Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/22/2020 2:34:03 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Supplies in China now up to 134K, adding every day...but soon Ramree will come under threat, as I can see Japan sending units up the Chiang Mai railway.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 511
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/23/2020 2:57:32 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline 		This is like hunting the Bismark, but sides reversed, a thrill ride with each combat replay.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 512
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/23/2020 11:55:51 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Dec 28, 1941

Dorniers continue to do good work...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 513
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/23/2020 11:56:23 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Chinese hold for now, 1-2...but, elsewhere invasion Australia continues!








Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 10/23/2020 11:57:17 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 514
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/24/2020 12:02:22 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		All out for Oz!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 515
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/24/2020 12:05:21 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Here they come...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 516
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/24/2020 12:16:34 AM   
jdsrae


Posts: 2716
Joined: 3/1/2010
From: Gandangara Country
Status: offline 		Dec is cyclone season.
You could do with a big Cat 5 in the Coral Sea right about now.

_____________________________

Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 517
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/24/2020 12:17:26 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Ok...this could be glorious! I don't think Japan knows I could refuel, rearm, take plane replacements and Lexington is still combat ready after taking two 20cm hits (one of which to the flight deck).

We have the intel advantage and will be able to get behind the IJN...the IJN has no bombers, letting us set maximum effort into an offensive strike.










Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 10/24/2020 12:18:33 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 518
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/24/2020 12:36:37 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I think there is another CVE sunk too...that is a shocking amount of losses in December -- even for a scenario 2 game I think.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 519
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/24/2020 6:28:02 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		That is impressive

Really shows that a very ambitious attack has big drawbacks.

Have you considered the possibility that he will land directly at Sydney btw?

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 520
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/25/2020 12:36:44 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled


Have you considered the possibility that he will land directly at Sydney btw?


He won't, but one can only hope that he does!

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 521
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/25/2020 1:12:08 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Planning a battle...below is the current situation, along with the above map you can get quite a good idea of the setup.

Wake cannot be invaded with the next turn, except for a fast transport invasion, in which case I think the defense are more than strong enough to not only hold, but inflict some serious damage on the enemy ships.

There is a 33% chance Wake could be bombarded at night. 9 hex range is extremely long for a bombardment by cruisers, but it can happen if the local decision making goes correctly. It can easily be bombarded during the day.

There are some juicy detected targets at Wake -- St. Mihel and a large xak convoy with only destroyer escort. Hard to see Japan not making a flank speed run with the destroyers to catch them, or at least spoil their unloading. Catching a convoy with destroyer escort is too good to avoid.

I want to play to the USN current strengths: which namely is better intel, much stronger daytime surface experience, local resupply. Therefore, our forces will be using multiple small task forces and will dogleg away during the night, and return during the day...to protect Wake Harbor and be in range of the invasion/CVE fleet for an air strike. We will keep our heavy cruisers in reserve...risking only destroyers in the daytime encounters.

I would like to skirmish with the IJN surface fleets in the morning or afternoon, after they have bombarded if possible, if not my destroyers will deplete IJN ammo supply...it is a pity our six sboats aren't in position yet.

Since I expect to lose a few planes on any strike...we will flood the probably encounter area with our subs. They can provide a slight boost to DLs and perhaps drain some ops points.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 10/25/2020 1:14:45 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 522
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/25/2020 3:13:36 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		The last S-boat is 10 hexes from Wake if I counted the dots correctly. Wouldn't a full speed run put them in the port or one hex out?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 523
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/25/2020 4:30:04 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

The last S-boat is 10 hexes from Wake if I counted the dots correctly. Wouldn't a full speed run put them in the port or one hex out?


That is right, but they don't have the fuel stocks to make a full speed run without oilers at Wake to replenish from. And yes, there are 3 oilers at Wake now, but only one has any fuel left and only 2500 units.

Plus a sboat full speed run is only 8 hexes...normal speed, keep heading west and hope play a part tomorrow.

There is a school of thought I retire for this day, and hit the fleets on the following day...but that is risky if the Japanese spot my forces.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 524
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/25/2020 7:10:04 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Turn is finished and away...

Allied High Command did decide to threaten the landings north of Perth, but at the beaches during the night and then the day, but also trying to get behind his leading elements into what I hope to be support shipping.

Lexington and Enterprise are preparing for a maximum effort, while the surface ships are moving into position for daytime intercepts.

CAP trap for the IJN CVs, although our P40 pilots aren't really all that skilled.

It will be a thrilling turn...

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 525
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 3:01:31 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline 		I like this: "Wow, look what I'm about to do at Wake! That Oz invasion? Ah, no biggie."

What do you have at Geraldton and vicinity? EDIT: Not to mention in NE Oz?

Cheers,
CB

< Message edited by CaptBeefheart -- 10/26/2020 3:02:55 AM >

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 526
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 3:16:30 AM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline 		Checking this after some very busy times, good to see you are defending with aggressive attacks!

I am a bit surprised he moved to Australia, I thought it was going to be India, and I think it is a better idea,

Lexington can take a lot of damage, a real pounding and still survive, in my game it had been bombed and torpedoed several times, catastrophic damage in pretty much every main battle and it is still afloat, just keep the fleet carriers far away from the KB and everything will be fine

_____________________________


(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 527
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 8:41:08 AM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline 		I think landing in Australia is a mistake. Difficult to keep troops supplied for IJA and Allies can reinforce easier.

_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 528
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 11:28:04 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Dec 30, 1941

The IJN pulls back...Deathstar not spotted.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 529
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 11:33:29 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Perth front -- all our carefully planned encounters fail to materialize, although the TF Java is threatening...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 10/26/2020 11:34:10 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 530
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 11:56:45 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		No experience fighting here at all...we have gotten 99% of Australian shipping away.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 531
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 12:04:19 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		IJA lands more than I had planned on...I was thinking of a fast transport...meanwhile the two armored units are now just making their way down to Pegu.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 532
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 12:11:09 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		More Yanks for the defense of Australia...

I wonder if I should take the 30K supply in support ships in Luganville and drop them in Oz...








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 533
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 12:20:12 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I can never find the emergency reinforcement rules in the manual...they are hidden to me -- but I recall a line somewhere in the south of Australia. I also don't know where the troops activate at -- probably off map.

Although none of my defensive traps and ambushes worked this day, I bought some more time...and that is what I need the most right now.

Up to four fleet CVs now....getting respectable.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 534
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 12:33:43 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Jan 1942 Device upgrades...we need those Matildas . It seems the Australian Tank units currently really are only good for paratroop defense...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 535
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 12:35:19 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		I've successfully defended Oz in my last game.

Very hard to defend coastal hexes from heavy bombardment and round the clock bombing

Sydney and Melbourne need to be forts six as fast as possible, and the inland airbases near Sydney need to be built up (Port Augusta as well)

Hard to hold the Brisbane line btw if he really pushes for it, but once he's past that I think emergency reinforcements kick in.

But while we were fighting in Oz, I managed to land (but ultimately fail) in Parashimo-java and Northern Sumatra, and the casualties I took in troops and ships was high, but he had to divert enough troops to make sure Oz failed.

If he's still struggling in June, then he's not going to get it


< Message edited by Encircled -- 10/26/2020 12:37:36 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 536
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 12:46:53 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I can never find the emergency reinforcement rules in the manual...they are hidden to me -- but I recall a line somewhere in the south of Australia. I also don't know where the troops activate at -- probably off map.


IIRC a little north of Sydney, but not too far north. Some troops might come in at either Aden or Cape Town. Maybe allof them for Australia.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 537
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 12:56:48 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I can never find the emergency reinforcement rules in the manual...they are hidden to me -- but I recall a line somewhere in the south of Australia. I also don't know where the troops activate at -- probably off map.

Although none of my defensive traps and ambushes worked this day, I bought some more time...and that is what I need the most right now.

The trigger line starts 1 hex south of Brisbane AFAIR. Most of the reinforcements will come off-map, yes. But you will also have a reinforcement convoy with loads of squads and devices to pump up your Oz units
This info is pretty solid methinks -> https://witp-ae.fandom.com/wiki/Emergency_Reinforcements

In general it is pretty hard for Japan to push south along that coast. Anzac units are good, and Allied fighters are concentrated there early enough provided you cover now and then against the bombardments. If you don't defend too forward that is, cause with KB commitment cut-off landings are always on the menu. Taking Sydney against a competent human player is nigh impossible in my opinion with all the logistics involved and a stream of US reinforcements. Watch for long range paratroopers, there are loads of inland bases on the RR track.

< Message edited by GetAssista -- 10/26/2020 12:58:07 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 538
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 1:03:47 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I can never find the emergency reinforcement rules in the manual...they are hidden to me -- but I recall a line somewhere in the south of Australia. I also don't know where the troops activate at -- probably off map.

Although none of my defensive traps and ambushes worked this day, I bought some more time...and that is what I need the most right now.

The trigger line starts 1 hex south of Brisbane AFAIR. Most of the reinforcements will come off-map, yes. But you will also have a reinforcement convoy with loads of squads and devices to pump up your Oz units
This info is pretty solid methinks -> https://witp-ae.fandom.com/wiki/Emergency_Reinforcements

In general it is pretty hard for Japan to push south along that coast. Anzac units are good, and Allied fighters are concentrated there early enough provided you cover now and then against the bombardments. If you don't defend too forward that is, cause with KB commitment cut-off landings are always on the menu. Taking Sydney against a competent human player is nigh impossible in my opinion with all the logistics involved and a stream of US reinforcements. Watch for long range paratroopers, there are loads of inland bases on the RR track.

+1

I don't defend North of Brisbane, just south of it to kick the trigger. The reinforcements really help your units upgrade. You want your units to be the best they can be to stave off Sydney/Melbourne attacks.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 539
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 10/26/2020 1:10:27 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled

I've successfully defended Oz in my last game.

Very hard to defend coastal hexes from heavy bombardment and round the clock bombing

Sydney and Melbourne need to be forts six as fast as possible, and the inland airbases near Sydney need to be built up (Port Augusta as well)

Hard to hold the Brisbane line btw if he really pushes for it, but once he's past that I think emergency reinforcements kick in.

But while we were fighting in Oz, I managed to land (but ultimately fail) in Parashimo-java and Northern Sumatra, and the casualties I took in troops and ships was high, but he had to divert enough troops to make sure Oz failed.

If he's still struggling in June, then he's not going to get it



Did he do strategic bombing?

Where you able to keep Alice Springs?

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 540
Page:   <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.969