Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Strategic Command Series >> Strategic Command WWII: World at War >> AAR >> RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 6/24/2019 10:29:54 PM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		7 May 1943

The Japanese fleet strikes! Well sort of, results are disappointing and we only catch a few battleships. Which leaves us open to counter-attack.

Our losses so far: One German submarine, a heavily damaged Italian BB.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by sveint -- 6/24/2019 10:49:51 PM >

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 121
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 6/24/2019 10:37:55 PM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		Saudi Arabia surrenders to Italian forces, however the German expedition to India is heavily bombed by the US air force.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 122
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 6/26/2019 6:37:43 AM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		4 June 1943

In a shameful defeat, Japan loses a carrier, 2 battleships and a destroyer. We retreat, sinking one US carrier and one battleship on the way.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 123
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 6/27/2019 6:52:27 PM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		2 July 1943

The IJN loses a further 2 CVs, a BB, a CA and a submarine. The massive combined Allied fleets score a major victory.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 124
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 6/27/2019 7:00:33 PM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		But while Allied naval and air units are busy in Madagascar and India, all Axis air units converge on England.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 125
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 6/27/2019 7:07:07 PM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		India is feeling the pressure too, despite Allied heavy air units limiting German supply.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 126
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 6/28/2019 6:20:08 PM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		30 July 1943

Japan loses another carrier and battleship.

Plymouth is ungarrisoned and Germany immediately exploits the opportunity. One US fighter unit is eliminated.

German income this month is 1843 MP! Nothing useful is left to produce.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by sveint -- 6/28/2019 6:27:01 PM >

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 127
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 6/29/2019 5:33:57 PM   
sapper32


Posts: 1197
Joined: 5/7/2007
From: Warminster England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sveint

30 July 1943

Japan loses another carrier and battleship.

Plymouth is ungarrisoned and Germany immediately exploits the opportunity. One US fighter unit is eliminated.

German income this month is 1843 MP! Nothing useful is left to produce.




Wow that's unreal over 1800 MPPs how the hell can Germany out produce the US ?????

_____________________________

The battle of Medjerda is almost forgotten,but was fought against highly disciplined German troops and blasted a route straight to Tunis it was a perfect infiltration battle and should be remembered as the best fought British battle of the war.

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 128
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 7/1/2019 5:29:02 AM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		The game just ridiculously favors the Axis. I've tried to comment on it but it doesn't look like it will change. 1.03 was a micro-step in the right direction.

(in reply to sapper32)
Post #: 129
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 7/2/2019 7:11:46 AM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		27 August 1943

The UK is headed for a fall. The Kriegsmarine starts receivine mass produced units. Fleet will be at full capacity in Jan 1944 with the delivery of 2 carriers.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 130
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 7/2/2019 9:29:19 PM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		24 September 1943

London falls. Surface naval action off Norway.

German income is now 1928 MPs....




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by sveint -- 7/2/2019 9:31:18 PM >

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 131
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 7/3/2019 3:31:49 AM   
countrboy

 

Posts: 213
Joined: 9/26/2015
Status: offline 		Your opponent must be struggling to remain interested at this stage. The game really probably ended long ago. There's no coming back from a Russian surrender I reckon, even if you were playing against an Axis AI.

Maybe there's an issue with Axis being able to conquer so many nations and grab all their MP? In real life a fair amount of 'national MP' was certainly 'taken' by the occupying Germans, but it seems a bit simplistic that if France generates say 40MP as an independent nation, that it also generates 40MP for Germany when under German occupation. That scenario allows the German MP juggernaut to grow beyond fantasy. Just a thought.

Enjoying your AAR anyway!

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 132
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 7/3/2019 6:04:53 AM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		Hi, we've agreed to play to the end. I don't think the Soviet surrender should remove garrison requirements, and clearly Germany is getting too much MP from conquests.

(in reply to countrboy)
Post #: 133
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 7/3/2019 6:13:35 AM   
countrboy

 

Posts: 213
Joined: 9/26/2015
Status: offline
quote:

I don't think the Soviet surrender should remove garrison requirements


I agree. It would take Germany a substantial investment in MP to garrison Russia securely and would stop the snowball effect of a Russian surrender to a certain extent. Have the devs explained why they did this?

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 134
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 7/4/2019 6:59:10 PM   
BillRunacre

 

Posts: 4945
Joined: 7/22/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: countrboy

quote:

I don't think the Soviet surrender should remove garrison requirements


I agree. It would take Germany a substantial investment in MP to garrison Russia securely and would stop the snowball effect of a Russian surrender to a certain extent. Have the devs explained why they did this?


It's a tricky situation as either the USSR surrenders in total to Germany or Japan, or it can be split between them both via a Decision.

If the latter then the USSR is divided between them, but in the process it effectively disappears - which means that it can't generate Partisans. Unfortunately there is no way around this at the moment.

So if planning on playing on against a human opponent there's no harm in having a house rule to not split the USSR

_____________________________

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/

(in reply to countrboy)
Post #: 135
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 7/4/2019 7:50:19 PM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		22 October 1943

The German fleet loses 2 destroyers and a lone corps is eliminated by US forces in India. Japan loses a very experienced HQ to overconfidence in China.

There is heavy fighting in India with severe losses on all sides. Japan can barely keep up with replenishments, however Germany will simply be railing in more and more troops that are sitting around in Europe and Russia.

Germany destroys several units in England, but does not yet take Manchester, the new capital.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by sveint -- 7/4/2019 8:07:39 PM >

(in reply to BillRunacre)
Post #: 136
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 7/6/2019 9:30:45 PM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		19 November 1943

Manchester falls, UK government moves to Edinburgh. India is about to fall.

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 137
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 7/11/2019 1:21:03 AM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		January 1944

UK falls, government moves to Australia. Germany is swimming in unspent MPs. India is on it's very last legs. Planning starts for invasion of North America/Australia.

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 138
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 7/14/2019 9:40:30 PM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline 		April 1944

In a dark world where the Axis controls Eurasia, Iceland and most of Africa, Rommel arrives in Australia...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 139
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 8/30/2019 6:46:47 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline 		I have the game and I'm just starting to take a look at it. Great AAR! Do you have any kind of victory condition screenshots you can show?

Cheers,
CB

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 140
RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) - 9/17/2019 9:26:07 AM   
boudi

 

Posts: 346
Joined: 1/7/2007
From: France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sveint

The game just ridiculously favors the Axis. I've tried to comment on it but it doesn't look like it will change. 1.03 was a micro-step in the right direction.


+1. the problem must be seriously solved.


< Message edited by boudi -- 9/17/2019 9:27:08 AM >

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 141
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Strategic Command Series >> Strategic Command WWII: World at War >> AAR >> RE: sveint (Axis) vs GeneralFerraro (Allies) Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.829