Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

"Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR: Jul 42 winds down

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR: Jul 42 winds down Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
"Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR: Jul 42 w... - 11/1/2020 5:44:05 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
After taking a few weeks to refresh after our last game, we're about to set forth on our next venture...swapping sides! Very much looking forward to playing Uwe, Large Slow Target, again! Maybe we can knock this one out in less than 6yrs? Probably not....

The "Bakayaro" is me....Adm Goto's alledged last words at Cape Esperence seem very appropriate to one who actually WANTS to try and play the Japanese side in a DBB-C with PDU-off! Last Jpn PBEM I played was back with the original WiTP, so I've been reading up on a number of wonderful AARs from folks like Mike Soli, Greyjoy, fcharton and FeurerKrieg to name but a few.


So, we'll have the same conditions we had last go-round:

DBB:C / Da Big Babes-C with stacking, Scenario 29 Dec 8th Start - prefer the 8 Dec start as it sets the war conditions and gives a pretty good blow to PH.

Beta: Latest version

REALISM OPTIONS
FOW ON
Advanced weather ON
Allied damage control ON
PDU OFF
Historical first turn OFF
Dec 7 surprise NA
Reliable USN torps OFF
Realistic R&D ON
No unit withdrawals OFF
Reinforcements +/- 60 (this provides the most variables which to me is a plus)

GAME OPTIONS
Combat reports ON
Auto sub ops OFF
TF move radius ON
Plane move radius ON
Facilities expand OFF
Auto upgrade ships and airgroups OFF
Air and ground replacements OFF
Turn cycle: 2 day Turn - This does a couple of things. First, it moves the game forward a bit more rapidly than daily turns. But also, it puts a little caution into both players and actually slows the tempo of operations for both sides - which also enhances the realism.

House Rules - with the intent of realism wherever possible, and what we had last game:
No 4e naval bombing below 10k
Dot base invasion/paradrops
Restricted units must pay PPs to cross national borders; Thai allowed to go to Burma, Indian restricted, less Eastern Army, must pay PP to leave India.
Sweeps at 2nd best maneuver band
Night AF/Port bombing limited to 1 unit per base through 12/42, 2 in 43, 3 in 44 and 4 in 45.
No strat bombing into or out of China till '45.
No mass armored "blitzkriegs" - one armor unit in hex if solo, must match with infantry for additional.

Think that's about it. Slowly moving from reading and researching to actually doing the first turn this weekend, so it might be a while before I hit the send button. MTF as I get into it....got initial opening moves in my head, think I've got a good plan for R&D based on Greyjoy's and a naval/merchant production/upgrade plan from the AARs as well. Now to put it into practice!

I have just two goals at this point: Survive until '45 (new Japanese motto to replace "Banzai!" at all levels) and don't break the industry (too much).

Should be fun!

< Message edited by IdahoNYer -- 2/10/2022 3:49:27 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/2/2020 5:00:16 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
Well.....started getting the Empire ready for the war today.

The to-do list on turn 1 is truly massive. Just started with some basic admin and housekeeping tasks today for a few hours in front of the computer.

First task was to begin the merchant ship conversions for those ships in port and available to convert. Quite a few that I want to convert are already at sea, or in ports without the needed shipyard.

Here's the list so far:
AKEs: 8 Limas, 4 Adens, 3 Ehime
AGs: 4 Ehime, 4 Gosan, 4 Miyati
AD: 4 Akasi, 4 Ehime
AS: 2 Husimi
PBs: 16 Ansyu-C, 30 Kiso-E, 20 To'su
AMc: 9 To'su, 31 Kiso-E, 10 Ha'chi
ACM: 7 To'su

Then did some naval pilot management....boy...reserve pool is bare! Started some pilot training and began squadron size conversions on the Hosho and Chiyoda. Will leave both in port to continue re-sizing squadrons for a while.

That was about it for today's efforts.

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 2
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/2/2020 5:10:27 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
Will resume admin tasks tomorrow with Army pilot management, setting up the initial convoys, and then get into air R&D time permitting.

R&D will be my biggest challenge in the PDU-off setting.

Here's my initial plan, based off of Greyjoy's plan in his AAR - comments Welcome!!!

Focusing on moving the Zero, Oscar and Frank lines up. Much of the Oscars go to Franks.
1x 30 Zero Sen Baku
3x30 Rufe
4x30 A6M3
1x30 A6M5 (was researching at start)
6x30 Oscar IIa
1x30 Oscar IIb (was researching at start)
5x30 Frank a
1x30 Frank b (was researching at start)

Secondary is moving Tojo, Judy, Randy C and George. Not worrying about the Jill or level bombers.
3x all three ea.

Other tidbits are the Val 2 (– if I want the Judy early, I’ll need the Val 2 early), Tony, Jack and Nick.
1x30 Val2
2x30 Tony
2x30 Jack
2x30 Nick a

Other R&D efforts will either remain the same or be changed out to support this. I'm not planning on researching jets or rockets at all at this point for instance.

For engines, I’ll need to get additional factories for the Naka HA-45, Mit HA-43 and perhaps Kawa 60.

Not sure if this is might be too much....

Thoughts?

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 3
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/3/2020 2:56:34 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
I don't see any ARs being converted - arfe you skipping those?

Xargun

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 4
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/3/2020 3:30:17 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IdahoNYer

R&D will be my biggest challenge in the PDU-off setting.


For engines, I’ll need to get additional factories for the Naka HA-45, Mit HA-43 and perhaps Kawa 60.

Not sure if this is might be too much....

Thoughts?



It really isn't more difficult, and after your first game it is by far easier to do r&d for pdu off.

I believe the end game fighter for Army is the Ki94.

You get really hit hard with night fighters as you almost have to r&d all of them to fill out all possible night fighter squadrons (around 22). By far and away the biggest handicap to pdu off for Japan.

I would look to boost Frank A up to around 7-9 factories, you will have available squadrons to upgrade by the time the plane rolls around (5 to 7). I think you might get 2 George thru the middle of 43 but they do expand to more squadrons eventually in 44 and 45. Think about sizing one of the Frank A factories to size 90 or even larger and that will go into production while the others shift to another Frank r&d.

You get very few Jack squadrons too...I think no more than 4 thru 44.

Val to Judy. Kate to Jill. Pretty straight forward upgrade here.

Pay attention to the goofy Tony upgrade path. You definitely want Tony, but there are traps there.

Try to leave available one or two factories to catch any mistake you might make.

I would look to see what upgrades to Frances...they are so much better than Betty/Nells.

Most importantly, I would put some on Sam. Sam and Frank are the most important planes in a PDU off game.

Finally, I don't think Randy C is worth it...it comes so late, the radar almost never activates, better to make sure you can upgrade every squadron to a night fighter and worry about Randy C in early 44.

IF the squadron later resizes (larger or smaller) on a set date -- then you must upgrade that plane with a full contingent of new planes until after the automatic resize. Squadrons that don't automatically resize can be upgraded with as few as 1 plane. You can do sequential upgrades on the same turn given supply,pools, and all requirements for upgrading are met.

Ships, no AR upgrade at start for Japan. You will need more than 7 acms if you want to keep your minefields...

Good luck and enjoy playing the best side!

Double check your future squadrons arrivals, and upgrade paths...I have played one DBB and one Stock and I might be off a bit confusing the two...












< Message edited by Lowpe -- 11/3/2020 3:32:02 PM >

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 5
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/3/2020 3:53:17 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
As Lowpe notes: PDO OFF is your friend. You basically need to set on factory on almost everything. For Fighters, you will need A6M and Oscar more than a PDU ON ... a lot of groups need this and a lot don't upgrade without them.

With so many models that need to be produced, you need grow many factories above 30 once in production.

< Message edited by PaxMondo -- 11/3/2020 3:56:41 PM >


_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/4/2020 2:18:38 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Xargun

I don't see any ARs being converted - arfe you skipping those?

Xargun



Not skipping them, just need to get them to a port with enough repair capability. Others can't convert until '42. I'll probably convert about 8 total to start with.

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 7
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/4/2020 2:40:09 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

As Lowpe notes: PDO OFF is your friend. You basically need to set on factory on almost everything. For Fighters, you will need A6M and Oscar more than a PDU ON ... a lot of groups need this and a lot don't upgrade without them.

With so many models that need to be produced, you need grow many factories above 30 once in production.


Lowpe/Pax - thanks for your comments and advice.

Will focus on the Oscar/Zero and Frank - the others as feasible. Was surprised to see the Ki-94 - great plane, but moving it from 2/46 to anything practical seems.....challenging.

Agree night fighters are going to be a problem - saw that from the other side in our last game. That's why I like the Randy C - it's gun value and has armor. But....its radar doesn't arrive until 10/45 according to Tracker - does that date advance if the aircraft is produced earlier? Putting any plane up against the B-29s, day or night, without armor is suicide.

My biggest fear at this point is the shear cost of this R&D effort - just in the initial R&D plan, its over 1.2 million supply - and that doesn't include necessary engine expansion/R&d, or any current factory expansion needed right in 12/41. Is that practical or am I wrecking the economy on Turn 1? I can cut a bit, but I still am going to be spending over 1 million supply. How much supply do you normally commit for industry/R&D in the beginning of a game?


(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 8
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/4/2020 7:26:06 AM   
jdsrae


Posts: 2716
Joined: 3/1/2010
From: Gandangara Country
Status: offline
In a scenario 1 game I changed every research factory to size 30 in the first week and expanded engines a bit too.
I didn’t export any supply from Japan for 3-4 months and didn’t run short of supply anywhere.
I think it’s worth setting up all research factories ASAP so they can start rolling the random dice to repair from the first week.
If you’re going to spend the supply on it one day anyway, better to do it sooner rather than later to start getting the benefit earlier.

I re-read the ASW section of the manual recently and it helped to explain why the IJN xAK to PB conversions are next to useless.
I now think there is more value in the AMc and ACM conversions.
To simplify it next time I will probably just do all Ansyu to PB, all Kiso to ACM and all Tosu to AMc or something like that.



_____________________________

Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 9
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/4/2020 1:09:23 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jdsrae

In a scenario 1 game I changed every research factory to size 30 in the first week and expanded engines a bit too.
I didn’t export any supply from Japan for 3-4 months and didn’t run short of supply anywhere.



An important difference between DDB and Stock Scenario 1 is that in Scenario 1 you get supply production from Refineries. You don't in DDB.

In DDB, you do have to be more careful on supply consumption, and you'll be shipping supply from Home Islands to the SRA all game since local production is limited. No supply production at refineries is also a good reason to expand HI on Java and at Singapore once you get them.....the payoff is in 500 days, and it gives you supply production right next to fuel source, alleviating any need to ship

_____________________________


(in reply to jdsrae)
Post #: 10
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/5/2020 3:56:33 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
Good luck and logistics wins the wars, remember the old saying for the want of a nail.

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 11
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/14/2020 2:29:04 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
Japanese first turn is finally away!

After much plotting, planning and gnashing of teeth worrying about 1) what did I forget?? 2) all the possibilities of what could go wrong! 3) did I wreck the economy already!?

OK, so what's the initial plan? Simply to be as aggressive as possible and keep pushing for as long as possible. Push the Allies to commit prematurely if possible. Keep L_S_T off balance!

Initial Main Effort will be Malaya to take Singapore, Eastern DEI to close the route to Australia (Mini KB support) and third, expansion in the Central and South Pacific (KB support). Once Singers is neutralized, focus will shift to the DEI itself and the oil centers.

Will take risk in the PI and I won't push too hard in China. Aleutians if forces can be made available.

Malaya will have 6 Divisions assigned to ultimately take Singers (2ID, 5ID, 18ID, 21ID, 33ID, 56ID, Imperial Gds). Initially, forces will land and seize Kota Bharu on the first turn. This will be followed by a divisional sized landing at Mersing on 11 Dec. That's the big risk - plenty of targets well within range of Singers air. This should have two divisions pushing south (Imp Gds, 5th ID) and one driving west from Mersing (18ID). Follow on divisions will land north or south as the situation permits. To provide a bit of a diversion, troops will land initially at Kuching and Singkawang.

To further draw some off some attention, an immediate landing will go in at Kendari supported by Mini-KB (initially Ryujo, to be joined by Zuiho). That will start the Eastern DEI landings, with troops following up at weakly held targets at Ternate and Sorong. 2 Bdes of the 4th ID will be made available to land at Ambon and Koepang, and then push west to isolate Borneo and the PI, then eventually land at Java. (remaining 4th ID Bde will seize Palembang).

KB starts off Pearl, and will route towards Wake Is to provide support there. Two CVs will detach (to Mini-KB) after Wake and then the remaining 4 then will head south to cover landings at Canton and eventually (hopefully) New Caledonia. Rabaul will be seized by the 144th Reg (supported by CVE Taiyo), which will then head to Koumac. 65th Bde will be shipped to Truk for either Port Moresby or Noumea as needed.

PI is going to have minimal forces against it at start, just the 48th and 16th Divisions with support. 48ID will land at northern Luzon and grind toward Clark and Manila. 16th ID will split between Mindanao and southern Luzon. 38th ID will follow after Hong Kong falls to complete conquest of Luzon.

Only the 55th ID(-) with the RTA will advance into Burma as a flank guard and to threaten Rangoon. Only after Singers is taken will more forces be made available.

Also, I'm going to minimize landing at Borneo's oil centers initially, as they will likely just get bombed.

That's the initial plan for the first couple of weeks...will see how that develops. The two big wild cards are of course Force Z and the US CVs. I need to keep L_S_T off balance with multiple lines of advance, yet not be over extended. That will be the challenge!

Hosho and Chiyoda will remain in Japan resizing squadrons and will also look to have 4 of the 6 old BBs remain in Japan to conserve fuel. I may bring a KB CV back to Japan to further resize training squadrons, but that probably can wait a bit. Lastly, Nagato and Mutsu will sail as a reserve of sorts if Force Z is still a viable threat.

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 12
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/14/2020 12:02:11 PM   
holdwyne

 

Posts: 7
Joined: 11/12/2020
Status: offline
Thomsen! Good Hunting..

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 13
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/14/2020 12:55:59 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
If you decide to resize using a CV, the Akagi has the largest possible air group size.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to holdwyne)
Post #: 14
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/14/2020 12:57:15 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
edit: This was a double post due to resubmitting after a 502 bad gateway error.

< Message edited by RangerJoe -- 11/14/2020 3:50:25 PM >


_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to holdwyne)
Post #: 15
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/14/2020 3:25:53 PM   
soulsilver


Posts: 316
Joined: 3/25/2020
Status: offline
I reccomend that you use the old BBs to protect your invasions in the SRA region. The only planes that can hurt them are the damned swordfish, and it's not too hard to have some land based LCAP to shut that down. It is much harder to resupply the 16 inch guns on nagato class but the AKEs you have at Pelileu can easily resupply the 14 inch guns. The BBs really help vs ambon early, as even CAs will have a hard time vs the CD guns there. Just be sure to send a convoy of fuel to palau at the start of the game, it feels bad to be taking fuel out of Japan at the start but it's worth it as allows you to spear head 2-3 invasions at once, if u also bring the Nagatos. If you bump into force Z you will also have a much better time with 2 fusos vs force z than 2 kongo vs force Z.

< Message edited by soulsilver -- 11/14/2020 3:27:53 PM >

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 16
RE: "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR - 11/21/2020 10:59:10 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: soulsilver

I reccomend that you use the old BBs to protect your invasions in the SRA region. The only planes that can hurt them are the damned swordfish, and it's not too hard to have some land based LCAP to shut that down. It is much harder to resupply the 16 inch guns on nagato class but the AKEs you have at Pelileu can easily resupply the 14 inch guns. The BBs really help vs ambon early, as even CAs will have a hard time vs the CD guns there. Just be sure to send a convoy of fuel to palau at the start of the game, it feels bad to be taking fuel out of Japan at the start but it's worth it as allows you to spear head 2-3 invasions at once, if u also bring the Nagatos. If you bump into force Z you will also have a much better time with 2 fusos vs force z than 2 kongo vs force Z.


Good point on the 14" vs. 16" reloading, but there is exactly 1 AKE in the entire IJN right now....so any BB usage will be challenging to resupply. Of all 6 old BBs, I'm least likely to use the Fusos - they burn one fuel point per hex more than the other two classes. Only the Yamatos burn more. So maybe I'll push out Ise or Hyuga...will see.

(in reply to soulsilver)
Post #: 17
8-9 Dec 41 - 11/21/2020 11:09:40 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
OK, finally got the first turn back and done...

8-9 Dec 41

Highlights – Big Bad Boise mauls a convoy postponing the Kendari landing for a while; other landings go in as planned.

Jpn ships sunk:
DD: 1 (Shirakumo)
xAK: 6
xAKL: 3

Allied ships sunk:
CL: 1 (Boise)
DD: 2 (Scout, Thanet)
SS: 1 (KXII)
CM: 2
CMc: 1
AG: 2
xAK: 2
xAKL: 7
HDML: 3

Air loss:
Jpn: 23
Allied: 16

Subwar:
Jpn: 6 Attacks, 4 ships hit (CMc, 3xAKL sunk, xAP dam)
Allies: 5 Attacks, 1 ship hit (xAK sunk)

Jpn Amph Inv:
Aparri (PI)
Laoag (PI)
Cotabato (PI)
Kuching (DEI)
Singkawang (DEI)

Allied Amph: None

Bases lost: None

Bases seized:
Kota Bharu (Malaya)

SIGINT/Intel: While Boise was accounted for, CA Houston is not and remains a threat. Force Z did not sortie, best bet is either Batavia or Soerabaja. CV Lex was sighted by a Kate heading toward Pearl on the 8th, but nothing solid.

Japan/Industry: Convoy system started and industry for the most part set. Lots of shipping still needs to move toward Nagasaki to form convoys though. Amphibious TFs forming and loading for 2nd ID and 33rd IDs bound for Malaya and two Bdes of the 4th ID bound for Ambon and Koepang. CVL Zuiho re-equips with Zeros and will depart Nagasaki next turn.

Kuriles/Aleutians: No firm plans here yet. I want to reach out to the Aleutians soon before the US can push garrisons west from Dutch Harbor, but not sure where I’m going to get some troops and engineers.

Central Pacific: KB slips through the Hawaiian chain near French Frigate Shoal overwatching the Repl TF as they both head west. KB will head toward Wake to provide support before turning south. Amphibious TFs remain sheltered in the Marshalls awaiting the KB. Nells based at Roi hold back from supporting Wake, and focus on Naval strikes which so far hasn’t provided any potential victims.

South Pacific: Initial focus is Rabaul, but that is still a few days away. CVE Taiyo continues to head to join the Rabaul TFs as they close on the Marianas, enroute initially to Truk. B-17s raided Babeldaob port, likely trying to target the ARD, but only managed to damage an xAKL. With the Claudes now aboard the Taiyo, Petes are pressed into CAP.

DEI/SW Pacific: As the Kendari Amphib TF was transiting the Celebes Sea near Jolo, CL Boise deftly avoided the covering CA TF and mauled the Amphib TF. Nearby CA TF (2CA, 4DD) then took on Boise, sinking her - she was pretty much out of ammo by this time - lucky for Maya and Ashigara! The remnants of the Kendari Amphib split, most going to Baleldaob but an escort TF with a crippled xAK-T wound up at Balabac where they’ll put troops ashore before the still on fire ship founders. Will look to get Kendari landing back on track once ships are available, probably around the time Zuiho arrives. With nothing to cover, CVL Ryujo TF will head back towards the Celebes Sea and cover the Mindanao landings as well as hunt Allied ships heading south. On the positive side, landings went in at Kuching and Singkawang with only two transports damaged by CD guns at Kuching. Troops are ashore in good order and will attack next turn. The Amphib TFs will cease offloading the remaining supply and head for home - gotta figure Force Z may sail to raid.

PI: Aparri and Loaog Amphib landings go in, less one xAK lost to a sub. A CL TF (CL, 4DD) runs across the Hong Kong DDs (2DD,DM) off Luzon and sinks one DD and damages another. Cotabato landings went in without a hitch. Quite a number of surface actions as Allied ships withdraw from Manila, but no major ships encountered - the numerous xAKLs and a few xAKs were enough for the IJN forces involved to deplete ammo enough to require them to head for replenishment - perhaps that was L_S_T’s plan here?? So, two CA TFs and a DD TF will head out to replenish, leaving the Cotabato Amphib, as well as the Amphib approaching Davao and Puerto Princessa a bit exposed. The few remaining naval assets will attempt to cover, while Tanaka’s CL TF (CL, 5DD) remains off Bataan to both cover the landings at northern Luzon and snare any ships departing Manila. Initial air strikes didn’t do much. Zeros failed to fly sweeps and the Nettys and the Zero escorts were met by a solid CAP over Clark AF. Air will focus on covering the landings in northern Luzon and hold off any further daylight strikes against Clark/Manila until Aparri and Loaog can be secured.

Malaya/Burma: A good first two days where no ships were hit by subs and all reinforcing convoys reached Kota Bharu, Singora and Patani without issue. Thailand based air supported the ground attack and Kota Bharu was taken the first assault. The only glitch was a failure of Zeros to sweep Singers, so the air threat there is undiminished. An Allied mining mission to Mersing was attacked by a sub and Nells with two minelayers sunk, but have to figure Mersing is now mined. Mersing will be the focus next turn, with max effort of air support out of the three Malayan airfields with over 100 Oscars and about 60 Zeros in support of the division sized landing supported by the Kongos and cruiser TF. Two SNLF airborne battalions will also support with para drops slated for Port Dickson and Kuala Lumpur, with some luck cutting the rail link to Singers. Lots of risk here, especially without a landing at Kendari to distract L_S_T, and if the weather grounds the LRCAP, this could get messy. Little activity against Burma for the time being, will be a slow grind there until the situation in Malaya is resolved.

China: I still hate China…between maintaining garrisons and trying to figure out multiple routes of advance, its going to be a bit before things get sorted out. The 38th ID(+) did manage to march to Hong Kong and will begin bombarding next turn.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 18
RE: 8-9 Dec 41 - 11/22/2020 4:13:31 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
I'm with soulsilver on the 14in BBs....I think they are very useful in the SRA early. The Allies start with quite a few cruisers, not to mention Force Z, but the Fuso/Ise classes will be able to stand against those threats. Plus, I hate to risk the KONGOs down there against Force Z, since long-term those are more valuable units.

If you leave anything behind, leave the NAGATOS, since re-arming them is difficult until you have some LIMA-class AKEs. You could send them to Rabaul; they are a one-shot deal with reloads, but Allies are only likely to take one shot there, and they will crush any Allied cruisers

Bring 'em, you can afford the fuel burn. I wouldn't worry about the fuel, I would just worry about subs.....

_____________________________


(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 19
RE: 8-9 Dec 41 - 11/22/2020 6:25:33 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
I decided to sortie the Ise/Hyuga and they are heading south to support upcoming operations against Ambon and Koepang in the next few weeks. Still not sure where I'm going to replenish the ammo with one bloody AKE avail though.

Then again, based on the last turn just done, won't have to worry about running into Force Z!

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 20
10-11 Dec 41 - 11/23/2020 7:11:50 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
10-11 Dec 41

Highlights – Battle of Mersing is a wild one that annihilates Force Z in three daylight naval combat rounds! Malayan Airborne landings thwarted.

Jpn ships sunk:
DD: 1 (Akatsuki)
DMS: 2
SC: 1
xAK: 1
xAKL: 1

Allied ships sunk:
BB: 1 (Prince of Wales)
BC: 1 (Repulse)
CL: 2 (Danae, Durban)
DD: 6 (Vampire, Tenedos, Electra, Encounter, Express, Isis)
xAP: 3 (one big, other PI coastal)
xAK: 1
xAKL: 2

Air loss:
Jpn: 28
Allied: 69

Subwar:
Jpn: 4 Attacks, 3 ships hit (xAKL sunk, 2TK dam)
Allies: 11 Attacks, 4 ships hit (DMS, SC sunk, CA (Suzuya), xAK dam) Allied subs are already a serious threat and IJN countermeasures are anemic. Suzuya, hit by a dutch torp, will need yard time (9/37(34)/3(1)) assuming she can get to Saigon without another sub encounter.

Jpn Amph Inv:
Mersing (Malaya)
Balabac (PI)
Davao (PI)
Digos (PI)
Guam (Central Pacific)
Jesselton (DEI)
Sorong (DEI)
Ternate (SW Pacific)

Allied Amph: None

Bases lost: None

Bases seized:
Aparri (PI)
Laoag (PI)
Cotabato (PI)
Kuching (DEI)
Singkawang (DEI)
Alor Star (Malaya-flipped)

SIGINT/Intel: Taking Boise, PoW and Repulse off the playing field is a major bonus for DEI operations, the question is how L_S_T will respond. Will he bring the US CVs there to re-balance? No contact with the CVs yet, for that matter, no contact with any warship in Pacific waters.

Japan/Industry: I’m already short quality pilots. No sense expanding squadrons other than trainers although I need to get some ASW Jake squadrons trained up and positioned to secure convoy routes from Formosa north at a minimum. That’s a priority. Also looking to get another Zero squadron deployed to replace the bloody Claudes in the Marshals. Also, have decided to send out BB Ise and Hyuga to the Eastern DEI campaign and the sole AKE will head with them to Babeldaob - along with 2 Bdes of the 4th ID in convoy.

Kuriles/Aleutians: NSTR.

Central Pacific: KB should be in range next turn to sweep and launch its first strike(s) on Wake, announcing her presence in the area - which is part of the idea. Wake Amph TF will also begin heading to Wake next turn as well. Will look to have the KB head south after supporting Wake, less two CVs which will head to Truk and then the DEI (one may still go to Japan to work airgroup resizing, especially now that Force Z is sunk)

South Pacific: CVE Taiyo has linked up with the Rabaul invasion TFs near the Marianas and takes aboard a squadron of Vals. The Manus Amph TF (PB, 2AKLs) has departed Truk and will slowly approach Manus to secure it for a seaplane anchorage.

DEI/SW Pacific: CVL Ryujo continues to disappoint - her TF (CVL, 2CA, DDs) runs into a US DD TF (4DD) which fortunately don’t successfully engage, but Ryujo’s Kates launch a single strike against them and miss as well. Ryujo will continue to loiter in the Celebes Sea providing cover to Mindanao and hunting ships departing from the PI. As the Sorong and Ternate Amphibs go in without issue, should be able to use these bases as seaplane bases once secured, getting some additional eyes out over the eastern DEI.

PI: Aparri, Loaog and Cotabato all taken without problems and troops will begin marching inland, although B-17s hit the troops at Cotabato with good effect from 2000ft. 9 Zeros are flown in to prevent a repeat. Subs also are providing a nuisance to the northern Luzon landings and have claimed two ASW TF ships and damaged an xAK. Tanaka (CL, 5DDs) off Bataan was also the focus on numerous PT attacks and even low-level torpedo laden PBYs - no damage scored to either side. He’ll pull off next turn and head to Cam Ranh Bay to replenish and reinforce the Mersing operations. The Davao and Digos landings went in without opposition as well and should secure objectives next turn. The only hiccup was the Puerto Princessa Amphib TF running into the obsolete PGs Asheville and Tulsa before the escorting TB can run interference. The US PGs succeed in damaging both the xAP and xAK enough to abort the operation, while the late arriving TB Hayabusa gains revenge later crippling both PGs - too late to rescue the operation. Also, the wayward Kendari troops are put ashore at Balabac and should secure the base next turn. Lastly, Amphib convoys are also approaching southern Luzon and Butuan on northern Mindanao which should effectively isolate Luzon.

Malaya/Burma: The Mersing landings go in with a major naval victory over Force Z! When I saw the start of the replay with Force Z reinforced (BB, BC, 4CL, 8DD) going against the Kongo TF (2BB, 2CA, CL, 6DD, DMS) in daylight I figured I had just lost the war in a single battle. I really didn’t expect to find Force Z waiting - was more concerned with air attacks, mines and subs. Well, the engagement started at 24k yds and closed to 10k yds before heading back out to 29k yds. All capital ships were repeatedly hit and I thought after the first round my ships were scrap. Then Nettys came in to tip the scales, scoring 5 torpedo hits on both Repulse and Prince of Wales, and two Brit airstrikes also come in but don’t hit a thing. Luck is getting better! At this point, I’m getting hopeful and then I’m surprised to see another round of naval combat! I don’t think I’ve ever seen an airstrike BETWEEN naval rounds before! After those torpedo strikes, I thought the IJN would just mop up, but no, the Brits were closing the range and trying to engage, even scoring hits on Kongo! But Repulse quickly sinks and damage against other Brit ships begin to build up as the TFs break off. Not done yet…IJN CA TF (4CA, 5DD) come in to finish off the PoW and remaining CL and 6DDs at minimal cost. IJN loss at this point was a single DD sunk. Most of the Kongo TF begins to head for home in two TFs by the end of the first day, and the landings start going in as the turn ends. Troops are at least coming ashore! Day two has multiple British airstrikes and fortunately the CAP is up, although all too many planes come in under the CAP to drop bombs and torps. All but one bomb and as single torp miss, only damaging two transports! Was lucky that no mines hit ships, and only one sub found its mark against Suzuya. After I got to the turn itself, I was shocked! Not only did a division plus worth of troops get ashore intact, the IJN was in damn good shape! I really thought most of the Kongo TF was in bad shape but other than Kongo being badly hurt (47/48(13)/33), two more DDs badly shot up, other damage was extremely light - Haruna (9sys) and Atago (7sys) despite numerous hits. I attribute this success to blind luck with the dice rolls and putting a solid TF leader on the bridge of the Kongo prior to the sortie. I couldn’t ask for a better result - now, if I can get Kongo and Suzuya back to port without running into a sub, I will be extremely grateful. The other aspect of the Mersing landings were the airborne landings going in at Port Dickson and Kuala Lumpur to block the rail line south. This didn’t go as well. As L_S_T had a sixth sense I was going into Mersing, he also brought troops in to secure both bases, so the paras failed to take their objectives. What I don’t know is whether having the paras in the hex without controlling the base itself will block the rail lines south? In any case, next turn will focus on getting the ships safely back to port, taking Mersing and pushing inland. Further paradrops will cease to preserve the units, although I will drop in supply and try Sallys on ground support to disrupt Allied counter attacks. Air will focus on protecting the beach head, although the majority of ships will depart - three badly damaged transports and a DMS will remain to offload. The remaining 18th ID IN Regiment at Kota Bharu will embark on transports and the IJN CA TF will prepare for another run to Mersing in the next few days. To the north, 5th ID elements will push on to Alor Star and then George Town, with the Imperial Guard Division joining the effort in the next few days. Additional Troops are enroute at sea, but they will take at least a week to join the fight.

China: NSTR.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 21
RE: 10-11 Dec 41 - 11/23/2020 7:12:42 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
and the combat report


Attachment (1)

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 22
RE: 10-11 Dec 41 - 11/23/2020 9:10:23 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
That is a major victory, great job! Planning a quick move on Palembang? The way is clear now if you do.

I hate to expose Palembang to bombing, but that's one spot you probably can't leave alone. Besides, the airbase is a valuable one.

_____________________________


(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 23
RE: 10-11 Dec 41 - 11/23/2020 10:13:15 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
If you capture Palembang, move CVEs in for CAP.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 24
RE: 10-11 Dec 41 - 11/25/2020 6:34:40 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

That is a major victory, great job! Planning a quick move on Palembang? The way is clear now if you do.

I hate to expose Palembang to bombing, but that's one spot you probably can't leave alone. Besides, the airbase is a valuable one.


I've got a 4th ID Bde enroute from Japan now, but its going to be at least a week. Singers is still a viable base too, focusing on Mersing has removed some direct pressure on Singers - such as no Sweeps as fighters are focused on LRCAP over Mersing. I need to get focused over the western Java Sea more as well - although I've taken Kuching and Singk, I haven't done anything with them - no planes to spare right now.

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 25
RE: 10-11 Dec 41 - 11/25/2020 6:39:43 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

If you capture Palembang, move CVEs in for CAP.


CVEs? Got none to spare - Taiyo is covering Rabaul and Hosho is working airgroup resizing in Japan. I'll have Land based fighters and AA avail...got to figure out where from of course...

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 26
12-13 Dec 41 - 11/25/2020 11:01:57 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
12-13 Dec 41

Highlights – Fairly quiet turn with one bad surprise - Brits bring 2 Bdes into Mersing and hold off initial Jpn attack.

Jpn ships sunk:
xAK: 2
xAKL: 1

Allied ships sunk:
PG: 1 (Tulsa)
AO: 1
TK: 3
xAP: 2 (small, coastal)
xAKL: 3

Air loss:
Jpn: 26
Allied: 09

Subwar:
Jpn: 6 Attacks, 4 ships hit (3TK sunk, AMC dam) Finding some nice fat tankers in the Java Sea!
Allies: 7 Attacks, 1 ship hit (xAK dam)

Jpn Amph Inv:
Naga (PI)
Morotai (SW Pacific)

Allied Amph: None

Bases lost: None

Bases seized: Despite continuing to rack up bases....I still feel I'm running behind!
Vigan (PI)
Davao (PI)
Digos (PI)
Balabac (PI)
Victoria Point (Burma)
Jesselton (DEI)
Sorong (SW Pacific)
Ternate (SW Pacific)

SIGINT/Intel: No indication of any Allied naval operations which is worrisome. Will need to increase recon and air search deeper into Allied areas vs focusing on near term objectives.

Japan/Industry: 2nd ID main body will depart Sendai on transports bound for Malaya next turn. Starting to be short xAPs and have started conversion on 5 xAKs to xAK-Ts.

Kuriles/Aleutians: NSTR.

Central Pacific: KB hits Wake with good effect; two big strikes inflict about 300 casualties and meets no CAP, although both F4Fs are observed and a Vindicator is destroyed on the ground. Hope this is enough for the minimal SNLF landing going in next turn, which will also be covered by the KB. The downside of this KB support is of course using valuable sorties, which I need to re-think how to maintain existing sorties or replenish them before the KB runs into the US CVs. One glitch in the Tokyo Express is the small Naval Guard detachment sent to secure Guam wasn’t enough to take the base and will have to attack again next turn with CL Kashii providing bombardment support.

South Pacific: Rabaul operation gets underway as a small Amphib TF (PB, 2xAKL) will land troops to seize Manus as an AV anchorage. Main Body will depart Truk heading initially toward Manus with the Cover CA TF (4CA, 4DD) sails with the Amphib Main body with the 144 IN Reg while the CVE Taiyo TF (CVE, 2DD) with a squadron of Vals trails to provide a surprise if the usual Aussie/NZ cruiser TF shows up. Will drop off an AV at Manus, and then head to target.

DEI/SW Pacific: CVL Ryujo’s Kates finally draw blood sinking a small xAP and two xAKLs off the Moluccas. This of course expends the last of her torpedoes, and the TF will head back to Babeldaob. The reinforcing CVL Zuiho TF (CVL, CL, 4DD) finds and strikes at the fleeing PI ships in the Philippine Sea, sinking a small xAP and damaging a big xAK. Will send the Zuiho TF back NE for a turn to see if they can hit some additional ships before heading back to Babel to rendezvous with the incoming AKE and CVL Ryujo. Landings go in at Morotai without problems and Mavis’ will begin flying out of both Ternate and Sorong starting next turn, getting eyes into the Banda Sea. As ships start returning from Davao landings, will look to resume the Kendari operation to open up fireworks in the Banda Sea area.

PI: Vigan falls as troops start heading south toward Clark. Not sure if L_S_T is going to make his stand at Manila, Bataan or perhaps Clark yet. Zeros will sweep Manila next turn for the first big effort. In the south, Zeros do ambush a B-17 strike at Cotabato downing the first 3 of the monsters for the war. Troops come ashore in southern Luzon at Naga unopposed, covered by a CL TF (CL, 2DD). Landings should go in at Butuan on the north shore of Mindanao next turn as well. This should box remaining US defenses in the central mountains. Subs remain a nuisance between Luzon and Formosa, despite much ASW sea and air effort.

Malaya/Burma: L_S_T surprises me by bringing two Aussie Bdes forward into Mersing! Nicely done. My Mersing “breakout” attack of a single regiment with all others in reserve mode was repulsed and now all troops will be needed to push the Allies back - likely a slow grind towards Singers. The airborne troops dropped at Port Dickson and Kula Kumpur are still fighting and delaying the exodus, but their time is limited. Will look to support the Mersing attack with a Cruiser bombardment as well as max effort from Nettys - all of this also means Singapore isn’t getting any attention from bombers or fighters. Will also send more paras remaining from those two SNLF Bns to drop on Kluong - in the slight chance that L_S_T has left minimal troops there to replace the advancing Aussies. To the north, the 5th ID’s lead elements are closing in on Georgetown and the Imperial Guard Div has arrived by rail at Kota Bharu. Will be a few days before they will mass to attack south along the west coast. The invasion of Burma officially kicked off with taking Victoria Point, and troops will cross the border further north from the Chiang Mai area in the next few days. It’s a small force however, just part of the 55th ID that is available and a few poor RTA divisions.

China: Will make the first attack on Hong Kong next turn…fingers crossed. China remains a mess as a pocket is possible NE of Hankow, but not sure who is encircling who at the moment.

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 27
RE: 12-13 Dec 41 - 11/26/2020 12:55:06 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
Maybe you two are dancing around each other near Hankow!

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 28
RE: 12-13 Dec 41 - 11/26/2020 2:05:09 PM   
holdwyne

 

Posts: 7
Joined: 11/12/2020
Status: offline
Those two Aussie Bdes are a significant part of the Singapore defense,
if you can somehow trap them outside of Singapore along with preventing major reinforcements..
the Singapore attack might prove less dicey.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 29
RE: 12-13 Dec 41 - 11/26/2020 7:00:13 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: holdwyne

Those two Aussie Bdes are a significant part of the Singapore defense,
if you can somehow trap them outside of Singapore along with preventing major reinforcements..
the Singapore attack might prove less dicey.



Little chance of that! Got the turn and the replay had them fall back to Johore Bahru. That's fine - they got beat up defending forward at Mersing, and now the race is on to Kluong to cut off the retreat!

(in reply to holdwyne)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> "Bakayaro!" DBB-C vs LST(A) Jpn AAR: Jul 42 winds down Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.359