LSD and LSV

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

LSD and LSV

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> LSD and LSV

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

LSD and LSV - 8/12/2020 12:27:10 PM

Ambassador

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline

Hi everybody,

This is a question about the game, and game mechanics, not about history.

Is there any difference in the game between LSD and LSV types of vessels, apart of basic database differences ?

I checked the manual, and they share the same amphibious unloading times (like the APA/AKA), the same types of TFs they can join (which puts them apart of APA/AKA, as they can join simple Cargo TF), and their description in 20.1.2 doesn't mention they're included for the sake of historical accuracy, yet are similar to each other (albeit not identical).

So, has anyone found a gameplay difference between Belle Grove- and Catskill-class vessels (apart of their different load capacities and defensive armaments) ?

Post #: 1

RE: LSD and LSV - 8/12/2020 5:13:00 PM

Jorge_Stanbury

Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline

As far as I know, they are identical (apart from load capacities, devices and TF composition)

I think the key here is the TFs types that it can use (compared to an AKA/ APA)

< Message edited by Jorge_Stanbury -- 8/12/2020 5:14:56 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Ambassador)

Post #: 2

RE: LSD and LSV - 8/12/2020 5:50:54 PM

Trugrit

Posts: 947
Joined: 7/14/2014
From: North Carolina
Status: offline

Did you mean to say Apart from Database Differences?

That would be kind of a strange Question.

I mean, apart from Database Differences, Load Capacities and Defensive Armament what is the Difference between a Destroyer and a Patrol Boat in the Game? I guess none.

If you want to look at just the Database Differences then I would say:

LSV is Faster, Lighter, More Maneuverable, More Durable and has more Endurance.
So, Yes there is a game play difference.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Ambassador)

Post #: 3

RE: LSD and LSV - 8/12/2020 6:17:36 PM

Ambassador

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trugrit

Did you mean to say Apart from Database Differences?

That would be kind of a strange Question.

I mean, apart from Database Differences, Load Capacities and Defensive Armament what is the Difference between a Destroyer and a Patrol Boat in the Game? I guess none.

If you want to look at just the Database Differences then I would say:

LSV is Faster, Lighter, More Maneuverable, More Durable and has more Endurance.
So, Yes there is a game play difference.

Yes, apart from the details. I really focus on the type of ship, not the details. A destroyer (DD) and a patrol boat (PB) have big differences regarding the types of TF they can join, which tender ship rearms or repairs them, and if I'm not mistaken even on which leader may be put in command (CDR/LCDR for DD, LCDR/LT for PB). Those are in-game differences, no matter the database values. A 12.000-ton PB with 4x2 12"-guns will still be unable to join an air combat TF or a bombardment TF, for example, but will still be able to be repaired by an AG (granted, his 12"-guns won't be rearmed).

It's game mechanics I'm looking for.

(in reply to Trugrit)

Post #: 4

RE: LSD and LSV - 8/12/2020 6:19:03 PM

Alfred

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

Hi everybody,

This is a question about the game, and game mechanics, not about history.

Is there any difference in the game between LSD and LSV types of vessels, apart of basic database differences ?

I checked the manual, and they share the same amphibious unloading times (like the APA/AKA), the same types of TFs they can join (which puts them apart of APA/AKA, as they can join simple Cargo TF), and their description in 20.1.2 doesn't mention they're included for the sake of historical accuracy, yet are similar to each other (albeit not identical).

So, has anyone found a gameplay difference between Belle Grove- and Catskill-class vessels (apart of their different load capacities and defensive armaments) ?

Read s.6.3.2.3 of the manual. There is a slight difference in terms of loading priority. However as this is essentially an under the hood transaction beyond player control, it won't really be noticed by players.

Alfred

(in reply to Ambassador)

Post #: 5

RE: LSD and LSV - 8/12/2020 6:26:28 PM

Ambassador

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

As far as I know, they are identical (apart from load capacities, devices and TF composition)

I think the key here is the TFs types that it can use (compared to an AKA/ APA)

Thanks. Until now, I've used them identically, but I wondered if there was some hidden features (as far as I know, Catskill had an full deck on top while Ashland's had an uncovered well deck - in fact, I'm not sure Catskill had a well deck, and not just a ramp to load the vehicules like on this photograph http://www.navsource.org/archives/10/17/10170114.jpg).

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)

Post #: 6

RE: LSD and LSV - 8/12/2020 6:31:16 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

That does not look like a well deck.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Ambassador)

Post #: 7

RE: LSD and LSV - 8/12/2020 6:42:30 PM

Ambassador

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Read s.6.3.2.3 of the manual. There is a slight difference in terms of loading priority. However as this is essentially an under the hood transaction beyond player control, it won't really be noticed by players.

Alfred

Thanks. I usually micromanage the loading of my assault troops, and try to avoid splitting a unit on many different types of ships (loading on separate TF before joining), so I guess I'd notice it even less.

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

That does not look like a well deck.

Nope, not at all. I guess DUKW's or LVT(A)'s could be launched, but I find scarce details on the operations of those ships during the war (at least, during WW2).

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 8