Arleigh Burke's standing orders

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Arleigh Burke's standing orders

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Arleigh Burke's standing orders

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Arleigh Burke's standing orders - 3/10/2019 2:27:22 PM

m10bob

Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline

U.S. TF commander Arleigh Burke became known as "Thirty One Knot Burke because just before daybreak, he would have all his ships get up to that speed in order to be ready for incoming orders to intercept possible enemy activity.

His standing orders allowed his ships' captains to operate on their own when advantageous to the victory of the force.

"While counting on surprise, Burke also had three advantages going into battle. The Navy�s Bureau of Ordnance, after much prodding by COMSUBPAC Vice Adm. Charles Lockwood, had finally fixed the bugs plaguing the Navy�s torpedoes. He also had a viable combat naval radar doctrine that was the result of brutal lessons learned in the Solomons campaign. The third advantage was more personal. During the Battle of Blackett Strait in March 1943, Burke served as a destroyer captain in Task Force 68. Though an American victory, Burke came away frustrated. The task force commander did not inform his ship captains of his intentions until just before the battle commenced. Burke was determined that his captains would know his exact thoughts well before battle. Though individual engagements would contain relevant specifics, Burke�s standing order in all cases was: �Destroyers to attack on enemy contact WITHOUT ORDERS from the task force commander.�"

(Pic shows Burke readin orders at the center.)

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by m10bob -- 3/10/2019 2:31:09 PM >

_____________________________

Post #: 1

RE: Arleigh Burke's standing orders - 3/10/2019 2:46:14 PM

Dante Fierro

Posts: 330
Joined: 2/23/2012
From: Idaho Falls
Status: offline

Brilliant commander.

(in reply to m10bob)

Post #: 2

RE: Arleigh Burke's standing orders - 3/10/2019 4:52:44 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: m10bob

U.S. TF commander Arleigh Burke became known as "Thirty One Knot Burke because just before daybreak, he would have all his ships get up to that speed in order to be ready for incoming orders to intercept possible enemy activity.

His standing orders allowed his ships' captains to operate on their own when advantageous to the victory of the force.

"While counting on surprise, Burke also had three advantages going into battle. The Navy�s Bureau of Ordnance, after much prodding by COMSUBPAC Vice Adm. Charles Lockwood, had finally fixed the bugs plaguing the Navy�s torpedoes. He also had a viable combat naval radar doctrine that was the result of brutal lessons learned in the Solomons campaign. The third advantage was more personal. During the Battle of Blackett Strait in March 1943, Burke served as a destroyer captain in Task Force 68. Though an American victory, Burke came away frustrated. The task force commander did not inform his ship captains of his intentions until just before the battle commenced. Burke was determined that his captains would know his exact thoughts well before battle. Though individual engagements would contain relevant specifics, Burke�s standing order in all cases was: �Destroyers to attack on enemy contact WITHOUT ORDERS from the task force commander.�"

(Pic shows Burke readin orders at the center.)

As with this game .... it depends. During the battle of Cape Esperance a destroyer found itself out of position between the cruiser column and the Japanese. Instead of informing the TF commander of his position and going to his assigned battle position, the captain decided to attack the Japanese alone. In doing so, he doomed his DD and caused the US TF to check fire until they could sort out friendly from enemy. This check fire came at the moment when CA Aoba had been hard hit and would likely have been beyond saving by a few more shell hits. Instead, Aoba turned away under smoke cover and escaped.

Standing orders to attack immediately were workable if only the DD Squadron was involved and communication with the TF Commander kept a clear picture of the situation.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to m10bob)

Post #: 3

RE: Arleigh Burke's standing orders - 3/10/2019 5:18:06 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

Poor communication was the problem with that DD in that battle, but it should have been said (if it hadn't already anyway) communicate what you are doing! In military terms, it is known as "Failure to Communicate" and it is an actionable offence. In game terms, it might mean a high aggression rating with a low naval rating . . .

quote:

U.S. TF commander Arleigh Burke became known as "Thirty One Knot Burke because just before daybreak, he would have all his ships get up to that speed in order to be ready for incoming orders to intercept possible enemy activity.

According to book that I read, his DD squadron was ordered to proceed to a certain location at best possible speed. Unfortunately, a DD had a paint brush or something in a pipe when it had been repaired and it's best possible speed was 31 knots. So he had a message sent that he was proceeding at 31 knots, hence the nickname.

Also, during a shore bombardment, the time to cease firing as (for example) 10 a.m. but when it came time to quit firing, one DD had two guns still loaded. Permission was asked to unload them through the muzzle and not the breach. Permission was granted and the guns were trained onto another island and fired. Whereupon, two 5 inch shell impacted at an ammo storage dump . . .

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 4

RE: Arleigh Burke's standing orders - 3/11/2019 9:30:02 AM

Buckrock

Posts: 578
Joined: 3/16/2012
From: Not all there
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
As with this game .... it depends. During the battle of Cape Esperance a destroyer found itself out of position between the cruiser column and the Japanese. Instead of informing the TF commander of his position and going to his assigned battle position, the captain decided to attack the Japanese alone.

Actually, the situation was a bit more complicated. The commander of the destroyer in question (Taylor of the USS Duncan) believed in the circumstances that he was following the lead of his divisional flagship (USS Farenholt) in making a divisional torpedo attack against an enemy force some 8000yds away. This belief came from a combination of the leading Farenholt's wide turn appearing to take the Van destroyers (including the Duncan) directly toward the enemy, that a standing divisional order had it that Van destroyers should be prepared to follow any such moves of the Farenholt "without signal" and finally, pre-battle orders stating the intention of the US task force was to close the enemy so as to engage at short range. Together, these factors suggested to Taylor a decision may well have been made on the Farenholt to close in for a torpedo attack and therefore he should have the Duncan follow and prepare for action. By the time it was realized the Duncan was going in alone, Taylor considered it too late to break off as his ship was already within visual distance of a Japanese cruiser (likely the Aoba) when orders came over the TBS to begin the engagement.

quote:

In doing so, he doomed his DD and caused the US TF to check fire until they could sort out friendly from enemy. This check fire came at the moment when CA Aoba had been hard hit and would likely have been beyond saving by a few more shell hits. Instead, Aoba turned away under smoke cover and escaped.

The Task Force commander (RAdm Scott) did not know that the Duncan was already amongst the Japanese warships when he issued his cease fire order. That order was given because his Van destroyer force (believed at the time to also include the Duncan) were currently racing along the engaged side of his cruiser force and therefore exposed to both friendly and not so friendly fire. Later, when Scott was convinced the formation of Van destroyers had all cleared the firing area, he then gave the order to re-open fire. So even had the Duncan stayed with the rest of the Van rather than closing the enemy, Scott would have almost certainly issued his cease fire order anyway as he still would have found the Van destroyers present on his engaged side when the firing started.

quote:

Standing orders to attack immediately were workable if only the DD Squadron was involved and communication with the TF Commander kept a clear picture of the situation.

One of the many complications of the Battle of Cape Esperance was that TBS communications were ordered to be kept to a minimum, partly to keep the comms clear for messages RAdm Scott deemed critical and partly because it was suspected the Japanese may have had the capacity to listen in. This restriction in turn led to a reliance on "follow the leader" responses along with the need to anticipate what the "leader" might be planning. Guess wrong and you get the Duncan.

< Message edited by Buckrock -- 3/12/2019 1:05:47 PM >

_____________________________

This was the only sig line I could think of.

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 5

RE: Arleigh Burke's standing orders - 3/11/2019 2:18:30 PM

Lecivius