DesertWolf101
Posts: 1445
Joined: 11/26/2016 Status: offline
|
Battle Assessment - Encirclement at Nanyang In assessing the battle, I think my opponent's comments at the time are worth going into: "I can honestly say I have never seen a game EVER where the chinese just slap around japanese divisions like in this one. I have no idea where your getting enough supply to keep a two month offensive going let alone fly planes at will,unless its this beta version. In all my previous games it was not uncommon to have 2 divisions and some support troops hold off entire hordes of chinese when they actually were brave enough to attack due to the low experience levels and supply issues." I wasn't going to let my opponent at the time know, but supply was a major issue for me. Logistics are the sinews of war, and from the start it became quickly clear to me that I needed a lot of supply in China if I were to conduct the aggressive operations I wanted to there. I knew supply was bad from historical context, but it took only the first week of game time to reveal just how bad the situation really is in the game. Strategically therefore, holding Burma was the key to large scale offensive operations in China and I poured significant resources into both holding it and into setting up the air supply over the hump as a secondary source. I have since read that this can be a risky play for an allied player, as the Japanese can encircle Burma by landing in India. The point I think however still stands. IF the strategic decision is to be very active in China - Burma needs to hold - warts, risks, and all. Operationally, the key to success for me was maneuver. This is undeniably a tough move given the state of Chinese forces in the early game, but I would argue that it is still the best available move. If I had sat in fortified positions without maneuvering my armies both at the front line and behind his lines, my opponent would have gradually and methodically reduced my stretched out positions. Maneuver allowed me to disrupt the Japanese supply by cutting his rail, marshaling armies together at the point of decision, and achieve encirclements. Tactically, success in the air for me was critical. I won't pretend to know whether this is always a realistic option in China, and I suspect it may far often be less likely than was the case for me this game. I can say however that using my fighters well allowed me to negate his bombing advantage to a large extend, and even assiduous use of Chinese bombers proved very beneficial at critical periods when I had to slow down a Japanese army for turn or two. These are the humble, but hopefully informed, experiences of a newbie.
< Message edited by DesertWolf101 -- 6/8/2020 5:51:32 PM >
|