Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
- 7/4/2001 2:06:00 AM   
Rick Borovec

 

Posts: 105
Joined: 3/21/2001
From: Rochester, Washington
Status: offline
The War in the Pacific is my favorite too! Playing as the Japanese on the advance or assualt is always a challange, mostly due to a lack of mobility and firepower, however on defense they can be quite nasty. Can't wait for ver.6 to see how that will finally effect the mostly infantry battles of the Pacific. Boro

_____________________________


(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 31
- 7/4/2001 2:18:00 AM   
Panzer Capta


Posts: 268
Joined: 11/24/2000
From: Bedford, NH, USA
Status: offline
Thanks for the information on "A Marine Moment". I have played this scenerio with earlier versions, and i expect it to play a wee bit differently with the upgraded versions (5.2, 5.3, and 6.0). I am currently reading "Flag of Our Fathers", a terrific book about the flagraisers at Iwo Jima, and highly recommended to all interested in the Pacific Campaign. The courage to do what was done by the USMC on Iwo Jima, and throughout the Pacific, is beyond all comprehension to most of us. Although we may not comprehend it, our responsibility is to never forget those that experienced it. Panzer Captain

_____________________________


(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 32
- 7/4/2001 2:46:00 AM   
Wild Bill

 

Posts: 6821
Joined: 4/7/2000
From: Smyrna, Ga, 30080
Status: offline
PC, have you tried the fine big scenario by "Wiseman," called "Iwo Jima?" It is a microcosm of the entire 6 week battle in one scenario. Wiseman did a great job here. I've played it twice and had a blast with it. It has a gritty, real Pacific feel to it. Wild Bill

_____________________________


In Arduis Fidelis
Wild Bill Wilder
Independent Game Consultant

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 33
- 7/4/2001 2:48:00 AM   
Wild Bill

 

Posts: 6821
Joined: 4/7/2000
From: Smyrna, Ga, 30080
Status: offline
I tried 5.4 with the scenario "The Bushmasters (scen#16)," and found it very challenging and a lot of fun. Nice to revisit some of these occasionally. The Japs can't seem to find the bridge so I am going to revise it and reissue it soon. Wild Bill

_____________________________


In Arduis Fidelis
Wild Bill Wilder
Independent Game Consultant

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 34
- 7/4/2001 3:07:00 AM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
meeeeeeeee sir. Though admitedly i like to see a few tanks here or there. 6.0 sounds like this theatre is going to get alot more interesting. Previously it would seem that the large Japanese squads were little better than targets, easy to hit. Now.......eek, hope the turn limits get longer cause i think the Japanese defence in depth is going to get alot harder :rolleyes: It would be interesting to see a few more China scenerios as well. That way one can get a chance to play around with the armor and armored cars that Japan had to play with.

_____________________________


(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 35
- 7/4/2001 4:07:00 AM   
murr

 

Posts: 41
Joined: 5/8/2001
From: OHIO U.S.A.
Status: offline
Iprefer pacific play since there arent too many games or scenarios that deal withit.Its the best infantry style play you can get.

_____________________________

GOOD HUNTING!

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 36
- 7/4/2001 7:15:00 AM   
Warrior


Posts: 1808
Joined: 11/2/2000
From: West Palm Beach, FL USA
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by General Mayhem: Japanese were difficult to kill, not to win. Because they didn't know how to lose, they continued to fought despite they had lost. That's why US atom bombed Japan...
Actually, that's not why we atom bombed the Japs. Probably we just wanted to see what the atom bomb would do to a real city, as cynical as it may sound. The Japs had been trying to surrender for months before we dropped the bomb, but we refused to talk to them. Prolonging the war also allowed the Russians to take Manchuria, with its hugh stores of weapons and material, after entering the war against Japan at the last moment. The fix was in, and the results were the Communist takeover of China (aided by all those weapons the Russians captured and the duplicity of our State Department), and later the Korean war.

_____________________________

Retreat is NOT an option.



(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 37
- 7/4/2001 8:03:00 AM   
Wild Bill

 

Posts: 6821
Joined: 4/7/2000
From: Smyrna, Ga, 30080
Status: offline
Whoa now, Warrior! I never heard that point of view before! That is very, very interesting. It is completely different from what I have read and assumed. Got to think on that one for a while...WB

_____________________________


In Arduis Fidelis
Wild Bill Wilder
Independent Game Consultant

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 38
- 7/4/2001 8:31:00 AM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
I think that one needs to be qualified a bit. Its true that certain elements of the Japanese government did put out feelers through 3rd party channels on negotiating a peace settlement with the Allies. However by around this same time the Potsdam declaration had been announced and since unconditional surrender was unacceptable to most (if not all) of the Japanese military leaders it never went anywhere. One is free of course to debate on whether the Allied position was unreasonable or inflexible, however given the scale and scope of the war, would any other kind of peace have been acceptable? Mao would have won eventually in China with or without the Russian invasion. Chang Ka-sheck's government was unpopular and hopelessly corrupt. I would'nt blame the US for that one. Vietnam....yes, but not China. As for the Atom bomb, disagree. Projections for Operation Olympic estimated 1,000,000 US casualties and perhaps ten times that number in Japanese (civilians included) A terrible choice to have to use the weapon but with the Japanese government showing no outward sign of giving up the struggle what other course was available?

_____________________________


(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 39
- 7/4/2001 8:40:00 AM   
A_B

 

Posts: 296
Joined: 4/11/2001
From: San Jose, CA
Status: offline
IMHO, the atom bomb gave Japan an honorable way out of the war. Prior to it's drop, the thought of surrender could not even be considered by many Japanese Leaders, or the bulk of the officer corp. It just couldn't be done. But fighting against the magic of science went beyond the warrior code - hence surrender was now OK.

_____________________________

Unconventional war requires unconventional thought

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 40
- 7/4/2001 8:52:00 AM   
New York Jets


Posts: 2087
Joined: 6/25/2001
From: St. Louis, MO but stuck in Bremerton,WA
Status: offline
I would love to play a Pacific campaign. Japanese vs. American/British/Chinese/etc. BTW: I noticed on the Stephen Ambrose website that Spielberg is planning a movie on Iwo Jima. [ July 03, 2001: Message edited by: Chris Trog ]

_____________________________

"There comes a time in every man's life, and I've had plenty of 'em."

- Casey Stengel -

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 41
- 7/4/2001 9:35:00 AM   
Wild Bill

 

Posts: 6821
Joined: 4/7/2000
From: Smyrna, Ga, 30080
Status: offline
Great news, Chris! That one should be a winner! And with the Nam one in the works...wow! Wild Bill

_____________________________


In Arduis Fidelis
Wild Bill Wilder
Independent Game Consultant

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 42
- 7/4/2001 10:19:00 AM   
Mike Mnich

 

Posts: 36
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: Eureka, KS, USA
Status: offline
Dear Bill, The Pacific is my favorite. I like to read the history, and I'd love to see several US Campaigns including Megacampaigns. I like playing Allies rather than Axis powers. Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 43
- 7/4/2001 6:19:00 PM   
General Mayhem

 

Posts: 180
Joined: 6/13/2001
From: Country of six thousand lakes and one truth
Status: offline
Any chance of getting atom bomb to game? Personally, I've been tempted to drop couple of them to few hills in couple of battles I've played. :D

_____________________________

----------------------------- Sex, rags and and rock'n roll! ------------------------------

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 44
- 7/4/2001 6:34:00 PM   
Wild Bill

 

Posts: 6821
Joined: 4/7/2000
From: Smyrna, Ga, 30080
Status: offline
:eek: Now that would be a blast! :D Wild Bill

_____________________________


In Arduis Fidelis
Wild Bill Wilder
Independent Game Consultant

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 45
- 7/4/2001 6:36:00 PM   
Wild Bill

 

Posts: 6821
Joined: 4/7/2000
From: Smyrna, Ga, 30080
Status: offline
Preisely one of the reasons I am asking the question, Mike. I personally really want at least one mega campaign of the Pacific. One of the island battles, Guadalcanal, Okinawa, Saipan, or fighting on New Guinea. I hope I can realize that dream. Wild Bill

_____________________________


In Arduis Fidelis
Wild Bill Wilder
Independent Game Consultant

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 46
- 7/4/2001 6:52:00 PM   
RolandRahn_MatrixForum

 

Posts: 588
Joined: 3/18/2001
From: Beloit, USA
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by General Mayhem: Any chance of getting atom bomb to game? Personally, I've been tempted to drop couple of them to few hills in couple of battles I've played. :D
I'm currently working on a small USMC vs. Japan Campaign covering the Invasion of Japan in late 1945/1946 (will need at least a couple of months to finish it). The representation of atomic bombs still gives me some headache.... I am trying representing the effect of a tactical nuke by placing some black beach hexes around ground zero and placing rough desert hexes some 100's yards around it, but the result did not look satisfying... By the way: I started a thread regarding the representation of tactical nuclear weapons in late march. Kind regards, Roland

_____________________________


(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 47
- 7/4/2001 7:38:00 PM   
General Mayhem

 

Posts: 180
Joined: 6/13/2001
From: Country of six thousand lakes and one truth
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by Wild Bill: Preisely one of the reasons I am asking the question, Mike. I personally really want at least one mega campaign of the Pacific. One of the island battles, Guadalcanal, Okinawa, Saipan, or fighting on New Guinea. I hope I can realize that dream. Wild Bill
I looked battle of Saipan, and it looked mighty intresting: www.cnmi-guide.com/history/ww2/4/main4.html 2/3 of troops were Marine and rest U.S. Army? If so, then one could play both forces. Which would expand usability of potential campaign a lot. Also playing Japanese could be intresting. But I don't know enough about the battle to be sure. [ July 04, 2001: Message edited by: General Mayhem ]

_____________________________

----------------------------- Sex, rags and and rock'n roll! ------------------------------

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 48
- 7/4/2001 7:45:00 PM   
RolandRahn_MatrixForum

 

Posts: 588
Joined: 3/18/2001
From: Beloit, USA
Status: offline
Hello everybody, I am sorry if this is a little off-topic, but I think that earlier in this thread there were some posts about the use of the atomic bomb with opinions about their use in WWII. 1st: 1 000 000 US casualities. The original estimates where around 250 000 US casualties for Olympic (Invasion of Kyushu, November 1945) and Coronet (Invasion of Honshu, March 1946) This would lead to some 60000 KIA/MIA, the rest wounded. For the Japanese, the death rate would be very likely 10+ Millions. One of the main (and today often forgotten) reasons is that there would have been a mass starvation in Japan if the war had continued. Japan depends on fishing much more than most other countries, and the situation in late 1945 prevented fishing. And the Japanese transportation system was going to collapse under the allied air raids, this would have prevented the transportation of food into the urban areas. It is often forgotten that a mass starvation in 1946 was prevented only due to the shipment of approx. 800 000 tons of food from the US to Japan. 2nd: There were other people dying on the asian mainland (mostly in China). The Japanese were using biological weapons in China resulting in outbreaks until 1948. Had the war continued, there are estimates that every additional months of warfare would have resulted in up to 100 000 additional deaths on the asian mainland. 3rd: There was a "peace fraction" in the Japanese goverment. However, even the doves were rejecting the idea of unconditional surrender. Foreign Minister Shigenori Togo was one of the advocates of a quick end to the War. However, when the Japanese ambassador of Japan in the Soviet Union (Naotake Sato) advised that an unconditional surrender should be accepted if it is modified by the extension of retention of the Imperial Institution, he [Togo] rejected this proposal. This was intercepted by the US Intelligence. The cover page of the Magic diplomatic summary of July 22, 1945, started with: "Tokyo again says no unconditional surrender; Sato pleads for peace" All this leads me to the conclusion that there were militarily justifiable reasons for the use of the Atomic Bombs in 1945. While I do fully sympathize with every innocent person killed or harmed by the atomic bombs in 1945 (and all other innocent victims of airraids in WWII), I think that these people were victims of the imperialist Japanese goverment. To get a better picture of what happened in August, 1945, I can only recommend the following books: Richard B. Frank: Downfall. The end of the Imperial Japanese Empire. John Ray Skates: The Invasion of Japan. Alternative to the bomb. Also usefull: Dunnigan, James and Nofi, Albert: The pacific war encyclopedia. I must apologize for posting this here, but I could not resist to say something regarding some earlier posts in this thread. Maybe we should continue (if this is desired) to disuss this under "Matrix games general discussions" or some other place. Kind regards, Roland

_____________________________


(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 49
- 7/4/2001 8:27:00 PM   
Halgary

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 6/4/2001
From: Oulu, Finland
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by Warrior: Actually, that's not why we atom bombed the Japs. Probably we just wanted to see what the atom bomb would do to a real city, as cynical as it may sound. The Japs had been trying to surrender for months before we dropped the bomb, but we refused to talk to them.
I heard about that too. It got something to do something with the fear of russia becoming the New Enemy. Leaders of USA wanted to show who was the boss, and what happened to those who opposed them. After all, who knew what Stalin would have done AFTER germany was conquered? Attacking a country (or it's allies) who posessed a bomb great enough to destroy entire cities were too big of a risk even to Stalin.

_____________________________


(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 50
- 7/5/2001 3:03:00 PM   
Wild Bill

 

Posts: 6821
Joined: 4/7/2000
From: Smyrna, Ga, 30080
Status: offline
Sorry gentlemen, In my haste to mention Pacific battles, I inadvertently left out the two fine campaigns by Bruce Hodgman and William Rusco. William did the Tulagi Campaign and Bruce is the author of the Guadalcanal campaign. Both are excellent examples of Pacific war fighting! Wild Bill

_____________________________


In Arduis Fidelis
Wild Bill Wilder
Independent Game Consultant

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 51
- 7/5/2001 10:47:00 PM   
A_B

 

Posts: 296
Joined: 4/11/2001
From: San Jose, CA
Status: offline
anyone out there want to work on a pacific campagin with me? Both set up opposing forces - in this case japs - test battles, and work on maps? I'm thinking of a US army, Philip., New Guinea, and back to Philip. Not historic in the sense of following a specific unit. More along the lines of a generated campaign, but with better maps, and a storyline. My interest in this area has been rekindled by my recently learning of the exploits of one of my great uncles. Apparently, he went into New Guinea as a Private First Class in '42, and spent the entire war in the same Company. He ended up as a First Sgt. at the end of the war. I'm trying to get more details, which are pretty much tainted by family lore by this point. It does seem pretty rare that a man could stay in a line unit for that long. He did have malaria, that i know.

_____________________________

Unconventional war requires unconventional thought

(in reply to Wild Bill)
Post #: 52
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.422