Crackaces
Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain quote:
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS German casualties are never remotely close to what was experienced historically in weeks 1-24. Everything M60 brought up is true. I emphasize the sentence above for good measure. Statistics N=2: Baseline for discussion "Turns 1 - 25" According to Wikipedia (and references within) German causalities: Killed 186,542 Soviet 586,952 German AFV's Lost: 2,735 Soviet: 20,500 AFV's 2x3 Casualties (+1 Soviet) German Causulies Killed: 144,998 Soviet 624,370 German AVF's Lost: 2,493 Soviet 13,978 8MP Casaulties:(no +1 attack) German Killed 132,014 Soviet 493,037 AFV's Lost 2,257 Soviet 14,443 Using the logic in multiple AAR's and forums .. it looks like the Soviets are superman <smile> This is a game not a similation. Two major battles where the German's got their clock cleaned in the intial moments of Operation Barbarossa are not going to happen because of the combat engine. (Battle of Brody for example). Otherwise at least these two games produced reasonable results to "historcal" (besides the superman Soviet tanks) turns 1-25. This is just a thought .. but I might propose this constant balance discussion in every AAR is ruining the game. Instead of games compleating players are rationalizing "the game is borked" then one could say that has an effect on prospective buyers of the game who will wait unit the game is "balanced" What I am most interested in this AAR is if M60 applies any lessons learned from the 8MP game for Soviet air, and does it make a difference. Ok back into lurking mode.
_____________________________
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
|