RE: T49

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: T49

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: T49

Page: << < prev 13 14 [15] 16 17 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: T49 - 5/18/2019 9:19:20 AM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Telemecus

That rail map is one of the clearest depictions of the weaknesses of Soviet rail as you go east - the sort of thing that needs to go in the library of WitE resources?

Thank you. I had to put the map up, because I though that just explaining it in text would not offer enough clarity.

quote:

I am assuming they will push back on the rail block at Svoboda during the Soviet turn, perhaps as part of an attempted break back in to the pockets? If so then it would have to be re-established in a future turn.

That is a possibility ofc. I am hoping that the huge gap that has emerged on the front will force the Soviets to pull back and reestablish defensive lines before mud hits, because once that happens, movement will be very constricted. Will have to see what strategy Bitburgerdraft will choose.

quote:

Looking east from the Voronezh pockets it is surprising there are not more units there. Presumably as well as the units that could rally there will be a garrison in Tambov. Just by coincidence there might be a couple of units railing past that sector that might have a low detection level as a result. One of your screenshots shows the battles with only about half a dozen recon missions in the area - was that the final amount in the turn? None was between Tambov and your units. I would probably have done more - but I know I am not the person to ask how much recon you should do!

There is probably a garrison at Tambov but I doubt that there are reserves in the area. Recon would have gotten something if that was the case. My recon shows that the Soviets have concentrated a huge number of units at Stalingrad. These are probably Guard units that are training and also building fortifications. That is a good point about recon. I tend to do a lot of recon actually but in this case I guess I wasn't that careful since it was the end of the turn and I had already moved all the units. So even if I had done more recon that wouldn't have changed the positioning of the forces although you are right, it would have given me valuable information.

quote:

Although you say the Axis air losses are large, they are below production in the single seat fighters and dive bombers that can be a problem. If you produce say 50 German bombers a turn, and when you take out the half of the year with mud and blizzard then you are about on a steady course with them. The Soviet side on the other hand did have large losses, and more FFBs than they produce. I would have guessed large bomber losses were down to flak where fighter escort would not have made much difference. But the total flak losses you have taken for the game are not that high. So would it be right to guess that basically the bombers have become the unfortunate bait for their FFBs to get shot down?

Large as in larger than most turns. I agree with you that they are not outrunning production and my pools are full because I have been micromanaging the air and have tried to preserve my air groups. It could be the flak, you are right. Will have to look at the losses of turn 50 (when I get it) and check the difference between flak losses for the 2 turns.

I could live with the bait part if my forces were poorly escorted but that is not the case. In some missions I am flying twice the fighter escort and still the Soviets are shooting 1/3 of the bombers down. I will have to fiddle with things to see what may cause it.

Thanks for the comment Tele, sure feels nice to talk about the game since it has been very quiet here for quite some time.

_____________________________

AAR WITW: Gotterdammerung 43-45
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4490035
AAR WITE: A Clash of Titans 41-45
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4488465
WitE 2 Tester and Test Coordinator

(in reply to Telemecus)

Post #: 421

T50 - 5/22/2019 10:58:13 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

T50, 28th of May-4th of June 1942
General Report from the front:

Mud has hit in all zones except for the Europe Zone. This makes movement, resupply as well as offensive/cleaning operations very difficult. Next week we will still have mud all over the front.

The enemy begun to pull back from their forward positions in front of Moscow and Tula, relocating to secondary defensive lines which are still well fortified.

Positions at the start of the week:

Positions at the end of the week:

The Voronezh pocket held and the Soviets are bringing in units in front of Tambov to restore their frontline. We have pushed formations forward to secure the outer layer of the pocket. Attacks in some of the exposed Soviet units have led to the destruction of 2 Rifle Divisions, 1 Rifle Brigade and 1 AT Artillery Brigade. 3 other attacks failed.

Positions at the start of the week:

Pocket, closer look:

Positions at the end of the week:

Circled in black are Soviet holds.

In the south the enemy has begun a long retreat and is probably aiming to reform their front behind the Don, using the river as a defense. 2 Rifle Divisions were destroyed in operations intending to destroy the pocket.

Positions at the start of the week:

Positions at the end of the week:

Point of interest in the south are 2 other things. First, the Soviet armored formations are concentrated on the Don where they are building fortifications. Secondly, The enemy is heavily fortifying the approaches to Stalingrad in preparation for the Axis summer offensive, several fortified Regions where spotted from the air and they are building up forts to level 3 (are at level 2 currently).

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by xhoel -- 5/26/2019 9:49:35 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 422

RE: T50 - 5/22/2019 11:03:02 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

Crimea

This week the 11th Army launched Operation Sturgeon Catch, the offensive on the fortress of Sevastopol. All 3 attacks by our forces where repulsed by heavy Soviet resistance. Casualties have been heavy, around 1.700 KIAs during the whole week. The fortification level in the affected hex has fallen to 1.62 but will probably be over level 2 next week again.
In all three battles, Soviet reserves activated and launched counterattacks that helped the defenders by a lot. The first battle (the costliest) only managed to lower the fort level by 0.18, a disappointing result, considering the heavy artillery support, the air support as well as the multiple Pioneer battalions that were committed (6 Pioneer Bns). The third battle came close to dislodging the Soviets but failed to do so. We will try to breach the Soviet defenses again next week and we are confident that we will have much more success.

Positions at the start of the week with units marked:

Positions at the end of the week:

3rd Battle as part of Operation Sturgeon Catch:

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 423

RE: T50 - 5/22/2019 11:11:12 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

Losses

The losses have been high because of the heavy fighting from last week. Permanent losses for this week amounted to around 65.460 men (both KIA and POWs) for the Soviets while the Axis lost around 6.240 men (KIA and POWs). It is interesting to note that around 2.500 men escaped from the pocket battles this week.

Losses in the air were high for the Axis as a result of a botched bombing run that was done without escort, we lost 32 bombers in one raid.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 424

RE: T50 - 5/23/2019 12:35:11 AM

Crackaces

Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline

I don�t see �Karl� or the 305mm here? That is the key to this battle. Karl takes forts down by 3 .. 305mm 2 . No fort level after any engineers .. and . A level 5 fort is 0 ..I disagree with the effectiveness but it will work ..

_____________________________

"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 425

RE: T50 - 5/23/2019 6:25:45 AM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

All the heavy artillery units were attached to the attacking HQs but it seems like they failed to commit to the battle unfortunately. I knew they had an effect on the fort level but didn't know they had such a big one. I'm guessing you tested this on battle message 7?

_____________________________

(in reply to Crackaces)

Post #: 426

RE: T50 - 5/23/2019 10:41:32 AM

Telemecus

Posts: 4689
Joined: 3/20/2016
Status: offline

Crackaces is Mr message level 7!

That first attack was disappointing.

One other thing to think about is HQs - and you may have done this already. If you only have one HQ, none of the units will have a discount to their CV. But if you are going to have multiple HQs anyway commit to the battle you can use it to your advantage as well to increase the number of SUs you use and which ones are committed. So you could for example use the main HQ for your attack to have only the 6 heaviest calibre artillery - guaranteeing some will be used. And then keep all the reserve activators in different HQs to maximise the number committing to battle and so overall number of SUs used over all. I think (though could be corrected) that there is no modifier to artillery from HQs that are not the main HQ in the battle precisely because it is a 0 CV unit. There are many other different tactics for taking advantage of multiple HQs many of which I do not know. Some you may be thinking about already here.

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 427

RE: T50 - 5/23/2019 1:34:47 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

Disappointing indeed, especially considering that I had my best divisions there. In hindsight I could have done better. Yes I am aware of the CV penalties for different HQs taking part in one battle but it is good that you mention that since there are players who do not know about it (or oversee it). I have used multiple HQs before because the extra firepower is worth it in some cases so I agree with you there that it has its advantages.

I will be running some tests to see the effects of Heavy Artillery on fort levels myself and will probably post about it.

_____________________________

(in reply to Telemecus)

Post #: 428

RE: T50 - 5/23/2019 3:39:08 PM

Crackaces

Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline

Again you don�t a need high message level to see results. �Karl� for example took Tambov down from fort level 3 to zero. Once it fires you see a message about the reduced fort levels. Add in 305�s you will see additional results. This could be a one off battle ...

_____________________________

"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 429

RE: T50 - 5/23/2019 5:19:22 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crackaces

Again you don�t a need high message level to see results. �Karl� for example took Tambov down from fort level 3 to zero. Once it fires you see a message about the reduced fort levels. Add in 305�s you will see additional results. This could be a one off battle ...

I know what you mean, I was just wondering how you came to the conclusion. There is the little message that says that the fort was reduced by this much, true.

I must say however that from my tests (ran around 15 so far), artillery is not doing a lot even when the big guns activate. At most the reductions are in very small percentages of around 10%. However that changes depending on the final odds and the manual states so as well. So with better final odds even if the defender holds they will lose fort level by quite a lot.

I guess you got really lucky with the Tambov attack or maybe I'm getting very unlucky in my tests.

Cheers!

_____________________________

(in reply to Crackaces)

Post #: 430

RE: T50 - 5/23/2019 6:36:23 PM

EwaldvonKleist

Posts: 2038
Joined: 4/14/2016
From: Berlin, Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crackaces

Again you don�t a need high message level to see results. �Karl� for example took Tambov down from fort level 3 to zero. Once it fires you see a message about the reduced fort levels. Add in 305�s you will see additional results. This could be a one off battle ...

Do you have a test case where this effect can be reliably reproduced? I do not doubt heavy artillery can drop the fort levels by 0.2, but I have yet to see 3 fort levels fall from artillery.

_____________________________

The Library of Gary Grigsby's War in the East resources.
Do you want total war? Guide for WitE players

(in reply to Crackaces)

Post #: 431

RE: T50 - 5/23/2019 6:59:01 PM

Crackaces

Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline

I can reload old turns now without the crime of cheating.

I will get pictures. I have 4 times have used or been a part of big guns all with huge drops in fort level. Leningrad 2x3, Sevastopol 8MP (the dude), Tambov, Stalingrad. Each time I got a message of significant fort level drop. I replayed Sevastopol mainly for political reasons where Karl, 305�s , and hvy rockets along with engineers took a fort level from 5-> 0. I could be confused but I saw a message showing fort level reduction but it might be what it is at rather than amount reduced.

_____________________________

"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"

(in reply to EwaldvonKleist)

Post #: 432

RE: T50 - 5/23/2019 7:25:07 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

Would be nice to see that. Like I said I am trying to recreate it and it isn't working so far. The big thing seems to be how the final odds are. Did you see a huge fort drop when the Soviets held and the odds were <1.5?

_____________________________

(in reply to Crackaces)

Post #: 433

RE: T50 - 5/23/2019 7:50:11 PM

Crackaces

Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline

The problem is recognizing results. For example, the dude reducing Sevastopol was pretty dramatic as it was supplied fort level 5 ... that for my attention like a heart attack. But now I will look and document factors. For example, how much stuff and what the Soviet has opposing . Leningrad Stalingrad and Tambov were isolated that means an inability to shoot back that I did not really think about ... all I saw in my attacks is the siege art fire , fort level drop, and the rest of my stuff being much more effective ....

_____________________________

"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 434

RE: T50 - 5/23/2019 8:07:54 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

I look forward to your report. Would be nice to have some actual facts as to what the Heavy Artillery can and cannot do.

Cheers!

_____________________________

(in reply to Crackaces)

Post #: 435

T51 - 5/29/2019 11:33:43 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

T51, 4th of June-11th of June 1942.
Report from the Front:

The enemy is holding their positions in the Tambov sector and we have made contact with their frontline by pushing forward some armored/motorized formations. Our forces engaged trapped Soviet units in the outer ring of the Voronezh pocket and destroyed 1 Rifle and 1 AT-Artillery Brigade. All other units have taken positions and are preparing for cleaning operations that will take place next week once the weather clears.

Positions AGC, before and after:

Pocket, before and after:

In the South the enemy continues to give ground as they retreat to the Don. We are giving chase accordingly. The 2nd Hungarian Army is starting to deploy in strength on the Don and their arrival should allow us to relocate certain formations to other sectors, to be used offensively. 1 Rifle Division was destroyed after attacks on the pocket.

Positions AGS, before and after:

Crimea

The offensive begun with an attack on the same hex as last week and we failed to push the Soviets back for a hair. Heavy losses taken on both sides. The second attack succeeded in pushing the Soviets back, but losses were heavy again. The same situation was repeated during the attack on the second defensive line, the Soviets held back one attack but were forced to retreat after the second. It was a really close call but we managed to win a hard fought victory. The attack destroyed the Soviet airbase that was acting as support point for the VVS which means that the Soviets no longer can rely on any major help from the air. The 16th Mot. Division has reached the outskirts of Sevastopol where 3 Guards Rifle Divisions are located. They will probably be formed into a Rifle Corps next week, something that would strengthen the Soviet position and also ease administrative burden.

A lot of what we do next week will be dependent on how the Soviets react to this development. The belief is that they will pull back in order to strengthen their position inside Sevastopol and the line connecting the port to the rest of the Coastal Army but the enemy is also in a good position to attack the 16th Mot. Division. A successful attack here, would send the 16th routing and cause headaches at the command of the XXIV Panzer Corps.

Crimea before and after:

Won battle at the first defensive line:

Losses from the heavy fighting in the Crimea:

The experienced commander of the Coastal Army defending Sevastopol:

Clarification: The Soviets can start building Rifle Corps in June 1942 (Turn 51). A Corps unit adds 4 CP as opposed to 3 Rifle Divisions adding 6 CP. The Soviets have a total of 12 Divisions (9 regular + 3 Guard) Divisions in the Sevastopol sector. It seems that the 9 regular Divisions are under the command of the Coastal Army commanded by the skilled GM Georgy Zakharov. This means that the Army is at 18 CP, so it is not suffering a overload penalty. This means that the Guard divisions (or Guard Corp once it forms) will either be put under the command of the Coastal Army (thus overloading it) or will be under the command of another Army and won't have artillery and additional support provided to them.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by xhoel -- 5/29/2019 11:57:17 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 436

RE: T51 - 5/29/2019 11:56:22 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

Casualties:

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 437

T52 - 6/2/2019 10:29:13 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

T52, 11th of June-18th of June 1942.
AGN

Army Group North launched operation �Fisherman�, whose aim was to cut off forward Soviet forces in preparation for the push on the northern flank of Moscow. The entirety of the 9th Army as well as 2 full Panzer Corps, 2 independent infantry Corps (XXIII and LI Corps) and air assets from the VIII Fliegerkorps were commited in battle for the operation. The 9th Army broke through Soviet forward defenses and secured a 30 by 30 mile gap that was used by the 2 Panzer Corps to move forward. From here on, the armored formations punched through the weak Soviet rear and made contact with the XXIII Corps which had secured a position between the two rivers. The operation has been a big success, routing several Soviet formations and encircling 9 Rifle Divisions and 8 Rifle Brigades (both normal and Naval Infantry ones). The 8th Army (Batov) and the 22nd Army (Zhukov) have either been routed or encircled. The losses have been high especially in the air, as the StG 2 has taken heavy losses due to strong enemy resistance in the air as well as heavy flak.

AGC

The destruction of the Voronezh pocket was the order of the day for AGC. Multiple formations were involved in the clean up operations which yielded a large number of POWs. 17 Rifle Divisions, 3 Rifle Brigades, and 1 AT Artillery Brigade were destroyed in the fighting. Voronezh itself has not been assaulted yet and its defenders (1 Fortified Region, 1 Rifle Division and 1 Naval Infantry Brigade) are holding a good defensive position with a high fort level (3.8). A bombing run on the city was met by heavy AA fire, which destroyed 13 bombers out of 80. Further air raids were put on hold.

(I believe that the flak in game (as of this patch) is far too powerful. Such results as shown, make bombing of big cities a stupid move because the losses are so heavy. And all of this in a city that has been cut off from supply for 3 weeks now. This isn't the first time this has happened but I wanted to emphasize it.)

The enemy pulled back from the Tula area, leaving open ground between us and them. Their new positions were unfortified and intelligence and recon reports indicated that an opportunity to encircle said forces existed. After due consideration was given, infantry formations were moved forward and opened a gap in the Soviet defense lines. The following panzer and motorised formations used the terrain to their advantage and after breaking through the enemy rear linked up just south of Ryazan. To secure the pocket, we have arranged our formations in two defensive lines. This will make it harder for the enemy to conduct counterattacks but the possibility still exist since there is a strong presence of Guard units in the area as well as other reserves that can be used for counterattacks. 15 Soviet Rifle Divisions as well as the headquarters for the 21st Army (Meretskov) have been trapped in the pocket.

The strong commitment of units to clean the Voronezh pocket as well as the follow up offensive has left us short of units to man the frontline. We have haphazardly thrown units forward but these positions will need to be reinforced next week.

Positions at the start of the week:

Positions at the end of the week:

Bombing run on Voronezh:

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by xhoel -- 6/2/2019 10:33:11 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 438

RE: T52 - 6/2/2019 11:06:54 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

AGS

If both AGN and AGC had great success this week, AGS failed in both of its offensives. The first offensive that meant to encircle Soviet forces defending the Donets line fell short of its objective. The northern thrust had difficulties from the beginning as heavy attacks by our infantry divisions were held back by tenacious Soviet defenders, which held back 3 attacks on the river line. Once the defenders where pushed back, the XXXXVIII Panzer Corps crossed the river and dislodged Soviet forces from their secondary defensive positions, eventually cutting the rail line from Stalingrad and hitting the Soviet rear. At this point, the XXXXVIII Panzer Corps was ordered to halt their advance and await for the southern thrust. The attacks from the south started well, the Soviets were pushed back from their forward positions and our units managed to reach the river line. Attacks by the XXXXIX Mountain Corps failed to dislodge the Soviet defenders in 2 occasions (bad rolls and underestimating the enemy from my side). Only one Soviet division was moved. This allowed us to order 2 Panzer Divisions to cross the river. Their attacks on the stubborn 341st Rifle Division also failed. At this point our armored units were ordered to turn around and secure their positions. We have gained a bridgehead over the Donets but the position is not exactly secure and Soviet counterattacks may ruin the day for the armored formations.

A full report over the failure of the Donets offensive will be posted at a later time.

Positions at the start of the week:

Positions at the end of the week:

Crimea

In the Crimea the Soviets pulled back from their forward positions. The 1st Guard Rifle Corps has been formed in Sevastopol and is defending the city together with the 138th Mountain Division. The x Mountain Division defending forward Soviet position was pushed back without much trouble. The unit was under direct Stavka control. The other attacks on a key Soviet posiiton failed to dislodge the Soviet forces which held back 3 determined attacks by the 11th Army as well as armored formations. Both sides took heavy losses and the fort level was reduced from 3.10 to 1.50. Soviet combat strength has also fallen and the position should be taken by next week.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by xhoel -- 6/2/2019 11:07:44 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 439

RE: T52 - 6/2/2019 11:24:12 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

Losses

The losses this week were very heavy as Axis forces went on the offensive on all sectors. The Axis suffered 14.065 KIA, lost around 436 guns and 104 AFVs. Total Soviet losses were much higher, for a total of 240.500 men, of which 39.489 men were KIA and 165.102 were taken POW. This means that irrecoverable losses for the week amounted to 204.591 men. Losses in guns and vehicles were high as well.

In the pocket cleaning operations, around 10.695 Soviets managed to escape capture and returned to enemy lines according to intelligence reports.

In the air, Dive Bomber losses were high due to their constant sorties in assistance of the offensives. The Soviets lost around 733 airframes.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 440

RE: T52 - 6/3/2019 9:04:11 AM

Telemecus

Posts: 4689
Joined: 3/20/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xhoel
A bombing run on the city was met by heavy AA fire, which destroyed 13 bombers out of 80. Further air raids were put on hold.

(I believe that the flak in game (as of this patch) is far too powerful. Such results as shown, make bombing of big cities a stupid move because the losses are so heavy. And all of this in a city that has been cut off from supply for 3 weeks now. This isn't the first time this has happened but I wanted to emphasize it.)

I have to agree on flak. While I understand the reasons the developers chose to do it to rebalance the air war, this was after they had just nerfed the Soviet air force. So it seemed to me taking away from the one arm that could shoot down bombers (if you placed them correctly and had them) and giving to another arm that was never that powerful.

This did remind me of a tactic Stelteck used with isolated units. He bombed them a lot (before the buff to flak) not because of the damage they did but simply to use up the enemy ammo. He would then find the enemy units suffered from the too little ammunition penalty. I wondered if you saw anything like that in clearing the pocket. It would not be worth losing 13 bombers over, but it is some compensation at least?

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 441

RE: T52 - 6/3/2019 10:10:05 AM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Telemecus

quote:

ORIGINAL: xhoel
A bombing run on the city was met by heavy AA fire, which destroyed 13 bombers out of 80. Further air raids were put on hold.

(I believe that the flak in game (as of this patch) is far too powerful. Such results as shown, make bombing of big cities a stupid move because the losses are so heavy. And all of this in a city that has been cut off from supply for 3 weeks now. This isn't the first time this has happened but I wanted to emphasize it.)

I have to agree on flak. While I understand the reasons the developers chose to do it to rebalance the air war, this was after they had just nerfed the Soviet air force. So it seemed to me taking away from the one arm that could shoot down bombers (if you placed them correctly and had them) and giving to another arm that was never that powerful.

This did remind me of a tactic Stelteck used with isolated units. He bombed them a lot (before the buff to flak) not because of the damage they did but simply to use up the enemy ammo. He would then find the enemy units suffered from the too little ammunition penalty. I wondered if you saw anything like that in clearing the pocket. It would not be worth losing 13 bombers over, but it is some compensation at least?

Flak was never this powerful so this shouldn't be the case in game either.

I don't follow the tactic and have not paid attention to it during the pocket clearing. To me, the AA using up their ammo stocks, shouldn't translate to the infantry running out of ammo for their rifles and SMGs. I bomb units to damage elements and cause disruption, which softens the targets and makes the battles easier for my side. The bomber losses were taken over Voronezh itself, and the AA firing should be part of the city AA SU defense, so it wouldn't affect the ammo that the onmap units have. I think bombing cities with heavy AA is now off the table, considering how little damage that raid caused (200 men disrupted) for such a high cost, especially when considering that these bombers were fresh and sitting on an AB which was fully stocked.

_____________________________

(in reply to Telemecus)

Post #: 442

RE: T52 - 6/3/2019 10:53:01 AM

Bear1888

Posts: 62
Joined: 4/4/2019
Status: offline

There must be a way to keep light flak units (20�mm gun units) strong against low flying ground attack AC while nerfing the heavy flak units effect on high altitude bombers.

Flak was not a real threat to medium bombers flying high but deadly for Sturmovik and JU-87 attack AC making low level attack runs. One of the most dreaded jobs for allied pilots was low level attacks on German airfields.

< Message edited by Bear1888 -- 6/3/2019 10:54:27 AM >

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 443

RE: T52 - 6/3/2019 4:38:13 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bear1888

There must be a way to keep light flak units (20�mm gun units) strong against low flying ground attack AC while nerfing the heavy flak units effect on high altitude bombers.

Flak was not a real threat to medium bombers flying high but deadly for Sturmovik and JU-87 attack AC making low level attack runs. One of the most dreaded jobs for allied pilots was low level attacks on German airfields.

The thing is that it needs to be changed and nerfed a bit.

_____________________________

(in reply to Bear1888)

Post #: 444

Update on the AAR. - 6/3/2019 4:41:45 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

Small update on the AAR:

Turns 10-15 have just been updated with high resolution images without watermarks, which should make reading through them much easier. Now all turns are updated with high quality images and there are no watermarks.

A small report is coming, in regards to the failed offensive operation in the south. This will probably be posted before the update for T53. At the end of turn 54 (the beginning of summer) I will be making a big report in regards to casualties, goals for the summer offensive, state of the 2 factions etc.

Stay tuned!

_____________________________

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 445

RE: Update on the AAR. - 6/3/2019 7:23:15 PM

chaos45

Posts: 1889
Joined: 1/22/2001
Status: offline

Just remember German flak is even more powerful against soviet bombers due to higher EXP lol.

Good pockets...going to be hard for your opponent to stay relevant already in 1942, his only option is to run in the south already. Should be able to easily push him almost to the map edge based on what I see the situation as on the map right now.

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 446

RE: Update on the AAR. - 6/3/2019 9:13:48 PM

Bear1888

Posts: 62
Joined: 4/4/2019
Status: offline

One suggestion about Sevastopol:

Is it possible to reinforce your infantry corps there with Model ( I know. Hube is a good commander but imho Model has +1 Moral and Infantry rating) and some heavy rocket launcher units? And you should have at least one siege artillery unit with a 60 cm caliber "Karl M�rser" as OKH reserve. Would be great to have this monster at Sevastopol.

Would be great to attach 3 pioneer units to each infantry division and pack the corps HQ with heavy artillery and SPG's.

< Message edited by Bear1888 -- 6/3/2019 9:16:38 PM >

(in reply to chaos45)

Post #: 447

RE: Update on the AAR. - 6/3/2019 9:37:12 PM

xhoel

Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

@chaos45: Could be. I am not seeing a huge difference between the performance of both flak arms (Soviet and German) but the fact remains that it needs to be nerfed.

I don't think it will be such a easy fight. The big thing will be Moscow and he has concentrated a lot of good units there who are defending in good terrain and with high fort levels. In the South, Stalingrad has been fortified as well and he has had ample time to fortify the Don line. I'm looking forward to the Summer, it should be a tough but fun campaign.

@Bear1888: Yes, Model will take command next week. I needed him in the AGN sector this week, in the offensive operation there but he will be flown to the Crimea ASAP. There are Heavy Artillery units concentrated in the Crimea, the Karl Morser is also present there and even activated on turn 51 if I recall correctly. All HQs are densly packed with arty but you are right, I should add some rocket regiments in the mix.

Unfortunately I cannot spare to attach 3 Pioneer Bns to each division. They have all been reinforced by 1 Pioneer Bn and the main units have also received Stugs in certain occasions.

_____________________________

(in reply to Bear1888)

Post #: 448

RE: Update on the AAR. - 6/3/2019 9:43:14 PM

Bear1888

Posts: 62
Joined: 4/4/2019
Status: offline

Nice. Now blast away this pesky rifle corps at Sevastopol German style:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaekR2nk1t8

(in reply to xhoel)

Post #: 449

RE: Update on the AAR. - 6/4/2019 7:20:46 AM

EwaldvonKleist

Posts: 2038
Joined: 4/14/2016
From: Berlin, Germany
Status: offline

I always missed the German rail artillery competent in WitE. An on map move-only-by-rail artillery regiment would be nice to have, but require some Code change.
The Soviets likewise miss some heavy coastal artillery across the map, e.g. the battleship turret batteries from sevastopol.
(they could be included in some sort of fortress fortified zone.)

< Message edited by EwaldvonKleist -- 6/4/2019 7:23:32 AM >

_____________________________

The Library of Gary Grigsby's War in the East resources.
Do you want total war? Guide for WitE players

(in reply to Bear1888)

Post #: 450