Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Not a step back!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> Not a step back! Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Not a step back! - 1/19/2021 8:38:19 AM   
Moebius40

 

Posts: 9
Joined: 8/18/2014
Status: offline
Not a step back! This meant, for both the Russians and the Germans, defending the position at any cost. Unfortunately it is not possible to issue such an order in WITE. It would be very useful to have the possibility to graduate the tenacity of the defense in this game, as in TOAOW. Implementing this option in WITE2 doesn't seem like a too complicated job to me. In my opinion it would add an important factor of realism to this wonderful game.
Post #: 1
RE: Not a step back! - 1/19/2021 2:14:01 PM   
RedLancer


Posts: 4314
Joined: 11/16/2005
From: UK
Status: offline
...simple until you factor in the AI - how do you teach it when to use that nuance? The AI is key to balancing the game for all so is a significant factor.

_____________________________

John
WitE2 Asst Producer
WitE & WitW Dev

(in reply to Moebius40)
Post #: 2
RE: Not a step back! - 1/21/2021 12:18:13 AM   
Technopiper

 

Posts: 182
Joined: 2/11/2019
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moebius40

Not a step back! This meant, for both the Russians and the Germans, defending the position at any cost. Unfortunately it is not possible to issue such an order in WITE. It would be very useful to have the possibility to graduate the tenacity of the defense in this game, as in TOAOW. Implementing this option in WITE2 doesn't seem like a too complicated job to me. In my opinion it would add an important factor of realism to this wonderful game.

I assume what you are saying is a higher level decision, for example, from Hitler or Stalin. If that is the case, not retreating is really a decision up to the player. Not retreating at the tactical level is an entirely different matter and involves the physical reality: sometimes you simply shouldn't be given a choice.

(in reply to Moebius40)
Post #: 3
RE: Not a step back! - 2/3/2021 5:42:04 PM   
HMSWarspite

 

Posts: 1401
Joined: 4/13/2002
From: Bristol, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moebius40

Not a step back! This meant, for both the Russians and the Germans, defending the position at any cost. Unfortunately it is not possible to issue such an order in WITE. It would be very useful to have the possibility to graduate the tenacity of the defense in this game, as in TOAOW. Implementing this option in WITE2 doesn't seem like a too complicated job to me. In my opinion it would add an important factor of realism to this wonderful game.


You need to consider that only a small proportion of "no retreat" decisions were actually followed when under actual assault. The difference between holding at any cost and falling back is only usually one of hours or a day at most, and the retreat is only 10 miles unless routed (negligible at this scale). Bastogne, for example was held by fully functional combat units that happened to be surrounded, not by broken units determined to die where they stood. 6th Army fought while it could but then surrendered. The decision not to try and break out is purely in the players hands. You can (as history) stay where you are and wait to die if you think tying up the besiegers is worth it (or the break out would be futile)

The majority of the bad decisions in RL about retreating that made a big difference were to shorten lines, avoid salients, abandon cities to avoid encirclement etc. All these are in the players hands. Thinking that the combat routines are where this would need to be enacted is very much only the tip of the iceberg. Bare in mind that a combat in WITE(2) is fighting on a 10 mile scale for several days. Whilst Hitler would intervene at such a scale even he couldn't be intervening in every regimental battle.

In this game, "no retreat" is what happens when a Front launches week one of an offensive and does a lot of damage but bounces off the prepared defences: as a player, by all means don't fall back. Wait for their reserves to attack next week, or choose to fall back on your supply lines a few hexes, giving a week of few attacks, lengthening their supply lines and shortening your own, at the expense of leaving the fortified hexes and giving up ground. "No retreat" is leaving the divisions in the city and putting them into the city fort rather than pulling back to avoid encirclement. It is responding to the partial penetration of your front by not evacuating the salient just formed, and instead attacking the shoulders of the breakthrough.

Units only fall back when beaten in game. In RL even the most fanatical Soviets or Germans couldn't hold when divisional HQ is hightailing it to avoid a roving tank column, or surrounded and dying in place. They could not hold when regiment has only 100 men left capable of action, the rest exhausted, scattered, hiding, out of ammo, leaderless (whatever "disrupted" represents)... In RL once you disrupt a division badly enough the units don't function anyway - its hard to arrange the resupply or unit move when cowering in a ditch avoiding incoming...

there is a degree of choice as to the level of casualties a unit commander is willing to tolerate before electing to give ground, that is out of the players hands and so it should be at this scale. You don't get to decide how much artillery ammo to use or whether to have your troops fall back from the front lines a few hundred meters to avoid the opening bombardment either (and that is at least as much of a feature about late war German behaviour as tactical No Retreat effects).

It has just occurred to me that, in game, armies in pockets do have a "no surrender" philosophy (i.e. hold till the end). They all have to be individually beaten. There would need to be a "contagious surrender" feature to make units not attacked surrender when things get bad enough, for there to be a shift from that. Not worth it but based on WitW/WITE (1) I would go for that before any manual adjustment of defender casualty tolerance.

_____________________________

I have a cunning plan, My Lord

(in reply to Moebius40)
Post #: 4
RE: Not a step back! - 2/3/2021 5:59:00 PM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
While you cannot give such a directive (and as others have mentioned, at the tactical level when men start fleeing it is rarely the first thing in their minds) you can play the game with it as a philosophy. Just don't retreat unless forced off a position. You can also re-insert units into the line who really should not be...exhausted, fought out units...accepting there is a chance of their complete collapse in return for your insistence they hold on one more time.

There is also an incentive to that: the VP system. Possessing a city is worth a set amount of points, but taking is worth a bonus in relation to when the city was taken (or re-taken) historically. Barring a catastrophically lopsided beating, those bonus points will likely determine who wins or loses the game. So the old WitE1 paradigm of "the soviets can run until the auto-victory check, and only Berlin matters in the end" doesn't hold. It may very well be worth it to stage a forward defense, or risk over-extension on the attack, to beat the schedule.

(in reply to HMSWarspite)
Post #: 5
RE: Not a step back! - 2/11/2021 8:27:24 PM   
NotOneStepBack


Posts: 915
Joined: 6/17/2011
Status: offline
You called? :)

(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 6
RE: Not a step back! - 2/11/2021 11:51:19 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline
Between city forts and encircled units being more resilient and more easily resupplyable by air and just making sure you have good leaders and supplies and ammo stockpiled, I do find that when you really want to hold a location in WITE2 there's more you can do to make that happen than in WITE.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC




For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to NotOneStepBack)
Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> Not a step back! Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.703