Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  45 46 [47] 48 49   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/24/2021 2:52:45 PM   
Ambassador

 

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

But do you have US PT boats ? Nationality matters there too.

EDIT : re convoy exit point, I think that what BBFanboy is concerned with is seeing NJP park a submarine at the exit points for the most probable destinations - so, same latitude as Perth or Adelaide.


Nationality is less important. This is because there are very few non USN PT boat equivalents in the game. IIRC, neither the Dutch nor the Filipinos get any replacement boats, and the British get only a handful of future arrivals. It therefore comes down to where can the USN PTs be generated. They are limited to American or Australian conditions.

Alfred


Excellent link!


Yeah, great summary as always, Alfred !

Stupid question maybe but... if I disband the Dutch PT boats, and Java later falls, I can’t spawn the PT boats again, right ? Because there is no available home base to load the supply in the TF ?
(Thinking about a situation where the torpedoes would be expended and no possibility to rearm them locally...)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1381
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/24/2021 3:11:06 PM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline
Remember there are two means of creating the boats from supply viz (a) TF carried supply or (b) national port. Each of course with its own criteria.

My recollection is that many years ago I did create some British MGB (they are the British equivalent of USN PTs) at an Indian port (= British national) which met the requirements (size 1 and 10k supplies). The same should be possible for the Dutch if they met the port requirement. The loss of the Javanese ports should not necessarily be fatal, though finding a suitable port which meets the port criteria and having any Dutch PTs would be the real challenge.

The basic point is that the built from supply types are overwhelmingly American so the coding effort went into refining the American and Australian relevant conditions as that was consistent with the historical record as adapted into the game abstraction. Thus it is possible to create USN PTs in a British port India but only under the TF carried supply rule.

Alfred

Edit: Further subsequent research came across a Don Bowen post of 13 January 2009 which confirms the accuracy of my comments in this thread. IOW, even after the complete loss of Java, the Dutch PTs could be "recalled" from the pools if a Dutch port, which meets the criteria, exists.

< Message edited by Alfred -- 1/25/2021 2:19:50 AM >

(in reply to Ambassador)
Post #: 1382
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/25/2021 5:25:24 AM   
Ambassador

 

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Remember there are two means of creating the boats from supply viz (a) TF carried supply or (b) national port. Each of course with its own criteria.

My recollection is that many years ago I did create some British MGB (they are the British equivalent of USN PTs) at an Indian port (= British national) which met the requirements (size 1 and 10k supplies). The same should be possible for the Dutch if they met the port requirement. The loss of the Javanese ports should not necessarily be fatal, though finding a suitable port which meets the port criteria and having any Dutch PTs would be the real challenge.

The basic point is that the built from supply types are overwhelmingly American so the coding effort went into refining the American and Australian relevant conditions as that was consistent with the historical record as adapted into the game abstraction. Thus it is possible to create USN PTs in a British port India but only under the TF carried supply rule.

Alfred

Edit: Further subsequent research came across a Don Bowen post of 13 January 2009 which confirms the accuracy of my comments in this thread. IOW, even after the complete loss of Java, the Dutch PTs could be "recalled" from the pools if a Dutch port, which meets the criteria, exists.

Cool, thanks. That’s better than simply using them for a suicide attack.

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 1383
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/25/2021 1:06:07 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Jan 30, 1942

The battle for Eastern Australia. A fluid, fast moving struggle.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Ambassador)
Post #: 1384
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/25/2021 1:34:32 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
You should also be getting Queen Mary soon IIRC. Having both Queens should move nearly all the Division except some of the heavy equipment and their attached support troops. There are a couple of large size 17 knot xAKs in the game too, that could be useful for fast runs from CT. They would of course need an escort with them.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1385
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/25/2021 2:15:10 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
Course, your opponent will also know that reinforcements are coming, and he'll be trying to stop them

Its a long, exposed crossing from CT to Oz

_____________________________


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1386
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/25/2021 2:29:10 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled

Course, your opponent will also know that reinforcements are coming, and he'll be trying to stop them

Its a long, exposed crossing from CT to Oz

Most of the IJN surface fleet seems to be busy with pushing the limits in SOPAC and NE Oz. I think mostly subs on the west side of Oz for now.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 1387
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/25/2021 2:34:03 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
Doesn't take much though does it?

Some long legged xAKs for refuelling, some DDs, and some Glen equipped subs

Perfect place for his AMCs (if he's any left of course!)

Put it one way, if he's going for Oz, he's got to have the assets guarding against reinforcements

_____________________________


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1388
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/25/2021 3:46:44 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
I am currently leaning on sending the British carriers down there to help protect the shipping lines...they might join up with Saratoga. I spotted some IJN shipping north of Carnavron the other day, and I bet that is where they are headed as they didn't show up at Geraldton. I will give it another day...

I have managed so far to get everything delivered to Australia with the exception of a lone float plane squadron that was the victim of the KB and my forgetfulness. We will see what happens going forward...

On the flip side, most convoys are now being sent to New Zealand, and from there to Hobart area. I have given too much shipping to Japan in the Java area after Dec 7...I don't want to give him too many more freebies.




(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 1389
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/25/2021 4:00:03 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
I spotted a lone raider to the south of Invergarcaill in NZ in my game

Lots of ocean to cover! (works in your favour as well of course!)

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1390
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/25/2021 7:07:57 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Perth theatre

Sending the Indians to the East Coast, where the terrain is better suited for their TOE.

I really need better Recon than Wirrawrays.

Banshee move is picking up momentum. Much better to use them here than in almost certainly fruitless anti-shipping role on the east coast. Rested the Hudsons today.










Attachment (1)

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 1391
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/25/2021 7:11:54 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Stuarts in China, albeit with rookie troops. It will take another month+ to fill out their numbers, and by then we will be approaching 100 prep. They will spend their time resting in Kunming, hopefully building morale, experience by adding replacements.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1392
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/25/2021 7:33:39 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
So much you can do with transports, and yet I have so few of them.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Ambassador)
Post #: 1393
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/26/2021 1:11:45 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
Transports and recons... welcome to the Allies' first half 1942 aircraft scarcity phenomenon.

Cheers,
CB

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1394
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/26/2021 2:21:23 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
There should be a reinforcement convoy tomorrow and I think it has Stuarts.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1395
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/26/2021 1:14:38 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

There should be a reinforcement convoy tomorrow and I think it has Stuarts.


I think it is another dozen days, we have variable reinforcement. Also, I think the Stuarts are done coming in but there are a dozen Matildas.



(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1396
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/26/2021 1:58:47 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
My bad, 19 days...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1397
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/26/2021 2:08:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Bomber pools

4E Beasts: Strategic bombing, transport hauling, infrastructure bombing

Awaiting the slug of squadrons in India, and then will upgrade them.

2E: every usage. Currently I don't have anything great...British are hauling supplies to China. Night bombing of ports, runways. Daytime bombing only where Zeroes can't go. Nothing to get excited about here.








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1398
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/26/2021 8:38:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Lots of Submarine attacks...

Miss a giant tanker off Palembang...

Miss a cargo ship off Honshu...

Miss a cargo ship off Townsville...

Hit a cargo ship at Townsville!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Ambassador)
Post #: 1399
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/26/2021 8:49:14 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Cruisers, destroyers, were working off system damage and safely tucked in port under a nice squadron of P40s...and a torpedo bomber is spotted!

It might be time to evacuate Perth area...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Ambassador)
Post #: 1400
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 3:11:37 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
The massive American Air Force is sending over 25 squadrons to India...the first have arrived on the map.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1401
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 3:29:44 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Our Port Stanley build up.

Dispatching lone cargo ships, and tankers, almost daily. They will stagger their arrival. The long legged merchants will head off to New Zealand, one ship at a time. This is a longer term project to get rolling but looks prudent given Japans attack in the South Pacific.

Should I send some of this fuel to New Zealand? My guess is to send a lot of it. There are a lot of USN Warships at Sydney...so much that I am really watching the fuel quite closely.

Lots of work needs to be done to make the route safer.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1402
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 3:33:13 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
On the western side of Australia the first convoys from Cape Town arrive at Adelaide...several already have arrived at Esperance.

Sydney also got 16k fuel from the first run from New Zealand to Sydney. Will change that and deliver the fuel further south in the future.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/27/2021 3:35:14 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1403
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 3:40:03 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Our hardworking subs. Using the linger feature on the patrol settings.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1404
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 4:33:40 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Sub losses




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1405
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 4:34:24 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Plane losses for the day. A lot of the losses come from trying to bomb Singers because they ran a few B17 raids out of them...plus Repulse is there.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/27/2021 4:35:14 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1406
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 5:13:19 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Our Port Stanley build up.

Dispatching lone cargo ships, and tankers, almost daily. They will stagger their arrival. The long legged merchants will head off to New Zealand, one ship at a time. This is a longer term project to get rolling but looks prudent given Japans attack in the South Pacific.

Should I send some of this fuel to New Zealand? My guess is to send a lot of it. There are a lot of USN Warships at Sydney...so much that I am really watching the fuel quite closely.

Lots of work needs to be done to make the route safer.

Buildup of enough supply and fuel in Oz/NZ is why the Allies usually do not start their comeback until Fall 1942. In your case I am guessing Spring 1942!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1407
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 5:15:47 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

On the western side of Australia the first convoys from Cape Town arrive at Adelaide...several already have arrived at Esperance.

Sydney also got 16k fuel from the first run from New Zealand to Sydney. Will change that and deliver the fuel further south in the future.





Japanese subs usually stake out Bass Strait and the Melbourne approaches, but sometimes they ignore Sale ...

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1408
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 5:19:37 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
Bass Strait and the Melbourne approaches are easy to patrol with air and naval assets if there is little risk of Japanese air activity. Then it becomes just air searches. They are also shallow waters which is makes it easier to kill subs.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1409
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 5:20:29 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Allied tanks attacking tomorrow!






Attachment (1)

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1410
Page:   <<   < prev  45 46 [47] 48 49   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  45 46 [47] 48 49   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.814