Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 3/30/2019 4:36:28 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

It's hard for you, Paul, to notice the forest for the trees. But from where I sit, you and your forces performed pretty doggone well here.

The real question is whether this blunts Mr. Kane from proceeding with his invasion. Going forward, does this leave him with inadequate protection to move against invasion sites well-protected by interlocking enemy airfields? If so, you might've won a key victory here. But if your air force is gutted or otherwise unable to stand toe-to-toe with him (due partly to PDU Off), then the picture is much different.

But you've fought well. :)

As for Obvert, don't listen to him. The guy is clearly inexperienced and incapable of defending the Empire. He just muddles along doing little or nothing....


Hi Dan. Although my navy has took a beating the last few turns, I still have a huge LBA armada ready to go. I'm not sure why he was going for Okinawa, he has big airbases already on the eastern Chinese coast and his ongoing conquest of Luzon means the door is already closed to the SRA fuel/oil. I'm starting to think he may actually have been en route to Korea and was using the Okinawa route as a waypoint keeping his fleets out of range of my LBA form the mainland? Whatever the target he's withdrawing for now.

< Message edited by Miller -- 3/30/2019 5:57:25 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 691
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 3/30/2019 4:43:22 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
10th-12th June 45

Kane continued to sit his death star about 10 hexes south of the mainland, obviously looking to pick off a few more cripples before retiring. It sinks a few small patrol craft send by me to burn up his CVs remaining sorties, however most of my cripples are now in port. On the 12th he decides to retire south, but forgets to send the order to one of his CVE TFs, which is attacked from the mainland in large numbers:

Morning Air attack on TF, near Daito Shoto at 103,68

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 78 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 21 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 78
A6M5c Zero x 31
B7A2 Grace x 120
N1K2-J George x 39
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar x 46
Ki-43-IV Oscar x 49
Ki-84a Frank x 11
Ki-84r Frank x 8
Ki-100-I Tony x 16

Japanese aircraft losses
B7A2 Grace: 4 damaged
B7A2 Grace: 1 destroyed by flak

Allied Ships
CVE Gilbert Islands, Bomb hits 7, heavy fires, heavy damage
CVE Cape Gloucester, Bomb hits 9, heavy fires, heavy damage
CVE Casablanca, Bomb hits 10, heavy fires, heavy damage
CLAA San Juan, Bomb hits 6, heavy fires, heavy damage
CLAA Oakland, Bomb hits 6, heavy fires, heavy damage
DE Corbesier, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
DE Shelton, Bomb hits 7, and is sunk
DE Jesse Rutherford, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
CLAA San Diego, Bomb hits 9, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Gleaves, Bomb hits 5, and is sunk
DD Frankford, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
DD Bailey, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DD Harding, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DD McCook, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DE Richard M. Rowell, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DE Chester T. O'Brien, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DE Silverstein, Bomb hits 2, on fire
DE Conklin, Bomb hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Daito Shoto at 103,68

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid detected at 79 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 21 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5c Zero x 31
B6N2a Jill x 71
B7A2 Grace x 48
N1K2-J George x 29
Ki-43-IV Oscar x 34
Ki-84a Frank x 23
Ki-84r Frank x 18
Ki-100-I Tony x 16

Japanese aircraft losses
B7A2 Grace: 2 damaged

Allied Ships
CLAA San Juan, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
DE Richard M. Rowell, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DE Tabberer, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
DE Chester T. O'Brien, Bomb hits 6, and is sunk
DD Bailey
DD Harding, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DD Niblack, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
DE Corbesier, Bomb hits 5, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Shubrick, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DD Frankford, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
DE Jesse Rutherford, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD McCook
DE McCoy Reynolds
DD Endicott, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Daito Shoto at 103,68

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid detected at 79 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 26 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 30
B6N2a Jill x 68
N1K2-J George x 10
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar x 27
Ki-43-IV Oscar x 51
Ki-84a Frank x 8

Japanese aircraft losses
B6N2a Jill: 1 damaged
B6N2a Jill: 1 destroyed by flak

Allied Ships
DE Key, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
DE Silverstein, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
DD Endicott, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
CLAA San Juan, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
DE McCoy Reynolds, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
DD Benson, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DD Niblack, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DE Conklin, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Shubrick, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DE Corbesier, and is sunk
DE Jesse Rutherford, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk

The fact that 200 a/c are lost on the ground and no CAP up at all means it was an a/c replenishment TF for his CVs. So a nice little haul of 3 CVEs, 3 CLAAs and about 15 DDs and DEs for free. Not as bad as losing 5 BBs, but still I can't complain






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Miller -- 3/30/2019 4:46:40 PM >

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 692
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 3/30/2019 4:51:42 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

Scoreboard



With a 4k point swing for the fall of Manila plus another 2k or so for strat bombing over the last fortnight it's looking like AV will arrive pretty much when the soviets activate. We shall see.


Nice. Great job getting here in this shape.

I forgot also this is a PDU-off game. No wonder he's strong in the air at this point!!

To conserve supply you might turn off replacements to all of the new HI divisions you're getting now. You have a lot of PPs too, and could buy some to send to the Russian front soon. They're only like 400-500 PP before filling out.


Yes I've turned off replacements for every single LCU for now. Not sure if it's even worth sending anything to try and stop the Ruskies, their divisions TOE are frightening!

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 693
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 3/30/2019 4:52:45 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
I'm now the proud owner of over 1000 of these heaps of sh ite.






The plan is to send them in en masse before my proper bombers in the hope the entire USN runs out of .50 cal ammo in shooting them all down. Hey, you never know.....

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Miller -- 3/30/2019 4:54:38 PM >

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 694
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 3/30/2019 5:43:24 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller
On the 12th he decides to retire south, but forgets to send the order to one of his CVE TFs, which is attacked from the mainland in large numbers:

So Mr.Kane is human after all, not a merciless meticulous malicious machine :)

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 695
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 3/30/2019 5:53:51 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller
On the 12th he decides to retire south, but forgets to send the order to one of his CVE TFs, which is attacked from the mainland in large numbers:

So Mr.Kane is human after all, not a merciless meticulous malicious machine :)


Yes, I was beginning to wonder....

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 696
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 3/30/2019 6:06:48 PM   
Anachro


Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline
Everyone makes mistakes. In my game, I had set ships to bombard and forgot that I also had them set to remain on station. Result being that the next day they were still at their point of bombardment and in range of enemy bombers..

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 697
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 3/30/2019 6:18:37 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro

Everyone makes mistakes. In my game, I had set ships to bombard and forgot that I also had them set to remain on station. Result being that the next day they were still at their point of bombardment and in range of enemy bombers..


That's how I lost 5 battleships a few months earlier in this game

(in reply to Anachro)
Post #: 698
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 3/30/2019 7:19:25 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

I'm now the proud owner of over 1000 of these heaps of sh ite.

The plan is to send them in en masse before my proper bombers in the hope the entire USN runs out of .50 cal ammo in shooting them all down. Hey, you never know.....


With your PP one option is to convert to FB and then to F, turn them to kamis and use them for CAP.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 699
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 3/30/2019 9:32:31 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

I'm now the proud owner of over 1000 of these heaps of sh ite.

The plan is to send them in en masse before my proper bombers in the hope the entire USN runs out of .50 cal ammo in shooting them all down. Hey, you never know.....


With your PP one option is to convert to FB and then to F, turn them to kamis and use them for CAP.


Don't think I can do that with PDU off?

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 700
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 3/31/2019 5:01:13 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller


quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

I'm now the proud owner of over 1000 of these heaps of sh ite.

The plan is to send them in en masse before my proper bombers in the hope the entire USN runs out of .50 cal ammo in shooting them all down. Hey, you never know.....


With your PP one option is to convert to FB and then to F, turn them to kamis and use them for CAP.


Don't think I can do that with PDU off?


Ahh. Maybe not. The upgrade for those is LB I guess so just the kami planes.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 701
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/2/2019 4:00:50 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
13th-20th June 45

A relatively quiet period considering the date. His cripples continue their slow crawl back to Guam pursued by my subs that achieve nothing other than being damaged or sunk. I try a cheeky high speed raid by my three operational CVs and at extreme range they sink a couple of damaged APAs containing by the looks of it at least a full division and a few DDs before I send them back home for fear of reprisals from his (at a guess) 12 or so undamaged CVs at Guam. The British CV Implacable is confirmed sunk by intel, hopefully at least one more went down as well.

In China He does another deliberate attack at Hankow which knocks the fort down to 2 and due to lack of supply my adjusted AV falls alarmingly:

Ground combat at Hankow (85,50)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 233604 troops, 2657 guns, 3050 vehicles, Assault Value = 9119

Defending force 145168 troops, 1327 guns, 642 vehicles, Assault Value = 4357

Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 2

Allied adjusted assault: 3370

Japanese adjusted defense: 12109

Allied assault odds: 1 to 3 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
4296 casualties reported
Squads: 16 destroyed, 444 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 73 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 83 disabled
Guns lost 111 (5 destroyed, 106 disabled)
Vehicles lost 26 (6 destroyed, 20 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Allied ground losses:
11478 casualties reported
Squads: 79 destroyed, 613 disabled
Non Combat: 16 destroyed, 275 disabled
Engineers: 18 destroyed, 284 disabled
Guns lost 214 (7 destroyed, 207 disabled)
Vehicles lost 186 (16 destroyed, 170 disabled)

Looks like I've got maybe a couple of weeks here before I'm kicked out. I've toyed with the idea of sending a kamikaze supply TF consisting of AKLs to try and get some supply through but such is his crushing air supremacy I doubt any would survive the trip. Maybe use single ship TFs?



< Message edited by Miller -- 4/3/2019 3:24:49 PM >

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 702
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/2/2019 5:01:04 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

I'm now the proud owner of over 1000 of these heaps of sh ite.






The plan is to send them in en masse before my proper bombers in the hope the entire USN runs out of .50 cal ammo in shooting them all down. Hey, you never know.....



Am at the end of September '45 and have been surprised by the plethora of kamikaze bi-planes that have been thrown at me.
Willows seem to be the prevalent model in the heavily modded scenario 40.

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 703
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/4/2019 7:52:13 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline
quote:

Looks like I've got maybe a couple of weeks here before I'm kicked out. I've toyed with the idea of sending a kamikaze supply TF consisting of AKLs to try and get some supply through but such is his crushing air supremacy I doubt any would survive the trip. Maybe use single ship TFs?



I don't think it's worth the expenditure in supply. You'll never build a stockpile as it will be bombed away, even assuming it does get in.

Air transport, perhaps, if you can be sure it won't be intercepted. However, I think it's best to cut your losses and save the supply.

The x3 bonus from Hankow's urban heavy terrain isn't going away. Unsupplied units perform at 25% peak effectiveness. The x4 (!!!) terrain bonus goes a long way to make up for the lack of supply.

However, I'd suggest using it as bait for a trap. An expendable string of empty, low-value PB/xAKL's with heavy LRCAP over it moving down the Yangtze should generate an Allied response. If the Allies use naval assets, a few kami squadrons on hand might get a shot at flying into DD's without much Allied CAP around...

Keep fighting!

As a side note, was down your part of the country a few weeks back. The time I spent on the LNER was the closet I've ever came to jetlag without flying ever! Good views from York northwards made up for it, however!

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 704
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/6/2019 5:04:08 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

quote:

Looks like I've got maybe a couple of weeks here before I'm kicked out. I've toyed with the idea of sending a kamikaze supply TF consisting of AKLs to try and get some supply through but such is his crushing air supremacy I doubt any would survive the trip. Maybe use single ship TFs?



I don't think it's worth the expenditure in supply. You'll never build a stockpile as it will be bombed away, even assuming it does get in.

Air transport, perhaps, if you can be sure it won't be intercepted. However, I think it's best to cut your losses and save the supply.

The x3 bonus from Hankow's urban heavy terrain isn't going away. Unsupplied units perform at 25% peak effectiveness. The x4 (!!!) terrain bonus goes a long way to make up for the lack of supply.

However, I'd suggest using it as bait for a trap. An expendable string of empty, low-value PB/xAKL's with heavy LRCAP over it moving down the Yangtze should generate an Allied response. If the Allies use naval assets, a few kami squadrons on hand might get a shot at flying into DD's without much Allied CAP around...

Keep fighting!

As a side note, was down your part of the country a few weeks back. The time I spent on the LNER was the closet I've ever came to jetlag without flying ever! Good views from York northwards made up for it, however!


Hello MM, valid points as always. Still plenty of supply in the homeland but getting it anywhere else is proving very difficult now.

Yes, we have some good beaches and castles on the Northumberland coast if you ever make it that far north.

(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 705
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/6/2019 5:08:05 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
21st-30th June 45

Not a lot to report. I finally manage to take a bite out of one of his big daytime B29 raids of over Nagasaki before his sweepers arrive, at least 50 go down and I manage to trade 1:1 in fighters for a change:






He then switches them to night time port bombing, trying to finish off my cripples from the recent Okinawa actions. They further damage a few cruisers but over the course of three nights he loses another 50 to NF and flak/ops. Of course I lose more NF in return but I still have plenty left in the pools.

The last few days of this period his death star sorties and hangs around Iwo Jima covering his DMS fleets sweeping the mines there, but not before 4 or 5 are sunk by CD guns in the process. The majority of my fleet is in TFs at Tokyo sitting under 1000 fighters, although I doubt he would dare try and move his DS within strike range of the homeland as he knows even a 2000 plane CAP may not be enough to repel any large counter strike by my LBA.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Miller -- 4/6/2019 5:20:16 PM >

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 706
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/8/2019 1:14:31 AM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline
Those are some decent flak numbers for B29s. What was it that brought them down, and what altitude were they flying at?

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 707
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/8/2019 9:28:06 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
Looks like your air war has changed with the arrival of the Frank Ki-84r.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 708
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/8/2019 12:55:52 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
The Boeing factories are going to have to add another shift if you keep shooting them down like that.

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 709
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/9/2019 11:03:58 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

Those are some decent flak numbers for B29s. What was it that brought them down, and what altitude were they flying at?


I think most of the flak kills were ones already damaged by the fighters. He usually flys his B29s at 15-20kft.

(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 710
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/9/2019 11:11:57 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

Looks like your air war has changed with the arrival of the Frank Ki-84r.


We have a limit of 35k feet for sweep/CAP in 1945 so I just decided to put my best fighters at that altitude. I think the layered CAP you have advocated works when the opposing planes and pilots are of similar quality but in this game my pilots are on average 10 exp lower than his and were still taking heavy losses when flying at the 5/7/9k alt bands you mentioned. I'm still losing but now at 2-3 to 1 instead of 5-10 to 1. I have also taken a lot of time to make sure the best pilots are in the best planes. I was horrified to find a load of 80 exp pilots still flying the Zero and swapped them out for rookies instead.

I've bought back all the fighter air groups from my sunk CVs and will be resizing them to 72 plane Sam groups with all my best pilots, that should make a dent in his sweepers hopefully.....

< Message edited by Miller -- 4/9/2019 11:13:09 PM >

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 711
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/9/2019 11:14:42 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

The Boeing factories are going to have to add another shift if you keep shooting them down like that.


Well according to intel I have shot down about 800 (so probably 600 in reality), so he still has over 1000 in play at the moment. At least 500 visit Hankow on a daily basis.

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 712
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/9/2019 11:32:55 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
Unacceptable loss rates for bombing missions in the ETO was 10%, acceptable was under 5%. If he has lost around 33% of those currently available so far, that doesn't bode well for him.

< Message edited by Bif1961 -- 4/9/2019 11:33:45 PM >

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 713
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/10/2019 12:22:44 AM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
60 B-29's lost in ONE DAY!

Ay caramba!

I bet he is not in a hurry to see the "Miller Report"

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 714
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/10/2019 9:05:47 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

Looks like your air war has changed with the arrival of the Frank Ki-84r.


We have a limit of 35k feet for sweep/CAP in 1945 so I just decided to put my best fighters at that altitude. I think the layered CAP you have advocated works when the opposing planes and pilots are of similar quality but in this game my pilots are on average 10 exp lower than his and were still taking heavy losses when flying at the 5/7/9k alt bands you mentioned. I'm still losing but now at 2-3 to 1 instead of 5-10 to 1. I have also taken a lot of time to make sure the best pilots are in the best planes. I was horrified to find a load of 80 exp pilots still flying the Zero and swapped them out for rookies instead.

I've bought back all the fighter air groups from my sunk CVs and will be resizing them to 72 plane Sam groups with all my best pilots, that should make a dent in his sweepers hopefully.....


I didn't realise you had an altitude limit. That changes a lot. I would not fly the low CAP if we had a 35k limit because ...

1. When you set CAP to 35k and have some decent radar in hex, your CAP will climb above sweepers coming in and dive. Huge advantage.

2. All of your best airframes can reach 35k, and he has no altitude advantage in sweeps, ever. The low CAP is only useful to combat high altitude sweeps where you can't match those max altitudes.



_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 715
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/11/2019 2:27:45 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
1st-15th July 45

China: I manage to sneak a few FT TFs up river to Hankow and drop off about 30k of supply. Just in time before his next deliberate attack:



Ground combat at Hankow (85,50)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 252581 troops, 2742 guns, 3070 vehicles, Assault Value = 10228

Defending force 188437 troops, 1645 guns, 586 vehicles, Assault Value = 5830

Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Allied adjusted assault: 2984

Japanese adjusted defense: 32645

Allied assault odds: 1 to 10 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
3205 casualties reported
Squads: 106 destroyed, 596 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 126 disabled
Engineers: 9 destroyed, 51 disabled
Guns lost 178 (14 destroyed, 164 disabled)
Vehicles lost 40 (2 destroyed, 38 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
34005 casualties reported
Squads: 420 destroyed, 3371 disabled
Non Combat: 15 destroyed, 352 disabled
Engineers: 16 destroyed, 270 disabled
Guns lost 213 (5 destroyed, 208 disabled)
Vehicles lost 201 (11 destroyed, 190 disabled)

Forts now down to one but once again he takes a beating in terms of losses. Unfortunately he realised I was getting supply up river and now has flooded it with PT boat TFs and low flying bombers, so that avenue is now cut off. He continues to pound it daily with hundreds of B24s and B29s and I have no supply left, although the ground units are still at 60-70% of required supply, so it looks like I can hold here for at least a few weeks more. Meanwhile his 2E bombers concentrate mainly on Changsha but he has not tried a ground attack there for at least a month.


Luzon: The end is nigh at Clark, fort is down to 2 and he has 10k AV to my 1K. I'm busy marching the troops slowly to Bataan for the last stand but I think they will be kicked out of Clark before they can complete the march. As with Hankow, Clark is bombed daily by hundreds of bombers of all types and supply is all gone.


Iwo Jima: His death star has been circling the island for the past fortnight and blasting it every day in an effort to force me out of supply, along with bombardments from TFs containing up to 10 BBs. His latest ground attack was on the 15th:

Ground combat at Iwo-jima (108,77)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 34944 troops, 618 guns, 935 vehicles, Assault Value = 1386

Defending force 25077 troops, 331 guns, 162 vehicles, Assault Value = 479

Allied adjusted assault: 600

Japanese adjusted defense: 631

Allied assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 6)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), disruption(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2255 casualties reported
Squads: 9 destroyed, 103 disabled
Non Combat: 7 destroyed, 70 disabled
Engineers: 9 destroyed, 85 disabled
Guns lost 52 (10 destroyed, 42 disabled)
Vehicles lost 8 (2 destroyed, 6 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
7420 casualties reported
Squads: 267 destroyed, 269 disabled
Non Combat: 63 destroyed, 174 disabled
Engineers: 27 destroyed, 62 disabled
Guns lost 188 (54 destroyed, 134 disabled)
Vehicles lost 249 (89 destroyed, 160 disabled

Still at 6 forts and he loses almost half his available AV in the attack. I'm hopeful of sneaking in another supply convoy when (if) his death star finally retires to replenish....

< Message edited by Miller -- 4/11/2019 2:29:44 PM >

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 716
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/11/2019 2:38:06 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
Uncle Joe

Well with only a month to go before the commies join in I finally started to look at the situation in Manchuria. My first job was to ship in some fuel to restart the industry there as I had totally neglected it and virtually every base was low on supply. I lost a big TK convoy in the process to low flying bombers from China but fortunately after they had already unloaded, the Yellow Sea is a no go area for my ships now.

Secondly, I have scraped together every unrestricted infantry and eng unit in the homeland and sent them to Rashin on the southern coast of Manchuria for redeployment. In total I have 16k AV to play with (including units in Korea). Any tips on how/where to defend? I don't see any reason to defend beyond the red line on the the map apart from small speed bump forces:






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 717
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/11/2019 2:43:56 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
The weak point in your line is the clear hex at Chinchow - that is where I would attack if I was him. Breaking the rail communication between regions is huge.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 718
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/11/2019 2:44:34 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Paul, you are punishing Mr. Kane even as the Allies inflict punishment of their own. Post a points screen when you can. I like following your games for many reasons, one of which is that you're just ahead of me and Erik (you caught and passed us), and it's interesting to compare the relative situations.

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 719
RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) - 4/11/2019 2:52:41 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

The weak point in your line is the clear hex at Chinchow - that is where I would attack if I was him. Breaking the rail communication between regions is huge.


That's a great spot BBfanboy and one I would have overlooked. Four rail lines converge at that spot. I will certainly be looking to reinforce it now!

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 720
Page:   <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Miller (J) vs Mr Kane (A) Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.016