. No wonder they couldn't fight back! My artillery was inflicting continuous losses on the enemy.

Air war was slowly turning to Soviets advantage.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 350
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 8:05:46 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline 		Here are the most important events during this campaign.

Turn 11: Smolensk was captured before we ran out of supply and the enemy could form a solid defense.
Turns 13-14: Kiev was surrounded.
Turns 14-16: Leningrad was surrounded.
Turn 31: We decided to stop the offensive towards Moscow and dig in.
Turns 44-59: The enemy suffered massive losses during the winter offensive.
Turns 60-65: Operation Jägerschnizel. Several enemy armies were destroyed in front of Moscow.
Turns 90-92: Several enemy armies were surrounded north of Moscow.
Turns 97-98: Several enemy armies were surrounded east of Kharkov.
Turn 113: Stalingrad was captured before we ran out of supply.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 351
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 8:09:19 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline
quote:

Is it possible as in War in the East and occupy all territory or is it game over with the surrender?


I think this scenario will go on until the last turn. There is no surrender. I just decided to end the game as it was not challenging anymore.

(in reply to Kursk1943)
Post #: 352
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/25/2018 9:27:46 PM   
TPOO

 

Posts: 180
Joined: 11/15/2007
From: Garden Grove, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jukipo

quote:

Is it possible as in War in the East and occupy all territory or is it game over with the surrender?


I think this scenario will go on until the last turn. There is no surrender. I just decided to end the game as it was not challenging anymore.


Did the victory message pop up when you got more than the maximum points? If so I may need to increase the point totally as I did not want the victory message to pop up that soon and it may have been a TOAW IV thing as it did not use to do that in TOAW III. Anyway hopefully sometime you can try the latest version uploaded to the mod thread as it should have an improved PO performance, at least I hope it does. Thank you.

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 353
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/26/2018 1:00:01 PM   
Jukipo

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/10/2015
Status: offline
quote:

Did the victory message pop up when you got more than the maximum points? If so I may need to increase the point totally as I did not want the victory message to pop up that soon and it may have been a TOAW IV thing as it did not use to do that in TOAW III.


There was no victory message. I just decided I had won. The game was not challenging anymore.

I noticed two possible bugs:

Soviet 1942 winter offensive did last only two turns 144-145 (Sov shock 120, Axis shock 95). Then shock changed back to Soviet 98, Axis 105. Briefing says shock lasts 10 turns. Is there a bug?

6th Pz Div 43 unit appeared on turn 118 with Pz-IVh tanks. The old unit 6th Pz Div 41 didn’t disappear, so I had two 6th Pz units. I didn’t use the 1943 variant.

(in reply to TPOO)
Post #: 354
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/26/2018 10:26:36 PM   
DanNeely

 

Posts: 489
Joined: 10/18/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DanNeely

Congratulations!

Now that the game's over, would you mind posting a save? I'd like to poke around what's left of the Russians and see exactly what the Turkish intervention with the fall of Makhachkala is.


So I ran the game forward a few turns, and from what I can tell taking Makhachkala did exactly nothing.


_____________________________

Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man ... weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not [it] an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius

(in reply to DanNeely)
Post #: 355
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/27/2018 12:09:23 AM   
Nicholas Bell

 

Posts: 549
Joined: 4/10/2006
From: Eagle River, Alaska
Status: offline 		Thanks again for you AAR, Jukipo. You showed how to do it right! I think you need a greater challenge for your next performance.

(in reply to DanNeely)
Post #: 356
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/27/2018 1:14:20 AM   
TPOO

 

Posts: 180
Joined: 11/15/2007
From: Garden Grove, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DanNeely


quote:

ORIGINAL: DanNeely

Congratulations!

Now that the game's over, would you mind posting a save? I'd like to poke around what's left of the Russians and see exactly what the Turkish intervention with the fall of Makhachkala is.


So I ran the game forward a few turns, and from what I can tell taking Makhachkala did exactly nothing.


3 Turk Divisions activate when taking Makhachkala but they seem to arrive at the Batumi hex. If occupied still by the Soviets they will not arrive until the hex is captured. I do not think I like that and they should arrive on their side of the border. Will have to change that.

(in reply to DanNeely)
Post #: 357
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/27/2018 2:24:22 AM   
TPOO

 

Posts: 180
Joined: 11/15/2007
From: Garden Grove, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jukipo

quote:

Did the victory message pop up when you got more than the maximum points? If so I may need to increase the point totally as I did not want the victory message to pop up that soon and it may have been a TOAW IV thing as it did not use to do that in TOAW III.


There was no victory message. I just decided I had won. The game was not challenging anymore.

I noticed two possible bugs:

Soviet 1942 winter offensive did last only two turns 144-145 (Sov shock 120, Axis shock 95). Then shock changed back to Soviet 98, Axis 105. Briefing says shock lasts 10 turns. Is there a bug?

6th Pz Div 43 unit appeared on turn 118 with Pz-IVh tanks. The old unit 6th Pz Div 41 didn’t disappear, so I had two 6th Pz units. I didn’t use the 1943 variant.


Thank you.
The 6th Pz Div 43 had an activation of Turn 118 instead of Event 118. So that is fixed
The Winter 42 offensive had a variable start date set in events and for some reason that can mess things up with other events triggering off it. Steve has the event loop set correctly but what happened with your game should not have happened. I am resetting it with out the variable and should function correctly now. It is just easier that way. I will upload a corrected version.

(in reply to Jukipo)
Post #: 358
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 3/28/2018 10:58:06 PM   
DanNeely

 

Posts: 489
Joined: 10/18/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TPOO


quote:

ORIGINAL: DanNeely


quote:

ORIGINAL: DanNeely

Congratulations!

Now that the game's over, would you mind posting a save? I'd like to poke around what's left of the Russians and see exactly what the Turkish intervention with the fall of Makhachkala is.


So I ran the game forward a few turns, and from what I can tell taking Makhachkala did exactly nothing.


3 Turk Divisions activate when taking Makhachkala but they seem to arrive at the Batumi hex. If occupied still by the Soviets they will not arrive until the hex is captured. I do not think I like that and they should arrive on their side of the border. Will have to change that.



I took Batumi too waited a few turns and they still didn't arrive.

That aside I think either making Batumi the trigger or requiring both it and Makhachkala as triggers might be a good idea. Without any supply point of their own the Turkish divs would just wither away; and with only 3 divs by themselves along the long border it'd be easy for the Soviets to wipe them out if they're lacking in any German support.

_____________________________

Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man ... weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not [it] an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius

(in reply to TPOO)
Post #: 359
RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) - 4/13/2018 6:39:03 AM   
gliz2

 

Posts: 454
Joined: 2/20/2016
Status: offline 		Great AAR.
The main issue here is Elmer. No offence but he was terrible. I have been playing mostly hugh EF scenarios like FITE(2) past 4 years and I know from experience even very avarage players pose much more of opponent.
Hell, I do go as far to say that an avarage player as commander of STAVKA will slow you down more than historically.
I'm having a bit of the problem of making a crushing breakthrough in the first 2 weeks when playing against human. Cause human think and adapt. Elmer does not.
My favourite in D21 was a case when I paradroped in almost undefended Moscov in August. Yes, Elmer had the city emptied of troops.

(in reply to DanNeely)
Post #: 360
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> The Operational Art of War IV >> After Action Reports >> RE: Thriumph or Tragedy? (D21) Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.359