Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/21/2018 2:47:04 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
True the Allies have ships to burn, but should they really be burned? I find the psychological as aspect of war critical in real life but doesn't affect forces here except when one side or the other gets frustrated and quits. The Japanese are handicapped by countries that collapsed after they lost some units and territory, especially the Dutch in DEI or the Americans in PI. That flipped all remaining units when they surrendered and Japan was not forced to invade every occupied base and dot to have those ares become their territory. If possible it would be good if we could have that included in the game.

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 301
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/22/2018 1:11:30 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
11th-20th Oct 43

In Burma he has about 100 ground units sitting at Toungoo not moving anywhere, guess he is resting them for now, next stop Rangoon and/or Moulmein...

I send Mr Tanaka and his ships from Rabual for a look to see what he had lying off Shortlands, he gets a nice little haul:

Night Time Surface Combat, near Shortlands at 109,131, Range 12,000 Yards

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
Seagull V: 1 destroyed

Japanese Ships
CA Myoko
CA Haguro, Shell hits 1
CA Nachi
CA Ashigara, Shell hits 2
DD Yamagumo, Shell hits 1
DD Minegumo, Shell hits 1
DD Asagumo
DD Arare, Shell hits 3, on fire
DD Kasumi, Shell hits 1
DD Yudachi

Allied Ships
CA Australia, Shell hits 23, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
CA Cornwall, Shell hits 30, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
DD Helm, Shell hits 11, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Mugford, Shell hits 3
DD Mahan, Shell hits 1
DD Case, Shell hits 18, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Shaw, Shell hits 1
DD Warramunga, Shell hits 5, on fire

Meanwhile in Cenpac my subs finish off the sole surviving Omaha class CL Trenton as it headed for PH. He invades Wotje in the Marshalls, bombarding it with no less than 6 fast BBs. His CVs are in the area and I send my entire fleet more in hope than expectation of forcing a battle, but as expected he sends them scurrying back towards Pearl as soon as my fleets are sighted. I'm at the peak of my carrier based air power now, with 15 CVs, and 10 CVL/Es in play carrying roughly 1300 a/c. Reading the Allied reinforcement shedule he has roughly the same but his will go through the roof in 44


(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 302
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/22/2018 11:10:06 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
Now you know why he scurries away, to come back and fight another day, when he is on steriods.

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 303
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/23/2018 2:37:58 AM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
Gosh, your surface combats of late are lit! I wonder if your opponent is on the brink of losing confidence in his electronic sailors

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 304
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/23/2018 6:26:44 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

11th-20th Oct 43

In Burma he has about 100 ground units sitting at Toungoo not moving anywhere, guess he is resting them for now, next stop Rangoon and/or Moulmein...

I send Mr Tanaka and his ships from Rabual for a look to see what he had lying off Shortlands, he gets a nice little haul:

Night Time Surface Combat, near Shortlands at 109,131, Range 12,000 Yards

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
Seagull V: 1 destroyed

Japanese Ships
CA Myoko
CA Haguro, Shell hits 1
CA Nachi
CA Ashigara, Shell hits 2
DD Yamagumo, Shell hits 1
DD Minegumo, Shell hits 1
DD Asagumo
DD Arare, Shell hits 3, on fire
DD Kasumi, Shell hits 1
DD Yudachi

Allied Ships
CA Australia, Shell hits 23, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
CA Cornwall, Shell hits 30, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
DD Helm, Shell hits 11, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Mugford, Shell hits 3
DD Mahan, Shell hits 1
DD Case, Shell hits 18, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Shaw, Shell hits 1
DD Warramunga, Shell hits 5, on fire

Meanwhile in Cenpac my subs finish off the sole surviving Omaha class CL Trenton as it headed for PH. He invades Wotje in the Marshalls, bombarding it with no less than 6 fast BBs. His CVs are in the area and I send my entire fleet more in hope than expectation of forcing a battle, but as expected he sends them scurrying back towards Pearl as soon as my fleets are sighted. I'm at the peak of my carrier based air power now, with 15 CVs, and 10 CVL/Es in play carrying roughly 1300 a/c. Reading the Allied reinforcement shedule he has roughly the same but his will go through the roof in 44




You're really causing him some problems, aren't you?

I think it's the turn of 44 when the extra Allied radar gunnery takes effect and your DDs begin to really suffer in every battle like this. Take advantage while you can and seek out any engagement possible.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 305
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/23/2018 7:47:19 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
21st-31st Oct 43

Not much of note. No troop movement from him in Burma, however a nasty sweep/B24 raid of Rangoon destroys 40 Oscars on the ground. He's starting to move troops around in China with the odd 4E raid thrown in so he is probably angling to start up hostilities again there soon.

The other area of note is around Rabual. I have the victorious cruiser force under Tanaka sitting under about 300 fighters there. He loads up all his bases in and around Shortlands with marine fighters and bombers and they attack the TF, he pays to the tune of 115 a/c for 3 losses and no hits by the few SBDs/TBFs to get through My CVs are currently hovering about 12 hexes NE of Shortlands so he may have hoped to get a shot at them instead but the result would have been the same. No sign of his death star the last few turns.

The Frank starts production next month, which is nice but it won't be a big game changer due to the poor service rating. Still waiting for a navy fighter squadron to arrive capable of upgrading to the George, I've even turned off production of it as I have about 300 in the pool!

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 306
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/23/2018 10:23:53 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

21st-31st Oct 43

Not much of note. No troop movement from him in Burma, however a nasty sweep/B24 raid of Rangoon destroys 40 Oscars on the ground. He's starting to move troops around in China with the odd 4E raid thrown in so he is probably angling to start up hostilities again there soon.

The other area of note is around Rabual. I have the victorious cruiser force under Tanaka sitting under about 300 fighters there. He loads up all his bases in and around Shortlands with marine fighters and bombers and they attack the TF, he pays to the tune of 115 a/c for 3 losses and no hits by the few SBDs/TBFs to get through My CVs are currently hovering about 12 hexes NE of Shortlands so he may have hoped to get a shot at them instead but the result would have been the same. No sign of his death star the last few turns.

The Frank starts production next month, which is nice but it won't be a big game changer due to the poor service rating. Still waiting for a navy fighter squadron to arrive capable of upgrading to the George, I've even turned off production of it as I have about 300 in the pool!


The Frank does change the game. It's just something you have to plan for with service 3. Rotate groups, use the rail, don't set them on islands.

The George is good enough you should just build as many as you can for later. Even the N1K1 can be useful late.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 307
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/25/2018 6:30:32 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
1st-10th Nov 43

Two very big downers during this period.

Number one, he attacks Shanghai port at extreme range with B24s and I had neglected to CAP it, his bombers sink a large TK and AO plus a few valuable PBs and Es. Lesson learned, CAP big ports or empty them within 20 hexes of his large airbases.

Number two was much worse. I've had my oldest CA's, the Aoba/Furutaka class at Singapore most of the game. After recon showed warships that looked to be threatening Rangoon I sent them north as a counter. It looked one of his TFs was going to visit Rangoon and sent them in to intercept it. However they find nothing and for some reason they are still at Rangoon during the daytime. I had neglected to LRCAP them (I expected them to be well clear in the day) and his low level B25s sink all but Kinugasa 3 CA's lost in one turn is a mini disaster for the IJN, even if they are the weakest in the game. Lesson learned #2, always CAP fleets no mater where you expect them to be next turn Nothing else of note to report.

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 308
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/25/2018 7:35:02 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
That hurts. You hate to lose them for nothing.

You can use his aggression though, especially with ports and other targets. CAP traps will be useful later too, but I have a feeling Mr Kane likes to go all-in, s you'll also have cover carefully!

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 309
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/25/2018 11:36:00 PM   
Anachro


Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline
I'm always with losing ships in an engagement initiated or in operations I have deliberately conducted for strategic or tactical purposes. Losing them for no reason or due to careless mistakes is always the most frustrating.

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 310
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/26/2018 2:13:25 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro

I'm always with losing ships in an engagement initiated or in operations I have deliberately conducted for strategic or tactical purposes. Losing them for no reason or due to careless mistakes is always the most frustrating.


It certainly is. I don't think they ever fired their guns at another ship the whole game

(in reply to Anachro)
Post #: 311
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/27/2018 2:15:21 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

The Frank starts production next month, which is nice but it won't be a big game changer due to the poor service rating. Still waiting for a navy fighter squadron to arrive capable of upgrading to the George, I've even turned off production of it as I have about 300 in the pool!


Yep, waiting for George to arrive really stinks,but don't turn off production as you will eventually have the squadrons and boy will you ever work them hard. Even the first version is capable all the way thru 1944. You need to anticipate losing thousands.

The Frank is second only to SAM in a PDU off game with respect importance. You get tons of squadrons, and you should really plan on losing 6000 plus over the course of the game unless you planned on rushing the KI94.

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 312
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/27/2018 3:21:35 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

The Frank starts production next month, which is nice but it won't be a big game changer due to the poor service rating. Still waiting for a navy fighter squadron to arrive capable of upgrading to the George, I've even turned off production of it as I have about 300 in the pool!


Yep, waiting for George to arrive really stinks,but don't turn off production as you will eventually have the squadrons and boy will you ever work them hard. Even the first version is capable all the way thru 1944. You need to anticipate losing thousands.

The Frank is second only to SAM in a PDU off game with respect importance. You get tons of squadrons, and you should really plan on losing 6000 plus over the course of the game unless you planned on rushing the KI94.



Actually, I'd say N1K1 is still usable into 45!

Some thoughts on airframes.

Don't turn off the N1K1 or upgrade all factories. It gets to 41k and that is important late.

Build the Ki-102A. It goes to 44k. I didn't research it, and wish I had.

Get the Ki-83 early. As early as possible. In my game with Loka they're killing it (meaning killing my guys).

In mid-43-early 44 think about training a LOT of fighter pilots of the IJAAF as it will be most important late after the big kill of IJN groups in mid-44. Looking back now I would begin to use PPs to convert 2E bomber groups to FB, train and also use these for rear area defence. It is also then important to research and build enough Ki-102B. I'm still building the Ki-45A Nick in late 44, and will be until the end I think.

Get the Sam as early as possible. I didn't.

The N1K5 and J2M5 work really well late at max altitude. I use them in low CAP and they're fine, but they have better manoeuvre than Allied planes up high and it seems to make a difference. They've both gone toe to toe with P-51D, P-47D25 and F4U-1D and have done really well. It's better to tackle the P-47D/D25 low though. They're dogs against a low CAP.

EDIT: This is PDU-off isn't it? Maybe you can't buy out 2E bomber groups in PDU-off.

< Message edited by obvert -- 7/27/2018 3:22:15 PM >


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 313
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/27/2018 7:15:01 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
Subscribed and I read it all so far.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 314
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/27/2018 8:07:45 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

The Frank starts production next month, which is nice but it won't be a big game changer due to the poor service rating. Still waiting for a navy fighter squadron to arrive capable of upgrading to the George, I've even turned off production of it as I have about 300 in the pool!


Yep, waiting for George to arrive really stinks,but don't turn off production as you will eventually have the squadrons and boy will you ever work them hard. Even the first version is capable all the way thru 1944. You need to anticipate losing thousands.

The Frank is second only to SAM in a PDU off game with respect importance. You get tons of squadrons, and you should really plan on losing 6000 plus over the course of the game unless you planned on rushing the KI94.



Actually, I'd say N1K1 is still usable into 45!

Some thoughts on airframes.

Don't turn off the N1K1 or upgrade all factories. It gets to 41k and that is important late.

Build the Ki-102A. It goes to 44k. I didn't research it, and wish I had.

Get the Ki-83 early. As early as possible. In my game with Loka they're killing it (meaning killing my guys).

In mid-43-early 44 think about training a LOT of fighter pilots of the IJAAF as it will be most important late after the big kill of IJN groups in mid-44. Looking back now I would begin to use PPs to convert 2E bomber groups to FB, train and also use these for rear area defence. It is also then important to research and build enough Ki-102B. I'm still building the Ki-45A Nick in late 44, and will be until the end I think.

Get the Sam as early as possible. I didn't.

The N1K5 and J2M5 work really well late at max altitude. I use them in low CAP and they're fine, but they have better manoeuvre than Allied planes up high and it seems to make a difference. They've both gone toe to toe with P-51D, P-47D25 and F4U-1D and have done really well. It's better to tackle the P-47D/D25 low though. They're dogs against a low CAP.

EDIT: This is PDU-off isn't it? Maybe you can't buy out 2E bomber groups in PDU-off.


Hi Obvert, thanks for your input. As much as I would like to research the likes of the Sam, Ki-83 and -102, I'd be starting from scratch now and would be unlikely to see any of them before the end of 44. I will turn on the N1K1 factories again to build up a big stock when upgradeable sqds come into play. Kicking myself as I took my eye off its research and allowed all the factories to convert to production when I had planed to convert most to research the N1K2, which has a better service rating of 2. I won't see that now until late 44 either

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 315
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/27/2018 8:09:17 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Subscribed and I read it all so far.


Thanks, good to know people are still interested in this.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 316
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/27/2018 8:37:38 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

. . . Kicking myself as I took my eye off its research and allowed all the factories to convert to production when I had planed to convert most to research the N1K2, which has a better service rating of 2. I won't see that now until late 44 either


Note to self:

Have a cheat sheet/reminder list of things to do/switch if I play the Japanese again! I only tried it once and I did not have tracker working.

One thing that I found out recently in my game against the Japanese computer - you can sweep your own base if there are enemy ground units there. I have even seen them in the bombers combat report but I have yet to see enemy CAP so I have not seen the effects on the enemy CAP.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 317
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/27/2018 9:21:41 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller


quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

The Frank starts production next month, which is nice but it won't be a big game changer due to the poor service rating. Still waiting for a navy fighter squadron to arrive capable of upgrading to the George, I've even turned off production of it as I have about 300 in the pool!


Yep, waiting for George to arrive really stinks,but don't turn off production as you will eventually have the squadrons and boy will you ever work them hard. Even the first version is capable all the way thru 1944. You need to anticipate losing thousands.

The Frank is second only to SAM in a PDU off game with respect importance. You get tons of squadrons, and you should really plan on losing 6000 plus over the course of the game unless you planned on rushing the KI94.



Actually, I'd say N1K1 is still usable into 45!

Some thoughts on airframes.

Don't turn off the N1K1 or upgrade all factories. It gets to 41k and that is important late.

Build the Ki-102A. It goes to 44k. I didn't research it, and wish I had.

Get the Ki-83 early. As early as possible. In my game with Loka they're killing it (meaning killing my guys).

In mid-43-early 44 think about training a LOT of fighter pilots of the IJAAF as it will be most important late after the big kill of IJN groups in mid-44. Looking back now I would begin to use PPs to convert 2E bomber groups to FB, train and also use these for rear area defence. It is also then important to research and build enough Ki-102B. I'm still building the Ki-45A Nick in late 44, and will be until the end I think.

Get the Sam as early as possible. I didn't.

The N1K5 and J2M5 work really well late at max altitude. I use them in low CAP and they're fine, but they have better manoeuvre than Allied planes up high and it seems to make a difference. They've both gone toe to toe with P-51D, P-47D25 and F4U-1D and have done really well. It's better to tackle the P-47D/D25 low though. They're dogs against a low CAP.

EDIT: This is PDU-off isn't it? Maybe you can't buy out 2E bomber groups in PDU-off.


Hi Obvert, thanks for your input. As much as I would like to research the likes of the Sam, Ki-83 and -102, I'd be starting from scratch now and would be unlikely to see any of them before the end of 44. I will turn on the N1K1 factories again to build up a big stock when upgradeable sqds come into play. Kicking myself as I took my eye off its research and allowed all the factories to convert to production when I had planed to convert most to research the N1K2, which has a better service rating of 2. I won't see that now until late 44 either


I'm always a bit lukewarm on the N1K2. It's fine, but the N1K1 just has more, and I'm beginning to think it's combination of guns and altitude override the service 2. I do like the J2M3, and that has service 2 also, so maybe that's my answer should I go through this again.

I'm only seeing the Ki-83 in Dec 44, and won't get the Sam for a few months still. They're still worth getting at this stage, and much better than waiting until mid-45. You need something to deal with the high and fast late Allied models beginning with the P-51D in November 44.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 318
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/28/2018 7:14:41 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
I see what you mean about the N1K2 as its max ceiling is 6000ft less than the N1K1, however that should not matter in this game due to a HR on max fighter ops, 20k 42, 25k 43, 30k 44, 35k 45, 40k 46 (unless I make it to 46 lol).

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 319
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/28/2018 7:24:40 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
11th-20th Nov 43

No troop movement by him in Burma but he steps up the sweep/bomb campaign there. One day I lose 50 Oscars for a handful of P47s and I pull them out of the fight for good. A few are already upgraded to the Frank and I'm waiting for them to repair before committing them en masse, I should have 120 to play with flown by my best pilots by the end of the month.

I now have decent CAP over every major base in B24 range from China but I am yet to get a bite, I think he has them set to commander discretion which usually sends them anywhere with no CAP so there have been no raids the last few days.

No sign of his CVs at all during this period, I think they may be in port getting upgrades (I hope so anyway as I have something planned for my CVs, more details nearer the time). I'm facing a dilema at Rabual. It's basically surrounded now by 7 or 8 huge airfields. He is only night bombing for now but I'm wandering if its time to pull out whilst the going is still good....

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 320
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/28/2018 7:35:09 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
Situation at Rabaul. All the yellow marked bases have maxed out airfields (at least size 7 or 8). All the fleets in the red circle are PT boats, he has at least 10 TFs at Shortlands alone. I have one div plus a few bits and pieces on Rabaul behind 7 forts and 1500 mines to deter any bombardment TFs.

I also have two heavy cruiser TFs sitting under 300 fighters on CAP that have already mauled one massed attack by land based carrier a/c, so I don't think they are in danger anytime soon. He is sending 100+ bombers at night that usually cost me a handful of losses every turn. But if he goes all in one day it could get nasty....






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Miller -- 7/28/2018 7:38:04 PM >

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 321
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/28/2018 8:33:50 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
Believe it or not the very next turn he sweeps Rabaul with everything he has in range, including P47s which I had only seen in Burma before now. I come off much worse as he downs 100 for about 30 losses, but with another 100 or so damaged I'm down to about 80 ready to fly next turn. Needless to say my cruiser TFs are heading north back to Truk before they get the B25 treatment like the ones I lost at Rangoon.....

< Message edited by Miller -- 7/28/2018 8:34:37 PM >

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 322
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/29/2018 7:23:42 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

I see what you mean about the N1K2 as its max ceiling is 6000ft less than the N1K1, however that should not matter in this game due to a HR on max fighter ops, 20k 42, 25k 43, 30k 44, 35k 45, 40k 46 (unless I make it to 46 lol).


In that case it's definitely different. I'd stress getting the Ki-84r ASAP then and any of the 3rd generation fighters are good under those altitudes.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 323
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/29/2018 4:56:43 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
21st-30th Nov 43

The main event this period is what I alluded to by having plans for my CVs. It was a port raid on Tulagi, where recon indicated 150 ships in port covered only by around 100 fighters. I sent the whole fleet on a full speed run to within 6 hexes and after a few sweeps to soften up the defences the main strike goes in:


Morning Air attack on Tulagi , at 114,137

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 185 NM, estimated altitude 30,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 55 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 42
A6M5c Zero x 289
B6N2 Jill x 167
B6N2a Jill x 27
D4Y1 Judy x 204
D4Y3 Judy x 114

Allied aircraft
P-39D Airacobra x 33
P-39N1 Airacobra x 15
P-40E Warhawk x 30

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
A6M5c Zero: 3 destroyed
B6N2 Jill: 2 destroyed, 11 damaged
B6N2 Jill: 1 destroyed by flak
D4Y1 Judy: 2 destroyed, 20 damaged
D4Y3 Judy: 4 damaged
D4Y3 Judy: 1 destroyed by flak

Allied aircraft losses
P-39D Airacobra: 5 destroyed
P-39N1 Airacobra: 2 destroyed
P-40E Warhawk: 4 destroyed

Allied Ships
xAP Lycaon, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
AD Whitney, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AR Jason, Bomb hits 2
DM Sicard, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAK Peisander, Bomb hits 2, on fire
AVP Merel, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
DM Montgomery, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Pijnacker Hordijk, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP President Taylor, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AV Langley, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
AV Wright, Bomb hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP William McArthur, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Idomeneus, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires
AM Velocity, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
LSI(L) Denbighshire, Bomb hits 1
AV Curtiss, Bomb hits 6, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Darvel, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
AM Bittern, Bomb hits 1, on fire
TK Marpessa, Bomb hits 1
AGP Mobjack, Bomb hits 1, on fire
TK Harpa, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
TK Francol, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
AVD Casco, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
TK Belita, Bomb hits 2, on fire
AR Hector, Bomb hits 1
AVD San Pablo, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Morinda, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
AV Chandeleur, Bomb hits 4, heavy fires
AV Albemarle, Bomb hits 7, heavy fires, heavy damage
SC PC-596, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Chevalier, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AKE Regulus, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
AV Tangier, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires
xAP Clan Macbrayne, Bomb hits 2, on fire
AM Champion, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
xAP Noordam, Bomb hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage
AM Skylark, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
DD DeHaven, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
AM Conflict, Bomb hits 2, and is sunk
AGP Niagara, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
AKE Makawao, Bomb hits 1, on fire
xAP Fiona, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
AM Sheldrake, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AVP Fazant, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AS Orion, Bomb hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP David J. Brewer, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AVP Heron, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AVD Mackinac, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
KV Dawson, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
xAP Matthew Flinders, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
PG Moresby, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Kaiping, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
AS Fulton, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
DM Ramsay, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AKE Mormacland, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
AM Kalgoorlie, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AV Pocomoke, Bomb hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage
SC PC-1079, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
LSI(L) Glenartney, Bomb hits 1, on fire
xAP Yarra, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
AVP Orion, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
AKE Vega, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires
AS Otus, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AM Direct, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
AVP Bellatrix, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Rochussen, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Chungking, Bomb hits 1, on fire
xAP Coolana, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
AKE Mormacmar, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires
TK Gulfcoast, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
xAP Francis P. Blair, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AM Kingfisher, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
AKE Manukai, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AR Vestal, Bomb hits 1
AM Impeccable, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
ARD AFDB-1, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DD Le Triomphant, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires
AVD Half Moon, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires
AGP Oyster Bay, Bomb hits 1, on fire
xAK Peshawur, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AM Strive, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
xAP Burwah, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Macdhui, Bomb hits 1
AS Bushnell, Bomb hits 1
PG Soerabaja, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AD Dobbin, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DM Tracy, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
xAP Siberg, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
AVD Chincoteague, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
xAP Frederick J. Turner, Bomb hits 2, on fire
AS Proteus, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AM Daring, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
AM Token, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
xAP Kooyong, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AKE Antares, Bomb hits 1, on fire
xAP Carlisle, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Sarpedonia, Bomb hits 1, on fire
xAP Clan Macilwraith, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AM Finch, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Oakbank, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
xAP Diomed, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
AVP Reiger, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage


Followed by a few more straggling strikes:

Japanese aircraft
A6M5c Zero x 46
B6N2 Jill x 36

Allied aircraft
P-39D Airacobra x 17
P-39N1 Airacobra x 6
P-40E Warhawk x 14

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5c Zero: 1 destroyed
B6N2 Jill: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged
B6N2 Jill: 1 destroyed by flak

Allied aircraft losses
P-39D Airacobra: 1 destroyed
P-39N1 Airacobra: 1 destroyed
P-40E Warhawk: 2 destroyed

Allied Ships
xAP David J. Brewer, Bomb hits 1, on fire
xAP John Drake Sloat, Bomb hits 1
TK Manvantara, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
xAP Sarpedonia, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AM Strive, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
xAP Yarra, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
xAP Kooyong, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
LSI(L) Denbighshire, Bomb hits 1
AMC Cornwallis, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage


Japanese aircraft
A6M5c Zero x 19
B6N2 Jill x 60
D4Y1 Judy x 24

Allied aircraft
P-39D Airacobra x 7
P-39N1 Airacobra x 2
P-40E Warhawk x 8

Japanese aircraft losses
B6N2 Jill: 1 destroyed, 7 damaged
B6N2 Jill: 1 destroyed by flak
D4Y1 Judy: 7 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
P-39D Airacobra: 1 destroyed
P-40E Warhawk: 1 destroyed

Allied Ships
xAP James Cook, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Rooseboom, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AVD Half Moon, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
KV Vancouver, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
AKE Makawao, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DM Gamble, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AS Bushnell, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DM Pruitt, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Clan Macbean, Bomb hits 1, on fire
TK Marpessa, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AM Chevreuil, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AR Delta, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AS Otus, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AKE Lillian Luckenbach, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AMC Pansy, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
TK Gulfcoast, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
AS Fulton, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires
PG Soerabaja, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Macdhui, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires
xAP Anglo Canadian, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AKE Mormacrey, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AGP Oyster Bay, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Clan Macilwraith, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AKE Manukai, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
AM Skylark, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
LSI(L) Glenartney, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
SC PC-1077, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AVP Fazant, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
AR Jason, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AS Holland, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AM Token, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Mijer, Bomb hits 1, on fire
xAP President Taylor, Bomb hits 1, on fire
xAP Speelman, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
TK Francol, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AV Chandeleur, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAK Peisander, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AKE Sirius, Bomb hits 1
AM Whippoorwill, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP David Gaillard, Bomb hits 1
AVD Mackinac, and is sunk

Japanese aircraft
A6M5b Zero x 19
B6N2 Jill x 12
D4Y3 Judy x 24

Allied aircraft
P-39D Airacobra x 3
P-39N1 Airacobra x 2
P-40E Warhawk x 2

Japanese aircraft losses
B6N2 Jill: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged
D4Y3 Judy: 1 destroyed, 4 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
P-39N1 Airacobra: 1 destroyed
P-40E Warhawk: 1 destroyed

Allied Ships
AM Vigilance, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
xAP Minnipa, Bomb hits 1
AGP Mobjack, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
xAP Speelman, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAK Asphalion, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AO Trinity, Bomb hits 1
TK Harpa, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
ARD AFDB-1, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AR Delta, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DM Gamble, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
xAP David Gaillard, Bomb hits 1, on fire


So nothing really major sunk but it looks like he has lost a big chunk of his support ships in the area. Total cost to me was about 100 a/c, mostly fighters, and I managed to shoot down about 50 of his fighters in return, luckily they were P39s and 40s and not P47s....


Elsewhere in Burma the Frank makes its debut, shooting down 50 Hurricanes flying CAP over Ramree Is where a British CA force was located. Unfortunately they sweep after my strike Nettys and low flying Oscar bombers went in and took heavy losses for just a few bomb hits on his CAs. He retires them back towards Calcutta the next day.

He flies another mega sweep of Rabaul on the last day of the month that knocks down another 100 of my fighters but I down almost 50 in return, including 20 P47s and I only lose 25 pilots. That has made up my mind, I'm going to evac the division there covered by my fleet sometime in the next month. I will leave a couple of SNLF there to stop it being an easy grab for him.

Finally, only one more month kill I get my Kamis....

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 324
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/29/2018 5:15:33 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

Finally, only one more month kill I get my Kamis....



Nice typo!

That was a major strike. Regardless of what sinks, you gained VPs and made him be more careful. That means more AA there and everywhere, and better fighters flying CAP.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 325
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/29/2018 5:18:50 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

Finally, only one more month kill I get my Kamis....



Nice typo!

That was a major strike. Regardless of what sinks, you gained VPs and made him be more careful. That means more AA there and everywhere, and better fighters flying CAP.


Haha yes I noticed it but thought I would leave it in. I think I will be on the wrong end of a few of these later in the game.

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 326
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/29/2018 5:38:55 PM   
adarbrauner

 

Posts: 1496
Joined: 11/3/2016
From: Zichron Yaaqov, Israel; Before, Treviso, Italy
Status: offline
Wow, Pearl Harbor of the Solomons

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 327
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/29/2018 6:21:55 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: adarbrauner

Wow, Pearl Harbor of the Solomons


I hope they do a movie of it with Ben Affleck playing a pilot who shoots down 10 Japs before himself being shot down, bailing out next to a PT boat which he then drives with one hand whilst shooting down more Japs with his pistol.

(in reply to adarbrauner)
Post #: 328
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/29/2018 6:22:02 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
Nicely done.

Even with all of his ships, those losses should hurt. Losing those AV (even temporarily) might hurt his search efforts if he likes to use them at dot bases to base search planes. If those tankers had fuel, they might just be done for. Do you have any bombers in range that can hit his port and possible damage/sink some more? Even at night? I don't know if you would want to use the KB for that, but a night strike with Kates at high altitude might work . . .

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to adarbrauner)
Post #: 329
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 7/29/2018 6:30:38 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Nicely done.

Even with all of his ships, those losses should hurt. Losing those AV (even temporarily) might hurt his search efforts if he likes to use them at dot bases to base search planes. If those tankers had fuel, they might just be done for. Do you have any bombers in range that can hit his port and possible damage/sink some more? Even at night? I don't know if you would want to use the KB for that, but a night strike with Kates at high altitude might work . . .


He has 200 fighters there and next door at Lunga, so any further daytime attack would be very costly. Night bombing is almost useless for Japan. Plus I have no idea where his CVs are, so I don't want to risk my CVs for what are really little more than third rate ships.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 330
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.047