Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

House Rules

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> House Rules Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
House Rules - 9/21/2019 8:35:08 PM   
AlessandroW


Posts: 50
Joined: 9/12/2019
Status: offline 		Hi guys,

after a very long stop I just started a small scenario PBEM and it has been immediately clear that I need to learn again a lot of stuff.

The next step would be to play the grand campaign, therefore I'm wondering after several patches and a better understanding of the game which house rules you think are needed but to pay PPs to change units to an unrestricted command.

Thanks in advance.
Post #: 1
RE: House Rules - 9/21/2019 8:44:44 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		The only times that you really need to pay for a ground unit is if you want to load it onto ships and/or air transport it to another base.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to AlessandroW)
Post #: 2
RE: House Rules - 9/21/2019 8:45:26 PM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline 		My viewpoint is no house rules are needed at all.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 3
RE: House Rules - 9/21/2019 9:20:00 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

My viewpoint is no house rules are needed at all.


If you make the mess, clean it up.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 4
RE: House Rules - 9/21/2019 9:54:34 PM   
AlessandroW


Posts: 50
Joined: 9/12/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

The only times that you really need to pay for a ground unit is if you want to load it onto ships and/or air transport it to another base.


Yes, but what about Kwantung Army units? Do you move them to China without paying PPs?


quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

My viewpoint is no house rules are needed at all.


If may I ask, why do you think are not neeeded?

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 5
RE: House Rules - 9/21/2019 10:11:40 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		Yes, you can move them by land all the way to Karachi if you want to.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to AlessandroW)
Post #: 6
RE: House Rules - 9/21/2019 11:46:46 PM   
jdsrae


Posts: 2716
Joined: 3/1/2010
From: Gandangara Country
Status: offline 		I dont think house rules are needed, but you can agree whatever you want with your pbem opponent.

Without house rules, Kwangtung Army ground units can move freely to China, Burma, India given enough time to walk there, but 2nd Air Div air groups in Manchukuo cant move to China.
The flip side is the Allies can freely move British Indian Army land units the other way.
So Japan has the initiative early war but the allies will get it later.



_____________________________

Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655

(in reply to AlessandroW)
Post #: 7
RE: House Rules - 9/22/2019 8:58:46 AM   
AlessandroW


Posts: 50
Joined: 9/12/2019
Status: offline 		I'm in the no HRs needed way of thinking too but lot of players still ask for them, therefore my post.

I don't have a in game experience to know what is better yet.

(in reply to jdsrae)
Post #: 8
RE: House Rules - 9/22/2019 11:16:00 AM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		PP for crossing national borders is a very common house rule for a reason.

You also need one at the start for stuff like Mersing Gambit (on the first turn, nothing wrong with it on 2nd turn!) or anything that would be impossible not to have been spotted as it is a "magic move"



_____________________________


(in reply to AlessandroW)
Post #: 9
RE: House Rules - 9/22/2019 12:00:11 PM   
btd64


Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline 		I just use the pp's for crossing national boundaries....GP

_____________________________

Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DWU-Beta Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 10
RE: House Rules - 9/22/2019 1:08:55 PM   
Trugrit


Posts: 947
Joined: 7/14/2014
From: North Carolina
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled

PP for crossing national borders is a very common house rule for a reason.

You also need one at the start for stuff like Mersing Gambit (on the first turn, nothing wrong with it on 2nd turn!) or anything that would be impossible not to have been spotted as it is a "magic move"



+1

I would say play with no house rules except national borders, you will learn a lot that way.

But, there is a major non-historical exploit that veteran players know about.
In Scenario 1 and 2 the Japanese have a move bonus.

If you don’t play the historical start the KB starts in the Kurile Islands (Etorofu).

The first turn move bonus is enough to allow it to transit to the west coast of the U.S.
and take it’s refuel tankers with it.

It can then strike San Diego and sink the Saratoga which is in port.

The other thing it might do is to locate off Manila and attack the 27 Allied subs in port there.

Or it can position off Singapore and take out the British warships.

In fact with the move bonus it can position off Sydney if it wants to on the first turn.

If you have a good Japanese opponent he won't use it this way.

PS: The other thing.
Players generally make a house rule to prevent the Japanese player from hunting Allied carriers on turn one.

I don't ask for that and I won't do it if I'm playing the Japanese.

As the Allies, it is a good Fly Trap.
If the Japanese player hunts your carriers on turn one because he knows where they are
you need to quit the game and find a good opponent.

Life is too short, and this game is too long to play an A-Hole.





< Message edited by Trugrit -- 9/22/2019 1:45:22 PM >

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 11
RE: House Rules - 9/22/2019 2:43:21 PM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline 		I do separate turn 1 rules from house rules.

This is what I usually ask for as the Allies( I would do the same as Japan also )

1. Allied TF that exist on turn one can change their orders, no new TFs can be created
2. Only ground and air units either in China or attached to China Command can be given orders on turn 1.
3. No deep penetrations by the Japanese( No Mersing turn 1, no Palambang, etc. )

(in reply to Trugrit)
Post #: 12
RE: House Rules - 9/22/2019 2:49:05 PM   
Dili

 

Posts: 4708
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline 		If you don't have house rules you can break the game.
You can use battleships to bombard every day but IRL they would need to get to port/shipyards to get their guns relined after maybe 500 shots (basically 3 resupplies) - Yamato i think did even need to get the whole tube replaced. You turn the game into Bombard in Pacific game.

You can get many hits with torpedo bombers with bombs, you can shut airfields by level bombing by night or sink many ships in port also by night.

Of course many players are not upset by this.

(in reply to Trugrit)
Post #: 13
RE: House Rules - 9/22/2019 3:27:25 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AlessandroW
which house rules you think are needed but to pay PPs to change units to an unrestricted command.


Technically speaking paying PPs to change units to an unrestricted command isn't a house rule so much as a regular aspect of gameplay.

You'll find that nearly everyone plays with some HRs, even if it's just the most common one (can't move restricted ground units out of national boundaries).

There's not as many as used to be required IMO because of the patches fixing the most obvious ones. However, there are still abundant issues with 'stratospheric sweep' and nighttime tactical bombing of airfields / ports. Some people use a limitation on 4E bombers with naval attack, but that's not one I am too hung up on.

_____________________________


(in reply to AlessandroW)
Post #: 14
RE: House Rules - 9/22/2019 3:51:28 PM   
AlessandroW


Posts: 50
Joined: 9/12/2019
Status: offline 		Thanks for all your feedbacks so far!


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
However, there are still abundant issues with 'stratospheric sweep' and nighttime tactical bombing of airfields / ports. Some people use a limitation on 4E bombers with naval attack, but that's not one I am too hung up on.


Can you give me some more details?

Sweep: I though that flying your fighters at their best maneuver level would be enough to limit this problem, is diving on your enemy the only best chance to win the dogfight?

Nightime: no clue here, too powerul? Is so what is the HR for that?

4E bombers: I thought it was more a commonplace that a real issue, therefore no under 10000 feet?

< Message edited by AlessandroW -- 9/22/2019 3:52:29 PM >

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 15
RE: House Rules - 9/22/2019 6:42:18 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline 		AllesandroW - in our PBEM, Large Slow Target and I agreed on a number of house rules at start, and have modified/added a few during our 5yr journey.....

We limited sweeps to second best maneuver band to prevent those "stratospheric sweeps" Chickenboy mentioned. To me, its been a good solution. CAP is not limited by this altitude restriction, only the sweepers.
We've also reduced night bombing a bit by reducing the squadrons able to target a specific base - 1 in '42, 2 in '43 and 3 in '44. Its helped, but night bombing can still be effective for the Allied once they get the B-24. We've also limited 4E on naval to the 10k foot minimum altitude, but frankly that has had limited effect as I wouldn't use Heavies against naval targets much.


(in reply to AlessandroW)
Post #: 16
RE: House Rules - 9/22/2019 9:17:57 PM   
Trugrit


Posts: 947
Joined: 7/14/2014
From: North Carolina
Status: offline
AlessandroW,

You should not worry too much about stratospheric sweeps.

You will see a lot about this on the forum. Discussions, Arguments, Sandbox runs,
Borked/Not borked, get off my lawn type threads…..etc.

There are counters to it so it won’t wreck your game.

The truth is that it is a slight problem that should have been fixed.
The Elf has acknowledged as much in posts.

But, the Devs had a lot on their plate so you can’t fault them too much.
They produced an outstanding game and it still works very well.

The way to fix it is to add much greater pilot and plane fatigue if a player flies those missions.
That would discourage players from flying both range and altitude missions all the way
out to the edge of the envelope.

Like the ships running at full speed you would cause much more damage to the air frame and pilots.
But, maybe it is not an easy thing to fix.



(in reply to AlessandroW)
Post #: 17
RE: House Rules - 9/23/2019 12:22:22 AM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AlessandroW

Thanks for all your feedbacks so far!


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
However, there are still abundant issues with 'stratospheric sweep' and nighttime tactical bombing of airfields / ports. Some people use a limitation on 4E bombers with naval attack, but that's not one I am too hung up on.


Can you give me some more details?

Sweep: I though that flying your fighters at their best maneuver level would be enough to limit this problem, is diving on your enemy the only best chance to win the dogfight?

Nightime: no clue here, too powerul? Is so what is the HR for that?

4E bombers: I thought it was more a commonplace that a real issue, therefore no under 10000 feet?


AlessandroW,

My post was to clarify examples of HRs that are IMO in commonplace usage. Not to recommend HRs for you or to revisit the concept of HRs that you do (or don't) need for a productive game. This is a 'can of worms' with some deeply held views about if and how the game models what we want it to. Many people want this game to reflect different levels of nuanced 'reality' than it does or can. Where we run into problems on the forum is arguing that *our* desired reality somehow should be a more universally accepted reality and arguing for that.

Make your own decisions about your gaming reality, don't assume my own. You may find that you don't need the same HRs that I (and others) do. Good on you either way.

_____________________________


(in reply to AlessandroW)
Post #: 18
RE: House Rules - 9/23/2019 2:45:02 PM   
AlessandroW


Posts: 50
Joined: 9/12/2019
Status: offline 		Thanks for all your inputs, much appreciated

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 19
RE: House Rules - 9/23/2019 3:09:02 PM   
Gridley380


Posts: 464
Joined: 12/20/2011
Status: offline 		One rule I've recently adopted myself (self-enforced, as I only play vs. the AI at this point) is to only carry fuel in "liquid" storage space; no loading fuel in dry cargo space. This has a significant effect on gameplay, to say the least.

(in reply to AlessandroW)
Post #: 20
RE: House Rules - 9/23/2019 4:23:18 PM   
AlessandroW


Posts: 50
Joined: 9/12/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gridley380

One rule I've recently adopted myself (self-enforced, as I only play vs. the AI at this point) is to only carry fuel in "liquid" storage space; no loading fuel in dry cargo space. This has a significant effect on gameplay, to say the least.


To be honest I never used xAK/AK to carry fuel too, not for some self-rule but only because it seems right.
Surely can be a bad choice if you want to haul more fuel.

(in reply to Gridley380)
Post #: 21
RE: House Rules - 9/24/2019 3:27:13 PM   
LargeSlowTarget


Posts: 4443
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hessen, Germany - now living in France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IdahoNYer

AllesandroW - in our PBEM, Large Slow Target and I agreed on a number of house rules at start, and have modified/added a few during our 5yr journey.....

We limited sweeps to second best maneuver band to prevent those "stratospheric sweeps" Chickenboy mentioned. To me, its been a good solution. CAP is not limited by this altitude restriction, only the sweepers.
We've also reduced night bombing a bit by reducing the squadrons able to target a specific base - 1 in '42, 2 in '43 and 3 in '44. Its helped, but night bombing can still be effective for the Allied once they get the B-24. We've also limited 4E on naval to the 10k foot minimum altitude, but frankly that has had limited effect as I wouldn't use Heavies against naval targets much.



And we have ruled-out "tank only" attacks above regimental size, i.e. if a hex holds more than one tank regiment, the tanks must only attack if accompanied by infantry which is attacking as well. This was done to avoid unrealistic "Armoured Blitzkrieg" with stacks of multiples tank units combined.

< Message edited by LargeSlowTarget -- 9/24/2019 3:30:45 PM >

_____________________________

AE Mod "Bottlenecks" UPDATED 01/2022

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 22
RE: House Rules - 9/24/2019 5:21:10 PM   
AlessandroW


Posts: 50
Joined: 9/12/2019
Status: offline 		Thanks LST for your suggestions!

Btw, I'm going to read your AAR!

(in reply to LargeSlowTarget)
Post #: 23
RE: House Rules - 9/24/2019 5:48:58 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AlessandroW

Hi guys,

after a very long stop I just started a small scenario PBEM and it has been immediately clear that I need to learn again a lot of stuff.

The next step would be to play the grand campaign, therefore I'm wondering after several patches and a better understanding of the game which house rules you think are needed but to pay PPs to change units to an unrestricted command.

Thanks in advance.




Just Say No!

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to AlessandroW)
Post #: 24
RE: House Rules - 9/24/2019 5:58:06 PM   
btd64


Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gridley380

One rule I've recently adopted myself (self-enforced, as I only play vs. the AI at this point) is to only carry fuel in "liquid" storage space; no loading fuel in dry cargo space. This has a significant effect on gameplay, to say the least.


Go to PBEM, You'll never look back. I also use the no dry space rule....GP

_____________________________

Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DWU-Beta Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to Gridley380)
Post #: 25
RE: House Rules - 9/24/2019 8:43:52 PM   
AlessandroW


Posts: 50
Joined: 9/12/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: btd64


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gridley380

One rule I've recently adopted myself (self-enforced, as I only play vs. the AI at this point) is to only carry fuel in "liquid" storage space; no loading fuel in dry cargo space. This has a significant effect on gameplay, to say the least.


Go to PBEM, You'll never look back. I also use the no dry space rule....GP



(in reply to btd64)
Post #: 26
RE: House Rules - 9/24/2019 9:31:37 PM   
Dili

 

Posts: 4708
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline 		Yep you get bad habit playing the AI, your brain even starts to feel scripted... PBEM is completely different

(in reply to AlessandroW)
Post #: 27
RE: House Rules - 9/24/2019 10:33:20 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Alessandro was probably question-marking the "no dry space" phrase. If so, Allessandro, that's a reference to cargo ships (xAKs) having "dry space" and tankers (TKs) having "wet space." btd64 and other players are saying they prefer to use only TKs to carry fuel, using xAKs only to carry supplies (dry stuff). That's because xAKs can carry fuel at half capacity, which doesn't sit right with these players as it increases the ability to move fuel dramatically. (Some xAKs carry both supplies and fuel, with most of the space for supplies but a small capacity for fuel, and these players consider it fine to use them in those capacities.)

(in reply to Dili)
Post #: 28
RE: House Rules - 9/24/2019 10:35:07 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		PBEM is a heckuva lot of fun but a bunch of players (perhaps a decided majority) play AI because of time constraints or other preferences. It's pretty clear they feel slighted or left out or demeaned by us PBEM players that harp on the fact that PBEM is more challenging (due to AI limitations) and more fun. Nearly everybody acknowledges those things but we do well to respect the choices of our brethren and to avoid diminishing the quality of their gaming.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 29
RE: House Rules - 9/25/2019 2:46:16 AM   
jagsdomain

 

Posts: 197
Joined: 7/4/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

PBEM is a heckuva lot of fun but a bunch of players (perhaps a decided majority) play AI because of time constraints or other preferences. It's pretty clear they feel slighted or left out or demeaned by us PBEM players that harp on the fact that PBEM is more challenging (due to AI limitations) and more fun. Nearly everybody acknowledges those things but we do well to respect the choices of our brethren and to avoid diminishing the quality of their gaming.

I will try a email game when I get more Experance. The AI sent 1 heavy 1 light cruiser and 2 dd do dock in a town they dont own. And a bb .ca and dd were 5 hexs away but was 2 different groups.
Dont think a real person would have dobt that.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> House Rules Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

4.234