2 major complaints

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

2 major complaints

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> The Operational Art of War IV >> 2 major complaints

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

2 major complaints - 8/23/2018 7:01:44 PM

lion_of_judah

Posts: 2113
Joined: 1/8/2007
Status: offline

I have one major complaint with this game, and that is there are only two sides, and not one where you could have at least 4-5 different nations instead of just two. My second complaint is that there is no production capacity.

Post #: 1

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/23/2018 8:27:27 PM

Cabido

Posts: 243
Joined: 12/11/2017
Status: offline

I have never seen a game with a production system that works well. The problem is that we have a posteriori knowledge of what worked well as a piece of equipment and what didn't, so that most games with production tends to see units with one or two kinds of equipment that proved very efficient historically or in game. Simulating factors that influence production levels, instead of choosing what to produce is more reasonable, in my opinion, but that can be simulated through events.

Much more important, once more in my very humble opinion, is to give more control over logistics, which is a fundamental aspect of operations. Being able to distribute supply in a non uniform way, creating supply dumps, etc. That would enrich game experience. Having to plan ahead accumulating supply, having to protect it, losing supply when attacked. A simple way would be to allow supply units to have cumulative effect by an on/off option set by the designer, who could then decrease the historical supply levels overall and provide some supply units to boost the levels locally at the will of the player.

More than two players would be a nice feature, but I imagine it would be a complicated one to implement. I may be wrong though.

(in reply to lion_of_judah)

Post #: 2

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/23/2018 9:49:59 PM

Lobster

Posts: 5104
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cabido

Much more important, once more in my very humble opinion, is to give more control over logistics, which is a fundamental aspect of operations. Being able to distribute supply in a non uniform way, creating supply dumps, etc. That would enrich game experience. Having to plan ahead accumulating supply, having to protect it, losing supply when attacked. A simple way would be to allow supply units to have cumulative effect by an on/off option set by the designer, who could then decrease the historical supply levels overall and provide some supply units to boost the levels locally at the will of the player.

+1

_____________________________

http://www.operationbarbarossa.net/

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I�m not sure about the universe-Einstein

Q: What do you call a boomerang that doesn�t come back?
A: A stick.

(in reply to Cabido)

Post #: 3

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/24/2018 12:44:38 AM

lion_of_judah

Posts: 2113
Joined: 1/8/2007
Status: offline

I think ATG does a pretty good job of doing the production of nations, if it is programmed correctly, just my opinion.

(in reply to Cabido)

Post #: 4

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/24/2018 12:39:31 PM

hingram

Posts: 129
Joined: 2/6/2002
From: SW Virginia
Status: offline

It would be nice if you could code the supply points as units or cities or ports that can be attacked by air, ground or sea. I'm assuming an amount of OO in the code where you could take advantage of Inheritance.

Multiple players sounds pretty hairy. I was thinking it would be nice if you had a closing sequence where you could forward the friendly turn to multiple people and then one person approves it to send it to the opposing side.

_____________________________

Hank

If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.

(in reply to lion_of_judah)

Post #: 5

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/24/2018 7:25:09 PM

MikeBrough

Posts: 260
Joined: 1/30/2005
From: Scotland
Status: offline

It's The OPERATIONAL Art of War. Production doesn't figure in operations.

It's a good idea, though - a strategic version of TOAOW.

_____________________________

Mike Brough
Proud to be an Arab

Be sceptical of the things you believe are false; be very sceptical of the things you believe are true.

(in reply to hingram)

Post #: 6

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/25/2018 9:02:56 PM

Curtis Lemay

Posts: 12969
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline

Virtually any aspect of wargaming comes with 20:20 hindsight issues. So, that doesn't nix production from my perspective - especially if both sides have it. For sure, my experience with it is that handling production is FUN! It would be great if TOAW could incorporate it in some subjects. But it's a big topic and will probably be a long way down the road before it hits the coding stage. Supply dumps will definitely come before that.

The scale of TOAW is Operational. The scope can include strategic issues. Some scenarios out there already do.

_____________________________

My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site

(in reply to MikeBrough)

Post #: 7

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/26/2018 5:20:36 PM

lion_of_judah

Posts: 2113
Joined: 1/8/2007
Status: offline

if one does make a strategic scenario, then how would you mimic production. Thanks

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)

Post #: 8

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/26/2018 5:50:33 PM

Curtis Lemay

Posts: 12969
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lion_of_judah

if one does make a strategic scenario, then how would you mimic production. Thanks

See my Soviet Union 1941 scenario. While you can't choose what to produce, you can model the destruction/displacement of factories and the capture of personnel centers.

_____________________________

My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site

(in reply to lion_of_judah)

Post #: 9

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/26/2018 5:50:48 PM

josant

Posts: 538
Joined: 3/14/2007
From: Spain
Status: offline

I do not care about production so much,I think that at operational level is not necesary, but I would like that Toaw have more than two sides.

(in reply to lion_of_judah)

Post #: 10

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/27/2018 3:18:40 AM

lion_of_judah

Posts: 2113
Joined: 1/8/2007
Status: offline

I checked out the page for this, but where can I download it?

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)

Post #: 11

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/27/2018 8:28:22 AM

Oberst_Klink

Posts: 4778
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lion_of_judah

I checked out the page for this, but where can I download it?

http://crossrl1.wixsite.com/my-toaw-site/soviet-union-1941

There you go.

Klink, Oberst

_____________________________

My Blog & on Twitter.
Visit CS Legion on Twitter & Facebook for updates.

(in reply to lion_of_judah)

Post #: 12

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/27/2018 1:47:18 PM

Curtis Lemay

Posts: 12969
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lion_of_judah

I checked out the page for this, but where can I download it?

It comes with TOAW IV. WWII - East Front folder.

_____________________________

My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site

(in reply to lion_of_judah)

Post #: 13

RE: 2 major complaints - 8/28/2018 1:43:39 AM

lion_of_judah

Posts: 2113
Joined: 1/8/2007
Status: offline

okay, thanks

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)

Post #: 14

RE: 2 major complaints - 9/2/2018 2:33:42 PM

RobS61

Posts: 36
Joined: 6/28/2018
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cabido

I have never seen a game with a production system that works well.

You've apparently never played Empire Deluxe. It's available from Killer Bee Software. I can't post a link because I'm still new here.

(in reply to Cabido)

Post #: 15

RE: 2 major complaints - 9/2/2018 3:29:36 PM

76mm

Posts: 4688
Joined: 5/2/2004
From: Washington, DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RobS61
You've apparently never played Empire Deluxe

With all due respect, AFAIK that is a much more rudimentary production system than most players would expect in a TOAW campaign on the Eastern Front, for instance.

< Message edited by 76mm -- 9/2/2018 3:30:17 PM >

(in reply to RobS61)

Post #: 16

RE: 2 major complaints - 9/2/2018 3:52:17 PM

Lobster

Posts: 5104
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: offline

Typically in a game with production players will find the 'perfect' set of units to produce and that is all that will ever be produced regardless of historical accuracy. About as historical as a fantasy game. The only way that could be avoided is to force them to produce a historical suite of units. Which would then beg the question, why have production at all?

< Message edited by Lobster -- 9/2/2018 3:53:11 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to 76mm)

Post #: 17

RE: 2 major complaints - 9/2/2018 4:03:48 PM

76mm

Posts: 4688
Joined: 5/2/2004
From: Washington, DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster
About as historical as a fantasy game. The only way that could be avoided is to force them to produce a historical suite of units. Which would then beg the question, why have production at all?

Yeah, I agree with this, although I do enjoy having production in "fictional" (ahem, I don't play fantasy) games.

(in reply to Lobster)

Post #: 18

RE: 2 major complaints - 9/3/2018 2:41:43 PM

RobS61

Posts: 36
Joined: 6/28/2018
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 76mm

quote:

ORIGINAL: RobS61
You've apparently never played Empire Deluxe

With all due respect, AFAIK that is a much more rudimentary production system than most players would expect in a TOAW campaign on the Eastern Front, for instance.

Of course. I merely replied to someone's statement that he had never seen a production system that worked, implying that there has never been one at all.

Lobster pretty much sums it up:

quote:

Typically in a game with production players will find the 'perfect' set of units to produce and that is all that will ever be produced regardless of historical accuracy. About as historical as a fantasy game. The only way that could be avoided is to force them to produce a historical suite of units. Which would then beg the question, why have production at all?

(in reply to 76mm)

Post #: 19

RE: 2 major complaints - 9/3/2018 6:44:27 PM

Cabido

Posts: 243
Joined: 12/11/2017
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RobS61

quote:

ORIGINAL: 76mm

quote:

ORIGINAL: RobS61
You've apparently never played Empire Deluxe

With all due respect, AFAIK that is a much more rudimentary production system than most players would expect in a TOAW campaign on the Eastern Front, for instance.

Of course. I merely replied to someone's statement that he had never seen a production system that worked, implying that there has never been one at all.

Lobster pretty much sums it up:

quote:

Typically in a game with production players will find the 'perfect' set of units to produce and that is all that will ever be produced regardless of historical accuracy. About as historical as a fantasy game. The only way that could be avoided is to force them to produce a historical suite of units. Which would then beg the question, why have production at all?

You went a bit to far with the implications of my sentence. "I have never seen" means just that. It doesn't mean there has never been one at all. I just followed this sentence with the reasons why I think it is problematic; the very same reasons you're corroborating when reproducing Lobster's words.

Is it possible to create a functional production system for TOAW? Perhaps. It just can't be based on the average war game production systems around. In the case of TOAW, which tends to reproduce historical situations with the granularity it does, it would be a real challenge to put on a functional production system which doesn't harm historical plausibility.

Of course we have previous knowledge of historical battle outcomes, so that one could be tempted to apply the same limitations to chosen tactics and strategies and that in fact happens after playing a scenario multiple times. But the dynamics of a battle are more open ended; in a certain historical circumstance, a single set of "moves" was tried, alternative "moves" outcomes remain obscure. We can't test multiple strategies for the same historical conjuncture in the real world. Regarding equipment, a single piece of equipment was tested in multiple situations and would, in hindsight, be completely discarded from production. Not only that, but a Tiger tank will be a Tiger tank in all scenarios you'll be playing, so your production preferences will tend to keep stable, while planning your tactical/strategical moves will be unique for each scenario.

I think production is fun too and I hope that whoever tries to implement it will take these problems in consideration. Perhaps a non-dictatorial system of decision, where your high command will present you some production options, in a slightly random way (as theater options), and you could accept them or reject them without knowing what options would be presented ahead of you. So, if you'll just be rejecting every proposal of P40 production saving your resources to produce P51s, the occasion may never present itself or may come too late. The proposals could have a probability based on historical production levels and the historical number of the specific kind of equipment on the represented theater.

(in reply to RobS61)

Post #: 20

RE: 2 major complaints - 9/4/2018 10:44:10 AM

2clicks

Posts: 17
Joined: 6/1/2018
From: Scotland
Status: offline

Maybe somewhere in-between production and the current production that we have where we could influence production, especially in larger scenarios. Something along the lines of prioritise tank production so that you get more tank replacements that are needed instead of loads of planes sitting around.

Personally I feels this sits with the area of the game while giving the player options.

(in reply to Cabido)

Post #: 21